This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,7.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 7.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 10.18 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5
126.58417 -59.02319 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2 Pallas 1 -1 1 10.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,10.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 10.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,11.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 11.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 12.71 00:54:41.66 +07:00:05.6
124.37185 -55.86109 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.101 Helena -1 -1 1 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.66 +07:00:05.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.66 +07:00:05.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 12.71 00:50:35.54 +06:04:09.5
122.54799 -56.80181 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.46 Hestia -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:35.54 +06:04:09.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:50:35.54 +06:04:09.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 13.21 01:03:12.81 +07:20:42.1
128.07954 -55.40898 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.124 Alkeste 0 -0 0 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:12.81 +07:20:42.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:12.81 +07:20:42.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 13.46 00:52:35.39 +08:52:02.5
123.41604 -54.00330 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.385 Ilmatar 0 -0 0 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:52:35.39 +08:52:02.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:52:35.39 +08:52:02.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 13.95 00:26:58.90 +09:38:08.3
112.93925 -52.76096 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.510 Mabella 0 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:58.90 +09:38:08.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:58.90 +09:38:08.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3839 2461211.8839 13.97 01:01:37.95 +09:42:53.0
127.11565 -53.07419 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.212 Medea -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:01:37.95 +09:42:53.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:01:37.95 +09:42:53.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8839,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3839 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461211.88415841 20.06.2026 09:13:01.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5978
Objects passed selection criteria: 5967
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4895.5
Average stars matched: 4784 (97.7224 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112068 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 05:21:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461049.62262976 09.01.2026 02:56:25.211 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last image: 2461211.88415841 20.06.2026 09:13:01.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 84
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32264
Objects passed selection criteria: 32193
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26920.5
Average stars matched: 26086.8 (96.9029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 05:23:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.88357052
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t9HuRqzi8f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uJlg3ItNnx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wUQstp1cb2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jKt9GH4w0l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec +0.7095 to +11.2754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9081 to 20.8681 deg, Dec 0.7095 to 11.2754 deg
Loaded 4466 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3642 out of 3799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3799 out of 6274 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec +0.7094 to +11.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8646 deg, Dec 0.7094 to 11.2737 deg
Loaded 4467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3635 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.5 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.t9HuRqzi8f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6274
Got 6274 stars (including 5838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6274 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=207 n_q2=265 n_q3=258 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uJlg3ItNnx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6217
Got 6217 stars (including 5773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=208 n_q2=264 n_q3=255 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wUQstp1cb2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=187, passed=3578
Got 3578 stars (including 3387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3534 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=262 n_q2=225 n_q3=272 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jKt9GH4w0l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=187, passed=3614
Got 3614 stars (including 3425 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=265 n_q2=224 n_q3=269 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.075
new2=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.119
reference average sigma_overall=0.2895 worst_q_ratio=1.311
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.9: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.23 +00:47:13.5: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:41.7: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.66 +01:14:03.8: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.9: 10.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.23 +00:47:13.5: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.9: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6623 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.23 +00:47:13.5: ref_mag=11.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6289 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7145 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6114 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.66 +01:14:03.8: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:41.7: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.66 +01:14:03.8: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5704 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.82 +01:19:19.7: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:52.05 +01:00:41.7: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5243 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.47 +01:11:09.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.47 +01:11:09.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.47 +01:11:09.7: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6605 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.82 +01:19:19.7: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.82 +01:19:19.7: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6935 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20344.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 20320_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.16 +00:58:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20344_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 20344_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20353_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20354_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20405_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20408_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:24.80 +00:48:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20417_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20417_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20421_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20426_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 20429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 01357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:34.28 +08:55:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:32.310 +05:59:46.72
Second-epoch image center 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0231 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:51:29.353 +06:00:29.18
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:26.730 +05:59:50.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2MjfCakpAf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9kiCOsjKay
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NjEwVgQkah
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GeQnLQlmLj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34129 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec +0.7073 to +11.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8906 to 20.8698 deg, Dec 0.7073 to 11.2841 deg
Loaded 4478 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3588 out of 3910 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3910 out of 34129 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34111 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec +0.7037 to +11.2806 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8822 to 20.8645 deg, Dec 0.7037 to 11.2806 deg
Loaded 4474 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3580 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 34111 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
2.4 pix fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
15.4 mag. Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2MjfCakpAf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1306, passed=34109
Got 34109 stars (including 32755 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=210 n_q2=257 n_q3=258 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.325
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9kiCOsjKay (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1297, passed=34085
Got 34085 stars (including 32721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.255 n_q1=213 n_q2=257 n_q3=253 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NjEwVgQkah (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=497, passed=20009
Got 20009 stars (including 19479 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=266 n_q2=221 n_q3=274 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GeQnLQlmLj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=628, passed=20226
Got 20226 stars (including 19569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20226 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=264 n_q2=223 n_q3=274 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-12-10_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0434.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_051838_TTUQ1b1x1_718096_95ouM7Ol/wcs_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: 10.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:12.89 +05:22:14.9: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.8: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.5: 10.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:38:43.27 +01:17:26.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.88 +01:12:31.4: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3150 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.8: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:12.89 +05:22:14.9: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.54 +01:05:01.8: ref_mag=10.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3507 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.5: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:12.89 +05:22:14.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0583 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.14 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:06.67 +01:45:50.5: ref_mag=10.14 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2954 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:38:43.27 +01:17:26.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:37.04 +01:47:08.4: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:38:43.27 +01:17:26.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4288 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:52.06 +01:00:41.5: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.7: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:37.04 +01:47:08.4: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.97 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:37.04 +01:47:08.4: ref_mag=10.97 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0452 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:52.06 +01:00:41.5: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.3: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:52.06 +01:00:41.5: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2847 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:49.81 +01:19:19.7: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:40.48 +01:11:09.5: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.7: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:45.67 +01:14:03.7: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3427 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:24.39 +01:55:46.4: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.3: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:41.25 +00:47:13.3: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3977 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:22.03 +01:25:11.7: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4894 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:40.48 +01:11:09.5: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:40.48 +01:11:09.5: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4261 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:49.81 +01:19:19.7: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:24.39 +01:55:46.4: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:49.81 +01:19:19.7: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4513 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:24.39 +01:55:46.4: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5265 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:45.53 +01:01:46.7: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.7: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:53.41 +00:59:06.3: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:45.53 +01:01:46.7: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:45.53 +01:01:46.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6009 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:17.47 +01:08:51.3: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:36.15 +00:55:30.7: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:46.36 +01:04:48.7: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6436 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:16.9: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:48.58 +01:52:11.4: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:53.41 +00:59:06.3: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:53.41 +00:59:06.3: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5940 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:17.47 +01:08:51.3: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:17.47 +01:08:51.3: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6129 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:36.15 +00:55:30.7: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:36.15 +00:55:30.7: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6275 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:48.58 +01:52:11.4: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:16.9: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:48.58 +01:52:11.4: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8880 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:54.93 +01:38:16.9: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9390 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:50.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:30.6: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:36.39 +01:15:33.8: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:55.43 +01:21:20.4: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:30.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:50.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:37.24 +01:30:30.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2231 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:39.72 +00:58:50.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0760 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:36.39 +01:15:33.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:36.39 +01:15:33.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2677 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:13.73 +01:52:09.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:19.86 +01:49:19.4: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:58.36 +01:44:53.7: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:55.43 +01:21:20.4: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:55.43 +01:21:20.4: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2632 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:46.67 +01:40:36.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:19.86 +01:49:19.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:58.36 +01:44:53.7: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:19.86 +01:49:19.4: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2655 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:58.36 +01:44:53.7: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3066 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:13.73 +01:52:09.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:13.73 +01:52:09.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1951 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:46.67 +01:40:36.8: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:46.67 +01:40:36.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4075 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:44.60 +01:38:14.3: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:21.60 +01:19:24.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:27.90 +00:59:12.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:52.70 +01:22:07.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:44.60 +01:38:14.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:44.60 +01:38:14.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4644 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:21.60 +01:19:24.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:21.60 +01:19:24.8: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4700 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.66 +07:00:05.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:50:35.54 +06:04:09.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:01.61 +01:18:02.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:27.90 +00:59:12.8: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:52.70 +01:22:07.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:27.90 +00:59:12.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4244 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:52.70 +01:22:07.5: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5026 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:32.12 +00:49:46.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:50:35.54 +06:04:09.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.66 +07:00:05.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:01.61 +01:18:02.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:01.61 +01:18:02.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3730 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:59.71 +00:56:42.3: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:32.12 +00:49:46.0: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:32.12 +00:49:46.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4698 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:38.85 +01:43:12.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:26.65 +01:24:43.6: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:13.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:59.71 +00:56:42.3: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:59.71 +00:56:42.3: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7059 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:52.76 +01:25:33.3: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:38.85 +01:43:12.0: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:26.65 +01:24:43.6: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:38.85 +01:43:12.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7804 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:26.65 +01:24:43.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6639 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:13.4: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:03.19 +01:19:13.4: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5952 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:06.34 +01:03:47.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:52.76 +01:25:33.3: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:52.76 +01:25:33.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7534 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:30.71 +01:02:20.3: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:06.34 +01:03:47.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.9: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:06.34 +01:03:47.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6838 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:57.62 +02:30:25.9: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0029 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:32.42 +01:57:08.9: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:51.43 +00:53:10.6: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:03:12.81 +07:20:42.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:35.16 +01:29:18.3: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:30.71 +01:02:20.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:30.71 +01:02:20.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6280 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:22.73 +09:41:34.3: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:32.42 +01:57:08.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:51.43 +00:53:10.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:32.42 +01:57:08.9: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9100 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:03:12.81 +07:20:42.1: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:51.43 +00:53:10.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8721 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:35.16 +01:29:18.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:36.51 +01:16:31.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:21:05.39 +01:19:54.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:35.16 +01:29:18.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8982 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:22.73 +09:41:34.3: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:22.73 +09:41:34.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4992 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:36.51 +01:16:31.5: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:21:05.39 +01:19:54.8: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:36.51 +01:16:31.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0455 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:21:05.39 +01:19:54.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9438 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:07.84 +01:51:14.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:32.01 +01:46:46.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:52:35.39 +08:52:02.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:07.84 +01:51:14.4: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:07.84 +01:51:14.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0781 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.95 +00:54:46.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:13:56.51 +05:08:23.1: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:32.01 +01:46:46.1: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:32.01 +01:46:46.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2268 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:52:35.39 +08:52:02.5: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.95 +00:54:46.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:18:44.48 +01:10:55.7: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.95 +00:54:46.6: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1380 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:13:56.51 +05:08:23.1: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:56.51 +05:08:23.1: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3391 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:20:14.03 +02:01:18.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:18:44.48 +01:10:55.7: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:18:44.48 +01:10:55.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0192 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:20:14.03 +02:01:18.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:14.03 +02:01:18.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2431 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:26:58.90 +09:38:08.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-56-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:01:37.95 +09:42:53.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:26:58.90 +09:38:08.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_20-57-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:01:37.95 +09:42:53.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52522.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52881.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52250_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52252_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52253_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52259_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:42.58 +01:09:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52265_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:28.18 +00:58:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52278_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:58:58.19 +03:47:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52288_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52291_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52291_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52292_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52327_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:06.52 +00:54:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52331_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52351_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:24.81 +00:48:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52352_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52357_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:56.35 +00:57:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52361_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52368_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52370_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52371_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52372_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52373_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52381_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52384_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52388_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52391_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52391_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52393_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52397_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:59.70 +00:52:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52399_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52422_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52429_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52459_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:09.03 +00:46:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52461_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52469_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52476_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52477_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52480_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:16:19.89 +00:54:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52482_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52488_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52501_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52503_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52506_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52506_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52513_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52515_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52518_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52520_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52522_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52525_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52528_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52556_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52570_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52571_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52571_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52582_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52585_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52595_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52595_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52597_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52602_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52621_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52627_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52630_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52631_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52643_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52661_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52670_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52671_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52684_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52711_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52713_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52719_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52721_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52739_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 52826_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:20.07 +04:06:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52881_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
Preparing report for the candidate 52906_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 19784_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:41:19.44 +05:20:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435
The candidate 07254_fd_Psc-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_04-13-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0435 did not pass the final checks
