This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.39 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4
4.29529 -10.62286 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 4047365940429465984 | 18:37:58.66 -30:12:46.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4: 12.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4: 12.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4047365940429465984,2461211.7331,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4047365940429465984 20260620.2331 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.59 19:26:27.55 -26:12:01.1
12.48286 -18.83673 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 -0 0 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:27.55 -26:12:01.1: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:27.55 -26:12:01.1: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7331,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2331 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.63 19:07:48.35 -27:06:42.9
9.94493 -15.32743 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -2 -0 2 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:48.35 -27:06:42.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:48.35 -27:06:42.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7331,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2331 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 12.40 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4
4.88597 -10.26088 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J183736.60-293216.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 V 14.790 V 2457950.00000 128.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4: 13.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J183736.60-293216.8,2461211.7331,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J183736.60-293216.8 20260620.2331 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.76 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0
12.55121 -16.71341 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J191750-2520.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.770 V Y 1.200 V 2452475.90000 156.250000000000
The object was found in astcheck.15556 Hanafy 391 137 414 16.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0: 13.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191750-2520.4,2461211.7331,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191750-2520.4 20260620.2331 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 12.69 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4
10.35805 -11.27076 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J185201.27-250558.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.640 g Y 0.740 g 2459049.39400 74.870000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4: 14.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J185201.27-250558.6,2461211.7331,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J185201.27-250558.6 20260620.2331 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.47 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2
7.49248 -12.96978 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J185344-2821.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.880 V Y 0.350 V 2452063.40000 75.344429000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185344-2821.0,2461211.7331,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185344-2821.0 20260620.2331 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.81 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6
10.87533 -10.15478 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J184830.98-240957.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 14.100 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6: 12.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J184830.98-240957.6,2461211.7331,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J184830.98-240957.6 20260620.2331 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.32 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5
8.13527 -13.86104 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J185836-2808.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.908 Ic Y 0.205 Ic 2452880.20000 177.300000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185836-2808.4,2461211.7331,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185836-2808.4 20260620.2331 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 12.40 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8
13.06510 -17.13507 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -4 1 4 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8: 13.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7331,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2331 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.69 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6
9.91581 -9.50338 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V4023 Sgr
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.700 pg 14.700 pg 2438615.00000 146.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V4023 Sgr,2461211.7331,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V4023 Sgr 20260620.2331 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.24 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7
8.39625 -15.78181 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J190705-2839.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.949 Ic Y 0.336 Ic 2452551.10000 73.350000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J190705-2839.8,2461211.7331,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J190705-2839.8 20260620.2331 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 12.14 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4
8.20727 -15.04117 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J190338.81-283236.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.140 V 13.910 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4: 13.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190338.81-283236.4,2461211.7331,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190338.81-283236.4 20260620.2331 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.84 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1
9.49637 -13.36002 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J185856-2643.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.040 V Y 0.410 V 2452138.10000 67.377876000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185856-2643.6,2461211.7331,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185856-2643.6 20260620.2331 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.38 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7
6.68691 -13.17859 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J185310-2909.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.650 V Y 0.610 V 2452361.90000 122.930664000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7: 12.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185310-2909.2,2461211.7331,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185310-2909.2 20260620.2331 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.94 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3
5.63036 -11.64765 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J184448.54-292748.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.860 V 14.100 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3: 13.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J184448.54-292748.9,2461211.7331,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J184448.54-292748.9 20260620.2331 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.78 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6
11.84773 -11.58406 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J185557.37-235414.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.430 V 12.810 V 2457484.80000 63.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J185557.37-235414.5,2461211.7331,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J185557.37-235414.5 20260620.2331 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.14 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7
6.52807 -14.59689 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J185851-2951.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.330 V Y 0.620 V 2452278.70000 92.888542000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185851-2951.6,2461211.7331,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185851-2951.6 20260620.2331 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 12.46 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4
13.02889 -16.96869 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J191938.95-250056.3
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.250 V 13.680 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191938.95-250056.3,2461211.7331,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191938.95-250056.3 20260620.2331 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 10.99 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8
11.71437 -17.13163 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J191811-2614.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.550 V Y 0.860 V 2452184.60000 84.615387000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191811-2614.3,2461211.7331,10.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191811-2614.3 20260620.2331 10.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.58 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9
12.35769 -18.43345 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 1.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J192436-2609.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.959 Ic Y 0.210 Ic 2452573.00000 127.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192436-2609.7,2461211.7331,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192436-2609.7 20260620.2331 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.98 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4
7.39877 -16.70924 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J190920.24-295408.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.630 V 14.190 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4: 12.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190920.24-295408.7,2461211.7331,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190920.24-295408.7 20260620.2331 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.44 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2
11.81721 -20.71955 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.451 Patientia 1 1 2 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2: 14.24 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2: 14.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7331,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2331 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.89 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7
7.56598 -14.92920 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J190204.18-290410.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.390 V 13.780 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7: 12.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J190204.18-290410.7,2461211.7331,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J190204.18-290410.7 20260620.2331 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2331 2461211.7331 11.87 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3
9.38935 -19.21065 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 1.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J192313.54-290337.0
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.990 V 13.410 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J192313.54-290337.0,2461211.7331,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J192313.54-290337.0 20260620.2331 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461211.73329983 20.06.2026 05:35:47.105 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8616
Objects passed selection criteria: 8608
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7633.25
Average stars matched: 6412 (84.0009 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 00:49:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461211.73329983 20.06.2026 05:35:47.105 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 196
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 85514
Objects passed selection criteria: 85396
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75343
Average stars matched: 59975.2 (79.6029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1868012 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 00:52:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.73290166
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0554 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IZUkJJJ0TQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mcvmIjO4cC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bq9Hvh3FUW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YbLTAVvK1U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.404200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.404200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
4.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
4.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.IZUkJJJ0TQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.739 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=247 n_q2=168 n_q3=255 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mcvmIjO4cC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.581 n_q1=250 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bq9Hvh3FUW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=162, passed=4452
Got 4452 stars (including 4287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.5 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.5 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.701 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=261 n_q2=172 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YbLTAVvK1U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=161, passed=4446
Got 4446 stars (including 4284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4446 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.5 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 350 (Dec -31.5 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.677 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=265 n_q2=171 n_q3=230 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.125
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.277
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.525 worst_q_ratio=1.336
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.554 worst_q_ratio=1.221
reference average sigma_overall=0.616 worst_q_ratio=1.201
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (921 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (927 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:40:42.81 -21:52:32.1: 10.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:42.81 -21:52:32.1: 10.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:42.81 -21:52:32.1: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5369 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24764_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24764_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.63 -26:20:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24783_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24783_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.36 -22:34:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24784_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:33.00 -29:04:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.92 -30:28:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20888_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:44.42 -22:18:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20247_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.45 -25:51:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 22335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.20 -28:51:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0554 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.300 -26:03:31.31
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:00.553 -26:03:29.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00282 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x7LJPMM3Gu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QxSVVhjyZ9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UWNvJ6Q06L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qZfm6XCzvC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.190200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.190200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.04
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 175 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
3.6 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.x7LJPMM3Gu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5805, passed=85932
Got 85932 stars (including 80013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85932 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.746 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=266 n_q2=176 n_q3=223 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QxSVVhjyZ9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UWNvJ6Q06L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1657, passed=36605
Got 36605 stars (including 34915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36605 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=243 n_q2=160 n_q3=239 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qZfm6XCzvC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1684, passed=36203
Got 36203 stars (including 34482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.652 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=242 n_q2=163 n_q3=239 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_004649_TTUQ1b1x1_49270_A2R3cKH5/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:38:12.09 -29:00:01.6: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:40:26.74 -27:44:28.1: 12.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:39:00.60 -28:10:53.5: 11.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:15.26 -22:15:55.6: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:14:57.13 -30:06:11.2: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:08.66 -28:34:23.7: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:38:44.66 -30:16:10.2: 11.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:54.92 -21:25:34.1: 12.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:58.76 -25:47:53.5: 12.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:38:12.09 -29:00:01.6: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:26.74 -27:44:28.1: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:38:44.66 -30:16:10.2: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:14:57.13 -30:06:11.2: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:39:00.60 -28:10:53.5: 11.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:08.66 -28:34:23.7: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:12.09 -29:00:01.6: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2641 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:26.74 -27:44:28.1: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1035 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:44.66 -30:16:10.2: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8135 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:00.60 -28:10:53.5: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7426 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:14:57.13 -30:06:11.2: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8464 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:08.66 -28:34:23.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0043 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:54.92 -21:25:34.1: 12.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:15.26 -22:15:55.6: 12.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:58.76 -25:47:53.5: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:54.92 -21:25:34.1: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3318 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:15.26 -22:15:55.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3697 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:58.76 -25:47:53.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4653 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:46.59 -29:50:19.7: 11.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:46.59 -29:50:19.7: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:46.59 -29:50:19.7: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5850 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4: 12.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:39.16 -30:34:37.7: 11.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:10.22 -20:39:06.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4: 12.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:37:58.65 -30:13:01.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.3842 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:39.16 -30:34:37.7: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:39.16 -30:34:37.7: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2708 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:27.55 -26:12:01.1: 14.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:17.97 -20:51:10.3: 11.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:48.35 -27:06:42.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:55.45 -29:55:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:27.55 -26:12:01.1: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:17.97 -20:51:10.3: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:48.35 -27:06:42.9: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:17.97 -20:51:10.3: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5428 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:58.3: 11.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:55.45 -29:55:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:55.45 -29:55:39.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:35:43.60 -30:14:14.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:35:43.60 -30:14:14.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:43.60 -30:14:14.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:58.3: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:23.68 -21:07:58.3: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8657 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:28.63 -21:36:58.7: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:20.93 -26:02:20.9: 13.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4: 13.42 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:28.63 -21:36:58.7: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:28.63 -21:36:58.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3652 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:20.93 -26:02:20.9: 14.52 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:54:20.93 -26:02:20.9: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.3788 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:37:37.09 -29:32:13.4: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.3903 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0: 13.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:17:49.93 -25:20:23.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7411 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4: 14.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:52:00.89 -25:05:54.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.6791 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2: 13.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:53:44.91 -28:21:07.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.4700 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6: 12.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:48:30.87 -24:09:54.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8140 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:58:35.85 -28:08:24.5: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3256 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:05.92 -24:36:24.9: 13.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8: 13.95 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:05.92 -24:36:24.9: 13.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:20:23.23 -25:02:50.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.3760 delta=1.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:54:05.92 -24:36:24.9: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.5153 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6: 12.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:07:04.79 -28:39:47.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2395 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:44:08.70 -24:44:20.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.6733 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:40:16.55 -29:43:21.0: 11.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4: 13.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:16.55 -29:43:21.0: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:16.55 -29:43:21.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5596 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:03:38.88 -28:32:36.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1241 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1: 12.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1: 12.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:58:55.98 -26:43:39.1: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8399 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3: 13.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7: 12.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:53:09.81 -29:09:13.7: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3751 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3: 12.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:44:48.87 -29:27:48.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.9378 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6: 12.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:55:57.34 -23:54:14.