This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2542 2461212.7542 13.11 16:07:25.87 -04:25:49.2
6.93006 33.15710 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 0 0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:25.87 -04:25:49.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:25.87 -04:25:49.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7542,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2542 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2542 2461212.7542 13.78 16:11:21.44 -04:17:32.7
7.75294 32.45105 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -0 -1 1 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:11:21.44 -04:17:32.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:11:21.44 -04:17:32.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7542,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2542 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2542 2461212.7542 13.70 16:16:14.83 -01:04:03.1
11.73218 33.30185 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 0 0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:16:14.83 -01:04:03.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:16:14.83 -01:04:03.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.2542* 16 16 14.83 -01 04 03.1 13.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7542,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2542 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461212.75444392 21.06.2026 06:06:13.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7341
Objects passed selection criteria: 7340
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7093.75
Average stars matched: 6951.5 (97.9947 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 01:22:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461212.75444392 21.06.2026 06:06:13.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 148
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54427
Objects passed selection criteria: 54325
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52568.2
Average stars matched: 50664.2 (96.378 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 156872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 01:24:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.75390892
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.95VBSPYSSk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ifGKmnsP3K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BU65BP6qmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WrxbmA509i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.641200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.641200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 5101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4301 out of 4502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4502 out of 9216 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.95VBSPYSSk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=9303
Got 9303 stars (including 8762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=304 n_q2=239 n_q3=204 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ifGKmnsP3K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=594, passed=9216
Got 9216 stars (including 8610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.676 n_q1=306 n_q2=238 n_q3=206 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BU65BP6qmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=8607
Got 8607 stars (including 8129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.575 n_q1=293 n_q2=243 n_q3=205 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.320
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WrxbmA509i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=482, passed=8487
Got 8487 stars (including 7995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=291 n_q2=242 n_q3=204 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.479 worst_q_ratio=1.411
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.320
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.260
reference average sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.366
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:19:26.39 -05:07:28.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:18:30.07 -02:23:21.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:18:30.07 -02:23:21.4: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:30.07 -02:23:21.4: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1861 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:19:26.39 -05:07:28.1: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:26.39 -05:07:28.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2665 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20469_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20469_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20470_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.20 +01:57:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20472_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20472_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:32.92 -01:04:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20476_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20476_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:18.67 +01:57:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20478_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20478_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.19 +02:10:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.01 -05:08:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0035 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.936 -01:59:46.95
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:09.910 -02:00:18.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00972 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bVC3iOve5i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EcXUk2iIZ9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.01VWKFXZGs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjxTkIRPMc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.478950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.478950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 59865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to +3.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to 3.2660 deg
Loaded 5107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4056 out of 4537 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4537 out of 59865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.0 pix fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bVC3iOve5i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3582, passed=62849
Got 62849 stars (including 59200 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62849 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=307 n_q2=238 n_q3=207 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.462
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EcXUk2iIZ9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3984, passed=59857
Got 59857 stars (including 55799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.648 n_q1=317 n_q2=228 n_q3=224 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.452
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.01VWKFXZGs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3091, passed=58858
Got 58858 stars (including 55708 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58858 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=300 n_q2=242 n_q3=205 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jjxTkIRPMc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3127, passed=60133
Got 60133 stars (including 56907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59237 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=299 n_q2=238 n_q3=208 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.405
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-05-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_011752_TTUQ2b1x1_371415_lvVzY8rF/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:41:27.43 -00:49:44.2: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:08:36.35 -03:25:46.1: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:18:20.20 -00:16:04.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:27:07.72 -00:51:30.2: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:36:14.33 -04:16:33.8: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:01:06.83 -00:12:52.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:36.18 -04:33:01.3: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:19:59.19 -02:09:58.7: 14.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:01.88 +01:45:12.2: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:47.73 -00:33:22.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:41:27.43 -00:49:44.2: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:27.43 -00:49:44.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5244 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:01:06.83 -00:12:52.7: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:36.18 -04:33:01.3: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:08:36.35 -03:25:46.1: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:19:59.19 -02:09:58.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:27:07.72 -00:51:30.2: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:06.83 -00:12:52.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7770 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:36.35 -03:25:46.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4758 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:36.18 -04:33:01.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2597 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:36:14.33 -04:16:33.8: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.19 -02:09:58.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5581 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:07.72 -00:51:30.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5701 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:18:20.20 -00:16:04.4: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:01.88 +01:45:12.2: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:14.33 -04:16:33.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6485 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:20.20 -00:16:04.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9577 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:01.88 +01:45:12.