This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 10.89 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7
19.30779 11.38413 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -1 2 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6267,10.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1267 10.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 11.58 17:49:55.15 -06:54:08.4
19.58995 10.34227 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 -1 1 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:55.15 -06:54:08.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:55.15 -06:54:08.4: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6267,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1267 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 13.53 18:05:04.74 +01:37:41.5
29.05945 11.05111 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.921 Jovita 1 -1 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:05:04.74 +01:37:41.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:05:04.74 +01:37:41.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6267,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1267 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 12.92 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5
24.59535 11.02543 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS 13789510
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 R1 11.650 R1 2451331.00000 61.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1267* 17 57 00.32 -02 15 39.5 12.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 13789510,2461228.6267,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 13789510 20260707.1267 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 11.78 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8
25.93140 15.58350 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V1070 Oph
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.120 V Y 0.890 V 2452195.10000 170.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1070 Oph,2461228.6267,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1070 Oph 20260707.1267 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 11.55 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5
25.90226 10.55822 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" XZ Ser
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.950 V 14.000 V 2454256.00000 172.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1267* 18 01 04.34 -01 20 52.5 11.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
XZ Ser,2461228.6267,11.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
XZ Ser 20260707.1267 11.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1267 2461228.6267 12.77 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8
23.70364 11.54573 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J175331-0247.0
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.900 V 14.400 V 2452739.00000 102.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175331-0247.0,2461228.6267,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175331-0247.0 20260707.1267 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461228.62698971 07.07.2026 03:02:41.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7605
Objects passed selection criteria: 7596
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6532
Average stars matched: 6360.25 (97.3706 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:07:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
First image: 2461176.76690851 16.05.2026 06:24:10.895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Last image: 2461228.62698971 07.07.2026 03:02:41.911 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 72880
Objects passed selection criteria: 72759
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59734
Average stars matched: 57123.8 (95.6302 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1922320 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:10:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.62632856
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0744 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0640 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pZb7v9QoVF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WVcL3sbdV2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m88jQNgc9t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xb70leJ0Io
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to +3.2761 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1369 to 277.8949 deg, Dec -7.2775 to 3.2761 deg
Loaded 5313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4214 out of 4368 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4368 out of 7975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to +3.2727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1541 to 277.8989 deg, Dec -7.2832 to 3.2727 deg
Loaded 5309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4205 out of 4363 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4363 out of 7875 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
3.5 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
3.4 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.7 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pZb7v9QoVF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=521, bad_region=0, passed=7975
Got 7975 stars (including 7444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.815 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.772 n_q1=185 n_q2=158 n_q3=282 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WVcL3sbdV2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, bad_region=0, passed=7875
Got 7875 stars (including 7348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7875 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.726 n_q1=181 n_q2=158 n_q3=279 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m88jQNgc9t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=0, passed=5105
Got 5105 stars (including 4803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5105 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.432 n_q1=177 n_q2=141 n_q3=316 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.453
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xb70leJ0Io (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=268, bad_region=0, passed=5357
Got 5357 stars (including 5088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5236 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=179 n_q2=142 n_q3=318 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.496
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.630 worst_q_ratio=1.293
ref2=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.611 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.453
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.496
reference average sigma_overall=0.6205 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (917 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:01:04.35 -01:20:52.7: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:01:04.35 -01:20:52.7: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:04.35 -01:20:52.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4965 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20609.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20430_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.03 +01:33:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 20529_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20530_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.15 -03:22:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20531_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:10.99 +02:02:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.16 -01:31:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20549_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20549_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.96 +02:49:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20574_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:16.70 -01:43:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20594_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:08.00 -02:56:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20608_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:39.61 +02:44:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 20609_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:04.35 -01:20:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.143 4178993528216879616 270.26831707385 -01.34771948284 10.6620 9.2636 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.143#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0744 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.262 -02:00:11.96
Second-epoch image center 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0640 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:43.700 -01:58:31.76
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:45.601 -01:59:02.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01171 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1yyHMLNSAZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h71mN1rk2S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XiI8kWrI6R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.frjj21myc8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.436000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.436000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 80645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to +3.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1354 to 277.8993 deg, Dec -7.2781 to 3.2791 deg
Loaded 5318 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4682 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4682 out of 80645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80458 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to +3.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 262.1446 to 277.9104 deg, Dec -7.2831 to 3.2730 deg
Loaded 5316 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4025 out of 4686 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4686 out of 80458 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1yyHMLNSAZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5532, bad_region=2, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 74977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.698 n_q1=187 n_q2=159 n_q3=275 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h71mN1rk2S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5629, bad_region=0, passed=80444
Got 80444 stars (including 74689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 78904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.800 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.677 n_q1=185 n_q2=156 n_q3=270 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XiI8kWrI6R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1657, bad_region=20, passed=39037
Got 39037 stars (including 37300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.701 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=176 n_q2=134 n_q3=320 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.647
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.frjj21myc8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1785, bad_region=17, passed=40915
Got 40915 stars (including 39049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=177 n_q2=139 n_q3=311 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.511
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_220440_TTUQ1b1x1_1631024_0FnvCUED/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:59:49.60 -00:26:06.6: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:59:35.42 +01:45:15.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:35:06.77 +03:00:05.6: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:55.15 -06:54:08.4: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:59:35.42 +01:45:15.8: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:59:49.60 -00:26:06.6: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:35.42 +01:45:15.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3939 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:49.60 -00:26:06.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7094 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:35:06.77 +03:00:05.6: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:06.77 +03:00:05.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4263 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:35.67 -02:15:03.9: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:55.15 -06:54:08.4: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:48:15.51 -00:59:45.8: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:35.67 -02:15:03.9: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:35.67 -02:15:03.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4664 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:48:15.51 -00:59:45.8: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:48:15.51 -00:59:45.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6199 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:55:40.63 +02:02:10.6: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:49:37.56 -02:14:43.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:55:40.63 +02:02:10.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:49:37.56 -02:14:43.9: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:40.63 +02:02:10.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0037 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:37.56 -02:14:43.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9694 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:05:08.43 +02:45:28.4: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:32:47.58 +03:09:48.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:05:08.43 +02:45:28.4: 13.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:08.43 +02:45:28.4: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3330 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:32:47.58 +03:09:48.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:47.58 +03:09:48.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:05:04.74 +01:37:41.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:38:34.06 +01:54:59.4: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:05:04.74 +01:37:41.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:57:00.32 -02:15:39.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9071 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:38:34.06 +01:54:59.4: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:34.06 +01:54:59.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4740 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:43:22.02 +01:01:55.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7740 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:43:18.50 -02:04:45.8: 13.39 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:43:18.50 -02:04:45.8: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:18.50 -02:04:45.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8026 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:04.34 -01:20:52.