This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 10.84 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0
19.30728 11.38541 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 0 0 0 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6321,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1321 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 11.48 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0
19.58968 10.34354 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6321,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1321 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 13.28 18:02:13.85 -13:41:33.0
15.11642 4.37569 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.540 Rosamunde -1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:02:13.85 -13:41:33.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:02:13.85 -13:41:33.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1321* 18 02 13.85 -13 41 33.0 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6321,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1321 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 13.55 18:01:54.16 -08:33:47.0
19.58130 6.94080 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.205 Martha -0 1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:54.16 -08:33:47.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:54.16 -08:33:47.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6321,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1321 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 13.37 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0
20.63655 5.77192 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J180805-0812.3
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.840 g Y 3.804 g 2452631.00000 208.693787000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1321* 18 08 05.06 -08 12 16.0 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J180805-0812.3,2461228.6321,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J180805-0812.3 20260707.1321 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1321 2461228.6321 12.56 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5
12.74939 9.36511 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" VX Ser
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.000 V < 14.800 V 2452909.00000 208.300000000000 M1e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5: 13.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1321* 17 39 37.80 -13 13 27.5 12.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VX Ser,2461228.6321,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VX Ser 20260707.1321 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461228.63237436 07.07.2026 03:10:27.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6137
Objects passed selection criteria: 6128
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5100
Average stars matched: 4977.5 (97.598 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:20:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461228.63237436 07.07.2026 03:10:27.145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64083
Objects passed selection criteria: 64002
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 56787.8
Average stars matched: 54562 (96.0806 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 173044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:23:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.63177771
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01449 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p1c9mSo0KS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KCtPPgDtOj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Y9g1qzk31
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q5I53VEpSD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p1c9mSo0KS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, bad_region=3862, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 6139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=357 n_q2=271 n_q3=193 n_q4=110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KCtPPgDtOj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, bad_region=3843, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 6155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=357 n_q2=280 n_q3=186 n_q4=110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Y9g1qzk31 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=2042, passed=5630
Got 5630 stars (including 3333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=350 n_q2=279 n_q3=185 n_q4=115 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q5I53VEpSD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=2118, passed=5839
Got 5839 stars (including 3455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5839 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=355 n_q2=279 n_q3=183 n_q4=112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.120
ref2=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.533 worst_q_ratio=1.115
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.133
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20477.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20484.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20477_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20477_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20484_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0
17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0091 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.397 -09:59:48.82
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.949 -09:59:01.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01449 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.541sfUgfRe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G3mx3caVKx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z0kKB1tvvw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MkwvKj7aAl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.509900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.509900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.541sfUgfRe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8119, bad_region=26419, passed=98540
Got 98540 stars (including 66756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=348 n_q2=272 n_q3=199 n_q4=114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G3mx3caVKx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8187, bad_region=26418, passed=98079
Got 98079 stars (including 66276 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=343 n_q2=273 n_q3=200 n_q4=117 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z0kKB1tvvw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3197, bad_region=14042, passed=56720
Got 56720 stars (including 40597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.607 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=346 n_q2=269 n_q3=195 n_q4=121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MkwvKj7aAl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3319, bad_region=14075, passed=57088
Got 57088 stars (including 40896 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=356 n_q2=264 n_q3=191 n_q4=121 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-09-35_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_221220_TTUQ2b1x1_2091557_zj99nuG6/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:15:55.56 -13:35:22.2: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:07:10.25 -09:57:13.0: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:50.05 -13:01:58.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.6: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:54:34.54 -13:21:20.8: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:15:55.56 -13:35:22.2: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:55.56 -13:35:22.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4514 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:50.05 -13:01:58.8: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:07:10.25 -09:57:13.0: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:10.25 -09:57:13.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5382 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:50.05 -13:01:58.8: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5879 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:54:34.54 -13:21:20.8: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.6: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:34.54 -13:21:20.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8223 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:43.44 -12:57:17.6: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1207 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:02:13.85 -13:41:33.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:58:37.68 -11:53:29.5: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:02:13.85 -13:41:33.0: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:58:37.68 -11:53:29.5: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:37.68 -11:53:29.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4066 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:04:59.19 -11:30:15.4: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:05:18.71 -11:34:53.9: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:54.16 -08:33:47.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.08 -06:50:46.5: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:59:24.90 -13:01:55.1: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:04:59.19 -11:30:15.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:59.19 -11:30:15.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3685 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:54.16 -08:33:47.0: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:16:13.60 -09:49:58.6: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:37:18.21 -13:47:31.6: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.08 -06:50:46.5: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:05:18.71 -11:34:53.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.08 -06:50:46.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6050 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:18.71 -11:34:53.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4699 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:59:24.90 -13:01:55.1: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:32.21 -06:32:38.4: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:24.90 -13:01:55.1: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4183 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:37:18.21 -13:47:31.6: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:18.21 -13:47:31.6: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5025 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:32.21 -06:32:38.4: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:16:13.60 -09:49:58.6: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:32.21 -06:32:38.4: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6780 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:13.60 -09:49:58.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5411 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:05.16 -12:41:48.6: 13.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:32:11.73 -11:07:45.0: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:05.16 -12:41:48.6: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:05.16 -12:41:48.