This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 06 39.08 +20 37 06.9 6.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9311,6.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4311 6.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 06 04.90 +20 41 55.0 7.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9311,6.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4311 6.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 10.15 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7
171.70966 -23.19830 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" AK Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 V 15.000 : V 2454827.00000 241.000000000000 M1-M5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 02 39.41 +21 03 58.7 10.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AK Tau,2461225.9311,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AK Tau 20260704.4311 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 06 39.07 +20 37 06.8 6.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9311,6.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4311 6.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 06 04.90 +20 41 54.9 6.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9311,6.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4311 6.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 10.90 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0
166.62165 -21.53799 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" SX Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V 16.600 V 2454736.00000 225.000000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 53 04.29 +25 32 39.0 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SX Tau,2461225.9311,10.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SX Tau 20260704.4311 10.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.94 03:43:05.35 +24:01:50.7
165.90768 -24.18191 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.63 Ausonia 0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:05.35 +24:01:50.7: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:05.35 +24:01:50.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 43 05.35 +24 01 50.7 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.9311,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.4311 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 10.27 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7
170.52870 -22.30738 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J040207+2228.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.150 V Y 0.240 V 2452769.60000 47.126044000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 02 06.88 +22 28 03.7 10.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J040207+2228.0,2461225.9311,10.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J040207+2228.0 20260704.4311 10.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.18 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7
165.93396 -31.35072 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CI Ari
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 13.600 V 2451437.75500 0.455285000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 23 05.50 +18 34 43.7 12.2 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CI Ari,2461225.9311,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CI Ari 20260704.4311 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 9.41 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0
168.56689 -22.89665 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 1406
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.300 V 11.100 V 2452796.90000 65.885553000000 M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 54 43.11 +23 19 11.0 9.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 1406,2461225.9311,9.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 1406 20260704.4311 9.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 11.79 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1
164.54297 -25.09228 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" AF Tau
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.800 pg 15.400 pg 2425150.00000 240.000000000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 36 22.20 +24 09 27.1 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AF Tau,2461225.9311,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AF Tau 20260704.4311 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.35 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8
169.81235 -20.04330 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0407065+243157
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.607 R1 Y 0.420 R1 604.603630000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 07 06.46 +24 31 55.8 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0407065+243157,2461225.9311,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0407065+243157 20260704.4311 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.06 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0
170.50156 -28.56131 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 307-0000152
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
6.630 J Y 0.193 r 72.624365560000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 43 21.13 +18 01 21.0 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 307-0000152,2461225.9311,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 307-0000152 20260704.4311 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 10.30 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5
174.13861 -24.85225 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J040404+1819.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.560 V Y 0.690 V 2452970.90000 110.521662000000 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 04 04 04.25 +18 19 09.5 10.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J040404+1819.2,2461225.9311,10.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J040404+1819.2 20260704.4311 10.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.10 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5
164.90940 -26.24026 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" TSVSC1 TN-N331132323-15-82-2
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.830 R 31.233000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 34 13.48 +23 04 07.5 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TSVSC1 TN-N331132323-15-82-2,2461225.9311,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TSVSC1 TN-N331132323-15-82-2 20260704.4311 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.4311 2461225.9311 12.04 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6
171.86143 -26.80488 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 308-0000441
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
7.610 J Y 0.004 r 0.100077670000
The object was found in astcheck.1236 Thais 408 -131 429 16.3 -0 0
ATTENTION: measured mag 12.04 is 4.3 mag brighter than the predicted asteroid brightness 16.3 - the transient may be an unrelated new object!
