This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.4310 2461219.9310 9.68 20:30:18.39 -03:29:34.5
41.46784 -23.52994 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3 Juno 0 -0 0 9.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:18.39 -03:29:34.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:18.39 -03:29:34.5: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.9310,9.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.4310 9.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.4310 2461219.9310 12.46 20:16:31.83 -03:48:03.3
39.44030 -20.63525 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.345 Tercidina 0 -0 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:16:31.83 -03:48:03.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:16:31.83 -03:48:03.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.9310,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.4310 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.4310 2461219.9310 13.37 20:25:20.24 -03:46:44.3
40.56072 -22.56961 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.313 Chaldaea 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:25:20.24 -03:46:44.3: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:25:20.24 -03:46:44.3: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.9310,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.4310 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.4310 2461219.9310 13.73 20:33:20.53 -01:04:19.7
44.17626 -23.03411 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.365 Corduba 1 -0 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:33:20.53 -01:04:19.7: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:33:20.53 -01:04:19.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.9310,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.4310 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.4310 2461219.9310 11.97 20:29:04.33 -01:03:25.4
43.62863 -22.09408 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J2029042-010327
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.004 R1 Y 0.479 R1 66.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:04.33 -01:03:25.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:04.33 -01:03:25.4: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2029042-010327,2461219.9310,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2029042-010327 20260628.4310 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461219.93126604 28.06.2026 10:20:51.386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 29
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14273
Objects passed selection criteria: 14215
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11113.8
Average stars matched: 10006 (90.0326 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117844 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 05:42:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
First image: 2461173.90747294 13.05.2026 09:46:35.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Last image: 2461219.93126604 28.06.2026 10:20:51.386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 160
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 51 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 96422
Objects passed selection criteria: 96182
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76180
Average stars matched: 69243.5 (90.8946 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1876884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 05:46:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461219.93072200
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:17.764 -02:03:17.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:17.764 -02:03:17.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.898 -02:03:40.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.509 -01:59:53.13
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.898 -02:03:40.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0632 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:17.764 -02:03:17.33
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:16.898 -02:03:40.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00741 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tzv7hLyAbW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XyKYQnOC49
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oST4hmzgjW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QfDZcsVOH5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits and wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.88
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2766 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7076 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2766 deg
Loaded 10847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8704 out of 9052 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9052 out of 13701 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to +3.2758 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.7075 to 316.4624 deg, Dec -7.2712 to 3.2758 deg
Loaded 10853 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8626 out of 9004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9004 out of 13571 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 26 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
14.8 mag. Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Tzv7hLyAbW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=818, bad_region=2573, passed=13701
Got 13701 stars (including 10431 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=291 n_q2=176 n_q3=306 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XyKYQnOC49 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=853, bad_region=2623, passed=13571
Got 13571 stars (including 10228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=293 n_q2=183 n_q3=298 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits -region wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oST4hmzgjW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=961, bad_region=3100, passed=14457
Got 14457 stars (including 10789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.588 n_q1=285 n_q2=204 n_q3=270 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QfDZcsVOH5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1080, bad_region=3136, passed=14439
Got 14439 stars (including 10702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14439 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=284 n_q2=211 n_q3=264 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.487 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new1=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.223
new2=fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits sigma_overall=0.541 worst_q_ratio=1.129
reference average sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.1055
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_052421_TTUQ2b1x1_676794_LDjfCFeN/wcs_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:18.39 -03:29:34.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:20:39.49 -02:37:26.9: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:43:09.08 -01:36:06.3: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:32:41.30 +00:16:47.3: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:46:37.70 -02:18:36.3: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:41:00.42 -00:11:25.8: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:54.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:37:34.71 -04:03:35.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:34:13.70 +01:15:50.1: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:17:57.33 +01:04:04.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:18.39 -03:29:34.5: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:20:39.49 -02:37:26.9: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:32:41.30 +00:16:47.3: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:39.49 -02:37:26.9: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9947 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:43:09.08 -01:36:06.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:41.30 +00:16:47.3: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7983 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:09.08 -01:36:06.3: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8585 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:46:37.70 -02:18:36.3: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:37.70 -02:18:36.3: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9502 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:17:57.33 +01:04:04.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:41:00.42 -00:11:25.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:37:34.71 -04:03:35.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:54.2: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:57.33 +01:04:04.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8539 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:00.42 -00:11:25.8: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9070 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:34.71 -04:03:35.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9072 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:34:13.70 +01:15:50.1: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:58.06 +02:08:54.2: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8358 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:13.70 +01:15:50.1: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9072 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:30:07.84 -01:44:16.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:38:34.71 -02:11:54.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:26:59.50 -01:35:53.8: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:37:07.87 +01:04:43.7: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:22:23.49 -00:33:47.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:28:32.84 -00:40:17.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:29:04.35 -01:03:25.2: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-46-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0427.fits at 20:20:29.70 -05:08:06.3: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:30:07.84 -01:44:16.4: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:38:34.71 -02:11:54.4: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:07.84 -01:44:16.4: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8766 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:34.71 -02:11:54.4: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9211 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:26:59.50 -01:35:53.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:59.50 -01:35:53.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9358 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:37:07.87 +01:04:43.7: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:07.87 +01:04:43.7: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0067 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:22:23.49 -00:33:47.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:28:32.84 -00:40:17.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:23.49 -00:33:47.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9740 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:32.84 -00:40:17.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9889 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:20:29.70 -05:08:06.3: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_04-47-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0428.fits at 20:29:04.35 -01:03:25.2: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:29.70 -05:08:06.3: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9871 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:04.35 -01:03:25.