This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2898 2461211.7898 11.05 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9
120.69820 27.93332 galactic UMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J172052.85+875143.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.010 V 12.620 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J172052.85+875143.5,2461211.7898,11.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J172052.85+875143.5 20260620.2898 11.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2898 2461211.7898 12.06 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6
120.86665 21.82962 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS 51722
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.250 R1 11.550 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 51722,2461211.7898,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 51722 20260620.2898 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2898 2461211.7898 11.93 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7
118.60325 25.64539 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J201115.72+855055.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.730 V 13.420 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J201115.72+855055.6,2461211.7898,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J201115.72+855055.6 20260620.2898 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.86056711 16.04.2026 08:39:02.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
First image: 2461146.86056711 16.04.2026 08:39:02.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Last image: 2461211.79008049 20.06.2026 06:57:32.954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10479
Objects passed selection criteria: 10470
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9977.75
Average stars matched: 9746 (97.6773 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 02:33:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.86056711 16.04.2026 08:39:02.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
First image: 2461146.86056711 16.04.2026 08:39:02.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Last image: 2461211.79008049 20.06.2026 06:57:32.954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 50
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53112
Objects passed selection criteria: 53032
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48875
Average stars matched: 46472 (95.0834 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 02:34:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.78960965
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits'
wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71
Second-epoch image center 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0648 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71
Second-epoch image center 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32
Second-epoch second image center 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00726 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dTQlLpBgB1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ptUe9H953I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UpLmS987ES
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4i9Z8GWGuh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec +77.0227 to +89.8981 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec 77.0227 to 89.8981 deg
Loaded 27814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6710 out of 7010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7010 out of 10444 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.763400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.763400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec +77.0227 to +89.8981 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2305 to 359.9613 deg, Dec 77.0227 to 89.8981 deg
Loaded 27814 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6710 out of 7010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7010 out of 10444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (aperture=7.6)
Read 10002 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.2329 to 359.9636 deg, Dec +77.0229 to +89.8983 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.2329 to 359.9636 deg, Dec 77.0229 to 89.8983 deg
Loaded 27813 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6636 out of 6928 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6928 out of 10002 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
3.0 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
2.3 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
4.5 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
4.5 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
3.0 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
15.0 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dTQlLpBgB1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, passed=10444
Got 10444 stars (including 9727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0280 through 0 to 179.9697, gap 179.9697 to 180.0280
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0250 through 0 to 179.9668, gap 179.9668 to 180.0250
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=239 n_q2=275 n_q3=206 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ptUe9H953I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=10002
Got 10002 stars (including 9298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0274 through 0 to 179.9682, gap 179.9682 to 180.0274
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0260 through 0 to 179.9673, gap 179.9673 to 180.0260
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.0 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=249 n_q2=264 n_q3=210 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UpLmS987ES (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, passed=9866
Got 9866 stars (including 9445 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0279 through 0 to 179.9685, gap 179.9685 to 180.0279
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0258 through 0 to 179.9684, gap 179.9684 to 180.0258
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=249 n_q2=201 n_q3=281 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.374
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4i9Z8GWGuh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, passed=9834
Got 9834 stars (including 9426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0278 through 0 to 179.9688, gap 179.9688 to 180.0278
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0266 through 0 to 179.9687, gap 179.9687 to 180.0266
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=249 n_q2=202 n_q3=281 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.093
ref2=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits sigma_overall=0.429 worst_q_ratio=1.136
new1=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.374
new2=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.367
reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.1145
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 18:59:08.34 +81:43:07.3: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 14:56:14.57 +80:10:03.7: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 18:18:53.15 +81:13:48.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 14:45:56.40 +88:33:18.9: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:11:15.54 +85:50:55.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 19:56:12.25 +80:03:03.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:05:51.01 +80:24:46.1: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:31:33.82 +84:22:41.6: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:47:35.79 +85:22:35.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:30:34.06 +83:30:33.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 18:59:08.34 +81:43:07.3: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 18:18:53.15 +81:13:48.4: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:56:14.57 +80:10:03.7: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:45:56.40 +88:33:18.9: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:11:15.54 +85:50:55.6: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 19:56:12.25 +80:03:03.9: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:18:53.15 +81:13:48.4: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1883 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:08.34 +81:43:07.3: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1464 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:14.57 +80:10:03.7: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0166 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:56.40 +88:33:18.9: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5853 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:12.25 +80:03:03.9: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0229 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:15.54 +85:50:55.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9403 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:05:51.01 +80:24:46.1: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:51.01 +80:24:46.1: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1807 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:31:33.82 +84:22:41.6: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:33.82 +84:22:41.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1039 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:47:35.79 +85:22:35.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:35.79 +85:22:35.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1323 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:30:34.06 +83:30:33.1: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:34.06 +83:30:33.1: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2324 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20317_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20351_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20351_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:03.39 +81:03:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20355_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:25.98 +80:39:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20366_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20368_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20372_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20374_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20377_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20380_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20382_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:37.84 +81:04:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20383_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20386_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20388_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20388_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 20392_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02428_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 02428_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:26.41 +80:10:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71
Second-epoch image center 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0648 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Image size: 940.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:00:00.334 +85:00:06.71
Second-epoch image center 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0600 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:02:08.742 +85:02:49.32
Second-epoch second image center 18:02:08.807 +85:02:23.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00726 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bhpJB62gfJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G72NyfqnmH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4p47xC8rg0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JL12fhPUC2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits and wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 55164 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 28180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6233 out of 7281 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7281 out of 55164 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.591700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.591700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 55164 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0169 to 359.9895 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9630 deg
Loaded 28180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6233 out of 7281 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7281 out of 55164 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits (aperture=5.7)
Read 60532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0306 to 359.9920 deg, Dec +76.9495 to +89.9627 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0306 to 359.9920 deg, Dec 76.9495 to 89.9627 deg
Loaded 28179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6371 out of 7307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7307 out of 60532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.7 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
2.2 pix Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
4.0 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
4.0 pix fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
2.7 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
15.2 mag. Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bhpJB62gfJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4211, passed=55140
Got 55140 stars (including 50844 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0289 through 0 to 179.9987, gap 179.9987 to 180.0289
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0247 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0247
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=242 n_q2=270 n_q3=212 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G72NyfqnmH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3804, passed=60521
Got 60521 stars (including 56618 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60521 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0274 through 0 to 179.9981, gap 179.9981 to 180.0274
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0256 through 0 to 179.9926, gap 179.9926 to 180.0256
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=249 n_q2=256 n_q3=222 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4p47xC8rg0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2732, passed=40921
Got 40921 stars (including 38167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40921 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0279 through 0 to 179.9893, gap 179.9893 to 180.0279
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40701 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0256 through 0 to 179.9911, gap 179.9911 to 180.0256
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 90.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=237 n_q2=203 n_q3=285 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.442
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JL12fhPUC2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2835, passed=41149
Got 41149 stars (including 38280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41149 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013064 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010451 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0018 through 0 to 179.9953, gap 179.9953 to 180.0018
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0264 through 0 to 179.9980, gap 179.9980 to 180.0264
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 834 to 900 (Dec 76.9 to 89.9)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=237 n_q2=200 n_q3=285 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-56-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0280.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_023046_TTUQ1b1x1_211700_hIOTrh1D/wcs_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:55:28.60 +84:58:31.2: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 21:13:02.34 +80:18:04.4: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 19:26:33.00 +86:32:19.0: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:15:12.97 +81:48:29.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:05:29.92 +81:50:19.4: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 19:47:15.52 +80:35:10.8: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 21:42:20.85 +81:54:57.8: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 22:47:45.95 +82:54:07.6: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:55:28.60 +84:58:31.2: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 21:13:02.34 +80:18:04.4: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:28.60 +84:58:31.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7532 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:13:02.34 +80:18:04.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1284 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 19:26:33.00 +86:32:19.0: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:33.00 +86:32:19.0: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8719 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 21:42:20.85 +81:54:57.8: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:05:29.92 +81:50:19.4: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 19:47:15.52 +80:35:10.8: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:42:20.85 +81:54:57.8: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3894 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 22:47:45.95 +82:54:07.6: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:05:29.92 +81:50:19.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1544 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:15:12.97 +81:48:29.0: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:15.52 +80:35:10.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0473 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:47:45.95 +82:54:07.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4829 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:15:12.97 +81:48:29.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5511 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:10:00.00 +84:34:31.7: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 21:47:50.98 +87:56:48.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:10:00.00 +84:34:31.7: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:00.00 +84:34:31.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9603 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 21:47:50.98 +87:56:48.0: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:47:50.98 +87:56:48.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0315 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 15:36:17.26 +83:12:36.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:20:59.89 +82:23:26.8: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:41:27.51 +82:25:28.4: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:04:24.78 +81:23:35.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 15:43:09.96 +82:55:49.8: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:52:58.02 +79:27:27.2: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:07:18.22 +85:04:07.5: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 15:36:17.26 +83:12:36.8: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:17.26 +83:12:36.8: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1831 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:20:59.89 +82:23:26.8: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:59.89 +82:23:26.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0396 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:04:24.78 +81:23:35.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 15:43:09.96 +82:55:49.8: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:09.96 +82:55:49.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4244 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:24.78 +81:23:35.2: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5716 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:41:27.51 +82:25:28.4: 13.63 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:27.51 +82:25:28.