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 07 04.4311* 03 52 08.96 +18 26 11.6 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 308-0000441,2461225.9311,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 308-0000441 20260704.4311 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461225.93136356 04.07.2026 10:20:59.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10781
Objects passed selection criteria: 10721
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6999.5
Average stars matched: 6829 (97.5641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 05:23:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
First image: 2461049.67777097 09.01.2026 04:15:49.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Last image: 2461225.93136356 04.07.2026 10:20:59.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 216
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65764
Objects passed selection criteria: 65543
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42860
Average stars matched: 41270.5 (96.2914 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 05:25:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461225.93089270
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0210 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qcBzadsJAk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.leN3RHTzAq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f4EPVONMwf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iR5yqqJOQR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.940200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.940200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5358 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6722 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5358 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 6126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4792 out of 5149 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5149 out of 11324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.5180 to +27.2932 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.5180 to 27.2932 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4773 out of 5143 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5143 out of 11315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
3.2 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qcBzadsJAk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=882, bad_region=0, passed=11324
Got 11324 stars (including 10422 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=293 n_q2=264 n_q3=174 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.leN3RHTzAq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=893, bad_region=0, passed=11315
Got 11315 stars (including 10408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=295 n_q2=262 n_q3=172 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f4EPVONMwf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=146, bad_region=0, passed=2784
Got 2784 stars (including 2636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2784 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=231 n_q2=154 n_q3=266 n_q4=311 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iR5yqqJOQR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=154, bad_region=0, passed=2716
Got 2716 stars (including 2554 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=231 n_q2=156 n_q3=265 n_q4=311 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.318
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.260
ref2=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.278
new1=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new2=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.318
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.269
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:34.18 +16:52:43.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:42.98 +17:11:34.2: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:22.50 +17:09:42.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:34.18 +16:52:43.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:34.18 +16:52:43.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.7: 9.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.3: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:42.98 +17:11:34.2: 9.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:42.98 +17:11:34.2: ref_mag=9.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6884 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.7: 9.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:04.52 +17:10:33.7: ref_mag=9.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8011 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.3: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: ref_mag=9.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0146 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.3: ref_mag=9.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8466 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:43.15 +16:38:56.0: 10.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:45.56 +16:40:35.4: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:07.47 +16:50:39.3: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:43.15 +16:38:56.0: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:43.15 +16:38:56.0: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2820 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:45.56 +16:40:35.4: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:45.56 +16:40:35.4: ref_mag=11.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2810 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:07.47 +16:50:39.3: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:07.47 +16:50:39.3: ref_mag=10.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5301 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1534 delta=1.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20650.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07061.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20576_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 20576_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20577_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.33 +17:20:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 20579_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20580_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.43 +17:16:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20581_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:42.69 +18:25:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20585_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.33 +16:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20587_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:49.57 +17:17:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20590_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:07.21 +19:33:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20592_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:38.09 +17:50:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20594_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:44.35 +17:39:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20595_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.82 +18:28:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20596_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:39.56 +17:14:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20601_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20601_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20602_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:14.86 +17:22:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20603_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:44.93 +19:18:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20605_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20607_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:33.16 +17:29:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20608_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:43.94 +18:19:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20610_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20614_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20614_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20616_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:19.75 +17:40:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20620_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20620_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:08.09 +18:38:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20621_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:21.88 +17:36:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20622_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:05.41 +18:06:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20625_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20626_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20626_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:18.56 +17:51:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20627_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20630_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20633_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:13.07 +18:22:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20634_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20634_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:09.52 +18:07:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20639_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:41.91 +17:34:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20645_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:01.69 +17:49:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20646_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:45.25 +17:26:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20650_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20650_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:45.56 +16:40:35.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.542 46280063617996416 060.69029847540 +16.67595223917 9.9920 8.4997 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.542#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:54.07 +17:13:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20656_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20656_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:41.69 +17:58:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20658_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.19 +19:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20665_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20667_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:43.21 +18:38:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20671_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:27.26 +18:06:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 07061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0210 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:41:33.240 +21:59:53.22
Second-epoch image center 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:41:31.686 +21:58:40.66
Second-epoch second image center 03:41:32.280 +21:58:42.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52PHkFcIZy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YcNAYaWfbs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ORaHpLO5sn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kii9UoC6Eg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits and wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71179 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4784 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6568 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4784 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 6152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4364 out of 5199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5199 out of 71179 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 71492 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec +16.4684 to +27.2933 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 46.6517 to 64.2527 deg, Dec 16.4684 to 27.2933 deg
Loaded 6156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4369 out of 5198 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5198 out of 71492 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 198 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.52PHkFcIZy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4312, bad_region=7, passed=71155
Got 71155 stars (including 66715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=283 n_q2=261 n_q3=189 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YcNAYaWfbs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4374, bad_region=8, passed=71475
Got 71475 stars (including 66975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=278 n_q2=265 n_q3=185 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits -region wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ORaHpLO5sn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=553, bad_region=1, passed=15267
Got 15267 stars (including 14694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=228 n_q2=152 n_q3=272 n_q4=310 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kii9UoC6Eg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=413, bad_region=1, passed=14753
Got 14753 stars (including 14317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=229 n_q2=154 n_q3=275 n_q4=304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0418.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_052138_TTUQ1b1x1_4127626_OSlZ8INN/wcs_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:10:03.01 +18:14:58.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:34.17 +16:52:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:10:03.01 +18:14:58.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:03.01 +18:14:58.7: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2611 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:22.49 +17:09:42.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:34.17 +16:52:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:34.17 +16:52:43.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:42.99 +17:11:34.2: 9.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:22.49 +17:09:42.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:22.49 +17:09:42.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:37.35 +16:37:38.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.7: 9.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:42.99 +17:11:34.2: 9.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:42.99 +17:11:34.2: ref_mag=9.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6592 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.2: 9.62 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.7: 9.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:04.53 +17:10:33.7: ref_mag=9.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7708 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: 9.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:22.42 +17:16:26.0: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:47:56.37 +18:40:11.1: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.2: 9.63 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:34.89 +16:46:17.2: ref_mag=9.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7969 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:01.28 +17:03:09.0: ref_mag=9.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0031 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:22.42 +17:16:26.0: 9.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:22.42 +17:16:26.0: ref_mag=9.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0493 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:47:56.37 +18:40:11.1: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:47:56.37 +18:40:11.1: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2646 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:45.55 +16:40:35.4: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:43.16 +16:38:56.0: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2901 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:07.48 +16:50:39.3: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:45.55 +16:40:35.4: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:45.55 +16:40:35.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.2775 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:01:07.92 +16:41:18.8: 10.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:07.48 +16:50:39.3: 10.38 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:07.48 +16:50:39.3: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5204 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:53:04.29 +25:32:39.0: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9014 delta=1.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:01:07.92 +16:41:18.8: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:07.92 +16:41:18.8: ref_mag=10.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8088 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:19.95 +16:37:30.8: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:19.95 +16:37:30.8: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.98 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:19.95 +16:37:30.8: ref_mag=10.98 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9576 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:53.26 +17:13:22.3: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:16.29 +17:07:11.0: 10.84 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:21.02 +16:53:22.2: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:53.26 +17:13:22.3: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:16.29 +17:07:11.0: 10.87 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.85 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:53.26 +17:13:22.3: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9715 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:16.29 +17:07:11.0: ref_mag=10.85 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9464 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:21.02 +16:53:22.2: 10.89 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:21.02 +16:53:22.2: ref_mag=10.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1019 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:54.17 +16:39:23.6: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:47.28 +16:47:27.3: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:54.17 +16:39:23.6: 11.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:54.17 +16:39:23.6: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1989 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:47.28 +16:47:27.3: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:49.14 +17:09:56.0: 11.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:47.28 +16:47:27.3: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2576 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:34.65 +17:10:04.1: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:11.31 +16:52:21.7: 11.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:34.65 +17:10:04.1: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:49.14 +17:09:56.0: 11.10 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:34.65 +17:10:04.1: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3378 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:49.14 +17:09:56.0: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3394 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:24.17 +17:07:31.6: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:11.31 +16:52:21.7: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:11.31 +16:52:21.7: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3498 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:14.04 +16:58:59.4: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:28.62 +16:52:03.8: 11.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:24.17 +17:07:31.6: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:24.17 +17:07:31.6: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4696 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.1: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:25.01 +17:24:27.0: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:14.04 +16:58:59.4: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:14.04 +16:58:59.4: ref_mag=11.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5453 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:28.62 +16:52:03.8: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:28.62 +16:52:03.8: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5245 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.1: 11.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:56.49 +16:48:09.1: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4050 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:35.13 +17:01:10.0: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:01.68 +16:51:19.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:25.01 +17:24:27.0: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:25.01 +17:24:27.0: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6714 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:20:20.12 +24:31:49.1: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:01.68 +16:51:19.3: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:35.13 +17:01:10.0: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:01.68 +16:51:19.3: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7529 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.43 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:35.13 +17:01:10.0: ref_mag=11.43 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6004 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:46.19 +17:07:55.6: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:14.35 +16:37:17.7: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:29.89 +17:05:53.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:14.58 +16:53:11.2: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:20:20.12 +24:31:49.1: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:20:20.12 +24:31:49.1: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2399 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:15.0: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:46.19 +17:07:55.6: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:46.19 +17:07:55.6: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7239 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:06:25.29 +16:43:17.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:14.35 +16:37:17.7: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:14.35 +16:37:17.7: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8003 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:29.89 +17:05:53.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:29.89 +17:05:53.1: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7189 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:14.58 +16:53:11.2: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:14.58 +16:53:11.2: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6566 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:09:43.68 +17:03:08.7: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:15.0: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:17.18 +16:38:15.0: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7090 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:06:25.29 +16:43:17.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:25.29 +16:43:17.5: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8774 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:54.60 +16:52:08.3: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:09:43.68 +17:03:08.7: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:43.68 +17:03:08.7: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7587 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:54.60 +16:52:08.3: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:43.98 +17:00:01.9: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:54.60 +16:52:08.3: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7807 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:34.67 +16:57:23.7: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:58.38 +16:45:00.5: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:43.98 +17:00:01.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:43.98 +17:00:01.9: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8727 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:48:54.49 +23:50:00.4: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:34.67 +16:57:23.7: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:34.67 +16:57:23.7: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9835 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:05:21.60 +16:49:24.8: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:55.57 +17:02:24.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:55.63 +16:45:33.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:58.38 +16:45:00.5: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:58.38 +16:45:00.5: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0374 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:48:54.49 +23:50:00.4: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:54.49 +23:50:00.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2640 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:03:08.22 +16:55:26.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:55.57 +17:02:24.7: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:05:21.60 +16:49:24.8: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:55.57 +17:02:24.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1270 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:55.63 +16:45:33.1: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:21.60 +16:49:24.8: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0717 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:55.63 +16:45:33.1: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1739 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:08:25.27 +16:55:52.6: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:31:40.67 +18:47:37.