Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 21.1692  2461212.6692  13.95  09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9
199.53572  49.88283 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9:  16.32 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits  wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits -crosshair 6304.68994 3873.99292 image    wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -crosshair 6304.08936 3874.00635 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 21.16921 09 48 47.69 +28 47 15.9          13.9 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 06 21.16900 09 48 47.89 +28 47 15.4          13.9 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 06 21.16941 09 48 47.48 +28 47 16.5          13.9 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 06 21.1692*  09 48 47.69 +28 47 15.9  13.9 U             Leo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461212.6692,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260621.1692 13.95CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last  image: 2461212.66941443 21.06.2026 04:03:47.407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6297
Objects passed selection criteria:  6258
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4296
Average stars matched: 4019.75 (93.5696 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 23:16:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last  image: 2461212.66941443 21.06.2026 04:03:47.407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  33358
Objects passed selection criteria:  33237
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.6    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 22937.2
Average stars matched: 21236.5 (92.5852 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   134812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 23:17:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267611 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 267611 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits_preview.png'

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits


renamed 'Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits_preview.png'

Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 457.7779
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.8111
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1974.9512
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.4711
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1977.4101
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 516.9348
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.31421
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T23:03:11.5484434' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T04:03:11.5484434' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.1688836575 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T04:03:21.4493237' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.1689982521 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     149.997702430314 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9998394409146 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.3147222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     290.282777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.32859309323073 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20426 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20426 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               895.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             29.50236 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             18.00144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits :)

Spent 0.664473 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 28.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T23:03:47.4079915' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T04:03:47.4079915' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.1692986921 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T04:03:57.3129387' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.1694133333 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     149.997702457296 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9998394387948 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.1972222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     290.345833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.33862621148848 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20426 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20426 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.1900005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 16.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 49.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               895.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 28.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 11.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             29.50236 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             18.00144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits :)

Spent 0.643785 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/d_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits



fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.66899940
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.5'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0382 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Image size: 937.5'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0357 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00266 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7LkqUYgh8v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rU5eS9u7hC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0uJ4bzkxrY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kobyZVzApZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2124 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2124 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4039 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 2.7 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
 2.7 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 14.0 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
 14.0 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.0 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7LkqUYgh8v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, passed=7484
Got 7484 stars (including 6942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.224 n_q1=240 n_q2=204 n_q3=230 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.275
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rU5eS9u7hC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, passed=7488
Got 7488 stars (including 6948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.232 n_q1=240 n_q2=209 n_q3=228 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0uJ4bzkxrY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, passed=3457
Got 3457 stars (including 3170 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3457 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3409 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=253 n_q2=208 n_q3=211 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kobyZVzApZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=279, passed=3446
Got 3446 stars (including 3165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.605 n_q1=256 n_q2=202 n_q3=211 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.268 worst_q_ratio=1.275
ref2=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new1=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.435
new2=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.507
reference average sigma_overall=0.2715 worst_q_ratio=1.297
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059_astrometric_residuals.png (906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.5'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0382 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Image size: 937.5'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0357 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:00:10.177 +29:58:40.82
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:09.451 +29:58:42.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00266 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwhU0onYcJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eYtlje97Hf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y9h9Hu50PM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1BijXqzALD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.64