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5557 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:58:17.18 +00:36:57.9: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:58:17.18 +00:36:57.9: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-24-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0099.fits at 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:17.18 +00:36:57.9: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0358 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_01-25-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits at 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:53:30.65 -02:47:02.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7609 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96583.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99378.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99145_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99145_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99150_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99150_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99151_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99151_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99152_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99152_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:03.56 -06:32:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99156_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99156_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:22.83 +01:28:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99159_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99159_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99273_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99273_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:42.86 -06:37:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99283_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99283_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:59.93 +02:49:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99285_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99285_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:17.82 +02:29:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99351_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99351_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:17.04 +02:42:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99378_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 99378_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99413_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99413_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:33.36 +01:08:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99536_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:53.24 +02:14:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:26.52 -01:00:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99616_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99616_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:50.85 +01:29:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99634_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99634_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:23.71 +02:39:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99680_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99680_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:48.91 -01:46:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:40.63 -02:44:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99689_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99689_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:22.62 +02:13:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99706_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99706_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99719_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99719_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.47 -00:37:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99728_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99728_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:48.93 +03:11:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99731_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99731_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.40 -02:32:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99763_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99763_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:34.67 -01:10:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99784_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99784_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:32.90 +00:27:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99785_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99785_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99787_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99787_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:43.23 +02:25:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99807_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99807_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:19.36 +02:36:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99810_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99810_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:48.54 +02:26:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99883_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99883_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:41.33 -01:42:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99909_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99909_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:44.70 +01:42:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99924_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99924_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.52 -06:50:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99932_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99932_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.83 +01:44:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99944_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99944_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.79 -00:44:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99957_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99957_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.42 +00:52:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99963_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99963_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:42.36 +01:52:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99968_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99968_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99978_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 99978_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.87 +01:35:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100036_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100036_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:00.32 +02:46:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100038_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100038_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100047_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100047_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:26.13 +03:06:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100070_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100070_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:09.96 +01:07:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100087_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:33.00 -01:52:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100133_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100133_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:05.83 -05:08:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100175_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100175_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:13.75 -06:46:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100184_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100184_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:16:14.44 -01:51:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100185_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100185_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.45 +00:04:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100230_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100230_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:08.92 +00:29:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100272_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100272_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100375_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100375_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:15.01 -04:20:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100394_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100394_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:27.77 +02:04:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100416_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100416_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100513_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100513_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:50.70 -02:34:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100612_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100612_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:08.69 -00:29:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100616_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100616_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100618_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100618_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:51.10 -06:30:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100620_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100620_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:52.61 -03:49:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100644_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100644_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:35.56 -03:21:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100703_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 100703_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:06.99 -00:27:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93376_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 93376_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:58.01 +00:18:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96583_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 96583_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45197_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 45197_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:09.64 +02:23:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 68553_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:11.00 +02:02:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 17647_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.16 -03:22:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23983_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 23983_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69127_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 69127_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48892_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 48892_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08851_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 08851_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:36.20 -05:19:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95474_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 95474_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:22.48 +01:54:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31114_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 31114_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:25.55 -01:20:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65828_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 65828_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:04.02 -00:35:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61315_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 61315_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:43.99 +01:59:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28302_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 28302_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:46.64 -01:41:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32479_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 32479_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:56.51 -01:13:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 91552_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01483_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 01483_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:54.19 -06:48:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 57977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:48.61 -00:43:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 91004_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.16 -01:31:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 94566_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:08.01 -02:56:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59749_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 59749_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:03.84 +02:18:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 32439_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:52.74 -01:13:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09816_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 09816_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:18.16 -05:07:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 49176_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:51.22 +00:56:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 74906_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:06.43 +00:46:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97645_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 97645_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:15.66 +00:43:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
Preparing report for the candidate 30977_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10518_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 10518_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:11.89 -04:58:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 01681_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:41.93 -06:49:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11462_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 11462_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:06.28 -04:47:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 04039_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.55 -06:19:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50250_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015
The candidate 50250_fd_Ser-07-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-02-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0015 did not pass the final checks