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:03:08.22 +16:55:26.7: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:08.22 +16:55:26.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2161 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:08:25.27 +16:55:52.6: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:25.27 +16:55:52.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0736 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:31:40.67 +18:47:37.4: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:31:40.67 +18:47:37.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5150 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:16.02 +17:02:02.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:05.35 +24:01:50.7: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:16.02 +17:02:02.3: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:16.02 +17:02:02.3: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4416 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:05.35 +24:01:50.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7: 11.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:02:06.88 +22:28:03.7: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2670 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:23:05.50 +18:34:43.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1614 delta=1.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:54:43.11 +23:19:11.0: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4146 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:36:22.20 +24:09:27.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7895 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:07:06.46 +24:31:55.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3191 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:43:21.13 +18:01:21.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0616 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:04.25 +18:19:09.5: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3028 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5: 13.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:34:13.48 +23:04:07.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0913 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-15-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0145.fits at 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-16-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0146.fits at 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:52:08.96 +18:26:11.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0290 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out86991.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out87003.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35781.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54822.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55322.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57655.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87026.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86917_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86917_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 86918_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86920_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:59.34 +17:20:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 86921_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86922_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:31.42 +17:16:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:42.68 +18:25:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86927_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86927_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.33 +16:38:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86929_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:49.58 +17:17:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86932_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:07.19 +19:33:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86935_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:38.06 +17:50:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86936_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:22.62 +18:54:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86937_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:44.35 +17:39:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86938_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:39.55 +17:14:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86939_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.81 +18:28:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86944_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86946_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:44.93 +19:18:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86947_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:14.86 +17:22:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86948_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86948_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:44.14 +18:44:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86951_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86952_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86952_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:39.95 +17:56:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86953_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:33.13 +17:29:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86955_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:43.94 +18:19:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86956_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86959_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86959_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86961_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:19.76 +17:40:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86965_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86965_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:08.09 +18:38:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86968_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:21.89 +17:36:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86969_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86969_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86970_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:05.41 +18:06:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86972_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86972_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86974_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86974_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:18.56 +17:51:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86975_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86975_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:34.00 +19:51:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86977_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86978_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:51.94 +18:14:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86979_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:13.24 +18:06:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86983_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86988_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86988_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86989_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:13.08 +18:22:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86990_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:09.52 +18:07:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86991_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:56.37 +18:40:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.392 44749096755188992 056.98449291908 +18.66988576007 9.7255 8.2723 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.392#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86993_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:41.92 +17:34:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 86999_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:01.69 +17:49:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87001_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87002_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:45.25 +17:26:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87003_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:45.55 +16:40:35.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.635 46280063617996416 060.69029847540 +16.67595223917 9.9920 8.4997 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.635#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87005_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87005_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:54.05 +17:13:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87007_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:41.70 +17:58:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87009_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87009_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.20 +19:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87018_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87022_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:43.21 +18:38:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87023_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87026_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87026_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87027_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87027_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:27.27 +18:06:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87029_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87029_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:36.41 +17:16:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87034_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87035_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87035_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:36.53 +17:27:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87036_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:01.31 +18:44:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87041_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:40.09 +17:26:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87043_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87043_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:41.72 +17:45:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87047_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87047_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.57 +17:29:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87049_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87052_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87052_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87055_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:40.68 +18:26:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87057_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:13.26 +18:43:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87058_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87058_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:59.61 +17:15:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87059_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87061_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87065_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87069_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:50.47 +18:06:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87070_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:37.02 +18:08:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87072_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87076_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:02.52 +18:51:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87078_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:13.07 +17:49:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87080_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:04.12 +18:04:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87081_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:50.93 +18:33:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87086_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87087_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:28.41 +18:12:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87088_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87091_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87091_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87092_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:00.87 +18:21:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87094_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:52.78 +17:44:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87095_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87096_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:21.60 +18:23:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87102_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:38.30 +17:13:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87103_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:51.36 +17:47:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87105_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:09.82 +17:37:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87107_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87113_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87114_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87115_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:21.57 +18:24:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87117_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:11.51 +17:25:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87118_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87118_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:19.24 +18:27:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87119_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87120_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:25.74 +20:01:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87121_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87121_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:53.06 +18:11:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87124_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:08.92 +17:21:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87125_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87126_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87126_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:54.05 +17:50:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87127_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:47.48 +18:20:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87130_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87130_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:17.62 +17:46:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87131_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87131_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:16.58 +18:38:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87132_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:16.27 +17:15:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87133_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87134_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87135_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87139_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87142_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87142_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:23.90 +17:36:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87143_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:19.88 +18:15:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87145_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:59.90 +17:58:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87150_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87157_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87166_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87166_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:17.81 +18:26:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87169_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87170_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87170_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87171_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:00.16 +18:49:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87172_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87172_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:28.70 +18:48:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87173_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87175_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87175_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:19.11 +17:22:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87178_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87179_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:04.09 +18:16:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87182_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87182_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87184_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87185_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87187_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87189_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87190_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:32.81 +17:18:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87193_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87195_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87195_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:22.70 +18:23:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87196_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87201_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87203_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:11.34 +18:21:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87216_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87216_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:45.29 +19:06:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87218_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:03.97 +17:16:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87221_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87221_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:45.06 +18:25:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87223_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87223_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87229_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87229_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:43.92 +18:22:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87238_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:23.04 +19:18:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87245_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:09.78 +17:58:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87252_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87255_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87255_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:15.33 +18:53:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87257_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87257_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:30.11 +18:02:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87258_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87260_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87260_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:29.74 +19:06:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87262_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87269_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87269_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87277_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87277_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:07.59 +17:43:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87280_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87280_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:57.38 +18:12:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87281_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87285_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87285_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87287_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87289_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87289_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:21.16 +18:55:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87299_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87299_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87310_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:39.31 +17:53:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87316_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87316_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87317_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87317_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:34.44 +19:20:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87318_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87325_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:11.24 +17:53:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87328_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:07.51 +24:00:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87331_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:52.58 +18:03:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87337_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87337_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87355_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87357_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87357_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87360_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87368_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87368_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87383_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87384_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87384_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 87387_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87392_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 87392_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 37504_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:41.66 +22:04:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 20315_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:12.47 +24:27:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 24042_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:09.63 +24:03:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 21365_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:49.56 +24:21:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 24998_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:19.53 +23:56:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 23745_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:52.49 +24:06:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 35781_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 55322_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28536_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 28536_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 11236_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.79 +25:42:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 29854_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 24649_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 65569_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:58.94 +19:38:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 45202_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:39.41 +21:03:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 20109_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 57655_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 54397_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 63847_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:48.28 +19:41:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 32790_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29232_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 29232_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:20.72 +23:25:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 63619_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:47.40 +19:39:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 63923_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:18.92 +19:42:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22731_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 22731_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:29.01 +24:06:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 23889_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:11.10 +24:08:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 35654_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:52.01 +22:28:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54822_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
Preparing report for the candidate 54822_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 64764_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:10.09 +19:36:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419
The candidate 22846_fd_Tau-02-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_05-20-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0419 did not pass the final checks