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7070 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:32:11.73 -11:07:45.0: 13.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:11.73 -11:07:45.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7384 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:00:56.18 -12:41:45.8: 13.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:40:54.27 -12:55:50.5: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:58:05.11 -11:39:51.1: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:40:54.27 -12:55:50.5: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:54.27 -12:55:50.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6808 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:00:56.18 -12:41:45.8: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:56.18 -12:41:45.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9036 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:48.28 -13:55:43.9: 13.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:58:05.11 -11:39:51.1: 14.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:05.11 -11:39:51.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9123 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:05:10.27 -08:10:58.2: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:09:45.97 -07:31:18.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:48.28 -13:55:43.9: 13.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:48.28 -13:55:43.9: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7596 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:59:20.37 -13:42:45.0: 14.47 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:05:10.27 -08:10:58.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:10.27 -08:10:58.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1392 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:09:45.97 -07:31:18.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:58:11.86 -10:40:55.6: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:19.46 -10:19:04.5: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:59:20.37 -13:42:45.0: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:20.37 -13:42:45.0: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2177 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:58:11.86 -10:40:55.6: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:11.86 -10:40:55.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0891 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:19.46 -10:19:04.5: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:19.46 -10:19:04.5: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2085 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:08:05.06 -08:12:16.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.3689 delta=1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5: 13.91 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:39:37.80 -13:13:27.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5556 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out117051.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116708.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31203.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92203.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116569_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116569_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116579_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116579_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116588_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116588_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116601_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116601_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:22.37 -09:41:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116602_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116602_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116613_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116613_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:42.53 -06:37:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116621_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116621_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:54.85 -06:54:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116630_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116630_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116654_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116654_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.14 -07:22:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116660_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116660_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.38 -13:44:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116686_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116686_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.45 -14:10:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116708_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 116708_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Successfully moved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.png to transient_report/116708_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015_reference.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116709_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116709_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:29.13 -12:10:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116716_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116716_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:03.77 -13:49:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116721_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116721_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116723_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116723_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.63 -13:30:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116725_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116725_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116726_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116726_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:28.37 -07:57:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116727_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116727_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116729_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116729_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.92 -13:12:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116751_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116751_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:36.83 -13:46:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116754_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 116754_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116768_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116768_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116784_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116784_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116788_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116788_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116796_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116796_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116836_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116836_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:36.11 -11:53:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116839_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116839_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:34.19 -13:17:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116867_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116867_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116882_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116882_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:42.82 -13:36:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116912_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116912_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:01.76 -13:26:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116918_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116918_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:27.25 -13:53:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116946_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116946_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116963_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116963_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116972_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116972_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.71 -10:38:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116979_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116979_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:42.01 -13:24:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116989_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116989_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:22.02 -11:45:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116993_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 116993_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117007_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117012_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117012_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:37.85 -11:25:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117017_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117017_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:23.57 -14:08:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117021_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117021_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117051_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117051_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:45.97 -07:31:18.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.007 4159038800940178816 272.44182369137 -07.52183356499 13.9737 12.2560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.007#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117062_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117062_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117088_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117088_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117107_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 117107_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92203_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 92203_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:05.43 -10:08:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92675_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 92675_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.48 -06:19:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31203_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 31203_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61044_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 61044_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:59.66 -10:40:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-07-06_22-10-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0015 did not pass the final checks