This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 10.64 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6
4.51634 -11.71271 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V3867 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V < 16.700 V 2452728.00000 422.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6: 13.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.14
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3867 Sgr,2461228.7244,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3867 Sgr 20260707.2244 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 11.36 19:19:35.48 -29:06:02.8
9.04621 -18.48484 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 3 -3 4 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:19:35.48 -29:06:02.8: 14.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:19:35.48 -29:06:02.8: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7244,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2244 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 11.79 18:12:31.23 -33:12:18.7
359.14184 -7.11551 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V2638 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.300 pg 18.500 pg 2436735.00000 261.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:12:31.23 -33:12:18.7: 14.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:12:31.23 -33:12:18.7: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2638 Sgr,2461228.7244,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2638 Sgr 20260707.2244 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.53 18:10:19.87 -36:21:26.6
356.11741 -8.18958 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V0641 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 pg < 16.500 pg 2424040.00000 281.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:10:19.87 -36:21:26.6: 13.74 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:10:19.87 -36:21:26.6: 14.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0641 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0641 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.52 18:14:15.65 -34:42:25.5
357.96901 -8.13266 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0682 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V < 16.000 V 2454707.00000 203.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:15.65 -34:42:25.5: 14.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:15.65 -34:42:25.5: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0682 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0682 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.88 18:18:25.48 -35:05:10.2
358.02238 -9.06532 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1840 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 V < 14.400 V 2452465.00000 203.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:18:25.48 -35:05:10.2: 14.15 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:18:25.48 -35:05:10.2: 14.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1840 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1840 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.44 18:45:34.17 -32:07:44.2
3.21519 -12.89750 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V1932 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 pg < 16.200 pg 2434157.00000 264.000000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:45:34.17 -32:07:44.2: 14.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:45:34.17 -32:07:44.2: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1932 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1932 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.59 18:28:39.35 -32:05:32.1
1.70068 -9.63838 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V3404 Sgr
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.100 pg 18.600 pg
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.59 is 3.5 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 16.10 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:28:39.35 -32:05:32.1: 13.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:28:39.35 -32:05:32.1: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V3404 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V3404 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.22 18:29:09.98 -32:04:27.6
1.76517 -9.72767 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1889 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.300 pg 18.100 pg 2436792.00000 148.820000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:29:09.98 -32:04:27.6: 13.24 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:29:09.98 -32:04:27.6: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1889 Sgr,2461228.7244,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1889 Sgr 20260707.2244 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 12.00 18:37:52.06 -34:13:02.2
0.58497 -12.29024 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J183751.69-341307.8
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.220 V 13.340 V 2456967.51900 21.968000000000
The object was found in astcheck.785 Zwetana -2 -1 3 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:52.06 -34:13:02.2: 13.09 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:37:52.06 -34:13:02.2: 13.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J183751.69-341307.8,2461228.7244,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J183751.69-341307.8 20260707.2244 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 11.72 18:42:31.72 -35:59:27.4
359.32300 -13.88514 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2381 Sgr
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V 14.400 V 2453175.00000 185.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:31.72 -35:59:27.4: 12.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:31.72 -35:59:27.4: 13.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2381 Sgr,2461228.7244,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2381 Sgr 20260707.2244 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2244 2461228.7244 11.65 18:29:07.32 -35:28:45.1
358.64205 -11.19791 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V1886 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.400 V < 14.300 V 2452935.00000 125.100000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:29:07.32 -35:28:45.1: 12.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:29:07.32 -35:28:45.1: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1886 Sgr,2461228.7244,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1886 Sgr 20260707.2244 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461228.72572308 07.07.2026 05:24:52.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11135
Objects passed selection criteria: 11132
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10328.8
Average stars matched: 9446.5 (91.4583 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 00:41:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461228.72572308 07.07.2026 05:24:52.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 334
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 107 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 123345
Objects passed selection criteria: 123196
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 112535
Average stars matched: 95508.8 (84.8703 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1906340 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 00:55:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.72314561
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:10.741 -33:57:42.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:47:10.741 -33:57:42.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0587 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Image size: 941.1'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:07.933 -33:57:55.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:47:07.933 -33:57:55.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0492 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:47:10.741 -33:57:42.72
Second-epoch second image center 18:47:07.933 -33:57:55.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01035 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j3eUBxZxjC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gAkfZIR3tw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5qe03sc2vG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z87tS1ptee
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.82
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=7.0)
Read 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Loaded 18882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 9621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9621 out of 12244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
4.3 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.j3eUBxZxjC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, bad_region=0, passed=9805
Got 9805 stars (including 9075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 335 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 330 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 330 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 334 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 329 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.03"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 329 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.23"
