This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2111 2461219.7111 11.32 19:19:55.22 -26:45:26.3
11.36508 -17.68586 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 0 0 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:55.22 -26:45:26.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:55.22 -26:45:26.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.7111,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.2111 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2111 2461219.7111 11.47 19:00:22.81 -27:20:50.8
9.04620 -13.90477 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides 0 0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:22.81 -27:20:50.8: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:22.81 -27:20:50.8: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.7111,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.2111 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2111 2461219.7111 12.60 18:56:40.98 -27:51:40.0
8.22301 -13.36187 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa -0 2 2 12.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:40.98 -27:51:40.0: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:40.98 -27:51:40.0: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.7111,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.2111 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2111 2461219.7111 12.60 19:13:05.99 -24:55:56.8
12.50865 -15.56827 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 1 0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:05.99 -24:55:56.8: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:05.99 -24:55:56.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.7111,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.2111 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 28.2111 2461219.7111 11.60 19:27:16.80 -28:15:03.3
10.52870 -19.75140 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 1 2 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:27:16.80 -28:15:03.3: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:27:16.80 -28:15:03.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461219.7111,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260628.2111 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461219.71148877 28.06.2026 05:04:22.630 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8593
Objects passed selection criteria: 8585
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7415.25
Average stars matched: 6195 (83.544 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 01:08:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461219.71148877 28.06.2026 05:04:22.630 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 86196
Objects passed selection criteria: 86094
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80599.2
Average stars matched: 65111.2 (80.7839 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1933520 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sat Jun 27 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-110-ga10a059d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-27)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 28 01:12:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461219.71066497
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01510 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ODrRXeDuL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W2Qmud4xXE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q4joRZeFN4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tCuHvYHqQM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.404200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.404200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8ODrRXeDuL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=0, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.739 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=247 n_q2=168 n_q3=255 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W2Qmud4xXE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=0, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q4joRZeFN4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=389, bad_region=0, passed=3992
Got 3992 stars (including 3597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=248 n_q2=174 n_q3=264 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tCuHvYHqQM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=383, bad_region=0, passed=4018
Got 4018 stars (including 3633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4018 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=250 n_q2=170 n_q3=260 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.983
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.125
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.405 worst_q_ratio=1.045
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=0.983
reference average sigma_overall=0.616 worst_q_ratio=1.201
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24772_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 24772_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.83 -23:56:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24776_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 24776_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.62 -26:20:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24782_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 24782_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.38 -22:34:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 24784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.79 -29:04:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24842_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 24842_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.95 -30:28:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20889_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.46 -22:18:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 22336_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.19 -28:51:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0042 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0185 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.226 -26:00:09.43
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:57.609 -25:59:28.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01510 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ckx4aceIKj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jV44eh67c5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ODo7DhWQ2N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DQTRda7X5E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.190200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.190200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ckx4aceIKj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5805, bad_region=0, passed=85932
Got 85932 stars (including 80013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85932 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.746 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=266 n_q2=176 n_q3=223 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jV44eh67c5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=0, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ODo7DhWQ2N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1618, bad_region=3, passed=46787
Got 46787 stars (including 45096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46787 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=239 n_q2=171 n_q3=274 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.925
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DQTRda7X5E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1577, bad_region=3, passed=46774
Got 46774 stars (including 45125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46774 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=247 n_q2=162 n_q3=266 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.011
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-03-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0142.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-28_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_001329_TTUQ1b1x1_1180660_nKWqD9Am/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:22.49 -23:41:37.9: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:35.74 -22:02:12.5: 12.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:58.43 -26:27:22.2: 12.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:39:27.76 -23:43:42.7: 12.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:54.90 -21:25:35.5: 12.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:10.24 -20:39:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:45.23 -20:42:49.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:58.43 -26:27:22.2: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:22.49 -23:41:37.9: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:27.76 -23:43:42.7: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:10.24 -20:39:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:10.24 -20:39:06.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:35.74 -22:02:12.5: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:58.43 -26:27:22.2: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8004 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:22.49 -23:41:37.9: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2905 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:27.76 -23:43:42.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5801 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:35.74 -22:02:12.5: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3896 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:54.90 -21:25:35.5: 12.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:54.90 -21:25:35.5: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0437 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:55.22 -26:45:26.3: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:22.81 -27:20:50.8: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:55.22 -26:45:26.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:23.77 -21:07:56.6: 11.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:09.18 -20:34:27.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:09.18 -20:34:27.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:09.18 -20:34:27.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:43.74 -30:14:14.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:22.81 -27:20:50.8: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:43.74 -30:14:14.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:43.74 -30:14:14.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:02.05 -25:56:49.7: 11.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:23.77 -21:07:56.6: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.77 -21:07:56.6: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9075 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:55.40 -29:55:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:02.05 -25:56:49.7: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.7: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:02.05 -25:56:49.7: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0583 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:03.56 -20:56:36.9: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:55.40 -29:55:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:55.40 -29:55:39.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:04.53 -22:34:25.5: 11.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.7: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.80 -21:36:58.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3858 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:03.56 -20:56:36.9: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:03.56 -20:56:36.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4317 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:48.3: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:04.53 -22:34:25.5: 12.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:04.53 -22:34:25.5: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3790 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:48.3: 12.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:48.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5087 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:05.75 -21:31:56.3: 12.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:21.71 -24:23:27.6: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:40.98 -27:51:40.0: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:24.89 -23:14:51.6: 12.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:05.75 -21:31:56.3: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:05.99 -24:55:56.8: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:05.75 -21:31:56.