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7750 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:40:42.85 -21:52:31.6: 10.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:41.81 -24:19:32.8: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7: 11.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:42.85 -21:52:31.6: 10.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:42.85 -21:52:31.6: ref_mag=10.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.5855 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:41.81 -24:19:32.8: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:41.81 -24:19:32.8: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1616 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:06.99 -28:08:22.7: 12.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:58:51.33 -29:51:43.7: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1411 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4: 13.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:06.99 -28:08:22.7: 12.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:06.99 -28:08:22.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9075 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:19:39.01 -25:00:56.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.4537 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:38:15.40 -25:15:47.0: 13.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:38:15.40 -25:15:47.0: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:38:15.40 -25:15:47.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.3375 delta=1.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4: 12.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:18:11.35 -26:14:21.8: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.9902 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2: 14.24 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:09:20.31 -29:54:07.4: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.9787 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:24:35.62 -26:09:39.9: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5781 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2: 14.50 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:33:18.98 -27:27:51.2: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=11.4249 delta=2.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7: 12.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7: 12.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:02:04.23 -29:04:10.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8872 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3: 12.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:23:13.56 -29:03:37.3: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.8572 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102421.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out157019.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10103.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117452.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12877.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14079.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14306.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out156614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157030.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18181.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32452.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36798.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44450.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46978.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47289.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57603.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65824.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 14s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:18.98 -22:33:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156186_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156186_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156187_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156193_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156193_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156196_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156196_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156197_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156197_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156203_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156205_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156205_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156210_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156211_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156211_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.65 -30:09:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156218_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156219_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156219_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156220_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 156220_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156221_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156221_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:41.00 -28:19:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156265_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156265_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:30.17 -20:41:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156349_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.22 -22:42:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156388_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.31 -28:37:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156393_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:33.86 -20:55:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156410_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156448_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156503_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156503_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.12 -25:11:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156511_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156511_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.51 -28:02:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156534_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156534_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156543_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156543_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:01.67 -21:22:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156559_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156559_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156574_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156574_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.82 -28:06:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156577_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156577_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.06 -21:08:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156588_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156588_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156591_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 156591_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156614_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 156614_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156624_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156624_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156656_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156656_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156694_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156694_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.17 -22:07:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156711_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156711_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156725_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156725_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156729_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.29 -26:25:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156738_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156738_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:37.71 -22:17:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156764_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156764_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156768_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:37.46 -21:46:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156770_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156770_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.55 -22:23:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156828_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156828_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156832_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:12.85 -21:03:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156845_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156845_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.61 -25:29:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156857_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156857_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.27 -28:17:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156880_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156880_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.98 -25:53:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156910_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156919_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.97 -28:00:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156937_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.86 -21:49:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 156975_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.63 -23:55:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157013_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157013_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.04 -27:20:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157016_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157016_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157019_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.93 -26:02:20.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.411 4073840771644986496 283.58760704957 -26.03898000840 11.9708 10.0419 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.411#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157030_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 157030_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157102_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157102_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:27.45 -21:19:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157178_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157228_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157228_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157232_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157232_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.67 -24:19:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157237_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:44.60 -24:21:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157238_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 157241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 102109_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.27 -27:14:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 96922_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:30.77 -26:20:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:47.93 -29:46:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97451_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97451_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:31.06 -30:18:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40058_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 40058_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:07.34 -25:44:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 139165_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 98036_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.93 -30:28:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 98091_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:12.54 -21:41:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 21658_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:20.41 -27:49:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 44450_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38365_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 38365_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:33.59 -25:56:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 99266_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:48.83 -29:40:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 