This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.4471 2461220.9471 10.27 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3
82.62310 14.79650 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in ASASSN-V 1" ASASSN-V J193056.73+503524.8
Type: SR
MeanMag 11.66 m Amp. 0.37 m Period 123.0 d
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461220.9471,10.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260629.4471 10.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.4471 2461220.9471 10.88 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9
81.20122 16.35974 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J191831+4958.3
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.095 V Y 0.930 V 81.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191831+4958.3,2461220.9471,10.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191831+4958.3 20260629.4471 10.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.4471 2461220.9471 11.87 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1
88.48545 13.99532 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CU Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.500 V 14.100 V 2437958.00000 213.600000000000 M6e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CU Cyg,2461220.9471,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CU Cyg 20260629.4471 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.4471 2461220.9471 11.18 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3
80.93876 16.29379 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GSC 03550-01716
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.950 R1 10.400 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GSC 03550-01716,2461220.9471,11.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GSC 03550-01716 20260629.4471 11.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.88072803 16.05.2026 09:08:04.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
First image: 2461176.88072803 16.05.2026 09:08:04.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Last image: 2461220.94735145 29.06.2026 10:44:01.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28546
Objects passed selection criteria: 28392
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18321.2
Average stars matched: 17833.2 (97.3364 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 28 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-114-g1509621d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 29 08:20:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.88072803 16.05.2026 09:08:04.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
First image: 2461176.88072803 16.05.2026 09:08:04.902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Last image: 2461220.94735145 29.06.2026 10:44:01.165 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 169664
Objects passed selection criteria: 169121
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 115470
Average stars matched: 110828 (95.9803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1928612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 28 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-114-g1509621d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 29 08:29:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461220.94675924
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10
Second-epoch image center 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10
Second-epoch image center 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90
Second-epoch second image center 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01070 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oXpiSKTRSs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.emXwU8YtOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2uSOpKZzVe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YX7Pf3u7Bf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30388 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4835 to 311.4057 deg, Dec +48.1337 to +59.2543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4835 to 311.4057 deg, Dec 48.1337 to 59.2543 deg
Loaded 18573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12739 out of 13915 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13915 out of 30388 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30388 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4835 to 311.4057 deg, Dec +48.1337 to +59.2543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4835 to 311.4057 deg, Dec 48.1337 to 59.2543 deg
Loaded 18573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12739 out of 13915 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13915 out of 30388 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4840 to 311.4075 deg, Dec +48.1509 to +59.2643 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4840 to 311.4075 deg, Dec 48.1509 to 59.2643 deg
Loaded 18561 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12720 out of 13888 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13888 out of 30267 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.4 pix Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
15.2 mag. Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.oXpiSKTRSs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2668, bad_region=0, passed=30388
Got 30388 stars (including 27686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.838 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.701 n_q1=222 n_q2=288 n_q3=183 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.emXwU8YtOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2696, bad_region=2, passed=30267
Got 30267 stars (including 27549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.822 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.631 n_q1=216 n_q2=292 n_q3=177 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2uSOpKZzVe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=363, bad_region=1, passed=6563
Got 6563 stars (including 6193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6563 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=299 n_q2=117 n_q3=307 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YX7Pf3u7Bf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, bad_region=0, passed=6487
Got 6487 stars (including 6119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=260 n_q2=121 n_q3=269 n_q4=311 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits sigma_overall=0.594 worst_q_ratio=1.411
ref2=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits sigma_overall=0.597 worst_q_ratio=1.375
new1=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.310
new2=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.299
reference average sigma_overall=0.5955 worst_q_ratio=1.393
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2650 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06421.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51729_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 51729_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:09.56 +54:14:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51730_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 51730_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:52.92 +51:11:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51755_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 51755_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:29.87 +48:16:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51805_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 51805_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:04.81 +56:00:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04896_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 04896_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:49.51 +50:12:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21144_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 21144_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:33.16 +54:56:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06421_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 06421_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30181_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 30181_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:29.93 +57:59:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01246_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 01246_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:10.67 +49:04:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:30:56.68 +50:35:24.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10
Second-epoch image center 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:45:52.177 +53:59:28.10
Second-epoch image center 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:45:55.025 +53:59:15.90
Second-epoch second image center 19:45:52.770 +53:58:42.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01070 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zOosWn7GWK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VDupQ7ZP7r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GScou4QM3P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lj6LGn5xIw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits and wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 184173 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4835 to 311.4219 deg, Dec +48.1338 to +59.2549 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4835 to 311.4219 deg, Dec 48.1338 to 59.2549 deg
Loaded 18583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10168 out of 14170 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14170 out of 184173 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.618800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.618800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 184173 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4835 to 311.4219 deg, Dec +48.1338 to +59.2549 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4835 to 311.4219 deg, Dec 48.1338 to 59.2549 deg
Loaded 18583 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10168 out of 14170 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14170 out of 184173 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 185999 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 281.4841 to 311.4231 deg, Dec +48.1509 to +59.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 281.4841 to 311.4231 deg, Dec 48.1509 to 59.2658 deg
Loaded 18569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10057 out of 14147 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14147 out of 185999 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zOosWn7GWK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=65, blended=25741, bad_region=4, passed=184108
Got 184108 stars (including 158152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 184108 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.627 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.930 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=224 n_q2=276 n_q3=187 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.483
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VDupQ7ZP7r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=94, blended=26341, bad_region=3, passed=185905
Got 185905 stars (including 159393 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 185905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.636 n_q1=223 n_q2=277 n_q3=188 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.468
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GScou4QM3P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1951, bad_region=2, passed=46889
Got 46889 stars (including 44860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46889 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=291 n_q2=118 n_q3=315 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lj6LGn5xIw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1986, bad_region=1, passed=47252
