This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3032 2461215.8032 11.58 19:30:20.84 -27:52:03.7
11.16610 -20.24741 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -0 0 0 11.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:20.84 -27:52:03.7: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:20.84 -27:52:03.7: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8032,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3032 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3032 2461215.8032 11.46 19:23:15.29 -26:29:10.6
11.92210 -18.27589 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 -0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:23:15.29 -26:29:10.6: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:15.29 -26:29:10.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8032,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3032 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3032 2461215.8032 11.60 19:04:06.33 -27:14:16.5
9.48997 -14.62033 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 -0 1 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:06.33 -27:14:16.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:06.33 -27:14:16.5: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8032,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3032 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3032 2461215.8032 12.46 19:16:47.32 -24:59:35.4
12.78962 -16.36182 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:47.32 -24:59:35.4: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:47.32 -24:59:35.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8032,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3032 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3032 2461215.8032 12.55 18:59:59.95 -27:36:33.2
8.76421 -13.93222 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa -1 0 1 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:59.95 -27:36:33.2: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:59.95 -27:36:33.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8032,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3032 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461215.80344333 24.06.2026 07:16:47.504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7767
Objects passed selection criteria: 7762
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7951.25
Average stars matched: 6988.5 (87.8918 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 02:28:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461215.80344333 24.06.2026 07:16:47.504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 134
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 85 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93179
Objects passed selection criteria: 93034
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 91553
Average stars matched: 77927.5 (85.1174 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1882128 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 02:33:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.80292933
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ky0erOrvSW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X0MCCF030v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WGcMJPcXXj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CVdqPXRSU1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ky0erOrvSW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=1388, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 6796 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=303 n_q2=135 n_q3=301 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X0MCCF030v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WGcMJPcXXj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=651, bad_region=1623, passed=8489
Got 8489 stars (including 6355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.811 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=306 n_q2=156 n_q3=275 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.497
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CVdqPXRSU1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=658, bad_region=1679, passed=8633
Got 8633 stars (including 6438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=306 n_q2=159 n_q3=278 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.471
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.323
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits sigma_overall=0.542 worst_q_ratio=1.497
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.526 worst_q_ratio=1.471
reference average sigma_overall=0.5355 worst_q_ratio=1.347
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23816_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 23816_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.75 -23:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23817_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 23817_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.74 -26:20:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23818_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 23818_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.92 -29:04:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23820_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 23820_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.50 -22:34:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.28 -28:51:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:59.234 -26:00:08.16
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:01.086 -25:59:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0WRooZOrJ1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zgoHhsDuI4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dNcOvN0QiW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JZ5lpoHbEP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 88 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0WRooZOrJ1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, bad_region=9579, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 70842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=331 n_q2=144 n_q3=263 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zgoHhsDuI4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dNcOvN0QiW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=7030, bad_region=14906, passed=97540
Got 97540 stars (including 76269 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.788 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=335 n_q2=178 n_q3=227 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.440
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JZ5lpoHbEP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=7145, bad_region=14949, passed=97414
Got 97414 stars (including 75958 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 97414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.798 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=325 n_q2=181 n_q3=232 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.632
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-03_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0048.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_021729_TTUQ2b1x1_1903608_GtYNcwo3/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:33.18 -23:13:22.0: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:42.73 -27:49:00.1: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:01.49 -26:18:19.9: 13.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:21.77 -28:28:45.6: 13.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:03.89 -24:18:18.8: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:57.24 -26:27:26.5: 12.91 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:33.81 -27:29:42.2: 13.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:33.18 -23:13:22.0: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:33.18 -23:13:22.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1430 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:42.73 -27:49:00.1: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:42.73 -27:49:00.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3622 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:21.77 -28:28:45.6: 13.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:21.77 -28:28:45.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4763 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:03.89 -24:18:18.8: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:22:26.09 -29:12:11.3: 13.09 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:46.00 -28:53:50.3: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:33.81 -27:29:42.2: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:57.24 -26:27:26.5: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:03.89 -24:18:18.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8321 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:33.81 -27:29:42.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4290 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:57.24 -26:27:26.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0510 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:01.49 -26:18:19.9: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:10.58 -22:07:06.6: 12.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:01.49 -26:18:19.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4259 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:22:26.09 -29:12:11.3: 13.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:46.00 -28:53:50.3: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:46.00 -28:53:50.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4236 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:26.09 -29:12:11.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6116 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:10.58 -22:07:06.6: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:10.58 -22:07:06.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0102 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:19.83 -22:57:23.8: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:48.84 -29:16:14.6: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:04.17 -29:21:43.6: 13.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:57.51 -28:13:22.6: 12.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:52.81 -22:22:33.4: 12.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:19.83 -22:57:23.8: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:19.83 -22:57:23.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0969 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:21:35.14 -27:35:43.8: 13.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:45.35 -26:22:45.5: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:48.84 -29:16:14.6: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:48.84 -29:16:14.6: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3938 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:21:33.19 -22:31:04.1: 12.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:04.17 -29:21:43.6: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:04.17 -29:21:43.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.0930 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:57.51 -28:13:22.6: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:57.51 -28:13:22.6: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0554 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:52.81 -22:22:33.4: 12.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:52.81 -22:22:33.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9274 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:45.35 -26:22:45.5: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:45.35 -26:22:45.5: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9282 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:35.14 -27:35:43.8: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:35.14 -27:35:43.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3414 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:33.19 -22:31:04.1: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:33.19 -22:31:04.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0283 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:47.63 -25:06:44.0: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:16.05 -26:27:26.5: 12.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:15.63 -28:16:48.7: 13.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:11.0: 12.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.1: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:16.05 -26:27:26.5: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:47.63 -25:06:44.0: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:16.05 -26:27:26.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9282 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:47.63 -25:06:44.0: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8395 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:25.41 -29:00:18.8: 12.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:15.63 -28:16:48.7: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:15.63 -28:16:48.7: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8136 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:28.96 -28:05:30.8: 12.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:11.0: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:35.34 -22:02:11.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5461 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.1: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:11.30 -29:40:38.1: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9974 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:25.41 -29:00:18.8: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:25.41 -29:00:18.