This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2451 2461215.7451 9.66 17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1
2.28417 6.98850 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.14 Irene -1 0 1 9.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7451,9.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2451 9.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2451 2461215.7451 10.93 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6
3.92013 11.71890 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V1559 Oph
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.380 V Y 0.370 V 2452234.90000 88.705406000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1559 Oph,2461215.7451,10.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1559 Oph 20260624.2451 10.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2451 2461215.7451 12.08 16:28:54.04 -12:58:39.8
2.85143 23.75774 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris -0 1 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:28:54.04 -12:58:39.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:28:54.04 -12:58:39.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7451,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2451 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2451 2461215.7451 12.18 16:39:26.37 -14:36:49.0
3.12775 20.73167 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 4327015384188428288
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.750 G 16.100 G 0.748690000000 A
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea -0 -0 0 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:39:26.37 -14:36:49.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:39:26.37 -14:36:49.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4327015384188428288,2461215.7451,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4327015384188428288 20260624.2451 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.2451 2461215.7451 13.29 16:47:16.25 -15:14:32.4
3.79310 18.83904 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.159 Aemilia -1 1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:47:16.25 -15:14:32.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:47:16.25 -15:14:32.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.7451,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.2451 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.85415595 13.05.2026 08:29:49.074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
First image: 2461173.85415595 13.05.2026 08:29:49.074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Last image: 2461215.74534491 24.06.2026 05:53:07.800 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8118
Objects passed selection criteria: 8098
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6387.5
Average stars matched: 6276 (98.2544 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 00:56:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461173.85415595 13.05.2026 08:29:49.074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
First image: 2461173.85415595 13.05.2026 08:29:49.074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Last image: 2461215.74534491 24.06.2026 05:53:07.800 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82625
Objects passed selection criteria: 82481
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72217.5
Average stars matched: 69522.8 (96.2686 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1938044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 00:59:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.74481266
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86
Second-epoch image center 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0724 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86
Second-epoch image center 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0736 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00895 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xiHkBs57aU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N9pXj31vIs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AiMsQgQy6B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.29FrCOW8pF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4966 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.2097 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4966 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.2097 deg
Loaded 6487 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4689 out of 4930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4930 out of 8488 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.08
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4966 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.2097 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4966 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.2097 deg
Loaded 6487 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4689 out of 4930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4930 out of 8488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 8530 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4965 to 261.6781 deg, Dec -23.5739 to -12.2097 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4965 to 261.6781 deg, Dec -23.5739 to -12.2097 deg
Loaded 6488 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4709 out of 4957 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4957 out of 8530 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.4 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xiHkBs57aU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=596, bad_region=0, passed=8488
Got 8488 stars (including 7885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=278 n_q2=153 n_q3=348 n_q4=162 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N9pXj31vIs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=618, bad_region=0, passed=8530
Got 8530 stars (including 7906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.6 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=280 n_q2=155 n_q3=344 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.431
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AiMsQgQy6B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=0, passed=4409
Got 4409 stars (including 4101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=285 n_q2=157 n_q3=334 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.29FrCOW8pF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=0, passed=4306
Got 4306 stars (including 4014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4306 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4196 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=280 n_q2=164 n_q3=335 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.291
ref2=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.431
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.193
reference average sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.361
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9245 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20405.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 20405_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 20432_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.90 -23:11:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04758_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 04758_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01958_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 01958_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:45.69 -16:05:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03359_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 03359_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.25 -17:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:11:52.57 -19:16:12.6
17:24:49.66 -23:15:19.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86
Second-epoch image center 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0724 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:08.624 -18:01:07.86
Second-epoch image center 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0736 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:26.280 -18:00:01.08
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:25.859 -17:59:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00895 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SQrkoELmuS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LdLoAc3Oc1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cNDZQ6RboL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CzxSBpPZXO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4382 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.1474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4382 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.1474 deg
Loaded 6531 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4534 out of 5415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5415 out of 92046 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.552800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.552800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 92046 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4382 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.1474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4382 to 261.6761 deg, Dec -23.5740 to -12.1474 deg
Loaded 6531 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4534 out of 5415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5415 out of 92046 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 92075 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4675 to 261.6805 deg, Dec -23.5739 to -12.1476 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4675 to 261.6805 deg, Dec -23.5739 to -12.1476 deg
Loaded 6524 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4538 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 92075 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 109 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SQrkoELmuS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6928, bad_region=1, passed=92026
Got 92026 stars (including 84936 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.407 n_q1=288 n_q2=158 n_q3=336 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.485
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LdLoAc3Oc1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=6956, bad_region=1, passed=92059
