NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Lup-01-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.37    15:33:14.40 -37:32:32.0   4081 1049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.45    15:33:14.49 -37:32:34.7   4076 1054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 21.1369  2461212.6369  13.41  15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3
335.11476  15.01889 galactic  Lup  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
466 Tisiphone                0     -2       2  13.4    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3:  14.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3:  14.36 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.87    15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0   7221 5579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.79    15:57:35.60 -29:58:45.9   7215 5584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 21.1369  2461212.6369  13.83  15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0
344.20253  17.60366 galactic  Lup  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
195 Eurykleia                0     -0       0  13.7    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0:  14.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0:  14.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Lup-01-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lup-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lup-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 290733 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 290733 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits

renamed 'Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.png' -> 'transient_report/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits_preview.png'
Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2929.6199 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 815.1864 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 5015.2923 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1296.6894 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 4949.1736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1287.9037 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.71193 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T22:16:29.7435031' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T03:16:29.7435031' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61212.1364553589 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T03:16:39.6464654' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61212.1365699768 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.780439471226 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.999765936174 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.9516666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.665 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.90879642290093 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 18.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits :) Spent 0.784475 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T22:17:28.9711497' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T03:17:28.9711497' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61212.1371408682 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T03:17:38.8735439' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61212.1372554745 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 234.78043949641 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -33.9997659257448 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.0077777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 163.87 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.9011071696416 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lup-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 39 08' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-34 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.7000007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 29.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 18.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits :) Spent 0.695347 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/d_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits


fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.63657110 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BAGExmASRV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.71zaPWWQRv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LCPhDWQwIZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vY9A4yuhny Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.3 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 2.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.BAGExmASRV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114 Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=257 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.71zaPWWQRv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203 Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LCPhDWQwIZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, passed=4650 Got 4650 stars (including 4314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4650 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4543 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.010 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.703 n_q1=236 n_q2=215 n_q3=196 n_q4=312 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.543 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.vY9A4yuhny (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, passed=4712 Got 4712 stars (including 4327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4712 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4599 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4595 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4595 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.117 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.682 n_q1=239 n_q2=218 n_q3=198 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.715 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.080 ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558 new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.654 worst_q_ratio=1.543 new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.651 worst_q_ratio=1.715 reference average sigma_overall=0.508 worst_q_ratio=1.319 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 Second-epoch image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:39:07.160 -34:00:01.08 Second-epoch second image center 15:39:09.695 -34:00:30.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01199 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KkoVck220Q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WRjYzI2SV8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UwDEeq5h8o Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M5aNin4pN7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 52 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 2.2 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.KkoVck220Q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279 Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WRjYzI2SV8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285 Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46441 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46442 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.541 n_q1=249 n_q2=215 n_q3=187 n_q4=306 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367 The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UwDEeq5h8o (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1755, passed=46122 Got 46122 stars (including 44294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46122 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45175 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45175 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45174 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.904 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.688 n_q1=243 n_q2=195 n_q3=200 n_q4=318 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.M5aNin4pN7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1765, passed=46419 Got 46419 stars (including 44592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46419 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.948 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=247 n_q2=200 n_q3=195 n_q4=315 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: 13.78 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: 12.94 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: 13.43 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: 12.90 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: 12.87 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: 13.57 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:53.79 -30:11:02.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6318 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: 13.27 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:10.04 -36:54:27.6: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9242 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:09.12 -32:59:18.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0214 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:17.23 -36:42:27.