This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.88 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7
84.98087 7.51381 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J201724.77+490335.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.050 V 14.100 V 2457504.10000 112.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J201724.77+490335.9,2461211.6234,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J201724.77+490335.9 20260620.1234 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.16 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2
78.83504 3.31705 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2068589776000480768 | 20:17:56.64 +41:38:29.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.742+/-0.028 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2068589776000480768,2461211.6234,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2068589776000480768 20260620.1234 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.05 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6
82.31241 6.37534 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J201426.63+461313.6
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.060 V 14.580 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J201426.63+461313.6,2461211.6234,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J201426.63+461313.6 20260620.1234 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 10.05 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8
81.96999 8.93842 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSV 12696
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 V 12.300 V M4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 12696,2461211.6234,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 12696 20260620.1234 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.41 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8
81.05261 6.85616 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200814.61+452533.8
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.870 V 13.570 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200814.61+452533.8,2461211.6234,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200814.61+452533.8 20260620.1234 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.93 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8
78.28560 5.31680 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J200719.50+421639.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.190 V 13.630 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200719.50+421639.1,2461211.6234,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200719.50+421639.1 20260620.1234 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.21 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9
81.81951 4.42847 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 5729209
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.000 R1 11.300 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5729209,2461211.6234,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5729209 20260620.1234 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 10.83 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3
80.43313 6.70009 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J200708.45+444918.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.230 V 12.610 V 2458388.10390 56.350912900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J200708.45+444918.5,2461211.6234,10.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J200708.45+444918.5 20260620.1234 10.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.99 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7
79.30789 3.30418 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J201925.38+420132.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.770 g Y 0.350 g 2458281.74300 665.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J201925.38+420132.2,2461211.6234,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J201925.38+420132.2 20260620.1234 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.64 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8
83.24428 5.74052 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 5776332
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 R1 11.850 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 5776332,2461211.6234,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 5776332 20260620.1234 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.06 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4
77.38872 7.44515 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1164 Cyg
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.700 pg 15.600 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1164 Cyg,2461211.6234,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1164 Cyg 20260620.1234 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.84 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8
82.84205 8.18263 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J2007097+473801
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.893 R1 Y 0.394 R1 65.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2007097+473801,2461211.6234,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2007097+473801 20260620.1234 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 10.86 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6
81.04925 3.76246 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J202243.85+434303.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.160 V 13.300 V 2457506.00000 109.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J202243.85+434303.5,2461211.6234,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J202243.85+434303.5 20260620.1234 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.79 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9
82.27897 8.71263 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J2002459+472559
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.983 g Y 0.394 g 2458346.31940 81.822171300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2002459+472559,2461211.6234,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2002459+472559 20260620.1234 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 11.32 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0
82.00314 10.09681 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J195451+4753.8
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.086 V Y 0.930 V 84.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195451+4753.8,2461211.6234,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195451+4753.8 20260620.1234 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1234 2461211.6234 12.08 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3
83.68396 1.36940 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2070079201935145856 | 20:42:08.90 +44:25:15.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.757+/-0.034 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2070079201935145856,2461211.6234,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2070079201935145856 20260620.1234 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.82639948 15.05.2026 07:49:50.915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
First image: 2461175.82639948 15.05.2026 07:49:50.915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Last image: 2461211.62368383 20.06.2026 02:57:56.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28081
Objects passed selection criteria: 27964
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18182.2
Average stars matched: 17429 (95.8572 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:06:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.82639948 15.05.2026 07:49:50.915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
First image: 2461175.82639948 15.05.2026 07:49:50.915 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Last image: 2461211.62368383 20.06.2026 02:57:56.283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 180944
Objects passed selection criteria: 180388
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120486
Average stars matched: 115049 (95.487 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1939404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:14:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.62317006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05
Second-epoch image center 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05
Second-epoch image center 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95
Second-epoch second image center 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01357 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O04N38qF1U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m3uWRP0YDt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NdoX8z0Bbl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9IvM2B7aeI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29352 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6391 to 318.2728 deg, Dec +40.2122 to +51.2354 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6391 to 318.2728 deg, Dec 40.2122 to 51.2354 deg
Loaded 23672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15611 out of 16885 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16885 out of 29352 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.656900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.656900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.89
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29352 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6391 to 318.2728 deg, Dec +40.2122 to +51.2354 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6391 to 318.2728 deg, Dec 40.2122 to 51.2354 deg
Loaded 23672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15611 out of 16885 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16885 out of 29352 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 30661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6337 to 318.2431 deg, Dec +40.2393 to +51.2644 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6337 to 318.2431 deg, Dec 40.2393 to 51.2644 deg
Loaded 23626 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15643 out of 16951 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16951 out of 30661 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.4 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
4.0 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
14.9 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.O04N38qF1U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2767, passed=29352
Got 29352 stars (including 26551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.816 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.807 n_q1=217 n_q2=277 n_q3=175 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m3uWRP0YDt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2934, passed=30661
Got 30661 stars (including 27693 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30661 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.733 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.957 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.825 n_q1=215 n_q2=279 n_q3=158 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NdoX8z0Bbl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=308, passed=6380
Got 6380 stars (including 6069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=294 n_q2=183 n_q3=254 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9IvM2B7aeI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, passed=6795
Got 6795 stars (including 6455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=295 n_q2=170 n_q3=259 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits sigma_overall=0.699 worst_q_ratio=1.168
ref2=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.733 worst_q_ratio=1.305
new1=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.352
new2=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.312
reference average sigma_overall=0.716 worst_q_ratio=1.2365
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.67 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.70 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:13:46.05 +44:34:31.5: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:13:46.05 +44:34:31.5: 10.40 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.40 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:46.05 +44:34:31.5: ref_mag=10.40 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2951 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32683_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 32683_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32763_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 32763_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:39.85 +41:02:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32832_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 32832_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:01.39 +49:17:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25091_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 25091_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:10.77 +49:04:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16705_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 16705_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:16.25 +46:18:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05
Second-epoch image center 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:24:08.870 +45:58:30.05
Second-epoch image center 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:23:46.948 +45:58:41.95
Second-epoch second image center 20:23:49.638 +45:59:21.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01357 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.leuX1hfi4T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b7efIQvbp7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IWkOUEWJUy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XWXDume83t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 197155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6392 to 318.2793 deg, Dec +40.2122 to +51.2419 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6392 to 318.2793 deg, Dec 40.2122 to 51.2419 deg
Loaded 23680 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12794 out of 18095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18095 out of 197155 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.505800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.505800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 197155 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.6392 to 318.2793 deg, Dec +40.2122 to +51.2419 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.6392 to 318.2793 deg, Dec 40.2122 to 51.2419 deg
Loaded 23680 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12794 out of 18095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18095 out of 197155 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 200210 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.5900 to 318.3003 deg, Dec +40.2394 to +51.2644 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.5900 to 318.3003 deg, Dec 40.2394 to 51.2644 deg
Loaded 23712 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12634 out of 18024 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18024 out of 200210 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.2 pix Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
15.1 mag. Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.leuX1hfi4T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=78, blended=31063, passed=197077
Got 197077 stars (including 165769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 197077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.686 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.839 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.788 n_q1=212 n_q2=282 n_q3=184 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b7efIQvbp7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=62, blended=32305, passed=200148
Got 200148 stars (including 167622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 200148 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 193136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 193134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 193134 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.701 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.814 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.755 n_q1=211 n_q2=283 n_q3=174 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IWkOUEWJUy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2043, passed=42620
Got 42620 stars (including 40535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42620 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42307 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.678 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.578 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=289 n_q2=166 n_q3=268 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XWXDume83t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2372, passed=45021
Got 45021 stars (including 42602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=286 n_q2=153 n_q3=271 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0010.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_220423_TTUQ1b1x1_3179412_FNrvETDy/wcs_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:15:10.25 +42:11:48.5: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:26:42.30 +43:22:58.7: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:54:57.56 +47:17:11.4: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:26:42.30 +43:22:58.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:42.30 +43:22:58.7: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8610 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:15:10.25 +42:11:48.5: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:10.25 +42:11:48.5: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9558 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:40:13.28 +46:29:56.2: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:54:57.56 +47:17:11.4: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:57.56 +47:17:11.4: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9386 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:40:13.28 +46:29:56.2: 10.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:13.28 +46:29:56.2: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0854 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:53:48.30 +47:42:45.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:03:05.69 +50:17:55.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:40:56.49 +48:47:25.0: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:43:27.76 +48:34:56.8: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:46:28.29 +50:01:49.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:03:05.69 +50:17:55.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:53:48.30 +47:42:45.6: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:53:52.88 +49:34:17.7: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:05.69 +50:17:55.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7919 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:35:48.11 +40:42:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:48.30 +47:42:45.6: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7888 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:40:56.49 +48:47:25.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:35:48.11 +40:42:39.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:48.11 +40:42:39.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:56.49 +48:47:25.0: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1072 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:46:28.29 +50:01:49.3: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:43:27.76 +48:34:56.8: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:28.29 +50:01:49.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0709 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:27.76 +48:34:56.8: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9472 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:53:52.88 +49:34:17.7: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:52.88 +49:34:17.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1618 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:56:34.63 +50:47:26.9: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:42:52.68 +50:21:57.6: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:56:34.63 +50:47:26.9: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:34.63 +50:47:26.9: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1935 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:47:37.46 +50:05:19.5: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:42:52.68 +50:21:57.6: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:52.68 +50:21:57.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3371 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:16:38.28 +46:55:03.2: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:50:42.84 +48:24:08.4: 13.54 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:47:37.46 +50:05:19.5: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:37.46 +50:05:19.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4569 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:16:38.28 +46:55:03.2: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:16:38.28 +46:55:03.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.3291 delta=1.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:50:42.84 +48:24:08.4: 13.58 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:42.84 +48:24:08.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7984 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:54:32.47 +42:47:18.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:38:03.78 +45:29:22.5: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:54:32.47 +42:47:18.3: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:32.47 +42:47:18.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8959 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:17:56.65 +41:38:30.2: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1611 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:17:24.77 +49:03:33.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8619 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:38:03.78 +45:29:22.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:03.78 +45:29:22.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9655 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:14:26.64 +46:13:11.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0506 delta=1.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:08:14.72 +45:25:31.8: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3953 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.95 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:00:41.54 +47:17:11.8: ref_mag=10.95 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0348 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:19.62 +42:16:37.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8728 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:06.58 +44:43:40.9: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1940 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:08.49 +44:49:17.3: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8052 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:19:25.42 +42:01:30.7: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9907 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:20:29.40 +46:38:23.8: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6443 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:57.47 +42:37:17.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0156 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:07:09.60 +47:37:57.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8328 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 21:10:44.93 +49:50:25.4: 9.23 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 21:10:44.93 +49:50:25.4: 9.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:44.93 +49:50:25.4: ref_mag=9.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.9293 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:09:36.74 +44:41:59.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:22:43.92 +43:43:02.6: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8489 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:15:17.91 +46:27:31.5: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:09:36.74 +44:41:59.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:36.74 +44:41:59.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9758 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:15:17.91 +46:27:31.5: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:17.91 +46:27:31.5: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2914 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-49-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:50.84 +47:53:47.0: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3233 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:02:45.68 +47:25:58.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7784 delta=1.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_02-36-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits at 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:42:08.86 +44:25:14.3: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0701 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228191.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out128182.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out131739.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out188769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21809.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97430.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 33s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 14s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226959_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226959_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226963_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226963_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226968_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226968_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226977_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226977_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:03:33.06 +45:37:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226979_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226979_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:25.18 +42:14:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 226981_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 226981_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:45.99 +46:31:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227037_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227037_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:24.62 +42:19:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227069_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227069_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:53:39.86 +41:02:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227116_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227116_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:26.86 +40:43:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227158_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227158_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:38:01.44 +49:17:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227324_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227324_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:53.40 +40:48:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227338_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227338_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227360_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227360_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:57.75 +41:20:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227386_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227386_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:39.30 +48:47:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227429_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227429_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:01:00.79 +42:46:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227436_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227436_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:48.63 +40:58:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227577_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227577_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:39:35.77 +45:58:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227630_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227630_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227674_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227674_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227739_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227739_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:29.88 +47:56:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227740_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227740_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227768_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227768_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227778_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227778_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227800_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227800_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227809_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227809_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227820_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227820_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:33.89 +48:56:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227836_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227836_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:57.71 +41:34:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227853_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227853_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:14.65 +45:45:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227855_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227855_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:50.64 +47:23:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227877_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227877_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227881_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227881_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:12.55 +50:14:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227918_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227918_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:13.42 +47:56:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227927_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227927_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:54.29 +45:30:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227929_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227929_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227938_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227938_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:01.28 +50:20:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227996_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 227996_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:40.68 +48:34:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228015_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228015_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:57:14.39 +41:53:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228024_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228024_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228054_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228054_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:23.02 +46:45:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228097_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228097_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228126_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228126_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:52:56.59 +47:47:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228134_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228134_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:55:21.00 +42:02:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228191_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228191_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:38.28 +46:55:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.695 2084054132170892288 304.15953774063 +46.91708553024 12.5256 10.4580 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228249_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228249_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:31:30.44 +49:11:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228331_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228331_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:20.47 +50:23:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228381_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228381_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:13.58 +45:54:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228400_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228400_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228408_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 228408_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:28:13.12 +43:29:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212275_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 212275_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:32.80 +45:22:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188769_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 188769_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15922_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 15922_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208789_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 208789_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208518_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 208518_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:23.73 +49:46:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97430_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 97430_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50816_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 50816_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:14.81 +43:31:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208309_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 208309_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127132_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 127132_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05468_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 05468_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:42.96 +40:56:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80993_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 80993_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27443_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 27443_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56640_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 56640_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:52.59 +44:11:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77323_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 77323_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:48.20 +45:20:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128504_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 128504_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:45.40 +47:29:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08174_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 08174_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:22.19 +41:02:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94718_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 94718_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:00.81 +46:05:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65660_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 65660_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191905_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 191905_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:07.77 +48:53:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94347_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 94347_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:48.90 +46:01:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69362_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 69362_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21809_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 21809_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62268_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 62268_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:39.65 +44:18:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70697_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 70697_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:08.33 +45:00:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43003_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 43003_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:59.48 +43:17:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125279_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 125279_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:45.11 +47:23:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75441_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 75441_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:58.96 +45:08:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09231_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 09231_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:58.73 +41:05:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24417_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 24417_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:44.85 +42:00:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07869_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 07869_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:56.09 +41:03:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10148_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 10148_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.62 +41:08:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43203_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 43203_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:03.27 +43:19:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106046_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 106046_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77149_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 77149_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:38.49 +45:17:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36042_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 36042_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40655_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 40655_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:35:03.35 +43:10:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06928_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 06928_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:15.27 +40:59:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28731_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 28731_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:34:01.37 +42:25:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67991_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 67991_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:40.21 +44:43:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24475_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 24475_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:31.47 +42:04:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131739_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 131739_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127677_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 127677_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:54:49.78 +47:22:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49674_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 49674_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:45:11.31 +43:40:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42249_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 42249_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:25.29 +43:11:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65134_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 65134_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:40.55 +44:37:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182449_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 182449_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:04.36 +49:24:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121860_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 121860_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:28.39 +47:06:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164895_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 164895_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179919_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 179919_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:10.80 +49:04:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108999_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 108999_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:06:16.23 +46:18:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49424_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 49424_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66160_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 66160_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102703_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 102703_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89744_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 89744_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:43.42 +45:51:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170667_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 170667_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:08:11.70 +49:35:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69230_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 69230_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:30:37.63 +44:55:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13788_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 13788_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.88 +41:26:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180716_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 180716_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:24:13.30 +49:28:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128182_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 128182_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141559_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
Preparing report for the candidate 141559_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63759_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011
The candidate 63759_fd_Cyg-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-57-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0011 did not pass the final checks
