This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.3886 2461214.8886 12.78 20:24:00.12 -13:03:51.1
31.23008 -26.34533 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:24:00.12 -13:03:51.1: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:24:00.12 -13:03:51.1: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 23.3886* 20 24 00.12 -13 03 51.1 12.8 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461214.8886,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260623.3886 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461214.8886,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260623.3886 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.3886 2461214.8886 13.63 20:45:34.12 -10:55:31.7
35.92981 -30.25371 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -1 2 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:34.12 -10:55:31.7: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:34.12 -10:55:31.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461214.8886,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260623.3886 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461214.88888832 23.06.2026 09:19:49.951 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9442
Objects passed selection criteria: 9432
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7756.5
Average stars matched: 5899 (76.0523 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114200 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 23 08:37:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461214.88888832 23.06.2026 09:19:49.951 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65055
Objects passed selection criteria: 64956
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53483.5
Average stars matched: 44016 (82.2983 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 159928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 23 08:39:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461214.88834053
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01107 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.br3vhPIBVp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0V1O2c44Th
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mfVUuabuDl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6KttBolOSf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.449100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.449100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Loaded 10202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7581 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 12515 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=7.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.br3vhPIBVp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=1217, passed=6247
Got 6247 stars (including 4715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=286 n_q2=152 n_q3=328 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0V1O2c44Th (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, bad_region=2216, passed=12515
Got 12515 stars (including 9826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=280 n_q2=141 n_q3=343 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mfVUuabuDl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, bad_region=2662, passed=10547
Got 10547 stars (including 7518 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10547 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=294 n_q2=218 n_q3=245 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6KttBolOSf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=537, bad_region=2669, passed=10656
Got 10656 stars (including 7605 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=295 n_q2=220 n_q3=245 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.253
ref2=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.190
reference average sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.266
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0408 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0509 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:16.763 -10:01:02.26
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:14.064 -10:01:02.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01107 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C5OPlXjLSw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XoLFVhF54s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fluJLTaJtH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QfjUMkAng1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.238900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.238900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.00
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 67486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Loaded 10232 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7501 out of 8355 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8355 out of 67486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C5OPlXjLSw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2235, bad_region=6663, passed=49692
Got 49692 stars (including 41013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43381 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=300 n_q2=150 n_q3=301 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XoLFVhF54s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4245, bad_region=10005, passed=67479
Got 67479 stars (including 53636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=273 n_q2=142 n_q3=353 n_q4=180 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fluJLTaJtH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4838, bad_region=12731, passed=70277
Got 70277 stars (including 54437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.497 n_q1=303 n_q2=210 n_q3=255 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QfjUMkAng1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=4884, bad_region=12703, passed=70067
Got 70067 stars (including 54223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=308 n_q2=207 n_q3=259 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0392.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-23_CI_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_043804_TTUQ2b1x1_3367577_YidUWZG2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:35:37.87 -09:38:38.9: 13.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:21.77 -12:01:08.1: 13.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:40:42.55 -11:08:26.9: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:18:17.22 -09:02:48.7: 13.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:23:36.07 -08:33:49.5: 13.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:41:34.62 -13:38:55.5: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:49.88 -13:23:46.5: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:33.51 -10:45:03.6: 14.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:43:35.90 -07:30:03.2: 13.44 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:26.87 -13:45:21.1: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:49.88 -13:23:46.5: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:41:34.62 -13:38:55.5: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:18:17.22 -09:02:48.7: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:40:42.55 -11:08:26.9: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:21.77 -12:01:08.1: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:35:37.87 -09:38:38.9: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:33.51 -10:45:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:49.88 -13:23:46.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5868 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:23:36.07 -08:33:49.5: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:43:35.90 -07:30:03.2: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:34.62 -13:38:55.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5284 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:17.22 -09:02:48.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7090 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:42.55 -11:08:26.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6874 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:21.77 -12:01:08.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7779 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:37.87 -09:38:38.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7614 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:33.51 -10:45:03.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.7499 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:36.07 -08:33:49.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5543 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.90 -07:30:03.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4795 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:26.87 -13:45:21.1: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:26.87 -13:45:21.1: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1679 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:36:23.67 -09:51:36.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:24:32.64 -07:43:23.8: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:25.1: 12.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:41.72 -13:52:24.9: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:15.96 -13:43:34.0: 13.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:24:00.12 -13:03:51.1: 14.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:06.71 -13:53:06.0: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:11.77 -14:06:50.2: 13.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:24:00.12 -13:03:51.1: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:41.72 -13:52:24.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:15.96 -13:43:34.0: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:25.1: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:24:32.64 -07:43:23.8: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:36:23.67 -09:51:36.4: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.72 -13:52:24.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3683 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:44.44 -13:55:25.1: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6817 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:15.96 -13:43:34.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2225 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:32.64 -07:43:23.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9196 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:23.67 -09:51:36.4: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1731 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:18:06.78 -11:17:05.6: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:06.71 -13:53:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:06.71 -13:53:06.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3538 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:11.77 -14:06:50.2: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:11.77 -14:06:50.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3937 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:18:06.78 -11:17:05.6: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:06.78 -11:17:05.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3677 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:03.29 -13:59:45.6: 13.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:31:52.23 -08:33:58.8: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:09.85 -12:47:26.1: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:33.07 -13:52:56.6: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:10.96 -08:10:28.5: 13.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:45.35 -12:29:34.8: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:44:10.66 -11:03:18.4: 13.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:03.29 -13:59:45.6: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:03.29 -13:59:45.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5069 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:33.07 -13:52:56.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:10.96 -08:10:28.5: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:31:52.23 -08:33:58.8: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:33.07 -13:52:56.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5925 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:10.96 -08:10:28.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5030 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:52.23 -08:33:58.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4583 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:09.85 -12:47:26.1: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:09.85 -12:47:26.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4011 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:11.18 -08:20:50.9: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:44:10.66 -11:03:18.4: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:10.66 -11:03:18.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6216 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:45.35 -12:29:34.8: 13.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:45.35 -12:29:34.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5548 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:11.18 -08:20:50.9: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:11.18 -08:20:50.9: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5329 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:10.97 -06:31:57.3: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:32:46.98 -13:41:12.6: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:44:57.82 -11:00:49.2: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:04.59 -13:29:09.3: 13.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:37:41.83 -13:14:18.2: 13.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:36:44.46 -13:35:04.4: 13.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:21.79 -12:11:37.4: 14.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:10.97 -06:31:57.3: 13.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:10.97 -06:31:57.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5805 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:32:46.98 -13:41:12.6: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:44:57.82 -11:00:49.2: 13.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:32:46.98 -13:41:12.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6164 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:04.59 -13:29:09.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:57.82 -11:00:49.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5957 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:37:41.83 -13:14:18.2: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:04.59 -13:29:09.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.6178 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:41.83 -13:14:18.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6837 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:06.73 -14:04:51.8: 14.28 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:36:44.46 -13:35:04.4: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:44.46 -13:35:04.4: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6130 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:21.79 -12:11:37.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:21.79 -12:11:37.4: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.6704 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:06.73 -14:04:51.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:06.73 -14:04:51.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=13.5709 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:34.12 -10:55:31.7: 14.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:12.83 -14:01:13.6: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:35:00.24 -14:15:34.3: 14.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:47.71 -14:13:41.2: 14.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:48:49.54 -13:39:17.6: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:33.62 -10:56:08.6: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:41:52.24 -11:34:49.3: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:12.83 -14:01:13.6: 13.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:35:00.24 -14:15:34.3: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:34.12 -10:55:31.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:12.83 -14:01:13.6: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6203 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:47.71 -14:13:41.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:00.24 -14:15:34.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6671 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:47.71 -14:13:41.2: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.7442 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:48:49.54 -13:39:17.6: 13.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:49.54 -13:39:17.6: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6080 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:02.74 -14:14:12.4: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:33.62 -10:56:08.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:33.62 -10:56:08.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7437 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:41:52.24 -11:34:49.3: 13.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:52.24 -11:34:49.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8011 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:59.57 -14:01:59.0: 14.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:02.74 -14:14:12.4: 13.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:48:00.30 -14:03:11.0: 14.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:02.74 -14:14:12.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7828 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:31:56.73 -06:48:32.5: 13.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:41.42 -14:11:57.3: 14.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:46.52 -10:37:57.9: 13.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:05.35 -13:14:43.7: 13.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:59.57 -14:01:59.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:48:00.30 -14:03:11.0: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:59.57 -14:01:59.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.5759 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:00.30 -14:03:11.0: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.7230 delta=-2.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:31:56.73 -06:48:32.5: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:46.96 -12:53:05.6: 13.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:31:56.73 -06:48:32.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6881 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:41.42 -14:11:57.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:41.42 -14:11:57.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.8242 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:46.52 -10:37:57.9: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:46.52 -10:37:57.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7802 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:05.35 -13:14:43.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:05.35 -13:14:43.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8227 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:55.67 -09:05:52.8: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:46.96 -12:53:05.6: 14.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:46.96 -12:53:05.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8400 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:41:40.41 -13:13:02.8: 13.