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1066 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:47.73 -00:33:22.8: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:47.73 -00:33:22.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2616 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:44:28.40 +01:22:48.4: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:11:21.44 -04:17:32.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:16:14.83 -01:04:03.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:33.92 -02:04:59.2: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:25.87 -04:25:49.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:33:19.36 +01:29:20.5: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:05:42.96 -02:05:01.5: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:18:40.11 -04:23:52.1: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:02:48.13 -04:47:54.0: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:01.52 -05:58:03.1: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:11:21.44 -04:17:32.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:16:14.83 -01:04:03.1: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:44:28.40 +01:22:48.4: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:28.40 +01:22:48.4: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8811 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:25.87 -04:25:49.2: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:05:42.96 -02:05:01.5: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:33.92 -02:04:59.2: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:42.96 -02:05:01.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3820 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:33.92 -02:04:59.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1644 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:33:19.36 +01:29:20.5: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:19.36 +01:29:20.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3240 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:18:40.11 -04:23:52.1: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:02:48.13 -04:47:54.0: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:40.11 -04:23:52.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4745 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:48.13 -04:47:54.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5310 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:01.52 -05:58:03.1: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:01.52 -05:58:03.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4916 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:39.98 -05:35:27.7: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:17.63 -06:01:42.6: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:22:02.69 -00:36:47.6: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:13:05.17 -02:33:15.5: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:05:41.65 +01:08:07.6: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:59:40.97 +00:13:49.8: 15.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:03:45.71 -01:58:51.2: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:39.98 -05:35:27.7: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:39.98 -05:35:27.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5907 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:17.63 -06:01:42.6: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:17.63 -06:01:42.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6422 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:22:02.69 -00:36:47.6: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:13:05.17 -02:33:15.5: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:05.17 -02:33:15.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7041 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:02.69 -00:36:47.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5774 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:05:41.65 +01:08:07.6: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:41.65 +01:08:07.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6105 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:59:40.97 +00:13:49.8: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:03:45.71 -01:58:51.2: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:40.97 +00:13:49.8: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8033 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:45.71 -01:58:51.2: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7929 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:23:19.11 -05:20:31.0: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:06:14.63 -05:26:55.2: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:30:07.28 -00:08:29.4: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:13.19 -02:38:41.3: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:01.50 -02:57:54.9: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:07:42.10 -05:20:27.4: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:40:59.42 +00:54:02.3: 15.44 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:23:19.11 -05:20:31.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:19.11 -05:20:31.0: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7310 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:06:14.63 -05:26:55.2: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:14.63 -05:26:55.2: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8320 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:13.19 -02:38:41.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:13.19 -02:38:41.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6695 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:30:07.28 -00:08:29.4: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:07.28 -00:08:29.4: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6513 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:01.50 -02:57:54.9: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:01.50 -02:57:54.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7893 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:40:59.42 +00:54:02.3: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:59.42 +00:54:02.3: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7074 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:07:42.10 -05:20:27.4: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:42.10 -05:20:27.4: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7823 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:10:49.55 -05:02:58.9: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:11:11.08 -06:08:22.5: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:44.74 +00:43:27.5: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:27:38.57 -05:32:28.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:10:05.22 -02:08:49.4: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:10:49.55 -05:02:58.9: 15.38 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:06:40.60 +01:56:23.6: 15.68 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:00:27.12 -04:20:54.2: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:49.55 -05:02:58.9: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7920 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:11:11.08 -06:08:22.5: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:11.08 -06:08:22.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7503 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:44.74 +00:43:27.5: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:44.74 +00:43:27.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7647 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:27:38.57 -05:32:28.6: 15.47 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:38.57 -05:32:28.6: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8353 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:10:05.22 -02:08:49.4: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:05.22 -02:08:49.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7481 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:00:27.12 -04:20:54.2: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:27.12 -04:20:54.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7989 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:06:40.60 +01:56:23.6: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:40.60 +01:56:23.6: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9017 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:04:39.51 -04:13:33.9: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:06:08.46 -04:44:32.5: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:04:10.66 -03:54:18.0: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:01:13.73 -02:44:40.2: 15.60 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:14:51.12 -02:25:24.9: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:31:21.75 +01:40:10.2: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:17.38 +01:51:16.7: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:04:39.51 -04:13:33.9: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:39.51 -04:13:33.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9108 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:06:08.46 -04:44:32.5: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:04:10.66 -03:54:18.0: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:08.46 -04:44:32.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7494 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:10.66 -03:54:18.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8021 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:01:13.73 -02:44:40.2: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:13.73 -02:44:40.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9178 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:14:51.12 -02:25:24.9: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:51.12 -02:25:24.9: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8009 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:31:21.75 +01:40:10.2: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:21.75 +01:40:10.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8524 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:17.38 +01:51:16.7: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:17.38 +01:51:16.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8855 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:52.49 -00:27:32.0: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:36:59.71 -02:42:43.0: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:38.29 +00:18:57.9: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:34:06.58 +00:26:02.6: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:10.89 -06:14:57.7: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:52.49 -00:27:32.0: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:09:03.26 -06:06:40.6: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:52.49 -00:27:32.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8045 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:42:55.79 -06:04:10.7: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:36:59.71 -02:42:43.0: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:38.29 +00:18:57.9: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:59.71 -02:42:43.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8555 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:38.29 +00:18:57.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7281 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:34:06.58 +00:26:02.6: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:06.58 +00:26:02.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8696 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:10.89 -06:14:57.7: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:10.89 -06:14:57.7: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8445 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:09:03.26 -06:06:40.6: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:03.26 -06:06:40.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8249 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:42:55.79 -06:04:10.7: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:55.79 -06:04:10.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6185 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:08:18.98 -06:02:25.8: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:47.57 +02:10:42.6: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:25:43.64 -01:33:52.2: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:44:00.51 -02:20:21.0: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:08:18.98 -06:02:25.8: 15.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:18.98 -06:02:25.8: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8914 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:47.57 +02:10:42.6: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:47.57 +02:10:42.6: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9447 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:25:43.64 -01:33:52.2: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:44:00.51 -02:20:21.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:43.64 -01:33:52.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9363 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:00.51 -02:20:21.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5936 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77162.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77166.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77072_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77072_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77075_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77075_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77079_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77079_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77081_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77081_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77082_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77082_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77101_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77101_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77104_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77104_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77108_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77108_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77119_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77119_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77124_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77124_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:43.09 -00:04:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77125_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77125_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77136_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77136_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:58.24 -05:49:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77137_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 77137_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77162_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 77162_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77166_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 77166_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77169_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77169_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:56.85 -00:24:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77180_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77180_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77211_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77211_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77215_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77215_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77217_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77217_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77224_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77224_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77228_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77228_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77244_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77244_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77258_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77258_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77272_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77272_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77276_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77276_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77277_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77277_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77279_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77279_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77283_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77283_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77286_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77286_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77287_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77287_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77306_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77306_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77307_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77307_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77309_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77309_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77322_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77322_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77331_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77331_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77334_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77334_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77347_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77347_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77348_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77348_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77351_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77351_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77354_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77354_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77357_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77357_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77367_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77367_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77377_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77377_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77378_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77378_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77385_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77385_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77388_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77388_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77390_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77390_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77391_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77391_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77394_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77421_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77421_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77425_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77425_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77427_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77427_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77434_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77434_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77436_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77436_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77446_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77446_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77447_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77447_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77456_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77456_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77463_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77463_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77468_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77468_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77553_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77553_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77599_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 77599_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.01 -05:08:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.19 +02:10:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_01-06-13_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks