This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 10.84 17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2
19.30826 11.38415 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -0 1 11.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6255,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1255 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 11.51 17:49:55.21 -06:54:07.4
19.59032 10.34219 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra 0 -0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:49:55.21 -06:54:07.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:49:55.21 -06:54:07.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6255,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1255 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 13.65 18:01:54.60 -08:33:48.1
19.58192 6.93906 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.205 Martha 1 -1 2 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:54.60 -08:33:48.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:54.60 -08:33:48.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461228.6255,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260707.1255 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 11.38 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9
18.54968 -0.55440 galactic Sct Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 16719846
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 V 14.500 V 2452828.00000 197.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 16719846,2461228.6255,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 16719846 20260707.1255 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 12.70 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3
15.67462 6.15843 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J175658.55-121959.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.070 V 14.530 V
The object was found in astcheck.23530 1993 FV45 299 -308 429 16.6 0 0
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.70 is 3.9 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 16.6 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1255* 17 56 58.61 -12 19 57.3 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J175658.55-121959.2,2461228.6255,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J175658.55-121959.2 20260707.1255 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 12.32 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4
14.45658 9.11146 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" ASASSN-V J174402.21-115418.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.770 V 14.140 V 2458315.00000 476.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1255* 17 44 02.61 -11 54 13.4 12.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174402.21-115418.2,2461228.6255,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174402.21-115418.2 20260707.1255 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 07.1255 2461228.6255 13.04 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7
14.85511 8.50169 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J174700.56-115215.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 V 16.000 V 2457467.10000 166.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 07.1255* 17 47 00.46 -11 52 15.7 13.0 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174700.56-115215.1,2461228.6255,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174700.56-115215.1 20260707.1255 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461228.62583440 07.07.2026 03:01:02.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9862
Objects passed selection criteria: 9820
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7227
Average stars matched: 6981.75 (96.6065 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:07:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461228.62583440 07.07.2026 03:01:02.092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 129
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87529
Objects passed selection criteria: 87338
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 63850.2
Average stars matched: 60696.5 (95.0607 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1923532 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Jul 6 21:07:40 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-130-g0d8e31cd
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-06)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jul 6 22:10:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461228.62519368
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01075 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1qvCb42Gse
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8xy48nnEg3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rDWn5fBagi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gxaTrGtGyl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.720450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.720450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.96
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
4.0 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
4.1 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1qvCb42Gse (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, bad_region=0, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 9676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.691 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=230 n_q2=416 n_q3=133 n_q4=136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8xy48nnEg3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, bad_region=0, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 9672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.932 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=234 n_q2=413 n_q3=131 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.363
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rDWn5fBagi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=214, bad_region=0, passed=3999
Got 3999 stars (including 3785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=242 n_q2=382 n_q3=151 n_q4=139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gxaTrGtGyl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=216, bad_region=0, passed=4235
Got 4235 stars (including 4015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4235 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=240 n_q2=383 n_q3=152 n_q4=139 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.691 worst_q_ratio=1.180
ref2=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.684 worst_q_ratio=1.363
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.525 worst_q_ratio=1.269
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.471 worst_q_ratio=1.354
reference average sigma_overall=0.6875 worst_q_ratio=1.2715
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.62 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20858.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20792_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20792_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.67 -13:46:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20846_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20846_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:40.88 -13:46:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20858_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 20858_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20909_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20909_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:28.61 -14:43:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09283_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 09283_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:18.87 -06:51:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03793_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 03793_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:35.42 -13:36:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:45:42.91 -06:37:57.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:50.289 -09:58:49.45
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:47.803 -09:58:37.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01075 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mScZ52Y0DI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LHr2sxJbVN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SaUqIbtLJj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZGuMU1ciB2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.525300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.525300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
3.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
3.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mScZ52Y0DI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8119, bad_region=1, passed=98535
Got 98535 stars (including 90263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=245 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LHr2sxJbVN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=8187, bad_region=2, passed=98077
Got 98077 stars (including 89707 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.824 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=238 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SaUqIbtLJj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1367, bad_region=13, passed=30099
Got 30099 stars (including 28683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=239 n_q2=347 n_q3=176 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.368
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZGuMU1ciB2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1504, bad_region=8, passed=31868
Got 31868 stars (including 30313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=237 n_q2=350 n_q3=171 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-00-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-06_CI_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_220238_TTUQ1b1x1_1545127_iCU7gyCL/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:32.39 -13:04:30.6: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:49:55.21 -06:54:07.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:13:06.43 -05:11:45.1: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:29:51.74 -14:47:17.2: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:21.49 -14:30:56.2: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:55:28.62 -05:26:03.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:49:55.21 -06:54:07.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:13:06.43 -05:11:45.1: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:29:51.74 -14:47:17.2: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:32.39 -13:04:30.6: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:06.43 -05:11:45.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3851 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:51.74 -14:47:17.2: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9988 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:32.39 -13:04:30.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5105 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:33.27 -07:50:04.5: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:21.49 -14:30:56.2: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:21.49 -14:30:56.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9190 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:55:28.62 -05:26:03.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:28.62 -05:26:03.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6585 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:33.27 -07:50:04.5: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:33.27 -07:50:04.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8995 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:54.60 -08:33:48.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.09 -06:50:45.9: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:54.60 -08:33:48.1: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.09 -06:50:45.9: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.09 -06:50:45.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6132 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:26:46.42 -13:01:48.9: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3783 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:56:58.61 -12:19:57.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6995 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:44:02.61 -11:54:13.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3211 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:47:00.46 -11:52:15.7: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0364 delta=1.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32740.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43447.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48384.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49025.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119336_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119336_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119340_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119340_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:29.92 -14:04:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119350_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119350_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119360_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119360_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:02.29 -14:10:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119361_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119361_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119476_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119476_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:42.92 -06:37:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119568_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119568_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:10.40 -08:11:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119581_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 119581_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119716_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119716_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.25 -07:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119783_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119783_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:32.89 -10:00:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119959_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 119959_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:42.86 -11:13:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120032_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120032_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120149_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120149_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:28.94 -08:04:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120238_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120238_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:53.13 -05:54:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120290_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120290_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:15.32 -14:33:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:05.82 -05:08:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120316_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120316_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120330_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120330_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:12.12 -12:41:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120339_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120339_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:55.03 -05:22:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120360_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120360_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:02.76 -13:30:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120399_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120399_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.97 -13:12:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120412_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120412_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:34.50 -06:50:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120437_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120437_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:34.31 -13:17:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120458_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120458_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:28.66 -08:34:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120465_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120465_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:06.29 -09:14:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120474_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120474_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:11.86 -15:04:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120504_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120504_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:01.74 -13:26:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120508_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120508_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:58.07 -07:14:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120543_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120543_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:41.95 -12:21:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120545_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120545_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:21.49 -05:27:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120566_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120566_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:29.13 -12:10:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120578_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120578_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:48.82 -10:20:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120625_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120625_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:34.93 -10:30:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120644_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120644_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:30.71 -11:31:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120645_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120645_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:43.47 -14:06:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120648_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120648_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:36.23 -05:19:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120670_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120670_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:42.05 -13:24:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120674_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120674_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:15.41 -07:53:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120707_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:47.23 -11:38:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120721_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 120721_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120723_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120723_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:47.81 -11:37:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120728_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120728_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:22.12 -11:45:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120733_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120733_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120741_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 120741_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:07.74 -07:42:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97234_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 97234_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:14.57 -06:47:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109310_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 109310_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:27.94 -09:53:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113775_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 113775_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:55.75 -08:38:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30796_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 30796_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:31.63 -13:16:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46663_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 46663_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:19.93 -12:04:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 09829_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:55.11 -14:32:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44760_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 44760_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:39.41 -12:12:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110152_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 110152_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:03.22 -09:27:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60756_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 60756_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:08.24 -10:42:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:49.53 -06:33:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60138_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 60138_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:09.55 -10:37:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89790_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 89790_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:22.97 -08:02:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33337_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 33337_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:36.02 -13:06:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42227_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 42227_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:01.14 -12:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67379_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 67379_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:08.03 -09:53:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94827_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94827_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:54.21 -06:48:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92996_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92996_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:18.89 -06:51:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96927_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 96927_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:20.63 -08:29:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94241_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94241_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:30.48 -06:51:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10881_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 10881_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:06.39 -14:27:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 49712_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:44.02 -11:47:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96216_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 96216_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:41.89 -06:49:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36595_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 36595_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:14.07 -12:50:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33513_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 33513_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:08.67 -13:04:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 52678_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:04.63 -11:30:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65467_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 65467_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:38.66 -10:08:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64038_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 64038_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:52.79 -10:19:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39436_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 39436_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:03.69 -12:37:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113070_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 113070_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:11.96 -04:58:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31511_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 31511_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:47.56 -13:11:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32740_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 32740_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06001_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 06001_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:52.64 -14:53:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:05.11 -08:12:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43447_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 43447_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108885_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 108885_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:16.00 -06:51:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86124_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 86124_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:29.28 -07:02:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 55019_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:05.39 -11:17:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54730_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 54730_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:24.01 -11:19:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59308_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 59308_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:20.58 -10:48:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85410_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 85410_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:21.94 -06:27:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25166_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 25166_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:08.54 -13:39:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66379_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 66379_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:52.03 -10:02:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34433_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 34433_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:54.84 -13:02:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69000_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 69000_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:50.18 -09:41:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22034_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 22034_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:18.49 -13:50:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111543_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 111543_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:35.32 -13:42:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95964_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 95964_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:24.33 -07:19:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 10302_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:59.77 -14:38:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 21982_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:49.29 -13:52:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47547_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 47547_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:36.86 -11:59:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43992_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 43992_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:43.57 -12:13:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73596_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 73596_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:06.66 -09:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81103_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 81103_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:14.93 -07:27:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48384_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 48384_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49025_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 49025_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06128_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 06128_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:36.39 -14:52:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43048_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 43048_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:43.98 -12:20:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61044_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 61044_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:59.68 -10:40:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95091_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 95091_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:52.57 -08:22:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49155_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 49155_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:06.41 -11:51:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69964_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 69964_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:43.16 -09:33:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94511_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94511_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:07.73 -08:39:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 08084_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:28.62 -14:43:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25242_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 25242_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:35.41 -13:36:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92675_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92675_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:46.48 -06:19:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17681_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 17681_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.47 -14:05:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 31203_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.74 -13:13:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36306_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 36306_fd_Oph-06-Q1b1x1_2026-07-06_22-01-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
