This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2454 2461215.7454 10.62 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8
21.14443 9.09565 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -0 1 10.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7454,10.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2454 10.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2454 2461215.7454 11.31 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6
20.70076 7.79982 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 -0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7454,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2454 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2454 2461215.7454 13.12 18:15:19.25 -13:39:47.3
16.67928 1.60518 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.540 Rosamunde 0 0 0 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:15:19.25 -13:39:47.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:15:19.25 -13:39:47.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.2454* 18 15 19.25 -13 39 47.3 13.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7454,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2454 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2454 2461215.7454 14.07 18:10:50.77 -11:28:15.3
18.08505 3.61165 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.282 Clorinde 1 -1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:10:50.77 -11:28:15.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:10:50.77 -11:28:15.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.2454* 18 10 50.77 -11 28 15.3 14.1 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7454,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2454 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461215.74564156 24.06.2026 05:53:33.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6148
Objects passed selection criteria: 6143
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5281.5
Average stars matched: 5158.25 (97.6664 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 00:56:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461215.74564156 24.06.2026 05:53:33.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64533
Objects passed selection criteria: 64453
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58299.8
Average stars matched: 56156.5 (96.3237 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 173044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 00:59:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.74518723
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00476 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KV7R61bE5a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M6Oh3b2zTj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wcrn8SO8i0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Z0IK4HvlK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KV7R61bE5a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, bad_region=3862, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 6139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=357 n_q2=271 n_q3=193 n_q4=110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M6Oh3b2zTj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, bad_region=3843, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 6155 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=357 n_q2=280 n_q3=186 n_q4=110 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Wcrn8SO8i0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, bad_region=2476, passed=6525
Got 6525 stars (including 3759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=350 n_q2=282 n_q3=185 n_q4=114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7Z0IK4HvlK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=2448, passed=6441
Got 6441 stars (including 3718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=351 n_q2=284 n_q3=183 n_q4=111 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.120
ref2=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.531 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.511 worst_q_ratio=1.071
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.5305 worst_q_ratio=1.133
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20476.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 20471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.46 -05:55:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20472_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 20472_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20476_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 20476_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8
18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.242 -09:59:59.56
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:01.246 -10:00:08.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00476 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GqPE25DuEw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6bcXldyGxj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.is06z7Vg0O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YVF58upDZ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.509900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.509900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GqPE25DuEw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8119, bad_region=26419, passed=98540
Got 98540 stars (including 66756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75140 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=348 n_q2=272 n_q3=199 n_q4=114 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6bcXldyGxj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8187, bad_region=26418, passed=98079
Got 98079 stars (including 66276 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=343 n_q2=273 n_q3=200 n_q4=117 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.is06z7Vg0O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=3695, bad_region=18311, passed=64211
Got 64211 stars (including 43617 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=350 n_q2=274 n_q3=199 n_q4=112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YVF58upDZ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3670, bad_region=18231, passed=63979
Got 63979 stars (including 43482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48106 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=348 n_q2=274 n_q3=193 n_q4=119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_005415_TTUQ2b1x1_3160016_Dbpf3vKU/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:37:52.71 -13:40:35.8: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:42:45.83 -11:23:15.8: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:32:51.71 -06:14:06.9: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:59:31.07 -13:05:44.3: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:38:16.74 -13:21:45.5: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:08:46.30 -12:04:33.1: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:37:52.71 -13:40:35.8: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:42:45.83 -11:23:15.8: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:45.83 -11:23:15.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1530 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:59:31.07 -13:05:44.3: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:52.71 -13:40:35.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2068 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:31.07 -13:05:44.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0055 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:32:51.71 -06:14:06.9: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:38:16.74 -13:21:45.5: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:51.71 -06:14:06.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0089 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:16.74 -13:21:45.5: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8774 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:08:46.30 -12:04:33.1: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:08:46.30 -12:04:33.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8893 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:17:55.60 -12:00:06.8: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:15:19.25 -13:39:47.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:17:55.60 -12:00:06.8: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:15:19.25 -13:39:47.3: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:55.60 -12:00:06.8: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0067 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:16:13.63 -09:49:57.1: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:18:19.64 -13:23:50.4: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:04:59.33 -11:30:17.3: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:37:18.14 -13:47:33.1: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:16:13.63 -09:49:57.1: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:58:37.69 -11:53:28.8: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:18:19.64 -13:23:50.4: 13.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:13.63 -09:49:57.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3870 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:19.64 -13:23:50.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4075 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:04:59.33 -11:30:17.3: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:59.33 -11:30:17.3: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4300 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:47.1: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:37:18.14 -13:47:33.1: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:18.14 -13:47:33.1: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4098 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:58:37.69 -11:53:28.8: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:37.69 -11:53:28.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4668 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:55:32.91 -09:01:29.6: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:47.1: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.06 -06:50:47.1: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5771 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:55:32.91 -09:01:29.6: 13.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:32.91 -09:01:29.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7728 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:44.90 -13:36:01.9: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:00:56.16 -12:41:52.4: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:44.90 -13:36:01.9: 13.56 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:44.90 -13:36:01.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6546 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:48.50 -13:55:41.5: 13.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:40:54.41 -12:55:51.7: 13.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:32.13 -06:32:39.4: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:00:56.16 -12:41:52.4: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:56.16 -12:41:52.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7238 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:44.95 -12:14:03.6: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:40:54.41 -12:55:51.7: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:54.41 -12:55:51.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8325 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:32.13 -06:32:39.4: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:48.50 -13:55:41.5: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:48.50 -13:55:41.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7998 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:32.13 -06:32:39.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6507 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:49:41.79 -12:20:59.4: 14.21 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:36:19.92 -13:20:16.9: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:44.95 -12:14:03.6: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:44.95 -12:14:03.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8910 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:37.42 -12:51:02.3: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:10:50.77 -11:28:15.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:49:41.79 -12:20:59.4: 14.25 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:41.79 -12:20:59.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9538 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:36:19.92 -13:20:16.9: 14.55 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:10:50.77 -11:28:15.3: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:37.42 -12:51:02.3: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:19.92 -13:20:16.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9433 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:05:10.31 -08:10:56.9: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:16.84 -10:32:37.6: 14.02 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:49.76 -10:22:30.1: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:16.84 -10:32:37.6: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:16.84 -10:32:37.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0430 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:05:10.31 -08:10:56.9: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:10.31 -08:10:56.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2500 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:35.43 -10:22:20.4: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:49.76 -10:22:30.1: 14.22 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:07:23.54 -12:21:46.3: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:49.76 -10:22:30.1: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0695 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:26.79 -08:43:02.9: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:35.43 -10:22:20.4: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:35.43 -10:22:20.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3039 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:09.40 -08:33:17.9: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:07:23.54 -12:21:46.3: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:26.79 -08:43:02.9: 15.04 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:23.54 -12:21:46.3: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3148 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:26.79 -08:43:02.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5705 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:09.40 -08:33:17.9: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:09.40 -08:33:17.9: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5855 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out116803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116795.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116569_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116569_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116573_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116573_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116579_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116579_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:51.49 -07:17:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116582_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116582_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116583_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116583_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:38.49 -08:15:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116598_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116598_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116613_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116613_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116621_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116621_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.46 -05:55:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116622_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116622_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116623_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116623_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:18.08 -06:10:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116624_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116624_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116627_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116627_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116628_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116628_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:01.46 -07:10:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116640_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116640_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116642_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116642_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116644_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116644_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116649_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116649_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116651_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116651_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116652_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116652_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.12 -07:22:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116665_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116665_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116666_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116666_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116675_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 116675_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116683_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116683_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:03.77 -13:49:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116684_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116684_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:54.57 -13:28:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116685_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116685_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.46 -14:10:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116690_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116690_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:57.27 -13:28:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116694_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116694_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:36.95 -13:46:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116697_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116697_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116698_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116698_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116699_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116699_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.86 -13:12:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116700_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116700_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116702_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116702_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116703_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116703_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116704_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116704_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116705_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116705_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116714_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116714_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116718_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116718_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:38.12 -11:31:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116725_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116725_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116726_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116726_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:29.15 -12:10:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116730_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116730_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:36.16 -11:53:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116731_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116732_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116732_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.81 -14:05:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116733_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116733_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116737_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116737_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116738_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116738_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.59 -10:38:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116742_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116742_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:01.72 -13:26:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116751_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116751_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116757_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116757_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:12.08 -12:41:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116772_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116772_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116778_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116778_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:12.14 -12:55:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116781_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116781_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116790_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116790_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116795_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 116795_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116803_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116803_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:37.42 -12:51:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.716 4161960714428713728 265.40599215262 -12.85082375286 13.8815 12.0221 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.716#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116818_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116818_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:37.82 -11:25:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116827_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116827_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116828_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116828_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116838_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116838_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:22.08 -11:45:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116850_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116850_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116866_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116866_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:56.86 -06:32:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116875_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116875_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116880_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116880_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116886_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 116886_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:05.46 -10:08:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:49.51 -06:33:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013
The candidate 67471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013 did not pass the final checks