This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1429 2461211.6429 13.36 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5
5.36312 3.99801 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.814 Tauris -2 -1 2 13.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5: 15.16 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.34
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.6429,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.1429 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1429 2461211.6429 13.79 17:46:28.62 -20:26:29.7
7.36880 4.24216 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2510 Shandong -1 -0 1 14.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:46:28.62 -20:26:29.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:46:28.62 -20:26:29.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.6429,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.1429 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1429 2461211.6429 13.34 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3
12.25113 8.17108 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 10.3 pix
The object was found in VSX10" Gaia DR3 4149369867513093888
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.100 G 14.120 G K
The object was found in astcheck.527 Euryanthe 0 3 3 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3: 14.97 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.1429* 17 42 48.72 -14 15 33.3 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4149369867513093888,2461211.6429,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4149369867513093888 20260620.1429 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.95808869 23.04.2026 10:59:28.863 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
First image: 2461153.95808869 23.04.2026 10:59:28.863 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Last image: 2461211.64320175 20.06.2026 03:26:02.631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14272
Objects passed selection criteria: 14203
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9648.5
Average stars matched: 9156.5 (94.9008 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120348 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:39:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.95808869 23.04.2026 10:59:28.863 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
First image: 2461153.95808869 23.04.2026 10:59:28.863 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Last image: 2461211.64320175 20.06.2026 03:26:02.631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137325
Objects passed selection criteria: 137002
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101886
Average stars matched: 94287.5 (92.5426 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1969952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:44:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.64256293
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52
Second-epoch image center 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52
Second-epoch image center 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01676 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mgUJbOZXfF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gczXSCpOb8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ir4FKoci72
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ye3ujIdJw7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.8561 to 275.0571 deg, Dec -23.5808 to -12.1225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.8561 to 275.0571 deg, Dec -23.5808 to -12.1225 deg
Loaded 15395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10531 out of 11346 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11346 out of 19272 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.718900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.718900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 19272 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.8561 to 275.0571 deg, Dec -23.5808 to -12.1225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.8561 to 275.0571 deg, Dec -23.5808 to -12.1225 deg
Loaded 15395 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10531 out of 11346 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11346 out of 19272 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 16834 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2191 to 275.1596 deg, Dec -23.2652 to -12.6512 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2191 to 275.1596 deg, Dec -23.2652 to -12.6512 deg
Loaded 14537 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9955 out of 10614 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10614 out of 16834 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mgUJbOZXfF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1752, passed=19272
Got 19272 stars (including 17505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=245 n_q2=169 n_q3=320 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gczXSCpOb8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1449, passed=16834
Got 16834 stars (including 15371 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.713 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.919 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.665 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.869 n_q1=235 n_q2=204 n_q3=296 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ir4FKoci72 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=487, passed=6645
Got 6645 stars (including 6152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.922 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.743 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.823 n_q1=190 n_q2=303 n_q3=195 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ye3ujIdJw7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=493, passed=6701
Got 6701 stars (including 6198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6701 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.009 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.748 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.818 n_q1=198 n_q2=298 n_q3=191 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.320
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.395
ref2=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits sigma_overall=0.713 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.775 worst_q_ratio=1.190
new2=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.764 worst_q_ratio=1.320
reference average sigma_overall=0.5325 worst_q_ratio=1.342
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.67 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.68 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.73 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21594_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 21594_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:02.96 -19:20:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20204_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 20204_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:48.07 -16:07:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52
Second-epoch image center 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Image size: 938.4'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:33.464 -17:58:10.52
Second-epoch image center 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0734 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:26.326 -18:01:13.58
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:22.759 -18:01:46.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01676 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PuFTptgP2n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DJ8mEUDX0n
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9Ecg7Skjqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l7v7teix0P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 178682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.7920 to 275.0612 deg, Dec -23.5807 to -12.0575 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.7920 to 275.0612 deg, Dec -23.5807 to -12.0575 deg
Loaded 15463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9861 out of 12954 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12954 out of 178682 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.544000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.544000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 178682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.7920 to 275.0612 deg, Dec -23.5807 to -12.0575 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.7920 to 275.0612 deg, Dec -23.5807 to -12.0575 deg
Loaded 15463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9861 out of 12954 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12954 out of 178682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 164484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.1992 to 275.1596 deg, Dec -23.2695 to -12.6301 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.1992 to 275.1596 deg, Dec -23.2695 to -12.6301 deg
Loaded 14569 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9830 out of 12695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12695 out of 164484 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PuFTptgP2n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=20543, passed=178661
Got 178661 stars (including 157888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 178661 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 174714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits N_match=923 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=247 n_q2=179 n_q3=311 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DJ8mEUDX0n (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=18138, passed=164474
Got 164474 stars (including 146132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164474 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 161463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 161460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 161459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=925 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.723 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.786 n_q1=242 n_q2=203 n_q3=294 n_q4=186 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9Ecg7Skjqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4590, passed=77290
Got 77290 stars (including 72600 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77290 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75091 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.768 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.905 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.757 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.826 n_q1=191 n_q2=307 n_q3=164 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l7v7teix0P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4639, passed=78506
Got 78506 stars (including 73779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 78506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013033 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010427 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.834 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.737 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.757 n_q1=196 n_q2=312 n_q3=162 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-25-07_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_223529_TTUQ2b1x1_328533_mUMEfUOU/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:55:04.00 -18:16:19.8: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:57:13.45 -18:24:52.7: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:40:14.79 -18:09:01.1: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:39:51.66 -17:01:42.4: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:55:04.38 -15:44:33.6: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:56:17.06 -15:44:57.5: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:46:54.39 -16:56:50.9: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:37:18.26 -21:28:28.8: 13.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:40:14.72 -18:21:09.3: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:54:56.05 -14:18:47.3: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:40:14.79 -18:09:01.1: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:37:18.26 -21:28:28.8: 13.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:55:04.00 -18:16:19.8: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:40:14.72 -18:21:09.3: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:39:51.66 -17:01:42.4: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:55:04.38 -15:44:33.6: 12.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:56:17.06 -15:44:57.5: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:18.26 -21:28:28.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3642 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:04.00 -18:16:19.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2294 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:14.79 -18:09:01.1: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4792 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:40:14.72 -18:21:09.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5383 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:51.66 -17:01:42.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5018 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:04.38 -15:44:33.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1121 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:17.06 -15:44:57.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2725 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:57:13.45 -18:24:52.7: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:13.45 -18:24:52.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7937 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:46:54.39 -16:56:50.9: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:54.39 -16:56:50.9: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3905 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:54:56.05 -14:18:47.3: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:56.05 -14:18:47.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3136 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:34:21.53 -20:59:06.7: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:37:20.63 -17:35:37.7: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 18:04:01.08 -18:58:45.9: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:49:48.62 -17:12:25.1: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:47:40.50 -14:46:16.0: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:36:33.47 -14:48:47.8: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:28:07.25 -20:12:55.2: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:49:48.62 -17:12:25.1: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:37:20.63 -17:35:37.7: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 18:04:01.08 -18:58:45.9: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:48.62 -17:12:25.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1814 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:20.63 -17:35:37.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2564 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:34:21.53 -20:59:06.7: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:01.08 -18:58:45.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0507 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:21.53 -20:59:06.7: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1929 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:52:26.07 -16:20:29.4: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:47:40.50 -14:46:16.0: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:40.50 -14:46:16.0: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1485 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:36:33.47 -14:48:47.8: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:33.47 -14:48:47.8: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7641 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:28:07.25 -20:12:55.2: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:28:07.25 -20:12:55.2: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1053 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:59:36.72 -15:05:12.0: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:52:26.07 -16:20:29.4: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:44:35.74 -21:35:20.9: 12.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:26.07 -16:20:29.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9655 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:42:32.98 -13:59:43.7: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:50:25.60 -20:26:10.2: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:59:36.72 -15:05:12.0: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:32:25.99 -15:34:11.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:44:35.74 -21:35:20.9: 12.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:36.72 -15:05:12.0: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9355 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:55:37.48 -19:06:51.7: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:51:41.45 -18:23:09.1: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:35.74 -21:35:20.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9879 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:42:32.98 -13:59:43.7: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:42:32.98 -13:59:43.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5995 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:56:59.23 -19:15:22.6: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:50:25.60 -20:26:10.2: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:32:25.99 -15:34:11.7: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:25.60 -20:26:10.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8305 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:25.99 -15:34:11.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5978 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:51:41.45 -18:23:09.1: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:55:37.48 -19:06:51.7: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.45 -18:23:09.1: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7035 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:37.48 -19:06:51.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7230 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:38:17.23 -14:17:32.2: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:56:59.23 -19:15:22.6: 12.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:59.23 -19:15:22.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6525 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:36:29.48 -18:07:34.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:38:17.23 -14:17:32.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:17.23 -14:17:32.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4945 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:45:26.87 -20:26:15.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:55:45.32 -16:33:06.7: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:36:29.48 -18:07:34.6: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:29.48 -18:07:34.6: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4096 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:45:26.87 -20:26:15.9: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:55:45.32 -16:33:06.7: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:45:26.87 -20:26:15.9: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9096 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:45.32 -16:33:06.7: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6631 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:38:11.74 -21:29:39.3: 13.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:59:31.13 -15:05:49.2: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:39:51.22 -17:14:32.7: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:38:11.74 -21:29:39.3: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:11.74 -21:29:39.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1247 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:59:31.13 -15:05:49.2: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:31.13 -15:05:49.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1508 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:54:37.49 -18:03:09.2: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5: 15.16 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:42:54.78 -22:16:41.5: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=13.3477 delta=1.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:39:51.22 -17:14:32.7: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:51.22 -17:14:32.7: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1884 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 18:01:50.80 -17:14:17.8: 13.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:54:16.31 -18:27:07.1: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:54:37.49 -18:03:09.2: 13.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:37.49 -18:03:09.2: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6232 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:57:52.44 -17:26:39.6: 13.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 18:01:50.80 -17:14:17.8: 13.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:46:28.62 -20:26:29.7: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:50.80 -17:14:17.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5852 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:41:41.35 -16:46:23.0: 13.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:54:16.31 -18:27:07.1: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:16.31 -18:27:07.1: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6603 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:57:52.44 -17:26:39.6: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:52.44 -17:26:39.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6206 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:46:28.62 -20:26:29.7: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:41:41.35 -16:46:23.0: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:41.35 -16:46:23.0: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8094 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_05-59-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0326.fits at 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_04-27-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0468.fits at 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3: 14.97 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:42:48.72 -14:15:33.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.3369 delta=1.66 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out213297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out216916.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205195_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205195_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205200_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205200_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205221_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205224_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205224_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205230_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205230_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205235_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205235_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205239_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205239_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205251_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205251_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205252_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205252_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205255_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205255_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:23.50 -15:33:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205258_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205258_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205259_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205259_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205260_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205260_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205262_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205262_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205266_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205266_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205268_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205268_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:24.99 -17:41:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205269_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205269_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:17.09 -18:04:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205271_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205271_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205273_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205273_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:38.40 -20:55:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205279_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205279_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205284_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205284_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205286_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205286_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205287_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205287_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:59.71 -18:23:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:17.89 -16:18:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205294_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205294_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205299_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205299_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205302_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205302_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205303_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205303_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205308_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205308_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205309_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205309_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205311_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205311_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205315_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205315_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205316_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205316_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:04.50 -16:36:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205317_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205317_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205318_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205318_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:16.40 -20:21:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205322_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205322_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205323_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205323_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205327_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205327_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:16.72 -21:41:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205328_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205328_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:10.69 -16:51:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205331_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205331_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205336_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 205336_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:28.59 -15:17:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207688_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 207688_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:08.51 -19:58:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207847_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 207847_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:57.21 -18:43:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208991_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 208991_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:01.21 -15:06:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209288_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 209288_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:11.65 -15:20:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209579_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 209579_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209661_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 209661_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:25.87 -15:09:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209721_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 209721_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:00.03 -18:40:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210111_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 210111_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:12.80 -15:19:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210327_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 210327_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:59.87 -17:16:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 210921_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 210921_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:30.98 -21:41:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211167_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211167_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:58.79 -22:09:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211186_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211186_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:05.49 -18:13:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211629_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211629_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:17.23 -16:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211706_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211706_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:53.30 -16:01:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211946_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211946_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211965_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 211965_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:50.38 -22:14:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 212404_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:00.44 -17:14:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212433_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 212433_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212843_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 212843_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:18.30 -15:50:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212927_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 212927_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213297_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 213297_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213486_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 213486_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:13.55 -16:22:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213530_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 213530_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:32.44 -16:14:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213826_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 213826_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:09.41 -18:39:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213987_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 213987_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:57.14 -16:11:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215253_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 215253_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215625_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 215625_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:49.04 -19:34:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 215822_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 215822_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:36.44 -17:16:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216046_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216046_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216164_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216164_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216506_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216506_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216595_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216690_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216690_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:45.80 -18:35:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216916_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 216916_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216975_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 216975_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:27.72 -14:43:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217086_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 217086_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197184_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 197184_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:53.28 -18:23:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124967_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 124967_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:02.89 -19:20:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195892_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 195892_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:25.13 -16:20:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88910_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 88910_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:08.18 -17:29:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18485_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 18485_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:18.37 -13:50:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193374_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 193374_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:48.24 -17:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167620_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 167620_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:57.75 -22:01:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49789_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 49789_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:46.37 -15:22:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198839_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 198839_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:11.12 -15:44:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 47757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:51.72 -15:39:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 192454_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:01.19 -20:54:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192258_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 192258_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:33.56 -15:30:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24505_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
Preparing report for the candidate 24505_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62086_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035
The candidate 62086_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-19_22-26-02_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0035 did not pass the final checks