Excluding outliers - 329 stars left (next iteration limit 363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=329 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.071 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.001 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=228 n_q2=101 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gAkfZIR3tw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, bad_region=0, passed=12244
Got 12244 stars (including 11301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 361 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 361 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 361 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 361 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 361 stars left (next iteration limit 397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=361 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.752 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=208 n_q2=153 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5qe03sc2vG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=0, passed=9469
Got 9469 stars (including 8983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 318 stars left (next iteration limit 349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=318 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.633 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.743 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.818 sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=183 n_q2=128 n_q3=7 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.772
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z87tS1ptee (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=663, bad_region=0, passed=10146
Got 10146 stars (including 9467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 366 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 357 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 357 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 365 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 357 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 357 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 357 stars left (next iteration limit 392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits N_match=357 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=209 n_q2=140 n_q3=8 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.011
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits sigma_overall=1.071 worst_q_ratio=1.142
ref2=Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits sigma_overall=0.612 worst_q_ratio=1.229
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits sigma_overall=0.656 worst_q_ratio=2.772
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=3.011
reference average sigma_overall=0.8415 worst_q_ratio=1.1855
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits) flagged: sigma=0.656 (ref avg 0.8415), ratio=2.772 (ref avg 1.1855), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 7509 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3814312.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3814312.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 33.1167 (2.41206e+14), 8 match, 0 conflict, 5 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.802,-33.9674), pixel scale 5.9699 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-++-++++(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3814312.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3814312.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.792574, -33.963349) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:10.218, -33:57:48.055).
Field size: 15.7853 x 10.5846 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50701 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> 'fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 7 00:52 fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 7 00:52 out3814312.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3814312.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3814312.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7167 degrees of RA,Dec (281.794,-33.9626)
log-odds ratio 33.1167 (2.41206e+14), 8 match, 0 conflict, 5 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.802,-33.9674), pixel scale 5.9699 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-++-++++(best)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3814312.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3814312.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.792574, -33.963349) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:10.218, -33:57:48.055).
Field size: 15.7853 x 10.5846 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50701 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 7 00:52 fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 7 00:52 out3814312.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 53296 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6362, 953.945] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 9.34627
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 160.608 (5.63857e+69), 22 match, 0 conflict, 185 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+---+-+--+-+------------------------------+-----+----------+---+--------+-+-++-----+-------------
--> log-odds 160.608
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 245.159 (2.96045e+106), 36 match, 0 conflict, 272 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+---+----+-+-----++---+----------+--------+-----+---+--+---+---+--------+-+-++-----+-------------
--> log-odds 245.159
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 658.856 (1.37307e+286), 82 match, 1 conflict, 225 distractors, 103 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+--+++--+--++---++---+----++--+---+-+--+-+++--+--+++-+---+----+--++-+-++---+-+---+---+----+
--> log-odds 658.856
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1255.97 (inf), 161 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+-+++++++--++-+-++++-+---+++-+++-++-++-+-+++-++--+++-+---+-++-+--++++-++--++-++--++-++----+
--> log-odds 1255.97
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2252.91 (inf), 309 match, 0 conflict, 416 distractors, 373 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+-+++++++--++-+-++++++---+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+++++-+-+-++++--+++++++-++++++--+++++----+
--> log-odds 2252.91
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4088.71 (inf), 602 match, 0 conflict, 1061 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-++++-+++++++-+++++-++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+-++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++---+
--> log-odds 4088.71
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 7063.95 (inf), 1146 match, 0 conflict, 1883 distractors, 1447 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-++++-+++++++-+++++-++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+-++++--+++++++--+++++--++++++---+
--> log-odds 7063.95
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6362, 953.945] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 9.34627
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 160.608 (5.63857e+69), 22 match, 0 conflict, 185 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+---+-+--+-+------------------------------+-----+----------+---+--------+-+-++-----+-------------
--> log-odds 160.608
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 245.159 (2.96045e+106), 36 match, 0 conflict, 272 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+---+----+-+-----++---+----------+--------+-----+---+--+---+---+--------+-+-++-----+-------------
--> log-odds 245.159
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 658.856 (1.37307e+286), 82 match, 1 conflict, 225 distractors, 103 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+--+++--+--++---++---+----++--+---+-+--+-+++--+--+++-+---+----+--++-+-++---+-+---+---+----+
--> log-odds 658.856
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1255.97 (inf), 161 match, 0 conflict, 249 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+-+++++++--++-+-++++-+---+++-+++-++-++-+-+++-++--+++-+---+-++-+--++++-++--++-++--++-++----+
--> log-odds 1255.97
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2252.91 (inf), 309 match, 0 conflict, 416 distractors, 373 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+-+++++++--++-+-++++++---+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+++++-+-+-++++--+++++++-++++++--+++++----+
--> log-odds 2252.91
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 4088.71 (inf), 602 match, 0 conflict, 1061 distractors, 730 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-++++-+++++++-+++++-++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+-++++--+++++++-++++++--++++++---+
--> log-odds 4088.71
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 7063.95 (inf), 1146 match, 0 conflict, 1883 distractors, 1447 index.
RA,Dec = (281.792,-33.9641), pixel scale 5.9771 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++++-++++-+++++++-+++++-++++++++-+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++--+-++++--+++++++--+++++--++++++---+
--> log-odds 7063.95
Got 14 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.794405, -33.962969) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:10.657, -33:57:46.688).
Field size: 15.7842 x 10.5842 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50531 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
Image size: 943.0'x628.9' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:10.911 -33:57:43.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9469 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3818789.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=0, passed=9469
Got 9469 stars (including 8983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 314 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 299 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 298 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 319 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 313 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.54"
Excluding outliers - 313 stars left (next iteration limit 327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits N_match=313 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.578 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.027 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.207 sigma_q3_arcsec=7.615 sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=180 n_q2=128 n_q3=5 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits): sigma 0.656->3.578, ratio 2.772->2.128; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits) flagged: sigma=0.531 (ref avg 0.8415), ratio=3.011 (ref avg 1.1855), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 9389 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3819056.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3819056.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.2666 (1.88816e+12), 7 match, 0 conflict, 9 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.789,-33.9713), pixel scale 5.97157 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++++---++--+(best)--------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3819056.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3819056.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.780971, -33.967283) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:07.433, -33:58:02.219).
Field size: 15.7898 x 10.5877 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50846 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits' -> 'fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 7 00:52 fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 7 00:52 out3819056.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3819056.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3819056.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7217 degrees of RA,Dec (281.782,-33.9665)
log-odds ratio 28.2666 (1.88816e+12), 7 match, 0 conflict, 9 distractors, 23 index.
RA,Dec = (281.789,-33.9713), pixel scale 5.97157 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----++++---++--+(best)--------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3819056.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3819056.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.780971, -33.967283) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:07.433, -33:58:02.219).
Field size: 15.7898 x 10.5877 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50846 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jul 7 00:52 fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jul 7 00:52 out3819056.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 77733 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6548, 954.225] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 14.2169
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 62.9978 (2.28866e+27), 23 match, 0 conflict, 198 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+--------+--+-----+-----+------+--------+-----+-------+-----------+----------+----------------+
--> log-odds 62.9978
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 440.528 (2.08439e+191), 73 match, 0 conflict, 419 distractors, 103 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++------++--+----++-+---+-----+++----+--+----++----+--+------+----+---------++-+-------+------+
--> log-odds 440.528
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 987.594 (inf), 143 match, 0 conflict, 357 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--++-++--+--+-++-+--+++--+-+++----++-++--+++--+-+--+--+---+----+-+---+---++-++----+++------+
--> log-odds 987.594
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1922.57 (inf), 270 match, 0 conflict, 372 distractors, 372 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++-+--+-++-+-+++++-+-++++---++++++-++++++++-++-++---+-++++-++--++--++++++---+++--++--+
--> log-odds 1922.57
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3480.3 (inf), 519 match, 0 conflict, 892 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++++--++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++++++++++++-++-++++-+-++++-++-++++-+++++++--+++-+++--+
--> log-odds 3480.3
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5909.35 (inf), 957 match, 0 conflict, 1190 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++-+--++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+-++++-++-++++-+++++++--+++++++--+
--> log-odds 5909.35
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.6548, 954.225] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 14.2169
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 62.9978 (2.28866e+27), 23 match, 0 conflict, 198 distractors, 44 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----+--------+--+-----+-----+------+--------+-----+-------+-----------+----------+----------------+
--> log-odds 62.9978
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 440.528 (2.08439e+191), 73 match, 0 conflict, 419 distractors, 103 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -----++------++--+----++-+---+-----+++----+--+----++----+--+------+----+---------++-+-------+------+
--> log-odds 440.528
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 987.594 (inf), 143 match, 0 conflict, 357 distractors, 201 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--++++--++-++--+--+-++-+--+++--+-+++----++-++--+++--+-+--+--+---+----+-+---+---++-++----+++------+
--> log-odds 987.594
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1922.57 (inf), 270 match, 0 conflict, 372 distractors, 372 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++-+--+-++-+-+++++-+-++++---++++++-++++++++-++-++---+-++++-++--++--++++++---+++--++--+
--> log-odds 1922.57
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3480.3 (inf), 519 match, 0 conflict, 892 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++++--++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++++++++++++-++-++++-+-++++-++-++++-+++++++--+++-+++--+
--> log-odds 3480.3
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 5909.35 (inf), 957 match, 0 conflict, 1190 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (281.78,-33.9681), pixel scale 5.97885 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-++-+--++++++-+--++++++++++++-+-+++++--+++++++++++++++-+++++++-+-++++-++-++++-+++++++--+++++++--+
--> log-odds 5909.35
Got 12 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (281.782706, -33.967007) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (18:47:07.849, -33:58:01.226).
Field size: 15.7896 x 10.5875 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.50562 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
Image size: 943.1'x629.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.91"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:47:08.104 -33:57:58.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10146 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3847326.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=663, bad_region=0, passed=10146
Got 10146 stars (including 9467 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 355 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 334 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 312 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 363 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 353 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.53"
Excluding outliers - 353 stars left (next iteration limit 367)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits N_match=353 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.973 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.112 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=209 n_q2=140 n_q3=4 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.832
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits): sigma 0.531->2.973, ratio 3.011->0.832; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=3.578 -- 4.25x the reference average (0.8415); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=2.973 -- 3.53x the reference average (0.8415); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742_astrometric_residuals.png (329 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.06 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260_astrometric_residuals.png (361 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166_astrometric_residuals.png (318 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.64 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (357 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-21-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0166.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_003834_TTUQ1b1x1_3303922_Ymwdv06T/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:58:47.17 -36:48:33.9: 11.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6: 13.85 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:13:20.00 -29:21:11.0: 9.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:06:37.76 -31:23:18.6: 11.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:13:20.00 -29:21:11.0: 9.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:20.00 -29:21:11.0: ref_mag=9.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8415 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:23:55.76 -31:39:04.5: 11.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:06:37.76 -31:23:18.6: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:42.22 -29:03:44.3: 11.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:37.76 -31:23:18.6: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0789 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:58:47.17 -36:48:33.9: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:47.17 -36:48:33.9: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9545 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:42:58.81 -30:28:53.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=10.6097 delta=3.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:23:22.12 -28:56:48.1: 11.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:23:55.76 -31:39:04.5: 11.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:42.22 -29:03:44.3: 11.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:55.76 -31:39:04.5: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1111 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:28:09.06 -33:05:25.5: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:42.22 -29:03:44.3: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1503 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:05.57 -34:26:23.8: 11.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:23:22.12 -28:56:48.1: 11.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:23:55.01 -33:37:51.1: 10.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:23:22.12 -28:56:48.1: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1875 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:28:09.06 -33:05:25.5: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:09.06 -33:05:25.5: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1320 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:14:05.57 -34:26:23.8: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:05.57 -34:26:23.8: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0821 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:23:55.01 -33:37:51.1: 9.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:55.01 -33:37:51.1: ref_mag=10.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9986 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22823_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22823_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.70 -29:04:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:38.25 -31:34:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22918_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 22918_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22926_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22926_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:52.91 -31:33:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22961_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22961_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:41.10 -36:48:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22979_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22979_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.48 -35:17:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22997_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22997_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.62 -29:55:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23015_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23057_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23057_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:44.60 -37:37:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23060_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23060_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:53.47 -36:27:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23065_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23065_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:31.93 -30:20:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23070_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23070_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:46.51 -30:23:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23083_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23083_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23089_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23089_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23102_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23102_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.49 -29:58:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23104_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23107_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23107_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23115_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23115_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04342_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 04342_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168110_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168110_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168116_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168116_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168123_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168137_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168137_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168138_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168138_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168144_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168144_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168149_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168149_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168154_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168154_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168167_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168167_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168171_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168171_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168173_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:13.04 -38:07:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168181_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168194_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168194_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:23.95 -37:39:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168195_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168195_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168197_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168197_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168206_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168206_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168216_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168216_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168219_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168219_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168223_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168223_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:31.30 -38:00:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168225_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168225_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168233_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168233_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168246_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168246_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168247_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168247_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168249_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168249_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168256_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168256_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168580_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 168580_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168602_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168602_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:10.06 -33:08:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168766_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168766_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168783_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168783_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:46.02 -31:23:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168816_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168816_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:25.54 -31:17:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168841_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168841_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:14.77 -36:18:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168842_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168842_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:41.25 -31:55:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168880_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:44.44 -35:44:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168928_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168928_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:22.42 -34:09:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168936_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168936_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:52.37 -33:52:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168958_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168958_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168980_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 168980_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:40.53 -29:15:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169023_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169023_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:05.36 -28:40:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169074_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169074_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:49.82 -34:49:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.19 -35:44:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169090_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169090_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:08.44 -33:52:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169095_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169095_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:54.99 -29:55:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169109_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 169109_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169156_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169156_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:51.98 -30:53:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169160_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169160_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:10.04 -32:20:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169186_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169186_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169224_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169224_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:34.38 -35:24:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169227_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169227_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169293_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169293_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:16.13 -36:22:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169349_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169349_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:56.16 -31:59:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:06.62 -32:43:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169391_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:20.85 -36:46:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169405_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169405_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:41.29 -34:21:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169434_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169434_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169492_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169492_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169562_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169562_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169563_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169563_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169564_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169564_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:53.47 -32:26:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169567_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169567_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:14.07 -29:55:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169619_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169619_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169627_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169627_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:56.83 -29:00:55.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.19)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169630_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169630_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:18.52 -34:39:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169678_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169678_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:09.01 -31:03:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169699_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169699_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:39.58 -29:33:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169715_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169715_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:17.63 -28:54:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169860_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169860_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:04.35 -35:46:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169864_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169864_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:12.96 -32:22:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169937_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169937_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169970_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169970_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169971_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169971_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:58.91 -35:32:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169981_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169981_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:41.08 -31:19:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169982_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 169982_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:50.35 -32:54:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170001_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170001_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:43.81 -36:36:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170013_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170013_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:48.70 -32:05:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170071_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170071_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:07.28 -35:50:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170117_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170117_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:51.73 -30:05:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170164_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170164_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:42.87 -29:22:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170205_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170205_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170220_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170220_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:37.39 -30:48:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:22.96 -32:28:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170273_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170273_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170282_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170282_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:07.54 -36:45:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.487 6728307577627584128 275.28070725749 -36.75658690173 12.2492 10.4298 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170286_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:34.05 -33:28:53.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.140 6735087338122568576 277.89150359498 -33.48157333866 13.2600 11.2970 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.140#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170307_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170307_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:39.24 -32:13:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170311_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170311_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:19.32 -29:28:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170337_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 170337_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:36.87 -33:57:46.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.954 4039606613802790016 272.65298132844 -33.96304239269 13.0851 11.4851 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.954#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170366_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170366_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170376_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170376_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:08.14 -28:49:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170386_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170386_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170437_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170437_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170442_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170442_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:46.40 -36:39:05.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.239 4037936288222963200 273.19190362418 -36.65173785819 12.9054 11.1547 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.239#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170457_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170457_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170491_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 170491_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170513_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170513_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170537_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170540_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170540_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:48.30 -31:04:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.240 4049310392458852736 274.45064183647 -31.07302096980 12.4694 11.0134 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.240#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170552_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170552_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:37.94 -28:50:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170577_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170577_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:53.44 -32:00:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170583_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170583_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170590_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170590_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:50.68 -31:29:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170593_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170593_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170597_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170597_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:24.73 -29:36:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170636_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:46.77 -29:13:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170639_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170639_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170652_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170652_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:51.50 -31:11:47.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.790 4046127404952646784 276.71432791611 -31.19656301768 13.1687 11.6966 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170656_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170656_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:15.46 -33:12:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170676_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170676_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:42.15 -33:40:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170680_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170680_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170685_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170685_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170703_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170703_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:28.91 -35:45:06.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.580 4038400075971973760 273.11903936394 -35.75220743350 12.8825 10.8036 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.580#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170712_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170712_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170733_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170733_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:22.15 -33:31:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170735_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170735_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170741_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170741_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170769_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170769_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:15.60 -32:29:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170777_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:38.89 -31:49:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170792_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170792_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170794_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170794_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:09.91 -28:53:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:21.44 -32:22:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170822_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170829_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170829_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170833_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170833_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170842_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170842_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170843_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170843_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170848_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170848_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170854_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170854_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170858_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170858_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:34.29 -36:50:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170869_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170869_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170876_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170876_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170897_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170897_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170898_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170898_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:58.72 -29:51:44.