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9832 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20447_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 20447_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 20448_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20681_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 20681_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20774_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 20774_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.94 +00:56:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20990_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 20990_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.62 +00:50:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21078_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 21078_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.06 -01:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21345_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 21345_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.72 -03:51:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 21466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.93 +01:19:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22139_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22139_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22207_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22207_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22280_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22280_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22315_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22315_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22324_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22324_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22325_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22325_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22344_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22344_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22354_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22411_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22411_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22439_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22439_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22473_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22473_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22500_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22500_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22567_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 22567_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 07850_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.72 -00:54:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01501_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 01501_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:13.76 -06:08:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05730_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 05730_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116603_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116603_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116605_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116605_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116611_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116611_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116617_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116617_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116620_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116620_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116625_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116625_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116626_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116626_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116629_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116629_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:42.94 +00:46:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116635_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116635_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 116889_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:18.40 -03:29:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120016_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 120016_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:42.12 -00:39:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 120103_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120443_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 120443_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:23.27 -03:37:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120759_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 120759_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:32.37 -02:03:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122158_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 122158_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:30.70 +01:48:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 122355_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:30.58 -02:03:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123693_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 123693_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124015_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 124015_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124945_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 124945_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125171_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 125171_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 125869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126095_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 126095_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126134_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 126134_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:37.96 -02:55:03.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.334 4222774741207764352 304.90719559383 -02.91821345198 13.1389 11.7287 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.334#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 126136_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 126472_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127464_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 127464_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127744_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 127744_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128114_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128114_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128166_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128166_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128242_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128242_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128256_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128470_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128470_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128574_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128574_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128649_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128649_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128838_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128838_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128890_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128984_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 128984_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129060_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129060_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129061_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129061_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129248_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129248_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129290_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129290_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129294_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129294_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129417_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129417_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129528_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129528_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129547_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129547_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129595_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129595_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129640_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129640_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129669_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129669_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129683_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129683_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129814_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129814_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129869_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129883_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129883_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129887_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129926_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129931_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129931_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129939_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129939_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129975_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 129975_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130026_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130026_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130027_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130027_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130057_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130057_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130076_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130076_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130090_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130090_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130097_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130097_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130102_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130102_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130112_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130112_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130115_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130129_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130129_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130168_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130283_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130283_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130435_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130435_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130667_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130667_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130786_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 130786_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 36882_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:51.71 -02:42:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 53466_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 83360_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:09.24 +01:23:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 80642_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11470_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 11470_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 07761_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:13.78 -06:08:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 54049_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:46:36.72 -00:54:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 45573_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:52.06 -01:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45482_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 45482_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:50.87 -01:52:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 83788_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:21:17.92 +01:19:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 86784_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:54.94 +00:56:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 87684_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:21.61 +00:50:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 26705_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:47.70 -03:51:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84983_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364
The candidate 84983_fd_Aql-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-28_05-20-51_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0364 did not pass the final checks