This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2345 2461211.7345 11.46 19:26:27.50 -26:12:01.8
12.48259 -18.83663 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 -0 0 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:27.50 -26:12:01.8: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:27.50 -26:12:01.8: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7345,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2345 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2345 2461211.7345 11.54 19:07:48.37 -27:06:43.8
9.94472 -15.32759 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 -1 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:48.37 -27:06:43.8: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:48.37 -27:06:43.8: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7345,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2345 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2345 2461211.7345 12.15 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2
5.64756 -11.66091 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2: 14.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.7345,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.2345 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.2345 2461211.7345 12.53 19:03:19.86 -27:20:08.7
9.32674 -14.50108 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 1.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 0 -1 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:19.86 -27:20:08.7: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:19.86 -27:20:08.7: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.7345,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.2345 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461211.73473829 20.06.2026 05:37:51.388 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7152
Objects passed selection criteria: 7138
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6161.5
Average stars matched: 5196 (84.3301 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 00:41:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461211.73473829 20.06.2026 05:37:51.388 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76945
Objects passed selection criteria: 76866
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75157.8
Average stars matched: 61950.5 (82.4273 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1868744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 00:45:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.73431542
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0724 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00261 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6AtFi6HBFS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VJVWm1hj4T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IUl4Xeh6l6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qip0bUySwg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6AtFi6HBFS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=248 n_q2=168 n_q3=254 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VJVWm1hj4T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=249 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IUl4Xeh6l6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, passed=4140
Got 4140 stars (including 3877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4140 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.647 n_q1=274 n_q2=215 n_q3=194 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qip0bUySwg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, passed=4124
Got 4124 stars (including 3882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4124 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.701 n_q1=275 n_q2=218 n_q3=191 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.654 worst_q_ratio=1.119
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.577 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.599 worst_q_ratio=1.164
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.664 worst_q_ratio=1.121
reference average sigma_overall=0.6155 worst_q_ratio=1.195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (937 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23833_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 23833_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.80 -23:56:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23836_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 23836_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.66 -26:20:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 23841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.95 -29:04:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.29 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0749 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0724 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:04.993 -26:04:37.07
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:04.670 -26:04:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00261 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.80VQ4zL9SR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SIVPhKukD5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CIbUWUVAgK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IsuuZHGk54
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 76 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.80VQ4zL9SR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 80016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=267 n_q2=176 n_q3=221 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SIVPhKukD5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CIbUWUVAgK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1985, passed=55859
Got 55859 stars (including 53791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55859 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54672 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 348 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.709 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.633 n_q1=284 n_q2=208 n_q3=186 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IsuuZHGk54 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1987, passed=55378
Got 55378 stars (including 53315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55378 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.829 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.672 n_q1=285 n_q2=208 n_q3=185 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-14_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_003923_TTUQ2b1x1_3405212_9QhK9FJd/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:18.38 -29:07:08.2: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:25:58.49 -22:48:57.1: 12.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:56.41 -28:50:17.3: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:12.45 -26:44:23.7: 12.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:55.5: 12.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:47:28.52 -29:34:38.5: 12.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:19.91 -22:57:24.3: 12.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:12.73 -27:14:51.7: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:12.94 -22:04:50.8: 12.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:58.49 -22:48:57.1: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:56.41 -28:50:17.3: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:55.5: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:12.45 -26:44:23.7: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:58.49 -22:48:57.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9390 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:47:28.52 -29:34:38.5: 12.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:19.91 -22:57:24.3: 13.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:18.38 -29:07:08.2: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:56.41 -28:50:17.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5776 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:15.38 -22:15:55.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5035 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:12.45 -26:44:23.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9523 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:28.52 -29:34:38.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8793 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:18.38 -29:07:08.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0000 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:19.91 -22:57:24.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9684 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:25.51 -29:00:18.8: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:12.73 -27:14:51.7: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:12.73 -27:14:51.7: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5893 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:12.94 -22:04:50.8: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:12.94 -22:04:50.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3347 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:25.51 -29:00:18.8: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:25.51 -29:00:18.8: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5069 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:30.96 -27:10:11.0: 12.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:39.43 -30:03:04.1: 12.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:55.94 -27:07:11.3: 12.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:38.02 -25:04:30.5: 12.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.3: 10.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:27.50 -26:12:01.8: 14.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:30.96 -27:10:11.0: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:38.02 -25:04:30.5: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:39.43 -30:03:04.1: 12.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:30.96 -27:10:11.0: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4198 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:55.94 -27:07:11.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:38.02 -25:04:30.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2014 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:39.43 -30:03:04.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3603 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:55.94 -27:07:11.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4063 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:48.37 -27:06:43.8: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2: 14.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:27.50 -26:12:01.8: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.3: 10.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:38.80 -28:45:48.3: ref_mag=10.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7050 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:48.37 -27:06:43.8: 15.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:54.13 -29:27:13.2: 14.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:12.20 -28:13:41.9: 12.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:03:19.86 -27:20:08.7: 14.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:31.96 -27:30:30.3: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:54.57 -26:23:03.3: 12.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:12.20 -28:13:41.9: 12.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:03:19.86 -27:20:08.7: 15.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:31.96 -27:30:30.3: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:12.20 -28:13:41.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4272 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:31.96 -27:30:30.3: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5006 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:03.8: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:54.57 -26:23:03.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:54.57 -26:23:03.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6624 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:14.01 -28:21:03.5: 12.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:03.8: 12.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:49.22 -24:26:03.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6774 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:14.01 -28:21:03.5: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:14.01 -28:21:03.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7318 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:42.21 -27:05:49.2: 12.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:29:27.31 -24:12:58.1: 12.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:03.92 -23:56:25.6: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:42.21 -27:05:49.2: 12.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:42.21 -27:05:49.2: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8622 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:07.0: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:29:27.31 -24:12:58.1: 12.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:27.31 -24:12:58.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7963 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:03.92 -23:56:25.6: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:03.92 -23:56:25.6: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7916 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:07.0: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:29.32 -26:08:07.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9426 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:38.66 -27:07:36.6: 12.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:37.97 -23:17:03.9: 12.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:38.66 -27:07:36.6: 12.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:38.66 -27:07:36.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0105 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:37.97 -23:17:03.9: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:37.97 -23:17:03.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9055 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:29.63 -23:19:39.4: 14.35 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:29.63 -23:19:39.4: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:44:29.63 -23:19:39.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.4476 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101374.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148430.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148100_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148101_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148101_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:04.02 -24:17:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148108_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148108_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:00.75 -25:34:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148114_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148114_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148125_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148136_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148136_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148138_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148138_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148142_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148142_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148146_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148146_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:27.70 -24:30:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148147_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148147_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148149_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148149_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148152_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148152_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:29.78 -27:44:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148158_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148158_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148160_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148160_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148163_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148168_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148169_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148169_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:29.43 -27:30:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148187_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148187_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148195_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148195_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148196_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148196_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148206_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148206_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148220_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148220_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148264_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148264_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.26 -28:37:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148268_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148268_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 148276_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148305_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:45.68 -24:25:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148341_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 148341_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148389_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148389_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.98 -25:53:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148405_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148405_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:54.10 -28:14:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148418_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148419_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:12.35 -24:52:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148430_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 148430_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148431_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148431_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.01 -27:20:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148447_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.09 -25:11:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148448_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148448_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148459_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148459_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.87 -28:06:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148475_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.19 -26:25:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148490_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148490_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.58 -25:29:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148501_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148501_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148503_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148503_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148511_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.70 -23:55:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148518_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148518_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.81 -25:10:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148529_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148529_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.35 -28:17:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148537_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148537_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148541_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148545_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148545_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:06.02 -28:00:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148547_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148547_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148561_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148561_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:28.06 -22:37:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148568_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148568_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148574_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148574_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148586_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148586_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148593_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148593_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148599_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148599_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 148607_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:21.04 -22:59:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.50 -22:34:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.80 -23:56:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.22 -28:07:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.47 -27:50:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.31 -28:51:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.50 -21:51:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.65 -28:03:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.67 -25:10:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98386_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 98386_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:54.61 -27:44:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.70 -26:20:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.52 -24:58:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.07 -22:07:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.62 -29:49:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 101374_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:29.63 -23:19:39.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.561 4078338323994360832 281.12268464085 -23.32764520937 12.3625 10.4586 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.561#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.18 -27:14:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_00-37-51_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks