This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2395 2461212.7395 11.62 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8
5.88548 27.94020 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 1 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7395,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2395 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2395 2461212.7395 11.90 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8
3.13608 23.35892 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 0 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7395,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2395 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2395 2461212.7395 12.36 16:41:50.41 -14:41:58.6
3.42671 20.21582 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 0 1 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:50.41 -14:41:58.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:50.41 -14:41:58.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7395,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2395 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2395 2461212.7395 13.64 16:40:50.63 -12:01:39.7
5.57649 21.99799 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 1 1 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:50.63 -12:01:39.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:50.63 -12:01:39.7: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7395,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2395 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2395 2461212.7395 14.12 16:12:33.94 -12:44:12.5
0.29894 27.01253 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis 1 0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:33.94 -12:44:12.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:33.94 -12:44:12.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7395,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2395 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461212.73981740 21.06.2026 05:45:10.223 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7939
Objects passed selection criteria: 7937
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7594.5
Average stars matched: 7443.75 (98.015 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:56:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461212.73981740 21.06.2026 05:45:10.223 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64645
Objects passed selection criteria: 64493
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61971
Average stars matched: 59870.5 (96.6105 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 167192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:58:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.73927242
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01252 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uq6qCeFBCo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4TOI1ScYQa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7qOaKKkx9o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sKirBZgDbK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Uq6qCeFBCo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4TOI1ScYQa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7qOaKKkx9o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=7015
Got 7015 stars (including 6595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=221 n_q2=252 n_q3=216 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sKirBZgDbK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, passed=7058
Got 7058 stars (including 6634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=223 n_q2=255 n_q3=212 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.221
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.232
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.8: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.49 -08:07:31.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:52.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:33.93 -09:43:48.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.49 -08:07:31.3: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:33.93 -09:43:48.2: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:52.7: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.8: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:33.93 -09:43:48.2: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0896 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.49 -08:07:31.3: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8820 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:55.00 -09:51:38.8: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0266 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:43.70 -10:42:52.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2364 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.87 -14:41:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20527_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.38 -06:11:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 20536_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.48 -07:42:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8
16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0395 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:00.684 -09:57:49.70
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:03.735 -09:57:50.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01252 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.THXn9zicBT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ay9DSYYlE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RQdHSjOrcb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EJND1qreng
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.THXn9zicBT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3ay9DSYYlE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=233 n_q2=248 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RQdHSjOrcb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2545, passed=58765
Got 58765 stars (including 56127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=220 n_q2=254 n_q3=217 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EJND1qreng (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2476, passed=57947
Got 57947 stars (including 55382 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=224 n_q2=256 n_q3=212 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-44-23_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_005034_TTUQ1b1x1_2271710_oRHIuWag/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:26.03 -12:37:39.5: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:32.57 -10:27:10.4: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:34.68 -10:10:16.7: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:02.53 -07:24:29.5: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:00.87 -11:51:56.8: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:33.69 -13:14:57.7: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:09.25 -07:24:44.7: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.53 -07:32:28.1: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:26.03 -12:37:39.5: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:32.57 -10:27:10.4: 11.16 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:26.03 -12:37:39.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2702 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:32.57 -10:27:10.4: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5151 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:34.68 -10:10:16.7: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.68 -10:10:16.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5096 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:33.69 -13:14:57.7: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:09.25 -07:24:44.7: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:02.53 -07:24:29.5: 14.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:00.87 -11:51:56.8: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:02.53 -07:24:29.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7262 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:09.25 -07:24:44.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5198 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:33.69 -13:14:57.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1015 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:00.87 -11:51:56.8: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7479 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:54.93 -07:42:01.8: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.53 -07:32:28.1: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.53 -07:32:28.1: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2132 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:50.41 -14:41:58.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:54.93 -07:42:01.8: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.93 -07:42:01.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0481 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.34 -14:38:19.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.97 -07:08:15.1: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:50.41 -14:41:58.6: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:50.63 -12:01:39.7: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.44 -12:27:34.3: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:34.13 -12:26:10.9: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:52.6: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.34 -14:38:19.8: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:21.90 -07:08:45.6: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.34 -14:38:19.8: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4421 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.97 -07:08:15.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:59.19 -07:06:44.6: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.44 -12:27:34.3: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:50.63 -12:01:39.7: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:52.6: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.97 -07:08:15.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6434 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:52.71 -07:02:52.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9004 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.44 -12:27:34.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9205 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:23.3: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:34.13 -12:26:10.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:34.13 -12:26:10.9: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8861 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:21.90 -07:08:45.6: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:21.90 -07:08:45.6: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8676 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:59.19 -07:06:44.6: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.19 -07:06:44.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0438 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:23.3: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.49 -12:08:23.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9103 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:33.94 -12:44:12.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:26.9: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:31.73 -13:08:14.4: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:25.45 -11:01:31.0: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:33.94 -12:44:12.5: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:26.9: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.22 -08:42:26.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0569 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:00.73 -10:40:12.9: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:25.45 -11:01:31.0: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:27.58 -10:59:49.0: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:25.45 -11:01:31.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2663 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:22.11 -13:52:29.9: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:31.73 -13:08:14.4: 14.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:31.73 -13:08:14.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1665 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:39.36 -12:43:09.3: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:00.73 -10:40:12.9: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:00.73 -10:40:12.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3201 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:27.58 -10:59:49.0: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:27.58 -10:59:49.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3693 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:22.11 -13:52:29.9: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:22.11 -13:52:29.9: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4861 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:39.36 -12:43:09.3: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:39.36 -12:43:09.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5940 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:46:44.49 -08:14:12.6: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:19.47 -13:47:39.4: 15.10 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:15.09 -13:28:21.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:46:44.49 -08:14:12.6: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:44.49 -08:14:12.6: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6039 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:55.62 -11:07:37.4: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:51:51.06 -13:41:01.3: 15.44 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:19.47 -13:47:39.4: 14.90 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:19.47 -13:47:39.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6245 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:15.09 -13:28:21.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:19.52 -11:34:16.9: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:46:00.35 -13:55:41.9: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:15.09 -13:28:21.4: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4886 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:51:51.06 -13:41:01.3: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:55.62 -11:07:37.4: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:51.06 -13:41:01.3: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7071 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:55.62 -11:07:37.