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4087 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 18:34:44.05 +80:43:57.3: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:52:58.02 +79:27:27.2: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:07:18.22 +85:04:07.5: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:58.02 +79:27:27.2: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5982 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:18.22 +85:04:07.5: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6437 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:34:26.00 +84:47:07.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 16:56:35.00 +84:14:54.6: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 18:34:44.05 +80:43:57.3: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:44.05 +80:43:57.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8243 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:34:26.00 +84:47:07.3: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:26.00 +84:47:07.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6448 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 18:35:37.59 +81:11:34.8: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 15:42:53.40 +80:05:56.6: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 16:12:38.09 +79:30:16.3: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 19:16:57.76 +81:34:05.3: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:23:43.16 +77:40:03.7: 14.47 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 16:00:05.82 +79:51:50.3: 14.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 16:56:35.00 +84:14:54.6: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:35.00 +84:14:54.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8684 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:19:30.09 +80:21:59.3: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 16:12:38.09 +79:30:16.3: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 15:42:53.40 +80:05:56.6: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:38.09 +79:30:16.3: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1163 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 18:35:37.59 +81:11:34.8: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:53.40 +80:05:56.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1538 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:37.59 +81:11:34.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0725 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:23:43.16 +77:40:03.7: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 16:00:05.82 +79:51:50.3: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 16:30:02.36 +80:53:39.5: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:43.16 +77:40:03.7: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3202 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:05.82 +79:51:50.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4117 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 19:16:57.76 +81:34:05.3: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:57.76 +81:34:05.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1077 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:10:36.74 +83:50:29.0: 15.40 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:19:30.09 +80:21:59.3: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:30.09 +80:21:59.3: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3985 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 18:11:12.57 +81:19:48.7: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 16:30:02.36 +80:53:39.5: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:02.36 +80:53:39.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2619 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:10:36.74 +83:50:29.0: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:36.74 +83:50:29.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2323 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 18:11:12.57 +81:19:48.7: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:12.57 +81:19:48.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6140 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-39-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0276.fits at 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:31:33.88 +84:22:41.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0562 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:20:54.51 +87:51:42.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0459 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_05-50-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:11:15.56 +85:50:55.7: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9271 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37562.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53924.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73793_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73793_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73799_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73799_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:11.93 +83:34:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73812_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73812_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:07:49.38 +81:35:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73823_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73823_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73835_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73835_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73842_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73842_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73844_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73844_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73848_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73848_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73851_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73851_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73853_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73853_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73857_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73857_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73858_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73858_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73863_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73863_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73991_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73991_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73996_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 73996_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74004_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74004_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74038_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74038_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:56.58 +80:50:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74039_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74039_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74045_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74045_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74052_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74052_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74054_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74054_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74073_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74073_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74076_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74076_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74092_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74092_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74100_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74100_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:36.67 +82:38:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74106_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74106_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74108_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74108_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74114_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74114_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74119_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74119_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:09.01 +85:06:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74125_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74125_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74132_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74132_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74138_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74138_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74143_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74143_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74156_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74156_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74162_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74162_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74173_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74173_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74176_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74176_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74180_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 74180_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47021_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 47021_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37562_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 37562_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25682_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 25682_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:19:03.31 +81:03:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53924_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 53924_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34903_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 34903_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:51.51 +83:49:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12819_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281
The candidate 12819_fd_Dra-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-57-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0281 did not pass the final checks