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:22:35.12 -11:16:53.1: 13.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.8: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:55.67 -09:05:52.8: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:04.93 -13:23:07.8: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:55.67 -09:05:52.8: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8303 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:38.81 -12:23:40.4: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:03.0: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:41:40.41 -13:13:02.8: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:40.41 -13:13:02.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7227 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.8: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:22:35.12 -11:16:53.1: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:02.12 -12:42:39.8: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7551 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:04.93 -13:23:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:35.12 -11:16:53.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7438 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:52:02.80 -12:53:50.5: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:04.93 -13:23:07.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=13.7716 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:38.81 -12:23:40.4: 13.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:38.81 -12:23:40.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7884 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:03.0: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:03.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7782 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:29:22.05 -10:54:31.9: 13.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:52:02.80 -12:53:50.5: 13.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:02.80 -12:53:50.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7373 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:06.44 -13:54:44.0: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:19:48.84 -14:15:59.4: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:29:22.05 -10:54:31.9: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:22.05 -10:54:31.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8329 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:48.84 -14:15:59.4: 13.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:19:06.44 -13:54:44.0: 14.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.84 -14:15:59.4: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7303 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:06.44 -13:54:44.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8774 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66638_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66638_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66640_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66642_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66642_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66643_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66643_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66647_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66647_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66651_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66651_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66654_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66659_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:48.02 -12:52:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66669_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66669_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:36.78 -12:31:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 68663_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69816_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 69816_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70138_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 70138_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70177_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 70177_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71314_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71314_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71334_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71334_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.31 -12:49:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71564_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71564_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71657_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71918_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71918_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.84 -06:23:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71961_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 71961_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72016_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72016_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72279_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72279_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72323_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72323_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72515_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72515_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72540_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72540_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72560_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72560_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72564_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72564_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72597_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72597_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72599_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72599_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72634_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72650_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72694_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72694_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72788_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72788_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72921_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 72921_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73012_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73012_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73073_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73073_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73093_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73093_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73172_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73172_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73184_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
Preparing report for the candidate 73184_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73186_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73186_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73204_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73204_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73211_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73211_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73261_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73261_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73306_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73306_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73401_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73401_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73502_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73502_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73572_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73572_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73583_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73583_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73614_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73630_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73645_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73646_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73646_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73717_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73717_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73720_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73720_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73724_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73724_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73740_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73740_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73758_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73758_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73764_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73764_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73801_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73801_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73823_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73823_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73841_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73841_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73957_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73996_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393
The candidate 73996_fd_Cap-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-23_04-19-49_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0393 did not pass the final checks