This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 12.40 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0
70.81095 5.98231 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" HAT 199-02127
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.115 g Y 0.276 g 2458270.33780 276.838557700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-02127,2461220.8481,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-02127 20260629.3481 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 12.45 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7
75.62003 6.59618 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J195408+4040.8
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.624 V Y 1.440 V 214.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195408+4040.8,2461220.8481,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195408+4040.8 20260629.3481 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 11.82 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8
75.89529 6.83250 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" HAT 199-03390
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.766 Ic 9.837 Ic
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-03390,2461220.8481,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-03390 20260629.3481 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 12.59 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6
70.79787 6.92208 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 199-03405
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.725 r Y 0.223 r 2458338.70050 50.221627200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-03405,2461220.8481,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-03405 20260629.3481 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 11.63 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4
75.29803 9.28027 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 199-03753
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.582 g Y 0.408 g 2458588.08600 46.053485200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-03753,2461220.8481,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-03753 20260629.3481 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 29.3481 2461220.8481 11.96 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2
70.62899 7.26667 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" HAT 199-02132
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.206 g Y 0.397 g 2458362.78520 73.560530900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-02132,2461220.8481,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-02132 20260629.3481 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
First image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Last image: 2461220.84834074 29.06.2026 08:21:26.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40001
Objects passed selection criteria: 39689
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24578
Average stars matched: 23809 (96.8712 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 28 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-114-g1509621d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 29 03:34:21 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
First image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Last image: 2461220.84834074 29.06.2026 08:21:26.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 270947
Objects passed selection criteria: 270014
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 177756
Average stars matched: 170572 (95.9582 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2074552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 28 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-114-g1509621d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-28)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 29 03:47:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461220.84783991
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0580 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iczeipD6VQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QnpSjCqmF3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YhzQxzN2Gm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F8ed1711rk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec +32.4089 to +43.4261 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec 32.4089 to 43.4261 deg
Loaded 30422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2455 out of 2763 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2763 out of 42857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.3 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
3.4 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
12.5 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.5 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iczeipD6VQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5150, bad_region=0, passed=43100
Got 43100 stars (including 37909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.91"
Excluding outliers - 794 stars left (next iteration limit 700)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=794 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.711 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.134 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=5.075 n_q1=170 n_q2=287 n_q3=125 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.622
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QnpSjCqmF3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5184, bad_region=0, passed=42857
Got 42857 stars (including 37636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 610 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.17"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 685 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 632 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.95"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.54"
Excluding outliers - 629 stars left (next iteration limit 661)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits N_match=629 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.829 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.783 sigma_q2_arcsec=4.749 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.955 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.900 n_q1=156 n_q2=342 n_q3=49 n_q4=82 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YhzQxzN2Gm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, bad_region=0, passed=6671
Got 6671 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=247 n_q2=138 n_q3=280 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F8ed1711rk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, bad_region=0, passed=6268
Got 6268 stars (including 5936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6084 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.776 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.604 n_q1=245 n_q2=242 n_q3=293 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.466
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits sigma_overall=8.711 worst_q_ratio=0.622
ref2=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits sigma_overall=5.829 worst_q_ratio=2.394
new1=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.225
new2=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits sigma_overall=0.529 worst_q_ratio=1.466
reference average sigma_overall=7.27 worst_q_ratio=1.508
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301_astrometric_residuals.png (794 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302_astrometric_residuals.png (629 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0580 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:38:24.013 +37:58:38.46
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:26.158 +37:58:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.muyf9eaYYx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cLu1pbxAZx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nZVfiD2AzN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T7OUfKMUXo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 298024 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.3851 to +43.2809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.3851 to 43.2809 deg
Loaded 29808 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1327 out of 2538 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2538 out of 298024 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.647200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.647200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 298024 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.3851 to +43.2809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.3851 to 43.2809 deg
Loaded 29808 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1327 out of 2538 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2538 out of 298024 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 297199 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.1823 to 305.7702 deg, Dec +32.3871 to +43.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.1823 to 305.7702 deg, Dec 32.3871 to 43.4289 deg
Loaded 30508 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1750 out of 2943 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2943 out of 297199 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.1 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.muyf9eaYYx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=71, blended=63637, bad_region=2, passed=297953
Got 297953 stars (including 234024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 297953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 667 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.00"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 614 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.18"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.18"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 274541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.92"
Excluding outliers - 820 stars left (next iteration limit 675)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=820 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.757 sigma_q1_arcsec=6.114 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.762 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.099 n_q1=187 n_q2=302 n_q3=135 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.585
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cLu1pbxAZx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=99, blended=63249, bad_region=1, passed=297100
Got 297100 stars (including 233549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 297100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.06"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 626 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.22"