Got 92059 stars (including 84934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90001 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90003 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=287 n_q2=157 n_q3=336 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cNDZQ6RboL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2492, bad_region=1, passed=54155
Got 54155 stars (including 51562 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=287 n_q2=166 n_q3=327 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CzxSBpPZXO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2385, bad_region=1, passed=53568
Got 53568 stars (including 51083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.515 n_q1=291 n_q2=167 n_q3=323 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-52-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_005414_TTUQ1b1x1_3158817_J1O5UygA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:15:58.57 -16:00:11.3: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:15:59.14 -20:04:37.8: 13.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:43:04.56 -18:07:26.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:12:17.90 -16:29:04.9: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:09:34.29 -14:46:54.4: 13.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:54:32.74 -18:19:06.2: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:48:12.70 -20:10:32.5: 13.76 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:54:51.75 -17:12:51.0: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:15:08.79 -15:09:21.9: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:01:09.12 -19:19:56.7: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:43:04.56 -18:07:26.3: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:09:34.29 -14:46:54.4: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:54:51.75 -17:12:51.0: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:15:58.57 -16:00:11.3: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:15:59.14 -20:04:37.8: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:48:12.70 -20:10:32.5: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:04.56 -18:07:26.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4570 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:58.57 -16:00:11.3: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5233 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:51.75 -17:12:51.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9910 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:12.70 -20:10:32.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9264 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:59.14 -20:04:37.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4754 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:34.29 -14:46:54.4: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8947 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:12:17.90 -16:29:04.9: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:54:32.74 -18:19:06.2: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:17.90 -16:29:04.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6006 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:32.74 -18:19:06.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9690 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:01:09.12 -19:19:56.7: 13.31 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:15:08.79 -15:09:21.9: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:09.12 -19:19:56.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5215 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:08.79 -15:09:21.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9564 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:16:26.13 -16:04:58.2: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:59:47.95 -16:19:17.9: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:57:32.49 -19:56:52.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:07:26.17 -17:33:41.9: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:08:44.51 -19:00:55.1: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:16:33.38 -18:51:28.2: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:21:06.84 -17:15:36.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:59:47.95 -16:19:17.9: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:57:32.49 -19:56:52.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:47.95 -16:19:17.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4917 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:08:05.61 -20:09:26.0: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:32.49 -19:56:52.0: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3106 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:16:26.13 -16:04:58.2: 13.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:26.13 -16:04:58.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3256 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:07:26.17 -17:33:41.9: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:08:44.51 -19:00:55.1: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:44.51 -19:00:55.1: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1940 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:26.17 -17:33:41.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1860 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:28:54.04 -12:58:39.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:16:33.38 -18:51:28.2: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:33.38 -18:51:28.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8214 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:21:06.84 -17:15:36.3: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:06.84 -17:15:36.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6480 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:08:05.61 -20:09:26.0: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:05.61 -20:09:26.0: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6013 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:39:26.37 -14:36:49.0: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:28:54.04 -12:58:39.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.5: 14.60 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:16:13.52 -14:56:14.0: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:39:26.37 -14:36:49.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:06:32.31 -20:42:31.1: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:55:20.96 -21:40:02.1: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.5: 14.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:03:01.29 -19:10:38.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:05:35.68 -21:17:03.9: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.3973 delta=2.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:14:47.07 -19:51:38.1: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:16:13.52 -14:56:14.0: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:13.52 -14:56:14.0: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4412 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:06:32.31 -20:42:31.1: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:32.31 -20:42:31.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6110 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:55:20.96 -21:40:02.1: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:20.96 -21:40:02.1: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8203 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:03:01.29 -19:10:38.1: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:14:47.07 -19:51:38.1: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:05:35.68 -21:17:03.9: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:03:01.29 -19:10:38.1: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=12.7449 delta=2.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:35.68 -21:17:03.9: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6802 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:47.07 -19:51:38.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7407 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:54:59.82 -21:58:52.9: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:10:56.84 -16:37:12.7: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:10:56.84 -16:37:12.7: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:56.84 -16:37:12.7: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8201 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:54:59.82 -21:58:52.9: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:54:59.82 -21:58:52.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8193 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:14:25.17 -17:28:33.2: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:09:56.66 -20:42:04.8: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:09:04.36 -19:39:57.4: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:37:39.23 -13:15:55.8: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:19:14.44 -17:48:21.2: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:14:25.17 -17:28:33.2: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:09:56.66 -20:42:04.8: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:25.17 -17:28:33.2: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9078 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:56.66 -20:42:04.8: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9490 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:37:39.23 -13:15:55.8: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:09:04.36 -19:39:57.4: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:39.23 -13:15:55.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1826 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:04.36 -19:39:57.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9277 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:22:13.49 -16:00:23.1: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:19:14.44 -17:48:21.2: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:14.44 -17:48:21.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0168 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:22:13.49 -16:00:23.1: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:13.49 -16:00:23.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0186 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:04:30.85 -17:28:06.0: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:33:40.74 -20:52:35.8: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:04:30.85 -17:28:06.0: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:30.85 -17:28:06.0: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1717 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:56:00.79 -17:55:50.8: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:45:26.16 -19:06:33.6: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:33:40.74 -20:52:35.8: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:40.74 -20:52:35.