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5715 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:40.49 -27:48:59.0: 12.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:28.96 -28:05:30.8: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:28.96 -28:05:30.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5843 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:40.49 -27:48:59.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:55.82 -27:07:10.9: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:40.49 -27:48:59.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5308 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:37.59 -22:36:58.1: 11.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:20.84 -27:52:03.7: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:55.82 -27:07:10.9: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:55.82 -27:07:10.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4151 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:23:15.29 -26:29:10.6: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:06.33 -27:14:16.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:37.59 -22:36:58.1: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:37.59 -22:36:58.1: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8676 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:20.84 -27:52:03.7: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:47.32 -24:59:35.4: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:15.29 -26:29:10.6: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:59.95 -27:36:33.2: 14.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:06.33 -27:14:16.5: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:47.32 -24:59:35.4: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:59.95 -27:36:33.2: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:43.93 -27:30:58.1: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:46:48.49 -29:36:14.8: 13.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:43.93 -27:30:58.1: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:43.93 -27:30:58.1: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8997 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:51.35 -29:41:32.7: 13.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:13.81 -29:19:27.4: 13.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:48.49 -29:36:14.8: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:48.49 -29:36:14.8: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9419 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:51.35 -29:41:32.7: 13.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:51.35 -29:41:32.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4028 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:13.81 -29:19:27.4: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:13.81 -29:19:27.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2770 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:24.97 -26:53:10.6: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:11.21 -26:21:58.9: 13.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:22.38 -26:58:13.3: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:24.97 -26:53:10.6: 13.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:24.97 -26:53:10.6: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6193 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:11.21 -26:21:58.9: 13.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:11.21 -26:21:58.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5360 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:51.99 -23:45:59.5: 14.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:22.38 -26:58:13.3: 13.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:22.38 -26:58:13.3: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5564 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:51.99 -23:45:59.5: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out148695.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148415.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148188_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148188_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148205_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148205_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148248_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148248_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148250_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148250_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148275_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148275_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:17.56 -22:03:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148278_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148278_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148282_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:34.65 -26:32:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148291_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148291_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:27.82 -28:20:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148294_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148294_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148301_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148301_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148306_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148308_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148312_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:11.36 -21:52:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148316_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148316_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148322_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148322_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148326_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148326_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148327_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148327_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148328_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148328_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148329_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:38.27 -30:10:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148331_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148331_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148332_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148337_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148337_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:01.23 -22:10:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148338_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148338_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:33.07 -24:00:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148341_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148341_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:56.30 -25:13:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148349_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148349_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:15.77 -22:58:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148351_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148352_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148352_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148359_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148359_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.45 -24:05:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148362_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148362_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148363_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148363_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:52.56 -29:46:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148368_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148368_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148371_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148371_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148377_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148377_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148381_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148381_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.78 -28:43:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.72 -23:01:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148390_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148390_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148391_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148394_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148394_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:18.54 -26:44:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148395_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148395_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:29.61 -27:44:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148398_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148400_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:32.91 -28:52:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148414_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 148414_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 148415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 148418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.28 -28:37:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.33 -25:11:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148434_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148434_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:50.48 -27:52:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148435_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
Preparing report for the candidate 148435_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148436_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148436_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.23 -26:25:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148442_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148442_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.90 -28:00:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148443_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148443_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.01 -27:20:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148445_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148445_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.16 -28:17:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148446_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148446_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.60 -25:29:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.83 -28:06:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148448_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148448_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148449_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148449_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.43 -23:55:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148455_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148455_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:50.14 -29:03:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148467_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148467_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148473_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148473_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:02.09 -28:21:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148487_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:42.34 -26:48:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148547_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148547_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148563_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148563_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148576_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148576_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 148695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:51.99 -23:45:59.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.401 4078121956369481088 281.21657775320 -23.76719321406 12.5399 11.0143 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.45 -25:01:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.50 -22:34:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.43 -22:07:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.52 -27:50:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.65 -28:03:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.23 -28:07:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.54 -21:51:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.11 -28:51:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.74 -25:10:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.41 -23:36:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.75 -23:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.75 -26:20:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.57 -29:49:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:21.00 -22:59:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.57 -24:58:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12507_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 12507_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:33.02 -29:04:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.43 -23:19:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049
The candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_02-16-47_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0049 did not pass the final checks