Got 47252 stars (including 45204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47252 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=249 n_q2=122 n_q3=279 n_q4=309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-43-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0052.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_054452_TTUQ1b1x1_565207_IMybx9q5/wcs_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:27:08.38 +51:39:02.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:38:08.29 +54:55:40.1: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:15:34.25 +48:32:34.3: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:35:08.86 +52:56:14.1: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:23:52.44 +50:51:58.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:38:48.97 +53:50:23.0: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:33:01.16 +55:45:39.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:22:24.46 +49:22:59.2: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:34:06.92 +57:17:49.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:23:00.09 +50:02:49.7: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:27:08.38 +51:39:02.5: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:08.38 +51:39:02.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2445 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:38:08.29 +54:55:40.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:08.29 +54:55:40.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4101 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:15:34.25 +48:32:34.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:34.25 +48:32:34.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1188 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:33:01.16 +55:45:39.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:35:08.86 +52:56:14.1: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:01.16 +55:45:39.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2813 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:22:24.46 +49:22:59.2: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:23:52.44 +50:51:58.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:08.86 +52:56:14.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2419 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:52.44 +50:51:58.1: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1599 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:24.46 +49:22:59.2: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5812 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:38:48.97 +53:50:23.0: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:48.97 +53:50:23.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5753 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:34:06.92 +57:17:49.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:06.92 +57:17:49.5: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7029 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:23:00.09 +50:02:49.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:00.09 +50:02:49.7: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0744 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:32:31.85 +51:14:41.1: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:19:21.44 +48:32:38.0: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:29:53.80 +49:07:17.3: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:25:38.01 +52:37:54.2: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:08:13.17 +48:54:12.8: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:19:21.44 +48:32:38.0: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:21.44 +48:32:38.0: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6527 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:36:30.03 +55:56:37.5: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:40:51.22 +54:59:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:32:31.85 +51:14:41.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:29:53.80 +49:07:17.3: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:31.85 +51:14:41.1: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8621 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:53.80 +49:07:17.3: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6566 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:08:13.17 +48:54:12.8: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:25:38.01 +52:37:54.2: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:13.17 +48:54:12.8: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5078 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:39:59.22 +55:15:43.6: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:38.01 +52:37:54.2: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5596 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:26:21.85 +49:03:28.5: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:40:51.22 +54:59:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:51.22 +54:59:54.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:36:30.03 +55:56:37.5: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:30.03 +55:56:37.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5365 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:39:59.22 +55:15:43.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:59.22 +55:15:43.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7113 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:26:21.85 +49:03:28.5: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:21.85 +49:03:28.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9999 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:32:26.59 +51:46:03.5: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:40:26.62 +55:05:50.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:24:34.79 +48:42:27.4: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:27:39.30 +51:13:26.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:32:26.59 +51:46:03.5: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:26.59 +51:46:03.5: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1113 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:40:26.62 +55:05:50.0: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:26.62 +55:05:50.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8879 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:46:28.21 +50:01:51.5: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:25:28.87 +48:19:08.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:37:43.53 +55:22:09.4: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:30:13.16 +49:03:44.2: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:29:45.70 +50:57:47.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:24:34.79 +48:42:27.4: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:34.79 +48:42:27.4: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2525 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:27:39.30 +51:13:26.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:39.30 +51:13:26.8: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1784 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:25:28.87 +48:19:08.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:28.87 +48:19:08.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:46:28.21 +50:01:51.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:28.21 +50:01:51.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9712 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:37:43.53 +55:22:09.4: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:43.53 +55:22:09.4: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0877 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:29:45.70 +50:57:47.9: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:45.70 +50:57:47.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4346 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:30:13.16 +49:03:44.2: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:13.16 +49:03:44.2: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4534 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:11:56.26 +48:33:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:36:04.89 +53:48:28.2: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:08:50.30 +48:53:51.0: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:11:56.26 +48:33:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:56.26 +48:33:20.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:36:04.89 +53:48:28.2: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:08:50.30 +48:53:51.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:04.89 +53:48:28.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4901 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:50.30 +48:53:51.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5143 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:17:57.12 +54:02:50.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:36:18.61 +50:15:03.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:59:49.86 +52:07:15.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:19:15.52 +50:54:31.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:24:44.84 +50:15:45.3: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:17:57.12 +54:02:50.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:57.12 +54:02:50.1: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4409 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:01:58.94 +50:34:00.9: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:36:18.61 +50:15:03.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:18.61 +50:15:03.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2669 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:20:28.72 +50:21:38.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:59:49.86 +52:07:15.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:19:15.52 +50:54:31.0: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:49.86 +52:07:15.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4776 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:15.52 +50:54:31.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7878 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:24:44.84 +50:15:45.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:44.84 +50:15:45.3: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4089 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:26:59.66 +50:14:39.9: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:01:58.94 +50:34:00.9: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:58.94 +50:34:00.9: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5933 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:20:28.72 +50:21:38.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:28.72 +50:21:38.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3118 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:26:59.66 +50:14:39.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:59.66 +50:14:39.9: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7886 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:52:35.10 +49:29:37.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:06:53.69 +48:57:00.8: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:17:27.25 +51:22:00.8: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:15:39.49 +52:30:41.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:51:38.21 +50:31:42.7: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:52:35.10 +49:29:37.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:06:53.69 +48:57:00.8: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:53.69 +48:57:00.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4628 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:35.10 +49:29:37.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7204 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:17:27.25 +51:22:00.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:27.25 +51:22:00.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2049 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:15:39.49 +52:30:41.6: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:39.49 +52:30:41.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8262 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:51:38.21 +50:31:42.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:38.21 +50:31:42.7: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9455 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:18:31.40 +49:58:17.9: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8936 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-08-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 20:30:57.07 +48:48:18.8: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:52:26.22 +55:19:41.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8669 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-09-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits at 20:30:57.07 +48:48:18.8: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:18:17.48 +49:42:50.3: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1915 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:57.07 +48:48:18.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0948 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27261.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211009_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211009_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211012_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211012_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:14.32 +55:54:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211017_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211017_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211026_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211026_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211027_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211027_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211034_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211034_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211035_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211035_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211038_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211038_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:44.24 +49:54:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211039_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211039_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211040_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211040_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211041_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211041_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211042_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211042_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211045_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211045_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211046_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211046_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211047_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211047_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:09.57 +54:14:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211073_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211073_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:30.04 +48:16:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211127_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211127_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:04.86 +56:00:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211349_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211349_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211354_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211354_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211355_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211355_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211359_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211359_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:25:52.38 +48:24:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211391_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211391_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:59.10 +49:15:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211432_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211432_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211444_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211444_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211448_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211448_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211464_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211464_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:34.25 +51:45:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211470_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211470_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211542_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211542_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:43.41 +49:17:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211547_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211547_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211556_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211556_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:26.69 +49:02:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211563_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211563_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211564_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211564_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211624_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211624_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:50.55 +50:19:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211626_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211626_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211631_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211631_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211640_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211640_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:39:12.11 +54:30:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211656_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211656_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211683_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211683_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211684_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211684_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211688_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211688_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211728_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211728_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:12.53 +50:14:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211883_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211883_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211895_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211895_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211897_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211897_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211906_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211906_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:13.90 +49:56:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211907_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211907_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:14.53 +50:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211927_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211927_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211935_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211935_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:19.07 +51:15:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211939_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211939_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211942_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211942_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211964_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 211964_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:10.97 +56:20:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212024_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212024_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212035_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212035_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212048_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212048_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212063_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212063_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212073_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212073_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:56.04 +50:50:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212079_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212079_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212093_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212093_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:13.58 +52:16:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212104_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212104_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:37.85 +49:35:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212110_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212110_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212121_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212121_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212210_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212210_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212252_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212252_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212324_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212324_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:13.54 +50:23:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212396_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212396_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212484_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 212484_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:51:38.64 +50:40:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135935_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 135935_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:22.84 +56:37:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27261_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 27261_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60562_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 60562_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:40.94 +51:38:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15803_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 15803_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:29.10 +49:34:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131502_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 131502_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:33.15 +54:56:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127104_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 127104_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22506_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
Preparing report for the candidate 22506_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07030_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 07030_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:10.68 +49:04:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08140_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 08140_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:38.46 +49:07:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29898_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 29898_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:49.46 +50:12:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36865_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 36865_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:30:56.72 +50:35:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11904_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 11904_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:34.67 +49:17:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194851_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 194851_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164930_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053
The candidate 164930_fd_Cyg-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_05-44-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0053 did not pass the final checks