This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.3523 2461225.8523 9.46 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1
40.90279 -22.80909 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 0 9.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.8523,9.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.3523 9.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.3523 2461225.8523 12.26 20:12:07.85 -03:39:12.7
39.03850 -19.59405 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina 2 -1 2 12.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:12:07.85 -03:39:12.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:12:07.85 -03:39:12.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.8523,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.3523 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.3523 2461225.8523 13.20 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1
39.88850 -21.69661 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea 0 -2 2 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1: 15.35 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.8523,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.3523 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.3523 2461225.8523 13.48 20:30:07.96 -01:03:24.9
43.76765 -22.32582 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.365 Corduba 2 -1 3 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:07.96 -01:03:24.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:07.96 -01:03:24.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461225.8523,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260704.3523 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 07 04.3523 2461225.8523 10.10 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5
39.13139 -26.86623 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0838 Aql
Type: M:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 pg < 13.000 pg 2427281.00000 336.000000000000 M5/6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0838 Aql,2461225.8523,10.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0838 Aql 20260704.3523 10.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461225.85252647 04.07.2026 08:27:28.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13119
Objects passed selection criteria: 13080
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9391
Average stars matched: 9190.5 (97.865 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 03:51:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461225.85252647 04.07.2026 08:27:28.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 85
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90973
Objects passed selection criteria: 90741
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 66160.5
Average stars matched: 63302.2 (95.6798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1924284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Jul 3 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-123-g57107621
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-07-03)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jul 4 03:55:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461225.85206718
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00224 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qJFGsBUFyw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eyMgZirtea
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eMXOjyBy11
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sWeW71mPyv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8626 out of 9004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9004 out of 13571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
3.3 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qJFGsBUFyw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=818, bad_region=0, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 12869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.622 n_q1=232 n_q2=229 n_q3=238 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eyMgZirtea (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, bad_region=0, passed=13571
Got 13571 stars (including 12699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.669 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.648 n_q1=240 n_q2=236 n_q3=228 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eMXOjyBy11 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=0, passed=5253
Got 5253 stars (including 4963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5253 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=210 n_q2=229 n_q3=267 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sWeW71mPyv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, bad_region=0, passed=5293
Got 5293 stars (including 5003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=205 n_q2=233 n_q3=272 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.523 worst_q_ratio=1.190
ref2=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.560 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.285
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.346
reference average sigma_overall=0.5415 worst_q_ratio=1.192
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20602.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 20602_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20628_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20628_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.68 +00:56:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20659_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20659_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.52 +00:50:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20702_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20702_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:51.93 -01:49:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20746_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20746_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.82 +01:19:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20754_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20754_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.61 -03:51:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.81 -00:54:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03686_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 03686_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.82 -04:25:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01501_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 01501_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:13.60 -06:08:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07121_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 07121_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:00:54.54 -01:31:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.589 -01:59:55.35
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:18.028 -02:00:00.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00224 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M0o9F5tnmy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fq7q5EvuoV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gfaaoIcBly
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lucZ0nMPJp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.554400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.554400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.95
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 97761 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to +3.2801 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7068 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2705 to 3.2801 deg
Loaded 10864 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8293 out of 9764 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9764 out of 97761 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 100598 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to +3.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7069 to 316.4680 deg, Dec -7.2721 to 3.2767 deg
Loaded 10863 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8253 out of 9762 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9762 out of 100598 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
3.1 pix fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
15.0 mag. Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M0o9F5tnmy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=7505, bad_region=0, passed=97733
Got 97733 stars (including 90106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.606 n_q1=236 n_q2=220 n_q3=241 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fq7q5EvuoV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=7692, bad_region=3, passed=100565
Got 100565 stars (including 92746 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.679 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.667 n_q1=234 n_q2=222 n_q3=237 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gfaaoIcBly (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1221, bad_region=1, passed=34313
Got 34313 stars (including 33041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34313 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=191 n_q2=225 n_q3=277 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lucZ0nMPJp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1268, bad_region=1, passed=34243
Got 34243 stars (including 32913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=193 n_q2=225 n_q3=276 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-26-48_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-07-04_CI_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_034116_TTUQ1b1x1_4008644_qN0Fi5X6/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:52.78 -04:12:03.5: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:20.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:02:47.86 -05:12:33.2: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:20:50.35 -06:29:26.1: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:05:27.51 -06:34:09.8: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:02:55.52 -04:28:46.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:51.79 -03:39:30.4: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:39.35 -04:59:24.5: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:05:23.41 -00:50:52.4: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:20.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:27.08 +01:56:20.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:52.78 -04:12:03.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:20:50.35 -06:29:26.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:02:55.52 -04:28:46.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:55.52 -04:28:46.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:52.78 -04:12:03.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9120 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:02:47.86 -05:12:33.2: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.35 -06:29:26.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5627 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:05:27.51 -06:34:09.8: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:47.86 -05:12:33.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9055 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:27.51 -06:34:09.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9230 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:27:21.51 -02:06:13.6: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:39.35 -04:59:24.5: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:51.79 -03:39:30.4: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:39.35 -04:59:24.5: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9823 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:51.79 -03:39:30.4: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9903 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:05:23.41 -00:50:52.4: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:23.41 -00:50:52.4: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1108 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:27:21.51 -02:06:13.6: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:21.51 -02:06:13.6: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2671 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:48:19.77 -04:37:38.7: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:12:07.85 -03:39:12.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:16:07.26 +00:31:50.8: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:49:53.96 +02:26:15.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:47:29.35 +01:50:39.5: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:23.68 -00:27:19.9: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:16:07.26 +00:31:50.8: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:07.26 +00:31:50.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3705 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:48:19.77 -04:37:38.7: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:19.77 -04:37:38.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3721 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:49:53.96 +02:26:15.4: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:12:07.85 -03:39:12.7: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:53.96 +02:26:15.4: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5864 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:32:14.52 +02:07:54.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:47:29.35 +01:50:39.5: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:23.68 -00:27:19.9: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:29.35 +01:50:39.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5868 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:23.68 -00:27:19.9: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5318 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:16:40.28 -01:34:08.1: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:27:53.41 -05:39:34.4: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:32:14.52 +02:07:54.4: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:14.52 +02:07:54.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5932 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:01:29.23 +02:06:54.4: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:16:40.28 -01:34:08.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:25:21.53 +01:46:00.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:19.05 +01:53:22.9: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:40.28 -01:34:08.1: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5403 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:36:41.54 -02:35:09.8: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:27:53.41 -05:39:34.4: 12.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.41 -05:39:34.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4110 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:56.45 +00:40:43.2: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:17:32.39 -02:03:37.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:01:29.23 +02:06:54.4: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:29.23 +02:06:54.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8488 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:19.05 +01:53:22.9: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:25:21.53 +01:46:00.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:19.05 +01:53:22.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8292 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:21.53 +01:46:00.2: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8217 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:36:41.54 -02:35:09.8: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:41.54 -02:35:09.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6236 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:56.45 +00:40:43.2: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:56.45 +00:40:43.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9033 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:17:32.39 -02:03:37.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:32.39 -02:03:37.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7415 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:11:12.48 -00:08:39.6: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:26:20.96 +02:56:38.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:21:31.92 +01:40:22.7: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:07.96 -01:03:24.9: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:11:12.48 -00:08:39.6: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:12.48 -00:08:39.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7281 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:26:20.96 +02:56:38.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:20.96 +02:56:38.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0565 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1: 15.35 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:21:04.64 -03:55:23.1: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=13.1959 delta=2.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:21:31.92 +01:40:22.7: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:31.92 +01:40:22.7: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1796 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:07.96 -01:03:24.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5: 11.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:22.2: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:02:11.10 -06:42:04.7: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:38.46 -06:48:33.5: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:45.7: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:38:15.30 -06:54:39.5: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1008 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:22.2: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:08.63 -06:42:22.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7903 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:11.15 -05:36:19.9: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:02:11.10 -06:42:04.7: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:11.10 -06:42:04.7: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0767 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:33.19 -06:06:01.4: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:38.46 -06:48:33.5: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:45.7: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:38.46 -06:48:33.5: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0013 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:42.43 -05:08:45.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8572 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:11.15 -05:36:19.9: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:11.15 -05:36:19.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9859 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:33.19 -06:06:01.4: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:33.19 -06:06:01.4: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2080 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:01.91 -06:48:10.8: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:35.19 -04:39:56.6: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:00.24 -04:14:40.3: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:41.34 -04:27:02.0: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:01.91 -06:48:10.8: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:01.91 -06:48:10.8: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4506 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:35.19 -04:39:56.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:35.19 -04:39:56.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4650 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:00.24 -04:14:40.3: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:41.34 -04:27:02.0: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:00.24 -04:14:40.3: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4907 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:41.34 -04:27:02.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1077 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:04:18.03 -05:57:12.0: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 21:03:36.07 -05:42:07.8: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:04:18.03 -05:57:12.0: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:18.03 -05:57:12.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2691 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 21:03:36.07 -05:42:07.8: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:36.07 -05:42:07.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4444 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119002.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119051.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117786_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117786_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117787_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117787_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117795_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117795_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117796_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117796_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:23.19 +01:38:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117823_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117823_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117829_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117829_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:46.67 -03:36:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:36.76 +03:11:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117917_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117943_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 117981_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118254_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118254_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118285_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118301_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118301_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118390_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118390_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118423_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 118423_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118430_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118430_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118464_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118464_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118478_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118478_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118491_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118491_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118518_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118518_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118544_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118544_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118574_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118574_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118575_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118575_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118590_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118590_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118596_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118597_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118597_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118603_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118603_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118623_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118623_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118650_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118650_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118657_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118657_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118667_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118667_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118714_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118714_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118721_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118721_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118728_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118728_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118772_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118772_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118774_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118774_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118791_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118791_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118793_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118793_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118854_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118854_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118890_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 118890_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119002_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 119002_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119051_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 119051_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119054_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 119054_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119056_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 119056_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.62 -03:51:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02102_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
Preparing report for the candidate 02102_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108197_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108197_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108215_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108215_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108200_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108200_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108192_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108192_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108191_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108191_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108190_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108190_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108171_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108170_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108170_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108166_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108166_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108136_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 108136_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.80 -00:54:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.69 +00:56:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:51.64 -02:42:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:13.60 -06:08:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 53466_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.30 -01:03:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21744_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 21744_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:38.82 -04:25:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45482_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 45482_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:50.84 -01:52:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.80 +01:19:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:09.27 +01:23:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 62693_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:45.55 +02:22:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.53 +00:50:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:51.93 -01:49:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08530_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 08530_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90930_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 90930_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:06.51 +00:22:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10617_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 10617_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56610_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 56610_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:46.28 +02:59:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 20695_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48168_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351
The candidate 48168_fd_Aql-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-04_03-27-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0351 did not pass the final checks