This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.3061 2461213.8061 10.30 21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1
18.48674 -40.06950 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 0 1 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.3061* 21 04 26.09 -27 36 29.1 10.3 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.8061,10.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.3061 10.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.3061 2461213.8061 13.26 21:09:32.09 -27:37:11.4
18.81295 -41.17186 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 1 1 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:09:32.09 -27:37:11.4: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:09:32.09 -27:37:11.4: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.3061* 21 09 32.09 -27 37 11.4 13.3 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.8061,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.3061 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.3061 2461213.8061 13.09 21:13:30.15 -23:53:40.2
23.89943 -41.10251 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:13:30.15 -23:53:40.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:13:30.15 -23:53:40.2: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.3061* 21 13 30.15 -23 53 40.2 13.1 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.8061,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.3061 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461213.80635875 22.06.2026 07:20:59.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3624
Objects passed selection criteria: 3624
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3543.5
Average stars matched: 3391 (95.6963 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 04:39:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461213.80635875 22.06.2026 07:20:59.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 162
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27407
Objects passed selection criteria: 27353
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26366.5
Average stars matched: 25195.5 (95.5588 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 130872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 04:42:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.80593343
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0924 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35
Second-epoch second image center 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00360 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SxMfFEgsd1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GYZ7JT8K4s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y22NPz1H1e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yPLTZFs90i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.480700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.480700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Loaded 7549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3915 out of 3964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3964 out of 4783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SxMfFEgsd1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, bad_region=821, passed=4477
Got 4477 stars (including 3400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=327 n_q2=157 n_q3=325 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GYZ7JT8K4s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, bad_region=800, passed=4783
Got 4783 stars (including 3752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=320 n_q2=152 n_q3=347 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y22NPz1H1e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, bad_region=782, passed=4081
Got 4081 stars (including 3074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=329 n_q2=162 n_q3=314 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yPLTZFs90i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=273, bad_region=785, passed=4079
Got 4079 stars (including 3075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=322 n_q2=162 n_q3=315 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.069
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.286 worst_q_ratio=1.131
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.239
reference average sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.1
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20576.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20576_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 20576_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.12 -28:47:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:04:26.09 -27:36:29.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0924 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:06:50.911 -25:58:54.35
Second-epoch second image center 21:06:50.045 -25:58:59.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00360 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.99j6T6uHkI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R4uuTPR55W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RO8BMWIW4e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1aDbmvdUjf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.303700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.303700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 32134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Loaded 7617 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5799 out of 6049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6049 out of 32134 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 83 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.99j6T6uHkI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1200, bad_region=3828, passed=31550
Got 31550 stars (including 26696 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28170 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=330 n_q2=149 n_q3=321 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R4uuTPR55W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=976, bad_region=4474, passed=32132
Got 32132 stars (including 26773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=316 n_q2=142 n_q3=349 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RO8BMWIW4e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1001, bad_region=4422, passed=29869
Got 29869 stars (including 24567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=324 n_q2=172 n_q3=294 n_q4=177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1aDbmvdUjf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1008, bad_region=4472, passed=29857
Got 29857 stars (including 24502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=328 n_q2=170 n_q3=293 n_q4=178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043226_TTUQ2b1x1_1206806_0jgDbyfi/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:20.32 -27:20:24.8: 13.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:00.60 -24:39:27.4: 12.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:12.0: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:48.71 -29:33:05.3: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:40:07.47 -23:28:11.0: 13.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:20.32 -27:20:24.8: 13.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:20.32 -27:20:24.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5932 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:00.60 -24:39:27.4: 11.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:12.0: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:00.60 -24:39:27.4: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4854 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:10.87 -28:44:12.0: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9715 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:48.71 -29:33:05.3: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:48.71 -29:33:05.3: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6545 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:40:07.47 -23:28:11.0: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:07.47 -23:28:11.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4527 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:12:47.88 -28:09:07.3: 12.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:51:14.73 -30:01:03.1: 13.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:09:32.09 -27:37:11.4: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:13:30.15 -23:53:40.2: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:15:19.35 -30:06:50.1: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:12:47.88 -28:09:07.3: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:47.88 -28:09:07.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9504 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:51:14.73 -30:01:03.1: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:14.73 -30:01:03.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0201 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:09:32.09 -27:37:11.4: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:14:32.33 -28:12:58.1: 13.46 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:35:49.67 -29:54:50.8: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:13:30.15 -23:53:40.2: 15.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:15:19.35 -30:06:50.1: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:15:19.35 -30:06:50.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3691 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:15.78 -29:20:22.0: 13.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:13:48.45 -30:12:28.7: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:14:32.33 -28:12:58.1: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:32.33 -28:12:58.1: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3679 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:23.14 -29:46:32.8: 13.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:35:49.67 -29:54:50.8: 13.34 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:49.67 -29:54:50.8: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2938 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:15.78 -29:20:22.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:13:48.45 -30:12:28.7: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:15.78 -29:20:22.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.5632 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:48.45 -30:12:28.7: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6161 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:58.70 -30:02:48.6: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:17:03.65 -26:39:13.6: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:23.14 -29:46:32.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:23.14 -29:46:32.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5936 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:26:47.17 -27:21:00.5: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:20:46.31 -27:14:56.8: 13.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:17:03.65 -26:39:13.6: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:35:25.67 -29:46:49.4: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:58.70 -30:02:48.6: 13.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:03.65 -26:39:13.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6572 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:58.70 -30:02:48.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5517 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:11.5: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:00:28.44 -28:28:25.7: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:20:46.31 -27:14:56.8: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:46.31 -27:14:56.8: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5811 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:26:47.17 -27:21:00.5: 14.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:26:47.17 -27:21:00.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7167 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:36.48 -29:22:29.8: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:35:25.67 -29:46:49.4: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:25.67 -29:46:49.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4876 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:11.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:05.10 -28:28:11.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6691 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:50.82 -29:30:59.0: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:35:36.62 -29:45:48.7: 13.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:36.48 -29:22:29.8: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:36.48 -29:22:29.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4985 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:00:28.44 -28:28:25.7: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:28.44 -28:28:25.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6578 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:50.82 -29:30:59.0: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:35:36.62 -29:45:48.7: 13.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:50.82 -29:30:59.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5989 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:36.62 -29:45:48.7: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6589 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:50.8: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:25:58.88 -28:26:06.1: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:16:14.78 -30:05:14.4: 13.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:23:13.82 -29:47:47.0: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:25:58.88 -28:26:06.1: 14.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:25:58.88 -28:26:06.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7442 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:50.8: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:16.12 -29:41:50.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7208 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:16:14.78 -30:05:14.4: 13.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:16:14.78 -30:05:14.4: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7813 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:23:13.82 -29:47:47.0: 13.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:24:24.68 -28:56:17.3: 14.29 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:23:13.82 -29:47:47.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7757 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:24:00.11 -28:31:54.6: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:29.73 -26:49:58.5: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:59.01 -30:15:37.9: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:24:00.11 -28:31:54.6: 14.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:00.11 -28:31:54.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8310 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:24:24.68 -28:56:17.3: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:24.68 -28:56:17.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8707 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:36:03.86 -29:51:39.5: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:29.73 -26:49:58.5: 13.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:29.73 -26:49:58.5: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7476 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:17:21.25 -29:28:06.9: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:48.80 -29:33:58.4: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:11:28.93 -29:27:00.0: 14.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:36:03.86 -29:51:39.5: 14.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:59.01 -30:15:37.9: 14.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:03.86 -29:51:39.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6714 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:59.01 -30:15:37.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6259 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:17:21.25 -29:28:06.9: 13.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:21.25 -29:28:06.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7018 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:03.55 -28:23:31.0: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:48.80 -29:33:58.4: 14.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:11:28.93 -29:27:00.0: 14.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:07.39 -29:27:13.9: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:11:28.93 -29:27:00.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8199 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:48.80 -29:33:58.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6365 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:20:23.71 -26:56:22.5: 14.62 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:55.72 -30:06:19.7: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:20:23.71 -26:56:22.5: 14.54 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:42.58 -29:50:14.0: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:47:19.66 -29:26:38.2: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:20:23.71 -26:56:22.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.8907 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:03.55 -28:23:31.0: 13.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:03.55 -28:23:31.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6623 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:07.39 -29:27:13.9: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:07.39 -29:27:13.9: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6997 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:55.72 -30:06:19.7: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:55.72 -30:06:19.7: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6632 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:47:19.66 -29:26:38.2: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:19.66 -29:26:38.2: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7182 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:09.46 -26:05:22.6: 13.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:42.58 -29:50:14.0: 14.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:42.58 -29:50:14.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8131 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:50.76 -27:01:24.1: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:09.46 -26:05:22.6: 13.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:09.46 -26:05:22.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7272 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:42:20.33 -29:20:52.6: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:43:05.05 -29:34:19.3: 14.29 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:50.76 -27:01:24.1: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:50.76 -27:01:24.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6699 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:43:05.05 -29:34:19.3: 14.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:42:20.33 -29:20:52.6: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:05.05 -29:34:19.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6849 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:20.33 -29:20:52.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7466 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:42:05.55 -26:57:51.7: 14.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:54.46 -29:39:07.3: 14.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:42:23.48 -30:03:16.2: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:42:05.55 -26:57:51.7: 14.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:05.55 -26:57:51.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7074 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:54.46 -29:39:07.3: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.46 -29:39:07.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7503 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:39:42.18 -28:49:55.1: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:46:28.22 -26:30:09.0: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:42:23.48 -30:03:16.2: 14.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:23.48 -30:03:16.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6466 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:39:42.18 -28:49:55.1: 13.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:42.18 -28:49:55.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7058 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:46:28.22 -26:30:09.0: 14.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:28.22 -26:30:09.0: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8465 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53052_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53055_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53063_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53073_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:26.08 -27:36:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53075_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53076_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53081_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53083_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53090_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53099_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53106_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53107_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53107_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53115_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53115_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53129_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53136_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53142_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53143_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 53152_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53158_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
Preparing report for the candidate 53160_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53163_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53163_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53168_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53170_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53174_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53178_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53185_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53206_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53209_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53214_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53220_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53225_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53225_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53228_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53229_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53230_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53238_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53241_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53241_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53246_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53250_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53252_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53255_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53259_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53260_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53265_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53265_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53271_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53275_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53279_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53279_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53294_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53294_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53297_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53305_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53309_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53315_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53315_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53319_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53323_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53331_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53334_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53334_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53338_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53338_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53341_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53341_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53342_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53347_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53356_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53357_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53360_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53360_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53361_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53371_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53371_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53378_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53392_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53392_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53402_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53402_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53405_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53405_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53416_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53416_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53423_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53425_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53425_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53451_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53451_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53455_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53460_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53475_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53475_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53489_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53489_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 53509_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287
The candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_02-20-59_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0287 did not pass the final checks