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2356 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:15:55.73 -15:59:21.4: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:56:00.79 -17:55:50.8: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:00.79 -17:55:50.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2535 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:45:26.16 -19:06:33.6: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:15:54.79 -16:51:24.1: 13.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:26.16 -19:06:33.6: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2549 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:15:55.73 -15:59:21.4: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:55.73 -15:59:21.4: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2684 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:47:16.25 -15:14:32.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:15:54.79 -16:51:24.1: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:54.79 -16:51:24.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2694 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:19:13.46 -18:29:09.3: 13.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:47:16.25 -15:14:32.4: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:19:13.46 -18:29:09.3: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:13.46 -18:29:09.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1163 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:09:10.83 -19:03:55.4: 13.80 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:03:24.32 -23:05:38.2: 14.07 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:09:10.83 -19:03:55.4: 13.78 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:03:24.32 -23:05:38.2: 13.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:10.83 -19:03:55.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6772 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:52:02.69 -17:11:56.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:24.32 -23:05:38.2: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4946 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:22:14.26 -15:44:33.6: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:22:44.61 -17:52:54.9: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:23:56.43 -18:51:09.3: 14.84 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:52:02.69 -17:11:56.1: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:22:14.26 -15:44:33.6: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:22:44.61 -17:52:54.9: 13.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:44.61 -17:52:54.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7341 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:14.26 -15:44:33.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9127 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 16:55:51.26 -17:39:37.7: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:23:56.43 -18:51:09.3: 14.99 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:56.43 -18:51:09.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.8059 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:02:52.79 -16:53:24.5: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 16:55:51.26 -17:39:37.7: 14.45 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:51.26 -17:39:37.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2504 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:02:52.79 -16:53:24.5: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:52.79 -16:53:24.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2547 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:17:22.79 -16:05:16.2: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-29-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:09:37.56 -20:00:59.2: 14.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:17:22.79 -16:05:16.2: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:22.79 -16:05:16.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9085 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-30-24_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0327.fits at 17:09:37.56 -20:00:59.2: 14.10 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:09:37.56 -20:00:59.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7804 delta=1.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112040.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112099.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112423.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112455.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89573.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111997.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111856_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111856_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111857_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111857_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111863_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111863_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111864_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111864_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111865_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111865_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111882_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111882_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111886_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111886_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111887_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111887_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111889_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111889_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111892_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111892_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111896_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111896_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111904_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111904_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111906_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111906_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111908_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111908_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:58.29 -19:37:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111913_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111913_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:04.80 -23:03:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111914_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111914_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111916_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111916_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111920_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111920_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:46.12 -20:09:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111921_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111921_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:22.78 -16:42:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111922_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111922_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:16.41 -17:59:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111923_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111923_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111924_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111924_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.93 -18:47:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111929_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111929_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111930_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111930_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111933_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111933_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111945_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 111945_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:49.67 -23:15:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111997_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 111997_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112011_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 112011_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112030_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112030_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:03.92 -14:39:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112040_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112040_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:37.59 -14:03:37.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.560 4138144261770596096 260.40676886607 -14.06048563171 12.6888 11.2377 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112046_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112046_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112068_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112068_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:30.16 -18:42:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112082_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112082_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:47.17 -20:30:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112086_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112086_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112098_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112098_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112099_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112099_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:01.29 -19:10:38.