117452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.89 -25:10:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 131679_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:16.44 -24:44:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 47278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:57.21 -24:53:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73682_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 73682_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:30.75 -22:29:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 106976_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.19 -28:07:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 101315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:12.61 -28:07:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 106841_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:08.88 -28:46:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19067_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 19067_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 05923_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.58 -29:58:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 101159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.46 -25:35:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 106754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.56 -27:50:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 62556_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:43.51 -24:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84423_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 84423_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:02.12 -24:13:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41667_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 41667_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:18.02 -25:39:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 74935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:38.76 -22:47:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19611_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 19611_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:41.26 -28:21:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 112912_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.83 -28:03:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105983_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 105983_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:39.99 -26:36:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57603_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 57603_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 28278_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:22.43 -27:14:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:34.34 -23:36:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 125717_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.56 -21:51:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.21 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62530_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 62530_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20917_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 20917_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 55245_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:33.14 -21:27:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83488_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83488_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.47 -24:06:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.66 -29:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46978_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 46978_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104980_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 104980_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:05.92 -24:36:24.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.787 4074831942699979520 283.52454009662 -24.60643383716 12.0855 10.7747 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12790_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 12790_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:06.41 -29:00:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 58811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:30.67 -22:06:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 17882_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:32.35 -28:24:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 65824_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17302_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 17302_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 116156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.99 -22:59:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 104527_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.87 -26:56:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 07811_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 18181_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98806_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 98806_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:31.70 -23:01:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 115846_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:45.06 -24:33:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43475_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 43475_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:45.05 -25:25:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135649_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 135649_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:31.89 -23:55:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 32452_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 72930_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.19 -22:32:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128057_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 128057_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.10 -24:13:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07087_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 07087_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:53.88 -30:03:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 36064_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:35.53 -26:16:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27017_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 27017_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:32.29 -27:16:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81707_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 81707_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:03.74 -23:50:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 103818_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.45 -24:58:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98153_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 98153_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:54.51 -27:44:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 103699_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:26.30 -27:17:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97886_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:00.37 -30:10:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97864_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97864_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:45.85 -22:18:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97799_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97799_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:13.37 -29:37:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 12877_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97791_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.80 -23:56:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10103_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 10103_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 109086_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.19 -25:01:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108903_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 108903_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:09.07 -27:03:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97709_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97709_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:45.92 -29:34:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97689_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97689_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:37.22 -29:17:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97665_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:48.01 -30:22:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97650_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97650_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:15.24 -22:18:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97616_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:27.59 -30:14:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82579_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82579_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97524_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.65 -26:20:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97495_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.38 -22:34:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78505_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 78505_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:46.91 -23:21:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 34401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:50.47 -26:29:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 36730_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:28.91 -26:10:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97331_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97331_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24367_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 24367_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:43.41 -27:46:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08353_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 08353_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97209_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40004_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 40004_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:45.40 -25:50:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39813_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 39813_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:13.30 -25:42:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97131_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 97131_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47289_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 47289_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133163_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 133163_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:29.04 -27:09:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64876_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 64876_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.63 -24:43:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 102421_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:15.40 -25:15:47.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 102317_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.58 -23:19:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36798_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 36798_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28532_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 28532_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:16.55 -27:14:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 102021_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:09.95 -28:59:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 37419_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08531_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 08531_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07024_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 07024_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:09.83 -30:02:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 132117_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14079_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 14079_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 44754_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:39.60 -25:12:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39053_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 39053_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:37:02.47 -25:51:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14306_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 14306_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119879_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 119879_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-35-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