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.620 4047990291299172992 275.99448698517 -29.86246213451 13.6850 11.8216 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.620#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170910_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170910_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:53.72 -29:19:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170916_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170916_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170919_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170919_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:15.16 -29:19:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170921_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170921_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:55.58 -33:44:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170940_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170940_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170943_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170943_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170949_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170949_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170960_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 170960_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170961_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170961_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:10.87 -33:10:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170988_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170988_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:20.27 -31:28:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170992_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170992_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170994_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170994_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:32.75 -30:53:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170996_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 170996_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171006_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171006_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:03.80 -33:40:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171018_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171018_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171038_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171038_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:01.03 -31:09:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171044_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171044_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171049_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171049_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171061_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171061_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171062_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171062_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171076_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171088_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171108_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171108_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:13.98 -31:00:58.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.585 4048994385904824448 273.80773667916 -31.01620504292 13.4308 11.6120 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.585#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171116_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171116_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:02.95 -34:02:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171122_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171122_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171128_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171128_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:18.60 -30:56:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171140_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171140_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171149_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171149_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171155_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171155_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171160_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171160_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171182_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171182_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171185_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171185_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:03.59 -33:04:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171188_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171188_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171191_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171191_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171199_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171199_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171204_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:53.37 -34:32:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171235_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171235_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:35.92 -30:43:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171237_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171237_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171240_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171244_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171244_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171250_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171252_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171257_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171257_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171263_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171263_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171282_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171282_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:50.16 -29:20:03.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.400 4051069125603033984 275.45887620864 -29.33425176726 13.3831 11.9440 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.400#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171299_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171299_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171304_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171304_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:48.11 -36:38:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171310_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171310_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:14.70 -33:52:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171313_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171313_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171317_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171317_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:46.08 -32:12:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171318_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171318_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171319_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171319_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171320_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171320_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171321_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171327_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171327_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:16.03 -30:26:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171331_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171331_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171337_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171337_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:51.93 -34:41:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171346_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171362_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171362_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171373_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171373_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171385_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171385_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171408_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171408_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171448_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171448_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:22.31 -32:42:01.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.603 4045922625293534848 275.59283076714 -32.70054516817 12.4806 10.9070 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.603#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171467_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171467_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171505_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171505_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171539_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 171539_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 148644_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:37.67 -31:12:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123254_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 123254_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:42.72 -35:03:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136294_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 136294_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 124902_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:48.47 -31:47:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69819_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 69819_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150208_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 150208_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:50.38 -32:16:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 118620_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.50 -29:58:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138587_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 138587_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.93 -32:13:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.001 4045819752261120896 274.67858196984 -32.22726264521 12.6999 11.3821 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78875_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 78875_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69907_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 69907_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 48646_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 164704_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 87501_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:46.50 -29:58:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.48 -35:17:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 115629_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:08.14 -29:21:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10003_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 10003_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.63 -29:55:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 122231_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:38.61 -30:29:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 122105_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:20.80 -31:14:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22843_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 22843_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16688_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 16688_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140892_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 140892_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 120799_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:37.28 -31:24:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58128_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 58128_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113480_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 113480_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:13.48 -32:36:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 94121_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:57.42 -31:14:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01740_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 01740_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 113165_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:46.50 -30:23:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44972_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 44972_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:45.22 -33:04:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 133381_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:55.88 -29:49:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 78025_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98024_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 98024_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 112383_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:52.82 -37:12:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 138375_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:10.19 -34:21:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33676_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 33676_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70174_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 70174_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 72343_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 36365_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 98398_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:30.84 -31:58:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 26932_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:07.01 -37:50:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110960_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 110960_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 31811_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 70870_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.75 -29:49:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 51332_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.71 -29:04:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18135_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 18135_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118410_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 118410_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:43.34 -35:17:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 156862_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:57.20 -37:37:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 06962_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73261_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 73261_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 02056_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:32.99 -38:46:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:52.91 -31:33:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01535_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 01535_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
Preparing report for the candidate 21908_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03820_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 03820_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:06.31 -38:21:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 122770_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:08.00 -36:04:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167
The candidate 129010_fd_Sgr-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-24-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0167 did not pass the final checks
