This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2471 2461212.7471 11.61 16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7
5.88442 27.94104 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 0 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7471,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2471 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2471 2461212.7471 11.95 16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0
3.13527 23.35978 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -0 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7471,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2471 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2471 2461212.7471 13.56 16:40:50.24 -12:01:42.0
5.57493 21.99890 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 0 0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:50.24 -12:01:42.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:50.24 -12:01:42.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7471,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2471 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2471 2461212.7471 13.87 16:12:33.45 -12:44:14.0
0.29715 27.01379 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 0 0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:33.45 -12:44:14.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:33.45 -12:44:14.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7471,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2471 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461212.74730943 21.06.2026 05:55:57.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6348
Objects passed selection criteria: 6343
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5880.75
Average stars matched: 5710.5 (97.105 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 01:22:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461212.74730943 21.06.2026 05:55:57.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 118
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53311
Objects passed selection criteria: 53196
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 50079.8
Average stars matched: 48081 (96.0089 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 01:24:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.74684760
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z6Hh413WLL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h44t6e0XY4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IIWwKmbrLK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7vfUxbThIN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.849000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.849000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z6Hh413WLL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h44t6e0XY4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IIWwKmbrLK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=372, passed=7303
Got 7303 stars (including 6925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.618 n_q1=199 n_q2=292 n_q3=195 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7vfUxbThIN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=7268
Got 7268 stars (including 6878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.632 n_q1=202 n_q2=290 n_q3=195 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.270
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.187
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits sigma_overall=0.532 worst_q_ratio=1.188
reference average sigma_overall=0.3445 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:16.56 -08:42:34.9: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:44.02 -09:39:06.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:36.0: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:53.07 -05:51:12.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:43.73 -10:42:52.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.04 -09:51:38.9: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.2: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:16.56 -08:42:34.9: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:44.02 -09:39:06.5: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:16.56 -08:42:34.9: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1946 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:44.02 -09:39:06.5: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1463 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:53.07 -05:51:12.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.04 -09:51:38.9: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:53.07 -05:51:12.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2183 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:26.59 -06:23:57.0: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2147 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:36.0: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.04 -09:51:38.9: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0450 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:51.34 -06:39:36.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1693 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:43.73 -10:42:52.2: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.2: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:43.73 -10:42:52.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1356 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.48 -08:07:31.2: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8310 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:41.66 -10:14:35.2: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:41.66 -10:14:35.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:41.66 -10:14:35.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2321 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20491_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 20491_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20513_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20513_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20543_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20543_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20545_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20550_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20550_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20555_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20555_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20559_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20559_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20560_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20560_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20563_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 20563_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.44 -07:42:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:22:05.37 -08:16:18.7
16:30:50.79 -13:00:54.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0109 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:09.160 -09:59:57.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:08.685 -09:59:18.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01106 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r8gc2lX41X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rbvshep0GB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yznoUKlxfF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DM2hYaUlld
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.684850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.684850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r8gc2lX41X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3301, passed=66491
Got 66491 stars (including 63079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=219 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rbvshep0GB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3301, passed=66535
Got 66535 stars (including 63103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=235 n_q2=248 n_q3=217 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yznoUKlxfF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2583, passed=54041
Got 54041 stars (including 51397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54041 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=214 n_q2=278 n_q3=209 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DM2hYaUlld (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2644, passed=54563
Got 54563 stars (including 51866 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54563 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=215 n_q2=282 n_q3=208 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_011950_TTUQ2b1x1_543096_h6126htc/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:23.75 -13:29:01.0: 14.19 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:02.98 -13:10:50.3: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:32.84 -13:14:56.2: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:56.63 -12:11:57.2: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:26.68 -12:24:48.3: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:17.75 -08:02:01.7: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:21.86 -12:36:07.9: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:05.40 -06:57:15.1: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:17.75 -08:02:01.7: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:21.86 -12:36:07.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:56.63 -12:11:57.2: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:32.84 -13:14:56.2: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:17.75 -08:02:01.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5888 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:21.86 -12:36:07.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0743 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:26.68 -12:24:48.3: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:23.75 -13:29:01.0: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:02.98 -13:10:50.3: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:56.63 -12:11:57.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6835 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:32.84 -13:14:56.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0023 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:05.40 -06:57:15.1: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:26.68 -12:24:48.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5108 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:23.75 -13:29:01.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2973 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:02.98 -13:10:50.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8816 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:05.40 -06:57:15.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3006 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:50.24 -12:01:42.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.96 -07:08:16.3: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:50.24 -12:01:42.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.96 -07:08:16.3: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.96 -07:08:16.3: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6111 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.45 -12:08:22.1: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:46.12 -13:55:52.3: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:33.45 -12:44:14.