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4719 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:21.71 -24:23:27.6: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:21.71 -24:23:27.6: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4713 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:24.89 -23:14:51.6: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:40.98 -27:51:40.0: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.89 -23:14:51.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6029 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:05.99 -24:55:56.8: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:08:49.34 -24:26:03.0: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.34 -24:26:03.0: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:00.88 -23:00:49.1: 12.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:46.96 -24:20:42.7: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.34 -24:26:03.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8143 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:46.96 -24:20:42.7: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:46.96 -24:20:42.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9986 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:00.88 -23:00:49.1: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:00.88 -23:00:49.1: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8277 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:27:16.80 -28:15:03.3: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:27:16.80 -28:15:03.3: 15.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156500.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157223.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156166_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:20.37 -26:06:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156170_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156170_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156183_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156183_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:23.95 -26:57:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:51.13 -21:12:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:30.17 -20:41:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156329_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156354_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156354_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.21 -22:42:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:38.78 -28:45:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.88 -20:55:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156394_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156394_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.27 -28:37:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.10 -23:17:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156500_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 156500_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156526_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156526_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:53.06 -20:59:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156551_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 156551_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156553_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156553_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.65 -21:22:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156557_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156557_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156635_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156687_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156687_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.14 -25:11:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156733_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.89 -22:23:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156746_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156746_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.73 -24:25:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.19 -26:25:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156799_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156799_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:25.41 -26:19:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:28.29 -25:56:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156835_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156835_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.70 -28:06:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156863_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156863_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156876_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156876_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.63 -22:17:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156884_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156884_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.06 -27:20:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156915_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156915_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156926_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156934_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156934_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.58 -24:52:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156938_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156938_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156984_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156984_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:04.97 -24:22:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156985_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 156985_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:12.80 -21:03:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157023_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157023_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.92 -22:39:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157040_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157040_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:06.03 -28:00:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157052_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.76 -22:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157059_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157059_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.52 -23:55:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157062_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157062_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:39.79 -21:39:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:41.60 -21:43:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157082_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157082_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.99 -25:53:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157092_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:35.52 -21:30:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157100_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157100_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157112_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157112_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157143_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157143_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.60 -25:29:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 157159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.87 -21:49:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157215_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157215_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.42 -24:01:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 157223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157249_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157249_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:21.54 -21:14:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:46.40 -21:25:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157284_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157284_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.38 -28:17:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157299_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157299_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.80 -22:42:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:21.85 -20:37:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157347_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157347_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157379_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:45.56 -21:40:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157415_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157415_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:34.81 -24:35:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157476_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157476_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157513_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157513_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157557_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157557_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:10.22 -22:54:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157568_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 157568_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:35.00 -23:20:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.53 -23:19:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.98 -22:59:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128057_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 128057_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.17 -24:13:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.40 -22:34:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.64 -26:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.83 -23:56:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:12.56 -21:41:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123911_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 123911_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.40 -22:07:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.17 -28:07:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.79 -28:03:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.47 -29:58:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 20149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.49 -28:02:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:43.55 -24:22:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.46 -25:35:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.85 -25:10:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.19 -28:51:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.61 -21:51:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:33.19 -21:27:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.90 -28:46:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20409_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
Preparing report for the candidate 20409_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.51 -27:50:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.49 -23:36:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.62 -29:49:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 99266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:48.79 -29:40:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.77 -24:44:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.23 -22:32:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 105090_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.08 -29:54:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.78 -26:56:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.43 -27:49:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.99 -30:28:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 97886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:00.33 -30:10:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 82020_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.59 -23:48:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:09.75 -29:09:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.45 -24:58:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.10 -25:01:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 102421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:15.44 -25:15:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.27 -27:13:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143
The candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-28_00-04-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0143 did not pass the final checks