This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2271 2461213.7271 11.49 19:24:55.71 -26:20:25.4
12.21149 -18.56971 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:24:55.71 -26:20:25.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:24:55.71 -26:20:25.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7271,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2271 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2271 2461213.7271 11.68 19:31:53.63 -27:39:43.7
11.50042 -20.49453 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia -0 0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:31:53.63 -27:39:43.7: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:31:53.63 -27:39:43.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7271,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2271 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2271 2461213.7271 11.63 19:06:01.31 -27:10:30.2
9.72356 -14.98706 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 -1 1 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:01.31 -27:10:30.2: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:01.31 -27:10:30.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7271,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2271 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2271 2461213.7271 12.73 19:18:39.80 -25:01:18.5
12.93319 -16.76465 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -0 1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:39.80 -25:01:18.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:39.80 -25:01:18.5: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7271,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2271 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461213.72729593 22.06.2026 05:27:08.368 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7684
Objects passed selection criteria: 7680
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7941.75
Average stars matched: 6966.75 (87.7231 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 00:41:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461213.72729593 22.06.2026 05:27:08.368 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 110
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88857
Objects passed selection criteria: 88781
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89442.2
Average stars matched: 75926.5 (84.8889 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2270764 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 00:45:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.72680855
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0762 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01326 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uSpDZIAu0Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nl1zFYEesW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cGt3lDvkpt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZjOgz5fGLJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uSpDZIAu0Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, bad_region=1388, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 6796 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.747 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.484 n_q1=303 n_q2=135 n_q3=301 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nl1zFYEesW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, bad_region=2274, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 10138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=321 n_q2=159 n_q3=272 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cGt3lDvkpt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=514, bad_region=1556, passed=8445
Got 8445 stars (including 6460 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=303 n_q2=150 n_q3=282 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZjOgz5fGLJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=1530, passed=8427
Got 8427 stars (including 6459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.759 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=310 n_q2=146 n_q3=280 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.565 worst_q_ratio=1.323
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.572 worst_q_ratio=1.335
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits sigma_overall=0.581 worst_q_ratio=1.306
reference average sigma_overall=0.5355 worst_q_ratio=1.347
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:32.90 -29:04:02.1: 12.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:32.90 -29:04:02.1: 11.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:41:32.90 -29:04:02.1: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.4427 delta=1.45 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out23845.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23827_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 23827_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23836_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 23836_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.70 -26:20:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23842_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 23842_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.47 -22:34:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23845_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 23845_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.90 -29:04:02.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.330 4071553959281720832 280.38580538525 -29.06769625241 10.6596 9.3639 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.330#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.30 -28:51:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0762 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0895 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:45.554 -25:57:18.64
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:42.844 -25:56:47.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01326 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FUhAyCplwC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vXfSE2zCTh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d8jzuemFVe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uiTlpH4f5k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FUhAyCplwC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, bad_region=9579, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 70842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=331 n_q2=144 n_q3=263 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vXfSE2zCTh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, bad_region=17584, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 115576 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=325 n_q2=171 n_q3=233 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.513
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d8jzuemFVe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=6018, bad_region=10444, passed=88526
Got 88526 stars (including 72408 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.802 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=318 n_q2=154 n_q3=254 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uiTlpH4f5k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=5965, bad_region=10625, passed=89197
Got 89197 stars (including 72986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89197 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=322 n_q2=159 n_q3=251 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.418
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-26-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003427_TTUQ2b1x1_193169_UotvwLoH/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:23.30 -28:20:20.3: 12.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:52.38 -23:25:10.3: 13.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:30.16 -27:11:49.9: 13.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:12:34.89 -23:06:41.7: 11.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:41.98 -29:34:14.5: 13.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:21:35.95 -25:17:43.7: 13.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:03.85 -22:50:06.9: 12.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:12.41 -25:19:07.4: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:12.59 -29:42:35.4: 12.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:15.66 -28:16:48.2: 13.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:30.16 -27:11:49.9: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:34.89 -23:06:41.7: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:03.85 -22:50:06.9: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:35.95 -25:17:43.7: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:23.30 -28:20:20.3: 12.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:12.59 -29:42:35.4: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:30.16 -27:11:49.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4179 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:35.95 -25:17:43.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2291 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:34.89 -23:06:41.7: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1047 delta=-1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:12.59 -29:42:35.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0686 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:03.85 -22:50:06.9: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7607 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:23.30 -28:20:20.3: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8905 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:41.98 -29:34:14.5: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:15.66 -28:16:48.2: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:41.98 -29:34:14.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4463 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:12.41 -25:19:07.4: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:15.66 -28:16:48.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9222 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:12.41 -25:19:07.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3007 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:52.38 -23:25:10.3: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:52.38 -23:25:10.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2220 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:41.69 -25:18:23.2: 12.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:40.88 -27:17:58.9: 13.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:42.73 -27:27:52.7: 12.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:23.09 -25:09:59.6: 12.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:25.50 -29:00:19.4: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:02.70 -22:02:27.2: 12.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:24:55.71 -26:20:25.4: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:41.69 -25:18:23.2: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:40.88 -27:17:58.9: 13.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:42.73 -27:27:52.7: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:41.69 -25:18:23.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9134 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:40.88 -27:17:58.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9989 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:25.50 -29:00:19.4: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:42.73 -27:27:52.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8659 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:23.09 -25:09:59.6: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:25.50 -29:00:19.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5344 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.09 -25:09:59.6: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9092 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:31:53.63 -27:39:43.7: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:02.70 -22:02:27.2: 12.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:24:55.71 -26:20:25.4: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:02.70 -22:02:27.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5837 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:01.31 -27:10:30.2: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:31:53.63 -27:39:43.7: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:01.31 -27:10:30.2: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:39.80 -25:01:18.5: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:39.80 -25:01:18.5: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:11.16 -26:11:26.6: 13.27 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:46.75 -24:20:46.1: 12.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:25.89 -24:59:02.7: 13.16 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:11.16 -26:11:26.6: 13.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:11.16 -26:11:26.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9515 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:27:30.60 -22:20:26.5: 12.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:46.75 -24:20:46.1: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:46.75 -24:20:46.1: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8916 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:25.89 -24:59:02.7: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:25.89 -24:59:02.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2008 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:12:33.19 -28:38:27.7: 13.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:27:30.60 -22:20:26.5: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:30.60 -22:20:26.5: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2611 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:33.14 -28:08:52.0: 13.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:33.19 -28:38:27.7: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:33.19 -28:38:27.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4560 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:22.16 -25:14:57.0: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:33.14 -28:08:52.0: 13.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:33.14 -28:08:52.0: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3806 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:22.16 -25:14:57.0: 13.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:22.16 -25:14:57.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4890 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:43.29 -26:07:06.9: 13.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:16.98 -23:19:42.6: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:03.40 -25:09:04.2: 13.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:54.28 -22:50:53.0: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:03.40 -25:09:04.2: 13.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:03.40 -25:09:04.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4857 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:43.29 -26:07:06.9: 13.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:43.29 -26:07:06.9: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5468 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:16.98 -23:19:42.6: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:16.98 -23:19:42.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4946 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:54.28 -22:50:53.0: 13.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:54.28 -22:50:53.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6137 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148275.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148468.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148137_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148137_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148148_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148148_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148157_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148160_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148160_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148164_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148164_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148172_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148172_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148175_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148175_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148182_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148182_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148184_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148184_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148189_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148189_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:53.05 -22:25:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148192_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148192_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148201_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148201_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148203_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:29.71 -27:44:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148275_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 148275_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148284_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148284_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.31 -28:37:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148285_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 148285_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 148305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148360_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148360_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.91 -25:53:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148365_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.24 -25:11:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148433_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.12 -26:25:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148456_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148456_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.00 -27:20:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148468_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
Preparing report for the candidate 148468_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148470_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148470_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.90 -28:06:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148478_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148478_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.51 -25:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148491_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148491_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.43 -23:55:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148520_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148520_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.84 -28:00:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148563_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148563_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148578_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148578_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:49.79 -26:58:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148584_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.19 -28:17:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148694_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148694_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148705_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148741_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148741_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:49.21 -23:08:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148742_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148760_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148760_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148773_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148773_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148818_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148818_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148835_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148835_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148840_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148840_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 148877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.26 -25:01:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.53 -24:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.48 -22:34:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.21 -28:07:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.54 -27:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.48 -21:51:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.29 -28:51:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.66 -28:03:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.73 -25:10:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.34 -23:36:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.72 -26:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.56 -29:49:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.96 -22:59:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.56 -23:19:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165
The candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-27-08_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0165 did not pass the final checks