This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.1337 2461213.6337 13.41 15:56:55.04 -29:56:03.7
344.12144 17.73600 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.195 Eurykleia -0 1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:55.04 -29:56:03.7: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:55.04 -29:56:03.7: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.6337,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.1337 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.1337 2461213.6337 13.46 15:32:45.83 -37:24:00.5
335.12430 15.18964 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX12" Gaia DR3 6012624567071953280
Type: E
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
18.850 G 19.060 G 3.682050000000
The object was found in astcheck.466 Tisiphone -2 -2 3 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:45.83 -37:24:00.5: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:45.83 -37:24:00.5: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6012624567071953280,2461213.6337,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6012624567071953280 20260622.1337 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461213.63400353 22.06.2026 03:12:47.905 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4106
Objects passed selection criteria: 4104
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4153.5
Average stars matched: 4101 (98.736 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111208 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 22:18:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461213.63400353 22.06.2026 03:12:47.905 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 42852
Objects passed selection criteria: 42791
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 42063
Average stars matched: 41253.5 (98.0755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150736 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 22:21:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.63347728
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tJcn40OUtX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DVBNX052Uj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RzB3vQp4Tr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MkHe4JIizb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tJcn40OUtX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, bad_region=1560, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 5141 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=325 n_q2=160 n_q3=267 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DVBNX052Uj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, bad_region=1222, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 3753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=308 n_q2=159 n_q3=273 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RzB3vQp4Tr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=465, bad_region=1197, passed=4817
Got 4817 stars (including 3281 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4817 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=306 n_q2=167 n_q3=254 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MkHe4JIizb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=1210, passed=4800
Got 4800 stars (including 3291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=307 n_q2=170 n_q3=249 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.126
ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.595 worst_q_ratio=1.110
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.555 worst_q_ratio=1.311
reference average sigma_overall=0.4465 worst_q_ratio=1.1535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20196_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 20196_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.69 -36:13:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0082 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.702 -33:59:55.92
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:06.595 -33:59:14.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zw2IfRqSZi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Od3fQzedVc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZfebHgvzpR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p6ZfeExYZr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 58 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Zw2IfRqSZi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, bad_region=14793, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 52720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=331 n_q2=161 n_q3=267 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Od3fQzedVc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, bad_region=10004, passed=47285
Got 47285 stars (including 35789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=310 n_q2=166 n_q3=252 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZfebHgvzpR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2378, bad_region=12542, passed=50487
Got 50487 stars (including 36184 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=324 n_q2=179 n_q3=221 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p6ZfeExYZr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2294, bad_region=12500, passed=51221
Got 51221 stars (including 36939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51221 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=329 n_q2=182 n_q3=220 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-02_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221427_TTUQ2b1x1_3385623_B60Trb8X/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:48.60 -30:55:46.7: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:42.02 -31:57:03.5: 13.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:47.12 -33:27:59.5: 13.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:27:00.03 -37:58:08.3: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:22.82 -34:57:40.6: 13.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:08:08.39 -32:06:51.9: 13.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:26:09.28 -37:10:51.7: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:25:17.28 -36:42:27.4: 12.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:22:35.22 -37:02:03.9: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:53:47.12 -33:27:59.5: 13.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:50:22.82 -34:57:40.6: 13.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:26:09.28 -37:10:51.7: 12.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:47.12 -33:27:59.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3372 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:43:42.02 -31:57:03.5: 12.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:48.60 -30:55:46.7: 12.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:27:00.03 -37:58:08.3: 12.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:08:08.39 -32:06:51.9: 13.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:22.82 -34:57:40.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5424 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:09.28 -37:10:51.7: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6056 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:48.60 -30:55:46.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0290 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:42.02 -31:57:03.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1557 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:00.03 -37:58:08.3: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0264 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:08.39 -32:06:51.9: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3197 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:25:17.28 -36:42:27.4: 12.49 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:17.28 -36:42:27.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3656 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:22:35.22 -37:02:03.9: 13.46 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:35.22 -37:02:03.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2206 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:55.04 -29:56:03.7: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:23.64 -37:51:15.5: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:29:48.22 -37:08:25.2: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:13.66 -37:28:48.4: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:49.56 -31:04:23.2: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:45.83 -37:24:00.5: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:31:10.08 -37:16:51.7: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:08.56 -35:56:09.3: 14.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:28.31 -31:45:26.3: 13.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:55.04 -29:56:03.7: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:45:29.81 -37:21:06.6: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:39:13.66 -37:28:48.4: 13.68 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:31:10.08 -37:16:51.7: 13.53 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:29:48.22 -37:08:25.2: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:23.64 -37:51:15.5: 13.80 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:45.83 -37:24:00.5: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:55:08.56 -35:56:09.3: 14.21 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:28.31 -31:45:26.3: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:49.56 -31:04:23.2: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:13.66 -37:28:48.4: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3625 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:10.08 -37:16:51.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:48.22 -37:08:25.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2150 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:23.64 -37:51:15.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5712 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:08.56 -35:56:09.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6125 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:28.31 -31:45:26.3: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4854 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:49.56 -31:04:23.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5184 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:45:29.81 -37:21:06.6: 14.00 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:29.81 -37:21:06.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5800 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:40.26 -35:38:06.9: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:15.17 -37:38:08.9: 13.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:17.63 -38:14:33.5: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:11.71 -31:17:47.8: 14.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:30:34.38 -35:40:14.8: 13.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:24.95 -35:35:06.1: 13.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:40.26 -35:38:06.9: 13.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:40.26 -35:38:06.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7497 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:17.63 -38:14:33.5: 13.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:33:15.17 -37:38:08.9: 13.99 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:11.71 -31:17:47.8: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:17.63 -38:14:33.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5502 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:15.17 -37:38:08.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6355 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:25.62 -32:01:10.0: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:11.71 -31:17:47.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7358 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:10.34 -37:57:00.4: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:30:34.38 -35:40:14.8: 13.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:34.38 -35:40:14.8: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5383 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:24.95 -35:35:06.1: 13.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:24.95 -35:35:06.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7786 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:25.62 -32:01:10.0: 13.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:25.62 -32:01:10.0: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7426 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:10.34 -37:57:00.4: 13.53 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:10.34 -37:57:00.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5686 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:29.00 -36:17:27.0: 14.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:28.03 -31:52:39.6: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:09.15 -34:57:02.4: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:30:30.94 -37:09:24.1: 14.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:44:10.36 -35:15:45.0: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:01.09 -32:22:41.4: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:29.00 -36:17:27.0: 13.98 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:50:28.03 -31:52:39.6: 13.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:36.82 -34:00:05.1: 14.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.03 -31:52:39.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7265 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:29.00 -36:17:27.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6050 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:58:09.15 -34:57:02.4: 14.18 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:09.15 -34:57:02.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8452 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:30:30.94 -37:09:24.1: 14.08 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:30.94 -37:09:24.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5236 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:44:10.36 -35:15:45.0: 13.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:51.53 -35:49:37.9: 13.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:00:01.09 -32:22:41.4: 14.00 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:10.36 -35:15:45.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7048 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:01.09 -32:22:41.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7618 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:36.82 -34:00:05.1: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:36.82 -34:00:05.1: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9133 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:51.53 -35:49:37.9: 14.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:51.53 -35:49:37.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6501 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:54.85 -30:42:09.1: 14.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:06.24 -33:20:01.1: 14.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:24.54 -34:51:19.6: 13.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:05.21 -33:15:59.2: 13.98 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:06.98 -33:01:03.2: 14.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:22:43.54 -37:52:44.3: 13.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:02.33 -34:54:15.4: 14.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:54.85 -30:42:09.1: 13.96 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:55:06.24 -33:20:01.1: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:06.24 -33:20:01.1: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8073 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:54.85 -30:42:09.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8708 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:24.54 -34:51:19.6: 13.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:24.54 -34:51:19.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8103 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:00:05.21 -33:15:59.2: 14.07 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:52:06.98 -33:01:03.2: 13.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:05.21 -33:15:59.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8599 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:06.98 -33:01:03.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8501 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:55.52 -37:53:51.0: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:22:43.54 -37:52:44.3: 13.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:43.54 -37:52:44.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6727 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:56:02.33 -34:54:15.4: 14.34 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:02.33 -34:54:15.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8978 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:39:55.52 -37:53:51.0: 14.23 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:55.52 -37:53:51.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8634 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:57.26 -30:42:31.2: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:53.88 -34:00:42.1: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:27.51 -35:04:54.6: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:20.77 -33:10:49.9: 14.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:51:57.26 -30:42:31.2: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:36:53.88 -34:00:42.1: 14.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:57.26 -30:42:31.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9164 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:53.88 -34:00:42.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8646 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:27.51 -35:04:54.6: 13.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:27.51 -35:04:54.6: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8842 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:20.77 -33:10:49.9: 13.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:20.77 -33:10:49.9: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9424 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82357.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81841_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81841_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81846_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81846_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81855_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81855_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81869_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81869_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81878_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81878_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81888_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81888_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81894_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81894_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81932_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81932_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:02.23 -36:59:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82105_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82105_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:06.72 -31:35:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82108_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82108_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82113_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82113_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:05.84 -30:35:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82164_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 82164_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82235_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82235_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82237_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82237_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82283_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82283_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82303_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82303_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82331_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82331_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82357_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 82357_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82371_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82371_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82377_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82377_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82397_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82417_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82417_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82421_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82421_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82431_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82431_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82435_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82435_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82438_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82438_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82449_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82449_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82450_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82451_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82451_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82465_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82465_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:07.49 -31:23:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82489_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82490_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82490_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:14.74 -33:36:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82492_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:16.40 -36:54:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82506_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82506_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82513_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82521_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82521_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82536_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82536_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82542_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82542_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82557_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:01.26 -32:53:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82558_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82558_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82561_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82561_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82563_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82564_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82564_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82581_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82581_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82583_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82583_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82591_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82591_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82592_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82592_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82616_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82616_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82621_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82621_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82640_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82640_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82664_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82690_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82690_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82705_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 82705_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.79 -36:13:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:23.94 -32:51:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81196_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019
The candidate 81196_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_22-12-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0019 did not pass the final checks