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6042 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:28.02 -30:53:54.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6674 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:08.21 -32:07:54.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7841 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:35.85 -29:57:52.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7954 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:35.00 -30:10:31.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7381 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:00.22 -30:25:46.4: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9264 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:08.96 -30:33:57.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6830 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: 12.85 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: 11.65 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: 12.86 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: 12.44 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:16.80 -36:51:37.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9232 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:27.27 -35:47:04.7: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9962 delta=-0.88 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: 13.65 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: 11.55 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: 13.44 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:33.35 -31:04:00.9: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9358 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: 12.84 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:29.54 -31:54:11.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0061 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: 13.20 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:19.25 -32:58:13.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2798 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: 13.40 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:09.85 -31:43:27.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3856 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: 13.55 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:48.26 -37:08:23.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2484 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3: 14.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: 14.24 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: 14.00 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:49.67 -31:04:23.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6908 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:28.16 -31:52:40.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: 14.05 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: 14.13 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:40.72 -29:45:42.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5547 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:40.08 -30:59:02.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7685 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: 14.36 +/- 0.29 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:56.56 -29:44:18.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7972 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: 13.65 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: 14.32 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: 14.41 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:32.38 -30:45:58.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8697 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: 13.83 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: 13.58 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:54.40 -31:51:30.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7539 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: 14.12 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:32.58 -30:19:45.5: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8766 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: 13.96 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: 13.81 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: 14.48 +/- 0.33 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.18 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:21.81 -30:54:35.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8992 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: 14.00 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:19.15 -31:09:28.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8385 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: 13.98 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:43.02 -32:09:38.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7689 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:31.34 -33:14:39.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7919 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: 13.75 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:20:57.43 -33:38:38.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6718 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: 14.73 +/- 0.32 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: 14.05 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: 13.89 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.17 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8491 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: 14.54 +/- 0.35 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:11.84 -31:06:34.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8677 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: 13.80 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:02.86 -30:58:51.2: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9967 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81821_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81821_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.52    15:41:23.89 -31:45:30.0   5078 4553   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:41:23.96 -31:45:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81823_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81823_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.83    15:42:36.09 -29:57:51.8   5249 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.77    15:42:35.60 -29:57:53.2   5242 5639   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81827_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.79    15:48:08.14 -32:07:54.8   5945 4311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.77    15:48:08.28 -32:07:55.0   5940 4316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81831_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81831_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.68    15:42:28.02 -30:53:55.3   5226 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.66    15:42:28.03 -30:53:54.1   5220 5073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81834_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81834_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.67    15:47:34.94 -30:10:32.5   5900 5498   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.82    15:47:35.06 -30:10:29.6   5895 5503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81837_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81837_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.63    15:46:53.76 -30:11:02.8   5810 5494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.64    15:46:53.82 -30:11:02.1   5805 5499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81853_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81853_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.91    15:05:10.05 -36:54:27.4   0655 1252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.94    15:05:10.03 -36:54:27.7   0650 1257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81858_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81858_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.86    15:29:00.81 -36:36:13.0   3555 1612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:29:00.78 -36:36:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81861_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81861_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.03    15:52:09.20 -32:59:19.3   6443 3780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.01    15:52:09.03 -32:59:17.9   6437 3785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81862_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81862_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.74    15:25:17.23 -36:42:28.2   3108 1530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.53    15:25:17.24 -36:42:27.5   3103 1534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81863_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81863_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.94    15:47:00.27 -30:25:45.9   5821 5345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.91    15:47:00.17 -30:25:46.8   5815 5350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81866_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81866_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.69    15:37:08.98 -30:33:57.1   4535 5271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.68    15:37:08.94 -30:33:57.6   4529 