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5462 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:46:00.35 -13:55:41.9: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:19.52 -11:34:16.9: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:00.35 -13:55:41.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5126 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:19.52 -11:34:16.9: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5254 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:05.41 -11:44:30.1: 14.41 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:03:07.17 -05:48:30.0: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:53.42 -06:37:19.8: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:05.41 -11:44:30.1: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:05.41 -11:44:30.1: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4067 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:21.94 -14:55:19.6: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:03:07.17 -05:48:30.0: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:53.42 -06:37:19.8: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:52.98 -11:54:42.8: 15.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:34.75 -09:55:43.8: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:07.17 -05:48:30.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7328 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:53.42 -06:37:19.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5306 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:53:15.31 -14:00:26.6: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:21.94 -14:55:19.6: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:21.94 -14:55:19.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5564 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:34.75 -09:55:43.8: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:52.98 -11:54:42.8: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:53:15.31 -14:00:26.6: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:34.75 -09:55:43.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5923 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:52.98 -11:54:42.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5714 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:15.31 -14:00:26.6: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6495 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:35.12 -05:29:07.2: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:01:43.65 -13:58:07.3: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:03:11.83 -14:08:20.4: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:35.12 -05:29:07.2: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:35.12 -05:29:07.2: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7125 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:03:11.83 -14:08:20.4: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:01:43.65 -13:58:07.3: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:56.38 -08:14:05.5: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:43.65 -13:58:07.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6141 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:11.83 -14:08:20.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6877 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:54:26.53 -14:21:44.5: 15.41 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:59.10 -08:34:39.4: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:52.37 -13:07:09.6: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:56.38 -08:14:05.5: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:54:26.53 -14:21:44.5: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:56.38 -08:14:05.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8426 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:59.10 -08:34:39.4: 15.59 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:26.53 -14:21:44.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6065 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:59.10 -08:34:39.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7410 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:52.37 -13:07:09.6: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:52.37 -13:07:09.6: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7140 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:29.29 -12:59:31.3: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:39.12 -11:14:03.7: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:18.93 -07:57:51.1: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:29.29 -12:59:31.3: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:29.29 -12:59:31.3: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6319 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:18.93 -07:57:51.1: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:25.46 -14:54:42.2: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:51.96 -11:58:13.0: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:39.12 -11:14:03.7: 15.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:18.93 -07:57:51.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8024 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:39.12 -11:14:03.7: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8875 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:00.27 -05:33:32.9: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:10:17.88 -08:39:07.3: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:25.46 -14:54:42.2: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:51.96 -11:58:13.0: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:25.46 -14:54:42.2: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7308 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:51.96 -11:58:13.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8131 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:00.27 -05:33:32.9: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:00.27 -05:33:32.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9134 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:08.95 -06:07:17.6: 14.93 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:10:17.88 -08:39:07.3: 14.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:36.63 -10:10:21.0: 14.37 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:42.28 -10:16:55.6: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:17.88 -08:39:07.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9142 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:36.63 -10:10:21.0: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:08.95 -06:07:17.6: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:36.63 -10:10:21.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6368 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:42.28 -10:16:55.6: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:08.95 -06:07:17.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5967 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:42.28 -10:16:55.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8593 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:27:21.35 -11:28:05.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:27:21.35 -11:28:05.4: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:21.35 -11:28:05.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6714 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:34.34 -06:37:07.9: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:34.34 -06:37:07.9: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:34.34 -06:37:07.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82539_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82544_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82552_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82552_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82554_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82554_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82573_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82573_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:47.33 -13:11:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82588_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82590_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82590_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:05.67 -08:16:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82593_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82593_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:51.07 -13:00:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82601_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82601_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82611_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 82611_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82639_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82639_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82679_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82679_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82689_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82689_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82699_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:51.12 -11:08:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82711_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.06 -10:03:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82721_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82724_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82724_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82728_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82728_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82748_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82748_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82765_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82765_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.89 -06:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82772_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82772_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:59.35 -11:49:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82777_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 82777_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82786_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:34.53 -09:34:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82794_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82798_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.88 -06:41:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82825_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.47 -06:56:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82831_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82831_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.86 -10:42:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82842_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82842_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:36.94 -11:28:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82849_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82849_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82861_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82861_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82874_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82874_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82881_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82881_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82883_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82883_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82909_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82909_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82911_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82911_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82925_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82939_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82939_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82945_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82947_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82947_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82952_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82963_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82963_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82968_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82968_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82981_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82987_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82987_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82994_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 82994_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83007_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83007_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83019_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83019_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83023_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83023_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83042_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83042_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83046_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83046_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83047_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83047_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83062_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83062_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.14 -05:03:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83090_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83090_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83091_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83091_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83092_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83092_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83095_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83095_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83117_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83117_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83171_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 83171_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.36 -06:11:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.77 -06:46:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.87 -14:41:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.32 -09:46:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.64 -13:57:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197 did not pass the final checks