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.64

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 38277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3559 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3559 deg
Loaded 5585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 4316 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4316 out of 38277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 47 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.0 pix  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
 15.6 mag.  Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bwhU0onYcJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1709, passed=38237
Got 38237 stars (including 36470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.219 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=223 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eYtlje97Hf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1697, passed=38264
Got 38264 stars (including 36504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=236 n_q2=209 n_q3=227 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y9h9Hu50PM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1105, passed=16963
Got 16963 stars (including 15845 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits N_match=903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.563 n_q1=275 n_q2=179 n_q3=233 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1BijXqzALD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1071, passed=16812
Got 16812 stars (including 15729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=272 n_q2=188 n_q3=230 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:17:27.14 +28:30:42.0:  13.07 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:14.9:  13.11 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:17:27.14 +28:30:42.0:  13.05 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:17:27.14 +28:30:42.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2336 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:14.9:  13.12 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:14.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2447 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9:  16.32 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9:  16.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 52327_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    10.15    09:41:43.60 +32:33:34.7   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52411_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 52411_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    10.48    09:40:18.80 +29:43:17.3   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52676_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 52676_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    11.61    10:11:19.41 +30:26:05.2   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 52748_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    11.39    09:42:54.34 +33:30:13.9   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53092_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.05    09:47:26.70 +34:07:05.6   6349 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53209_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.32    09:58:58.24 +27:19:07.8   4971 4801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53393_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53393_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.66    10:15:00.24 +31:29:04.6   2861 2280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  10:15:00.22 +31:29:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53584_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.66    09:55:13.82 +27:32:38.7   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53668_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.81    10:01:22.50 +28:45:55.8   4638 3930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  10:01:22.49 +28:45:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53771_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53771_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.80    10:01:24.14 +28:48:04.0   4634 3909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  10:01:24.12 +28:48:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53789_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.84    09:52:39.47 +25:58:52.5   5844 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  09:52:39.50 +25:58:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 53815_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    12.80    09:46:49.08 +31:46:49.2   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54023_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.12    09:44:29.19 +26:16:28.5   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54129_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.03    09:47:23.08 +29:21:44.4   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54172_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.16900    2461212.66900    13.29    10:16:05.02 +32:00:15.3   2729 1962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.21    10:16:05.24 +32:00:14.4   2726 1962   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54222_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54222_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.16900    2461212.66900    13.34    10:17:27.11 +28:30:42.5   2503 4075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.16    10:17:27.17 +28:30:41.6   2501 4075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54445_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54445_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.42    10:07:03.05 +26:29:27.4   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54501_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.47    09:43:39.13 +30:16:41.1   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54636_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54636_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.53    09:56:04.87 +26:58:22.2   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54761_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54761_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.40    10:13:02.53 +32:55:48.7   3126 1408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  10:13:02.50 +32:55:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54835_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 54835_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.26    10:00:15.62 +30:08:33.1   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55015_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55015_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.50    09:45:54.28 +33:46:09.6   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55215_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55215_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.64    09:42:26.83 +33:11:26.7   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55347_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55347_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.98    10:19:32.74 +29:28:04.2   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55528_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55528_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.82    10:15:12.88 +31:28:46.9   2833 2283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

**** FOUND  10:15:12.89 +31:28:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55623_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55623_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.20    10:19:15.46 +31:53:59.0   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55642_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55642_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.03    10:19:12.03 +26:56:19.3   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55666_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55666_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.75    10:04:37.41 +32:45:09.1   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55721_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55721_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.96    09:49:18.58 +30:12:22.3   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55737_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55737_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.12    10:18:00.11 +28:50:33.6   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55759_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55759_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.07    10:02:47.68 +26:01:32.9   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55884_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 55884_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.21    09:59:23.96 +27:04:05.3   4916 4954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56036_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56036_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.01    09:50:37.55 +25:59:05.3   6121 5583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56061_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56061_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.94    09:50:52.42 +33:23:46.4   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56072_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56072_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.15    10:08:13.60 +29:28:29.8   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56118_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56118_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.32    10:14:41.78 +29:26:36.5   2879 3517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56140_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
Preparing report for the candidate 56140_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56255_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56255_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.32    10:05:39.47 +26:22:49.5   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56282_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56282_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.32    10:09:43.00 +30:15:50.2   3539 3028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56284_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56284_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.13    09:42:15.57 +27:10:32.3   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56311_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56311_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.32    10:12:59.44 +33:52:40.4   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56317_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56317_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.38    09:51:17.37 +32:36:47.3   5896 1572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56361_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56361_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.87    09:48:55.98 +28:55:47.0   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56371_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56371_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.95    09:44:10.05 +30:52:32.0   6856 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56380_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56380_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.37    10:07:08.42 +33:22:02.2   3877 1149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56387_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56387_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    13.84    09:47:49.69 +30:11:29.8   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56398_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059
The candidate 56398_fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.16941    2461212.66941    14.58    10:20:19.64 +32:02:21.9   2180 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_230756_TTUQ2b1x1_118180_oXBzrJnb/fd_Leo-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_23-03-47_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 22s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9
########### Completed Leo-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9
###################################################################################
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9  -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
09:48:47.69 +28:47:15.9
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.66899940 -observatory V36
07:39:48.05 +21:25:18.0 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:46:12.48 +20:01:53.4 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:27:31.36 +18:24:12.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:59:31.83 +21:02:11.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:39.55 +03:06:00.1 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:13.00 +20:34:00.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:44.60 +00:19:58.3 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:31.00 -23:09:42.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:19:58.53 +01:43:28.2 Moon (-10.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 20 23:16 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.66899940:
07:59:38.92 +21:01:47.8 Io (6.2mag)
07:59:25.11 +21:02:33.0 Europa (6.3mag)
07:59:28.86 +21:02:16.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:59.43 +21:00:45.4 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:59:03.40 +20:40:18.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:59:33.78 +21:02:04.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:58:41.94 +20:50:27.7 Elara (17.6mag)
08:02:20.07 +21:06:47.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:05:30.71 +21:05:00.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:31.28 +03:06:25.5 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:39.71 +03:06:12.9 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:51.65 +03:08:19.6 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:39.60 +03:06:30.5 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:53:05.52 +03:06:03.2 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 23:16 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.66899940:
17:29:52.10 -35:29:12.0 JWST
10:36:04.52 +49:53:45.3 Chandra
08:28:25.53 -46:31:03.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 23:16 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.66899940 -observatory V36
18:33:38.83 -33:30:58.2 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:06:23.05 -67:59:40.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:51.82 +32:08:47.1 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:36.96 +15:51:02.0 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:21:06.42 -34:32:30.0 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:08:48.32 +32:01:03.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:49:49.67 +27:00:44.1 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:39:32.45 +30:35:45.6 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:51.60 +04:28:24.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:19:37.48 +21:42:00.1 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:14.96 -11:04:47.1 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:43.45 +67:12:56.2 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:14:09.08 -08:01:31.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:54.53 +79:56:26.8 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:29:22.33 +64:47:49.6 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:06:26.39 +28:51:43.7 14.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:27:41.50 +14:29:30.1 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:02:40.60 +34:50:33.0 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:59.23 -14:55:11.6 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:51.50 +32:16:23.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.65 +51:57:16.6 17.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:58:45.24 -11:31:08.2 15.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:35:44.11 +23:05:21.2 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:18.54 +04:32:20.3 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:46:21.27 +77:30:10.3 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:21:37.29 +44:15:30.9 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:15:21.83 +00:17:19.6 16.7mag A/2026 E1
20:46:50.18 -10:05:39.1 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:43.09 -01:13:46.0 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:31:38.99 +27:19:06.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:27:37.40 +19:57:42.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:37:09.60 -05:39:15.3 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:25:36.72 +34:19:37.1 17.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:40:41.63 +18:41:53.9 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:47:40.40 +07:28:33.8 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:36:12.96 +30:54:56.1 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:20:51.72 +29:28:32.5 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:21:49.27 +32:22:54.9 15.4mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:13:05.55 +09:07:49.0 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:20:26.29 +20:01:32.2 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:59:13.61 +19:32:35.0 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:50:28.48 +16:48:23.7 16.3mag 141P/Machholz
06:54:08.79 +17:51:26.6 16.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:56:42.64 +17:19:30.9 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:06:24.35 -23:02:22.9 16.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:25:14.56 +28:36:10.2 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:00.63 +06:01:28.5 16.1mag 169P/NEAT
00:52:47.28 +04:50:49.1 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:14.44 -08:05:30.1 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:03:43.43 +34:48:11.8 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:06:46.13 +03:13:19.4 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:40:28.73 +34:37:19.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:58:45.75 +03:59:57.3 18.0mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:14.69 +07:29:21.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:49.10 +20:22:20.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:21:05.18 +40:44:32.0 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 23:16 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 23:16 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 23:16 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:11:41.646 +16:56:18.65  AT 2026pap  2026-06-12.83 20.32
20:46:15.499 -32:19:29.95  SN 2026pao  2026-06-11.36 18.635
15:03:43.225 +02:12:54.73  AT 2026pan  2026-06-05.29 20.61
23:06:24.407 +14:31:45.25  AT 2026pam  2026-06-06.80 19.38
11:47:31.848 -25:11:15.00  AT 2026pal  2026-06-07.35 20.37
15:04:37.659 -01:15:27.46  AT 2026pak  2026-06-07.45 20.29
17:48:25.754 +32:00:08.94  AT 2026paj  2026-06-12.05 19.81
21:50:53.005 -01:05:39.13  AT 2026pai  2026-06-08.43 20.366
12:25:02.669 +52:19:31.14  AT 2026pah  2026-06-03.24 19.8587
21:46:05.755 -08:58:40.30  TDE 2026pag  2026-06-03.38 19.3089
10:27:13.174 +19:29:29.02  AT 2026paf  2026-06-01.20 19.6465
22:55:52.731 -02:16:03.48  AT 2026pae  2026-06-05.45 19.7544
15:08:17.400 -12:11:26.44  SN 2026pad  2026-06-12.28 20.06
22:23:33.649 -01:35:22.74  AT 2026pac  2026-06-09.42 20.1163
16:50:53.544 -15:00:19.11  AT 2026pab  2026-06-07.24 21.56
17:27:02.076 +41:10:59.54  AT 2026paa  2026-06-07.32 20.214
18:20:18.686 +77:47:56.78  AT 2026ozz  2026-06-09.31 19.322
22:11:50.531 +22:43:04.06  AT 2026ozy  2026-06-11.18 19.472
11:50:19.187 +31:49:23.30  AT 2026ozx  2026-06-10.91 19.389
18:26:16.254 +32:18:13.23  AT 2026ozw  2026-06-11.07 20.169
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 23:16 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Jun 20 23:15:39 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 55s (0.92 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 98s (1.63 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 23s (0.38 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 70s (1.17 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 22s (0.37 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 118s (1.97 min)
FIELD_Leo-01-Q2b1x1: 231s (3.85 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 233s (3.88 min)
Finished: Sat Jun 20 23:19:32 CDT 2026