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.109 4129257635147535232 255.75535835280 -19.17722404697 12.4886 11.4246 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.109#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112102_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112102_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112113_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112113_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112115_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112115_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:53.71 -15:13:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112118_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112118_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:53.78 -13:07:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112123_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112123_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112125_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112125_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:51.05 -14:09:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112126_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112126_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:54.87 -19:55:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112127_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112127_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:37.96 -17:12:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112141_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112141_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:36.78 -22:36:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112142_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112142_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112143_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112143_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112152_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112152_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112160_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112160_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112165_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112165_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:36.27 -16:49:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112172_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112172_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:00.45 -14:36:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112191_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:52.66 -19:52:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112196_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112196_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112200_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112200_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112206_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112206_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:28.50 -19:16:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112207_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112207_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:02.38 -19:18:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112209_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112221_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112221_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112228_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112228_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112229_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112229_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:21.65 -21:50:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112235_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112235_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:41.43 -17:07:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112242_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 112242_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112247_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112247_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.33 -20:05:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112256_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:12.91 -17:19:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112259_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:53.95 -17:19:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112273_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112273_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:49.42 -19:54:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112294_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112294_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:12.24 -15:32:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:56.84 -14:10:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112317_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112317_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:26.50 -19:48:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112321_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112321_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:12.07 -17:15:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112361_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112361_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112364_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112364_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112371_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112371_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:05.54 -19:36:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112386_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112386_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:00.69 -17:07:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112409_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112409_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112423_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:02.69 -17:11:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.192 4132605300146408448 253.01122258993 -17.19896814199 14.1799 12.4651 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.192#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112436_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112436_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:10.87 -17:26:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112449_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112449_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:36.87 -16:15:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112455_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112455_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:56.43 -18:51:09.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.228 4122575525064459648 260.98518671020 -18.85260767192 13.0995 11.8566 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.228#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112465_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112465_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112472_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 112472_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88463_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 88463_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:35.77 -20:15:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77224_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 77224_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.71 -21:44:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68179_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 68179_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:36.46 -19:34:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22367_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 22367_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:45.69 -16:05:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14786_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 14786_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.85 -14:41:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.47 -16:08:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22270_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 22270_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89573_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 89573_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:37.56 -20:00:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.769 4128218351828735872 257.40638471551 -20.01692363434 12.6131 11.4604 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.769#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82154_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 82154_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.11 -20:59:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09489_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 09489_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.17 -14:20:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39091_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 39091_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.28 -17:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55638_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 55638_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:52.60 -19:16:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 18161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.42 -15:27:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87809_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 87809_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.22 -19:53:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28532_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 28532_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:25.60 -16:30:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 78742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.18 -21:35:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22920_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 22920_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:24.03 -16:12:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 54302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.06 -19:06:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28692_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 28692_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:43.89 -16:07:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57835_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 57835_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.89 -23:11:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65946_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 65946_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.79 -19:20:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45773_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 45773_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_00-53-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks