This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 11.86 16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1
3.85438 29.26744 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona -0 -1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 12.16 16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3
1.74426 25.07842 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -1 1 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 12.60 16:31:06.17 -14:24:17.0
1.98422 22.45918 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 0 1 12.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:06.17 -14:24:17.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:06.17 -14:24:17.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 13.16 15:58:56.19 -04:52:45.4
4.95577 34.56939 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho -0 -0 1 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:56.19 -04:52:45.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:56.19 -04:52:45.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 13.40 16:37:42.73 -13:31:20.9
3.79244 21.72271 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 0 -0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:42.73 -13:31:20.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:42.73 -13:31:20.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 13.98 16:00:24.15 -13:51:28.1
357.15277 28.51732 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis -1 -1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:24.15 -13:51:28.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:24.15 -13:51:28.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 13.97 16:31:14.36 -12:49:05.4
3.36888 23.40369 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia -2 1 2 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:14.36 -12:49:05.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:14.36 -12:49:05.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.2174 2461228.7174 14.04 15:58:48.03 -06:15:11.6
3.62737 33.74442 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -1 -1 2 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:48.03 -06:15:11.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:48.03 -06:15:11.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 14.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.7174,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.2174 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461228.71777795 07.07.2026 05:13:26.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8406
Objects passed selection criteria: 8406
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8154
Average stars matched: 7926.25 (97.2069 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 01:33:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461228.71777795 07.07.2026 05:13:26.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62288
Objects passed selection criteria: 62167
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59017.8
Average stars matched: 57221.8 (96.9568 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 163768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jul 7 01:35:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.71700397
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LbI0hd5WZx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fuVI248iiH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5pMDwzHCXx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FIMx4NzsqD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
3.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LbI0hd5WZx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 120 stars left (next iteration limit 132)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=120 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=56 n_q2=64 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fuVI248iiH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 119 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 119 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 119 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 119 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 119 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 119 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 119 stars left (next iteration limit 130)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=119 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=57 n_q2=62 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.990
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5pMDwzHCXx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, bad_region=1, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7832 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 134 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 134 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 134 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 134 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 134 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 134 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 134 stars left (next iteration limit 147)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits N_match=134 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=59 n_q2=75 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FIMx4NzsqD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=336, bad_region=0, passed=8123
Got 8123 stars (including 7778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8123 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 131 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 131 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 131 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 131 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 131 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 131 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 131 stars left (next iteration limit 144)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=131 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=57 n_q2=74 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.063
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.047
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=0.990
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.063
reference average sigma_overall=0.4305 worst_q_ratio=1.0185
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (120 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (119 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (134 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (131 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:43.65 -10:42:52.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:32.1: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:40.47 -11:40:25.8: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:10.47 -10:25:13.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:44.97 -08:24:37.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:54.91 -09:51:39.3: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:51.31 -06:39:36.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:16.52 -08:42:36.2: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:43.65 -10:42:52.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:32.1: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:44.97 -08:24:37.7: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:40.47 -11:40:25.8: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:10.47 -10:25:13.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:54.91 -09:51:39.3: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:43.65 -10:42:52.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8410 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.44 -08:07:32.1: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8791 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:40.47 -11:40:25.8: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1532 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:44.97 -08:24:37.7: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1356 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:10.47 -10:25:13.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1630 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:54.91 -09:51:39.3: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0549 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:51.31 -06:39:36.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:16.52 -08:42:36.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:51.31 -06:39:36.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1977 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:16.52 -08:42:36.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2217 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:35.40 -10:18:50.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:44.04 -09:39:07.4: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:28.44 -08:12:15.7: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:35.40 -10:18:50.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:35.40 -10:18:50.5: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1981 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:28.44 -08:12:15.7: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:28.44 -08:12:15.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2126 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:44.04 -09:39:07.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:44.04 -09:39:07.4: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1938 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20526.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20512_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.72 -14:41:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.31 -06:11:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20517_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20517_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 20518_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20521_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.22 -09:46:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 20526_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20527_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20528_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.47 -07:42:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:13:26.85 -08:52:53.1
16:22:04.90 -12:57:11.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0154 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.132 -10:00:23.61
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:11.144 -09:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K1VMkS0hyj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bTqsh33yma
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YiXTVjg8Te
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4yyvxc0jQn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K1VMkS0hyj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 120 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 120 stars left (next iteration limit 132)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=120 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=55 n_q2=65 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bTqsh33yma (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 122 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 122 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 122 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 122 stars left (next iteration limit 134)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=122 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=58 n_q2=64 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YiXTVjg8Te (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2125, bad_region=32, passed=52177
Got 52177 stars (including 49949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52177 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 137 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 137 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 137 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 137 stars left (next iteration limit 150)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits N_match=137 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=60 n_q2=77 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4yyvxc0jQn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2186, bad_region=23, passed=52650
Got 52650 stars (including 50370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 135 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 135 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 135 stars left (next iteration limit 148)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits N_match=135 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=NaN sigma_q4_arcsec=NaN n_q1=59 n_q2=76 n_q3=0 n_q4=0 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-12-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0156.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-07_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_003631_TTUQ1b1x1_3169056_PTNgD1x5/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:32.27 -14:59:26.0: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:06.5: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:32.99 -14:33:33.7: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:02.54 -07:24:32.8: 14.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:02:43.28 -13:51:11.4: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:46.59 -13:34:01.4: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:06.17 -14:24:17.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:32.27 -14:59:26.0: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:32.27 -14:59:26.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4593 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:46.59 -13:34:01.4: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:02.54 -07:24:32.8: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:32.99 -14:33:33.7: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:02:43.28 -13:51:11.4: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:06.5: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:02.54 -07:24:32.8: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7582 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:46.59 -13:34:01.4: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2953 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:32.99 -14:33:33.7: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2641 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:43.28 -13:51:11.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6166 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:24.87 -15:02:06.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3541 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:34.07 -12:26:10.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:56.19 -04:52:45.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.20 -14:38:19.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:06.17 -14:24:17.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:34.07 -12:26:10.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:56.19 -04:52:45.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.07 -12:26:10.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8457 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.20 -14:38:19.6: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.20 -14:38:19.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3492 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:42.73 -13:31:20.9: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:22.06 -14:44:51.7: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:54.69 -13:16:29.1: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:13.47 -15:14:50.2: 14.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.98 -07:08:16.8: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:13.47 -15:14:50.2: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:42.73 -13:31:20.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:22.06 -14:44:51.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:54.69 -13:16:29.1: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:13.47 -15:14:50.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5083 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:22.06 -14:44:51.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4943 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:54.69 -13:16:29.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6670 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:45.76 -14:19:07.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.35 -12:27:34.6: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.98 -07:08:16.8: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.98 -07:08:16.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6375 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:52.73 -07:02:53.5: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:45.76 -14:19:07.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:45.76 -14:19:07.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6912 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.35 -12:27:34.6: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.35 -12:27:34.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9112 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.06 -08:42:31.3: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:25.03 -08:34:35.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.37 -12:08:21.8: 13.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:52.73 -07:02:53.5: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:52.73 -07:02:53.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8449 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:24.15 -13:51:28.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.06 -08:42:31.3: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:25.03 -08:34:35.8: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.06 -08:42:31.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8283 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.37 -12:08:21.8: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:25.03 -08:34:35.8: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9006 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.37 -12:08:21.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8239 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:46.04 -13:55:50.7: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:14.36 -12:49:05.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:24.15 -13:51:28.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:54:52.16 -14:36:34.6: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:46.04 -13:55:50.7: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.04 -13:55:50.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8961 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:14.36 -12:49:05.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.53 -10:21:37.2: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:48.03 -06:15:11.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:54:52.16 -14:36:34.6: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:52.16 -14:36:34.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9305 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:48.03 -06:15:11.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.53 -10:21:37.2: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.53 -10:21:37.2: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0591 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:58:02.82 -10:05:36.2: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.64 -09:50:38.0: 13.72 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:58:02.82 -10:05:36.2: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.64 -09:50:38.0: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:02.82 -10:05:36.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1038 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.64 -09:50:38.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0458 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:40.18 -14:19:58.0: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:40.18 -14:19:58.0: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:40.18 -14:19:58.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4424 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:43.08 -14:20:47.8: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:39.16 -12:43:09.8: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:43.08 -14:20:47.8: 14.79 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:39.16 -12:43:09.8: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.08 -14:20:47.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2775 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:39.16 -12:43:09.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2944 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:04.98 -14:59:13.4: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:04.98 -14:59:13.4: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:04.98 -14:59:13.4: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4444 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:21.32 -11:28:05.5: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:29.31 -10:47:40.1: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:21.32 -11:28:05.5: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:21.32 -11:28:05.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5337 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:29.31 -10:47:40.1: 14.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:29.31 -10:47:40.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6004 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:53.71 -12:21:05.5: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:03:03.56 -12:24:48.2: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:53.71 -12:21:05.5: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:53.71 -12:21:05.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6337 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:53.60 -12:09:44.0: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:03:03.56 -12:24:48.2: 15.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:03.56 -12:24:48.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6777 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:53.60 -12:09:44.0: 15.88 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:53.60 -12:09:44.0: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7268 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:08.81 -06:07:15.7: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:55.44 -11:07:38.8: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:32.86 -13:22:11.1: 15.41 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:08.81 -06:07:15.7: 14.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:08.81 -06:07:15.7: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6175 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:55.44 -11:07:38.8: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:55.44 -11:07:38.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7119 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:44.47 -11:04:43.7: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:32.86 -13:22:11.1: 15.24 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:32.86 -13:22:11.1: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.6990 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:44.47 -11:04:43.7: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:44.47 -11:04:43.7: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5855 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:18.52 -13:59:42.1: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:54.54 -09:26:00.2: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:24.13 -11:33:08.7: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:55.67 -11:39:32.6: 15.84 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:18.52 -13:59:42.1: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:54.54 -09:26:00.2: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:18.52 -13:59:42.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7830 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:24.13 -11:33:08.7: 15.45 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:54.54 -09:26:00.2: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5652 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:24.13 -11:33:08.7: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8101 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:10.04 -06:12:48.1: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:55.67 -11:39:32.6: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:55.67 -11:39:32.6: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8032 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:10.04 -06:12:48.1: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:10.04 -06:12:48.1: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7474 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:12.01 -14:30:25.8: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:49.45 -05:25:34.1: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:29.72 -14:15:31.6: 15.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:12.01 -14:30:25.8: 15.35 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:12.01 -14:30:25.8: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8555 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:49.45 -05:25:34.1: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:29.72 -14:15:31.6: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:49.45 -05:25:34.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6379 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:29.72 -14:15:31.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5751 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:31.59 -09:28:57.8: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:02.69 -08:07:34.1: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:56.43 -12:14:03.3: 15.47 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:31.59 -09:28:57.8: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:31.59 -09:28:57.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6456 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:02.69 -08:07:34.1: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:02.69 -08:07:34.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8473 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:56.43 -12:14:03.3: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:56.43 -12:14:03.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8578 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82568.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82605.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82665.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82687.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82507_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82507_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82510_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82513_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:23.36 -13:52:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:12.56 -15:05:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:50.67 -13:20:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:47.31 -13:11:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82552_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82552_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:26.86 -08:52:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:04.91 -12:57:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82565_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82565_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:53.72 -15:13:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82585_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82585_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82602_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82602_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:16.71 -12:48:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82612_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82612_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.46 -12:31:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82625_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82625_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82630_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82630_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.37 -10:03:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82632_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82632_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82635_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.85 -08:22:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82647_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82647_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82650_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82650_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82651_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82651_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82655_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82655_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82657_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82657_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82658_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82658_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82665_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82667_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82670_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82670_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82673_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82673_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.37 -06:56:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82687_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82689_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82689_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
Preparing report for the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82706_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82706_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.93 -06:26:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82728_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82728_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82734_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82734_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82742_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82748_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82748_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82749_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82749_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82773_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82773_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:14.29 -11:20:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82801_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82801_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:27.37 -05:05:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82836_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82836_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82839_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82839_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82863_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82863_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82871_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82871_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82880_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82880_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82885_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82885_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82895_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82895_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82906_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82906_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82926_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82931_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82931_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82951_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.76 -10:42:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82980_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82980_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 82981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.31 -06:11:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.69 -06:46:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77102_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 77102_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:23.83 -14:56:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.22 -09:46:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.73 -14:41:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.60 -13:57:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.20 -05:51:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.14 -07:56:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-07_00-13-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0157 did not pass the final checks