5275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81881_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81881_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    11.93    15:49:33.32 -31:04:01.2   6144 4951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    11.94    15:49:33.39 -31:04:00.5   6139 4957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.28    15:20:02.81 -29:56:20.8   2277 5607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:20:02.81 -29:56:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81897_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81897_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.21    15:24:02.19 -36:59:29.5   2957 1356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:24:02.28 -36:59:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81919_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81919_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.97    15:47:59.88 -30:58:32.2   5938 5016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:47:59.84 -30:58:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81985_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81985_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.01    15:30:29.58 -31:54:12.1   3683 4451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.01    15:30:29.49 -31:54:11.8   3677 4456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81996_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81996_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.92    15:15:27.32 -35:47:04.2   1878 2030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.12    15:15:27.23 -35:47:05.2   1873 2034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82000_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82000_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.01    15:51:06.73 -31:35:17.4   6331 4636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:51:06.72 -31:35:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82018_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82018_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    12.94    15:12:16.82 -36:51:36.2   1526 1352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    12.91    15:12:16.78 -36:51:38.9   1521 1356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82024_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82024_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.09    15:36:51.39 -37:04:40.7   4509 1340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:36:51.36 -37:04:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82038_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82038_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.31    15:54:09.87 -31:43:28.4   6728 4536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.49    15:54:09.82 -31:43:26.4   6722 4542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82070_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82070_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.28    15:35:19.24 -32:58:14.2   4308 3815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.28    15:35:19.26 -32:58:13.5   4303 3820   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82095_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82095_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.25    15:29:48.21 -37:08:23.1   3663 1285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.24    15:29:48.30 -37:08:23.2   3658 1289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82097_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82097_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.07    15:17:13.93 -34:33:59.8   2054 2785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:17:14.01 -34:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.73    15:47:28.80 -32:25:43.9   5851 4138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:47:28.82 -32:25:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82129_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 Preparing report for the candidate 82129_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82145_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82145_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.65    15:56:07.50 -31:23:17.0   6984 4736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:56:07.51 -31:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82146_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82146_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.62    15:49:49.66 -31:04:23.8   6179 4947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.78    15:49:49.68 -31:04:22.4   6174 4952   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82161_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82161_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.65    15:50:28.18 -31:52:40.3   6248 4458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.65    15:50:28.13 -31:52:40.1   6243 4463   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82165_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82165_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.54    15:09:40.80 -29:45:42.5   0899 5642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.57    15:09:40.65 -29:45:42.4   0893 5646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82166_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82166_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.71    15:57:40.03 -30:59:01.4   7201 4968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.85    15:57:40.14 -30:59:03.0   7196 4973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82180_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82180_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.71    15:38:56.58 -29:44:17.2   4769 5774   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.94    15:38:56.54 -29:44:18.9   4763 5779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82181_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82181_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.81    15:43:57.64 -30:09:44.2   5420 5518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:43:57.70 -30:09:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82183_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82183_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.87    15:51:14.94 -33:36:39.5   6311 3413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:51:14.88 -33:36:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82192_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82192_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.70    15:35:54.42 -31:51:30.2   4378 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.85    15:35:54.37 -31:51:30.0   4373 4492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82203_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82203_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.77    15:49:32.39 -30:45:59.3   6147 5134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    14.07    15:49:32.37 -30:45:58.1   6141 5139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.82    15:41:05.18 -29:46:32.4   5045 5755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:41:05.24 -29:46:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82208_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.79    15:51:32.51 -30:19:45.8   6416 5393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    14.03    15:51:32.65 -30:19:45.2   6411 5398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82220_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82220_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.89    15:51:21.78 -30:54:35.4   6382 5041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.91    15:51:21.84 -30:54:34.7   6376 5046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82222_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82222_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.84    15:44:19.12 -31:09:27.4   5464 4908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.84    15:44:19.19 -31:09:28.7   5459 4913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82223_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82223_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.72    15:34:43.00 -32:09:38.5   4227 4303   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.83    15:34:43.04 -32:09:38.1   4222 4308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82226_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 Preparing report for the candidate 82226_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82244_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82244_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.72    15:32:31.36 -33:14:38.9   3956 3645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.89    15:32:31.31 -33:14:39.5   3951 3650   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82255_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82255_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.67    15:20:57.43 -33:38:39.1   2502 3361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.67    15:20:57.42 -33:38:37.3   2496 3366   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82259_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82259_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.86    15:49:10.46 -31:21:08.7   6090 4780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.84    15:49:10.47 -31:21:08.0   6085 4785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82278_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82278_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    13.88    15:43:11.82 -31:06:34.8   5319 4939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.86    15:43:11.86 -31:06:34.0   5314 4944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 82295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 21.13657    2461212.63657    14.02    15:37:02.85 -30:58:51.4   4522 5019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-16-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    13.95    15:37:02.87 -30:58:51.0   4517 5024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    11.00    15:25:47.76 -36:13:51.8   3156 1825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:25:47.75 -36:13:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    11.58    15:51:24.01 -32:51:17.1   6344 3869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:51:23.98 -32:51:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 81195_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    11.50    15:26:26.66 -38:06:08.1   3269 0693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:26:26.66 -38:06:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 80816_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 The candidate 80816_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 21.13726    2461212.63726    11.26    15:38:51.14 -35:44:11.5   4750 2152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_221813_TTUQ2b1x1_3369374_o0mUDwbu/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_22-17-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits **** FOUND 15:38:51.22 -35:44:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0 ########### Completed Lup-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0 ################################################################################### 15:33:14.44 -37:32:33.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 15:57:35.61 -29:58:46.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.63657110 -observatory V36 07:39:43.13 +21:25:56.5 Mercury (0.9mag) 08:46:03.31 +20:02:30.8 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:27:25.59 +18:23:50.1 Mars (1.3mag) 07:59:30.13 +21:02:16.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:52:39.11 +03:05:58.0 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:03:12.56 +20:33:59.2 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:44.53 +00:19:58.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:31.14 -23:09:41.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:18:52.93 +01:55:44.1 Moon (-10.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 20 22:21 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.63657110: 07:59:37.52 +21:01:51.7 Io (6.2mag) 07:59:23.81 +21:02:36.4 Europa (6.3mag) 07:59:27.62 +21:02:20.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:59:57.57 +21:00:50.8 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:59:01.80 +20:40:22.9 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:59:33.03 +21:02:06.3 Thebe (16.6mag) 07:58:40.39 +20:50:32.7 Elara (17.6mag) 08:02:18.28 +21:06:53.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:05:29.10 +21:05:04.7 Carme (18.9mag) 00:52:30.94 +03:06:23.6 Titan (8.6mag) 00:52:39.50 +03:06:10.5 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:51.28 +03:08:17.6 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:52:39.31 +03:06:28.3 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:53:05.12 +03:06:01.3 Phoebe (16.6mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 22:21 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.63657110: 17:29:59.07 -35:28:26.9 JWST 09:48:39.39 +43:57:42.5 Chandra 08:20:06.39 -44:56:18.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 22:21 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.63657110 -observatory V36 18:33:40.44 -33:30:51.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:06:21.08 -67:59:40.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:53:51.09 +32:08:45.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:09:37.71 +15:50:58.9 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:20:46.87 -34:36:10.6 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:08:49.03 +32:01:00.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:49:47.31 +27:00:44.3 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:39:30.92 +30:35:50.4 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:57:50.45 +04:28:20.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:19:38.78 +21:42:00.5 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:15:15.50 -11:04:46.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:07:44.81 +67:12:51.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:14:13.88 -08:01:18.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:17:53.93 +79:56:55.2 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:29:19.33 +64:47:45.0 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:06:23.58 +28:51:35.7 14.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:27:42.85 +14:29:22.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:02:42.43 +34:50:01.2 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:30:57.28 -14:55:19.9 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:17:49.72 +32:16:43.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:04.65 +51:57:24.2 17.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:58:43.39 -11:31:01.7 15.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:35:42.24 +23:05:24.3 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:18.33 +04:32:22.6 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:46:26.23 +77:29:53.0 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:21:34.35 +44:15:24.0 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:15:21.05 +00:16:48.1 16.7mag A/2026 E1 20:46:46.77 -10:05:18.8 8.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:05:42.45 -01:13:42.9 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:31:36.00 +27:18:52.1 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:27:33.27 +19:58:18.3 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:37:08.19 -05:39:20.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:25:30.39 +34:19:33.0 17.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:40:36.85 +18:41:42.3 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:47:36.51 +07:28:11.9 15.8mag 88P/Howell 05:36:06.75 +30:54:54.1 15.4mag 93P/Lovas 03:20:45.81 +29:28:18.2 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:21:44.53 +32:23:02.8 15.4mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:13:02.08 +09:08:38.2 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:20:23.07 +20:01:26.1 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:59:09.77 +19:32:32.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:50:21.17 +16:48:43.4 16.3mag 141P/Machholz 06:54:01.27 +17:51:29.2 16.2mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:56:33.68 +17:19:26.1 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:06:23.08 -23:02:36.6 16.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:25:07.81 +28:35:31.2 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:32:02.01 +06:00:44.7 16.1mag 169P/NEAT 00:52:42.15 +04:50:29.3 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:43:15.64 -08:05:31.2 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR 08:03:39.11 +34:48:19.5 17.7mag 240P/NEAT 01:06:40.85 +03:12:26.7 16.1mag 260P/McNaught 04:40:23.11 +34:37:02.2 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:58:37.51 +03:58:19.3 18.0mag 320P/McNaught 15:10:15.33 +07:29:28.5 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:17:47.45 +20:22:23.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:21:02.02 +40:44:41.1 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 22:21 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 22:21 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 22:21 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 16:11:41.646 +16:56:18.65 AT 2026pap 2026-06-12.83 20.32 20:46:15.499 -32:19:29.95 SN 2026pao 2026-06-11.36 18.635 15:03:43.225 +02:12:54.73 AT 2026pan 2026-06-05.29 20.61 23:06:24.407 +14:31:45.25 AT 2026pam 2026-06-06.80 19.38 11:47:31.848 -25:11:15.00 AT 2026pal 2026-06-07.35 20.37 15:04:37.659 -01:15:27.46 AT 2026pak 2026-06-07.45 20.29 17:48:25.754 +32:00:08.94 AT 2026paj 2026-06-12.05 19.81 21:50:53.005 -01:05:39.13 AT 2026pai 2026-06-08.43 20.366 12:25:02.669 +52:19:31.14 AT 2026pah 2026-06-03.24 19.8587 21:46:05.755 -08:58:40.30 TDE 2026pag 2026-06-03.38 19.3089 10:27:13.174 +19:29:29.02 AT 2026paf 2026-06-01.20 19.6465 22:55:52.731 -02:16:03.48 AT 2026pae 2026-06-05.45 19.7544 15:08:17.400 -12:11:26.44 SN 2026pad 2026-06-12.28 20.06 22:23:33.649 -01:35:22.74 AT 2026pac 2026-06-09.42 20.1163 16:50:53.544 -15:00:19.11 AT 2026pab 2026-06-07.24 21.56 17:27:02.076 +41:10:59.54 AT 2026paa 2026-06-07.32 20.214 18:20:18.686 +77:47:56.78 AT 2026ozz 2026-06-09.31 19.322 22:11:50.531 +22:43:04.06 AT 2026ozy 2026-06-11.18 19.472 11:50:19.187 +31:49:23.30 AT 2026ozx 2026-06-10.91 19.389 18:26:16.254 +32:18:13.23 AT 2026ozw 2026-06-11.07 20.169 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 22:21 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 91 C