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:58.29 -08:14:10.0: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:59.06 -07:06:45.1: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:37.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:49.33 -13:50:04.7: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:38.98 -12:35:30.0: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.45 -12:08:22.1: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.45 -12:08:22.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8924 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:46.12 -13:55:52.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:58.29 -08:14:10.0: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:33.45 -12:44:14.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:59.06 -07:06:45.1: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:37.0: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:49.33 -13:50:04.7: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.12 -13:55:52.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0990 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:58.29 -08:14:10.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2114 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.06 -07:06:45.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2492 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.62 -10:21:37.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1056 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:49.33 -13:50:04.7: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2295 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:50.35 -12:18:11.5: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:38.98 -12:35:30.0: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:38.98 -12:35:30.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4150 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:50.35 -12:18:11.5: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:50.35 -12:18:11.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4163 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.16 -08:42:26.7: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:45.91 -12:48:34.6: 14.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:29.33 -12:59:32.1: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:11.38 -12:54:03.3: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:00.00 -12:34:58.6: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:47.22 -08:54:09.0: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:18.06 -07:50:54.5: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.16 -08:42:26.7: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:45.91 -12:48:34.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:29.33 -12:59:32.1: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.16 -08:42:26.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0271 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:11.38 -12:54:03.3: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:45.91 -12:48:34.6: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5098 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:29.33 -12:59:32.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4436 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:11.38 -12:54:03.3: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5508 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:00.00 -12:34:58.6: 14.56 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:00.00 -12:34:58.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3361 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:55.59 -11:07:38.2: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:18.06 -07:50:54.5: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:47.22 -08:54:09.0: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:18.06 -07:50:54.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4391 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:47.22 -08:54:09.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4727 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:55.59 -11:07:38.2: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:55.59 -11:07:38.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5830 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:22.34 -13:02:46.5: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:22.65 -13:10:09.3: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:26.30 -06:56:27.2: 15.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:58.02 -11:39:29.2: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:24.94 -11:08:23.2: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:22.34 -13:02:46.5: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:35:26.78 -14:01:35.1: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:58.02 -11:39:29.2: 15.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:22.65 -13:10:09.3: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:22.34 -13:02:46.5: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5070 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:08.42 -13:11:56.0: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:26.30 -06:56:27.2: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:58.02 -11:39:29.2: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6359 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:24.94 -11:08:23.2: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:22.65 -13:10:09.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6370 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:26.30 -06:56:27.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4804 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:24.94 -11:08:23.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6279 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:27.47 -10:59:50.4: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:08.42 -13:11:56.0: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:35:26.78 -14:01:35.1: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:08.42 -13:11:56.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7422 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:26.78 -14:01:35.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5843 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:27.47 -10:59:50.4: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:27.47 -10:59:50.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5910 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:22.01 -09:27:23.5: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:27.85 -13:54:00.9: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:23.11 -12:39:17.9: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:05.19 -13:27:30.1: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:38.68 -14:03:35.3: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:22.01 -09:27:23.5: 14.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:27.85 -13:54:00.9: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:22.01 -09:27:23.5: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6037 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:27.85 -13:54:00.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6161 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:23.11 -12:39:17.9: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:05.19 -13:27:30.1: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:08:00.00 -11:25:37.9: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:38.68 -14:03:35.3: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:19.72 -13:01:20.8: 14.82 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:23.11 -12:39:17.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7912 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:05.19 -13:27:30.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6178 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:38.68 -14:03:35.3: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8173 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:29.41 -13:20:37.8: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:19.72 -13:01:20.8: 14.67 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:19.72 -13:01:20.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7579 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:08:00.00 -11:25:37.9: 15.65 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:00.00 -11:25:37.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8580 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:29.41 -13:20:37.8: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:04:15.73 -12:20:49.3: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:29.41 -13:20:37.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6811 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:35.90 -10:42:11.9: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:25.32 -12:58:17.3: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:02.81 -08:07:34.3: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:52.93 -11:54:42.9: 15.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:04:15.73 -12:20:49.3: 15.43 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:15.73 -12:20:49.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8472 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:35.90 -10:42:11.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:35.90 -10:42:11.9: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5125 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:52.93 -11:54:42.9: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:02.81 -08:07:34.3: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:52.93 -11:54:42.9: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5365 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:02.81 -08:07:34.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7878 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:25.32 -12:58:17.3: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:25.32 -12:58:17.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8551 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:42.53 -14:10:34.1: 15.32 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:50.82 -14:13:12.1: 15.36 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:33.67 -13:08:19.0: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:42.53 -14:10:34.1: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:42.53 -14:10:34.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5741 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:50.82 -14:13:12.1: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:50.82 -14:13:12.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7544 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:33.67 -13:08:19.0: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:33.67 -13:08:19.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9118 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:24.19 -12:01:00.1: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:25.59 -13:07:04.2: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:17:01.97 -12:41:26.2: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:29.84 -06:05:39.3: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:37.37 -13:08:54.8: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:24.19 -12:01:00.1: 15.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:25.59 -13:07:04.2: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:24.19 -12:01:00.1: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8817 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:25.59 -13:07:04.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6227 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:17:01.97 -12:41:26.2: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:29.84 -06:05:39.3: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:01.97 -12:41:26.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6524 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:29.84 -06:05:39.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8239 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:37.37 -13:08:54.8: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:47.20 -09:27:13.7: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:37.37 -13:08:54.8: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7824 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:33.87 -14:04:31.7: 15.37 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:55.48 -12:02:13.9: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:47.20 -09:27:13.7: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:47.20 -09:27:13.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8649 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:33.87 -14:04:31.7: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:33.87 -14:04:31.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4801 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:58.78 -08:11:21.3: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:55.48 -12:02:13.9: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:10.16 -08:32:23.2: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:55.48 -12:02:13.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9139 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:32.94 -10:14:48.8: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:06.81 -08:09:37.0: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:08.87 -13:22:27.5: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:58.78 -08:11:21.3: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:10.16 -08:32:23.2: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:32.94 -10:14:48.8: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:58.78 -08:11:21.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8682 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:10.16 -08:32:23.2: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8443 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:32.94 -10:14:48.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8522 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:06.81 -08:09:37.0: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:06.81 -08:09:37.0: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5504 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:08.87 -13:22:27.5: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:08.87 -13:22:27.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9115 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:17.81 -12:44:12.6: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:34.23 -12:51:17.1: 15.23 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:17.81 -12:44:12.6: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:17.81 -12:44:12.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8121 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:34.23 -12:51:17.1: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:34.23 -12:51:17.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82101.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81587_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81587_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81594_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81594_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81600_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81600_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81602_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81602_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81610_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81610_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81613_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81613_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81620_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81620_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:05.35 -08:16:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81734_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81734_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:50.77 -13:00:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81826_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81826_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.18 -05:49:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81848_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 81848_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:34.18 -12:26:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82076_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82076_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82101_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 82101_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82132_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82132_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.11 -10:03:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82212_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 82212_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82240_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82240_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82271_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82271_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82295_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82295_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82341_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82341_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82346_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82346_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82432_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82432_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82433_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82433_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82442_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82442_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82463_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82463_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82474_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82474_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82517_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82517_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:13.28 -11:21:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82613_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82613_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82618_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82626_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82626_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82643_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82643_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82647_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82647_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82697_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82718_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82747_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82747_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82753_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82753_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82761_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82761_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82775_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82775_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82778_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82778_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82795_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82795_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82796_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82796_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82815_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82815_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82817_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82817_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82824_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82853_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82853_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82857_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82857_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82876_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82876_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82889_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82889_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82899_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82899_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82909_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82909_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82937_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82937_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82944_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82944_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82947_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82947_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82955_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82955_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82959_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82959_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82971_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82971_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82973_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82973_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82980_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 82980_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83000_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83000_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83018_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83018_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83060_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83060_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83067_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83067_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83110_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83110_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83128_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83128_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83142_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83142_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83153_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 83153_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.44 -07:42:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.66 -13:57:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-55-57_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0185 did not pass the final checks