Excluding outliers - 624 stars left (next iteration limit 647)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits N_match=624 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.910 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.180 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.607 n_q1=171 n_q2=323 n_q3=55 n_q4=75 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nZVfiD2AzN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3297, bad_region=1, passed=60696
Got 60696 stars (including 57336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=249 n_q2=141 n_q3=285 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.T7OUfKMUXo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3071, bad_region=0, passed=58416
Got 58416 stars (including 55289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.841 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=235 n_q2=245 n_q3=287 n_q4=158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.614
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-20-43_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-29_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_032208_TTUQ1b1x1_548807_cCgFFz4E/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:57.80 +36:11:05.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:03:12.95 +33:32:04.4: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:50:39.01 +35:49:14.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:52.98 +36:48:33.6: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:30.13 +32:43:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:57:53.11 +32:40:12.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:20.14 +34:50:49.1: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:09:56.89 +36:58:32.3: 14.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:57.80 +36:11:05.0: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:57.80 +36:11:05.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3960 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:35:52.98 +36:48:33.6: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:50:39.01 +35:49:14.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:03:12.95 +33:32:04.4: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:52.98 +36:48:33.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5969 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:39.01 +35:49:14.3: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1273 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:12.95 +33:32:04.4: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3104 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:57:53.11 +32:40:12.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:53.11 +32:40:12.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:12:20.14 +34:50:49.1: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:51:30.13 +32:43:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:30.13 +32:43:06.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:09:56.89 +36:58:32.3: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:20.14 +34:50:49.1: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9068 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:56.89 +36:58:32.3: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9255 delta=-1.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:50.86 +36:10:59.7: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:50.86 +36:10:59.7: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:50.86 +36:10:59.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8605 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:50:42.94 +32:43:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:13.57 +38:13:35.6: 15.19 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:45:57.14 +32:44:43.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:11:13.57 +38:13:35.6: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:13.57 +38:13:35.6: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0128 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:50:42.94 +32:43:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:42.94 +32:43:24.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:45:57.14 +32:44:43.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:57.14 +32:44:43.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:40.32 +36:13:40.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3720 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:07.87 +40:40:39.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.4071 delta=1.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:53:46.98 +41:01:58.8: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7967 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:33.52 +36:40:26.6: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5836 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:40:51.58 +41:42:51.4: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5332 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:38:38.98 +36:41:33.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8726 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out239238.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out250896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out284708.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334403_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334403_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334404_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334420_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334420_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:21.97 +35:03:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334423_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:21.92 +35:44:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334441_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334441_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:03.61 +33:08:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:05.08 +36:58:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 334965_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:20.80 +39:08:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:25.64 +36:52:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335303_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335311_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335311_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:13.42 +37:10:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335322_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335367_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335385_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335385_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335421_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:58.04 +35:00:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335448_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:46.71 +42:26:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335461_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335551_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335551_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:18.58 +39:14:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335571_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:57.46 +36:56:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335596_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:59.26 +42:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335733_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335733_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:19.29 +40:22:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335753_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335753_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:17.02 +34:41:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335760_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:33.22 +33:44:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:25.37 +40:22:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335864_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335864_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:49.40 +36:57:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335928_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 335928_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 336217_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:41.37 +37:00:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 102809_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 133465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:37.41 +37:01:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 235443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:47.99 +40:32:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 182170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:29.63 +38:35:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 237263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:53.87 +40:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 239238_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 250896_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 256330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:18.39 +42:55:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 192327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:57.82 +38:54:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 120555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:02.45 +36:46:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47431_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 47431_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:15.05 +34:23:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 116847_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 294550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.25 +41:08:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 261973_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:21.98 +42:27:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159593_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 159593_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:59.92 +37:49:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284708_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 284708_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 78787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:03.31 +35:27:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118047_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
Preparing report for the candidate 118047_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272575_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 272575_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:45.36 +42:12:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 120592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:59.03 +36:43:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 275117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:37.55 +42:04:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014
The candidate 09855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-29_03-21-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0014 did not pass the final checks
