This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1369 2461212.6369 13.41 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3
335.11476 15.01889 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.466 Tisiphone 0 -2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6369,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1369 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1369 2461212.6369 13.83 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0
344.20253 17.60366 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.195 Eurykleia 0 -0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6369,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1369 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461212.63725661 21.06.2026 03:17:28.971 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4043
Objects passed selection criteria: 4041
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4102.75
Average stars matched: 4050.25 (98.7204 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111212 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 22:21:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461212.63725661 21.06.2026 03:17:28.971 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41986
Objects passed selection criteria: 41937
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41840.8
Average stars matched: 41160 (98.373 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150004 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 22:24:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.63657110
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BAGExmASRV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.71zaPWWQRv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LCPhDWQwIZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vY9A4yuhny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BAGExmASRV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=257 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.71zaPWWQRv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LCPhDWQwIZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=4650
Got 4650 stars (including 4314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.010 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.703 n_q1=236 n_q2=215 n_q3=196 n_q4=312 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vY9A4yuhny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, passed=4712
Got 4712 stars (including 4327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.117 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.682 n_q1=239 n_q2=218 n_q3=198 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.715
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.080
ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.654 worst_q_ratio=1.543
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.651 worst_q_ratio=1.715
reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KkoVck220Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WRjYzI2SV8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UwDEeq5h8o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M5aNin4pN7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KkoVck220Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WRjYzI2SV8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285
Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=187 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UwDEeq5h8o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1755, passed=46122
Got 46122 stars (including 44294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.904 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.688 n_q1=243 n_q2=195 n_q3=200 n_q4=318 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M5aNin4pN7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1765, passed=46419
Got 46419 stars (including 44592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.948 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=247 n_q2=200 n_q3=195 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: 13.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: 12.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: 12.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6318 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9242 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0214 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6042 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6674 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7841 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7954 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7381 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9264 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6830 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: 12.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9232 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9962 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: 13.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: 11.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9358 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: 12.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0061 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: 13.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2798 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3856 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: 13.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2484 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: 14.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: 14.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6908 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: 14.05 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: 14.13 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5547 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7685 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: 14.36 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7972 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: 13.65 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: 14.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: 14.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8697 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: 13.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7539 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: 14.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8766 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: 13.96 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: 13.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: 14.48 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8992 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: 14.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8385 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: 13.98 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7689 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7919 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: 13.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6718 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: 14.73 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: 14.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: 13.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8491 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: 14.54 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8677 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: 13.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9967 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81821_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81821_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:23.96 -31:45:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81823_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81823_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81831_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81831_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81834_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81834_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81837_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81837_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81853_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81853_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81858_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81858_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:00.78 -36:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81861_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81861_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81862_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81862_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81863_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81863_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81866_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81866_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81881_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81881_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:20:02.81 -29:56:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81897_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81897_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:02.28 -36:59:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81919_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81919_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:59.84 -30:58:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81985_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81985_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81996_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81996_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82000_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82000_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:06.72 -31:35:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82018_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82018_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82024_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82024_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:51.36 -37:04:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82038_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82038_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82070_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82070_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82095_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82095_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82097_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82097_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:14.01 -34:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:28.82 -32:25:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82129_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 82129_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82145_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82145_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:07.51 -31:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82146_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82146_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82161_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82161_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82165_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82165_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82166_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82166_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82180_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82180_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82181_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82181_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:57.70 -30:09:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82183_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82183_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:14.88 -33:36:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82192_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82192_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82203_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82203_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:05.24 -29:46:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82220_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82220_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82222_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82222_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82223_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82223_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82226_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 82226_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82244_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82244_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82255_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82255_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82259_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82259_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82278_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82278_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 82295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.75 -36:13:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:23.98 -32:51:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:26.66 -38:06:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80816_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 80816_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks