This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.30 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2
76.11225 4.13778 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J301.6224+39.8075 | 20:06:29.11 +39:49:10.8 (Gaia DR3) | DBF (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J301.6224+39.8075,2461211.6224,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J301.6224+39.8075 20260620.1224 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.25 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0
65.33790 10.69695 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ASASSN-V J191206.42+333613.6 | 19:12:06.42 +33:36:13.5 (Gaia DR3) | SR (local) | 65.110000000000 (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J191206.42+333613.6,2461211.6224,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J191206.42+333613.6 20260620.1224 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.33 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5
71.66550 4.20351 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2059681017432468096 | 19:54:25.90 +36:04:39.7 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2059681017432468096,2461211.6224,11.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2059681017432468096 20260620.1224 11.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 10.84 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9
71.62118 6.46596 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" HAT 199-00433
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.491 Ic 8.620 Ic
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-00433,2461211.6224,10.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-00433 20260620.1224 10.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 9.94 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3
70.29542 7.71629 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1439 Cyg
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 pg 13.600 pg
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1439 Cyg,2461211.6224,9.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1439 Cyg 20260620.1224 9.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.80 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6
75.45088 11.23696 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J193151+4245.1
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.073 V Y 1.320 V 154.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193151+4245.1,2461211.6224,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193151+4245.1 20260620.1224 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.85 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9
69.53789 9.51186 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J192613+3646.9
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.539 V Y 0.900 V 80.700000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192613+3646.9,2461211.6224,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192613+3646.9 20260620.1224 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.74 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0
75.36650 6.74156 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J195248+4032.0
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.272 V Y 0.800 V 121.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J195248+4032.0,2461211.6224,11.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J195248+4032.0 20260620.1224 11.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.19 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5
67.25819 8.79219 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" HAT 199-03304
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.694 Ic 9.885 Ic
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-03304,2461211.6224,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-03304 20260620.1224 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.09 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0
71.42686 6.01221 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V1289 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 pg < 17.800 pg 2432710.00000 190.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1289 Cyg,2461211.6224,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1289 Cyg 20260620.1224 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.22 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5
70.89294 6.84461 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSV 12302
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.991 g Y 0.470 g 2458254.73450 86.619507200000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 12302,2461211.6224,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 12302 20260620.1224 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.57 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4
75.81155 10.91275 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V1133 Cyg
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.000 V < 15.200 V 2454319.00000 362.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4: 15.48 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.26
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1133 Cyg,2461211.6224,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1133 Cyg 20260620.1224 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.56 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5
71.64434 10.63995 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J192549+3908.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 V 15.000 V 2453987.00000 101.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192549+3908.5,2461211.6224,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192549+3908.5 20260620.1224 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.87 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3
70.75071 11.03104 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J192204+3832.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.040 g Y 1.140 g 2458539.99500 118.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192204+3832.1,2461211.6224,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192204+3832.1 20260620.1224 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.53 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6
73.54247 9.38440 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J193604+4014.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.026 V Y 1.030 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193604+4014.1,2461211.6224,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193604+4014.1 20260620.1224 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.44 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0
72.09026 7.14299 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" HAT 199-00997
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.942 Ic 9.080 Ic
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-00997,2461211.6224,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-00997 20260620.1224 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.07 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0
70.15970 7.45955 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSV 12209
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 V 14.000 V 2457559.00000 184.376526100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 12209,2461211.6224,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 12209 20260620.1224 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.66 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4
67.49678 8.12957 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GZ Cyg
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.000 pg 15.500 pg 120.000000000000 :
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GZ Cyg,2461211.6224,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GZ Cyg 20260620.1224 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.21 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9
71.08519 6.25376 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" HAT 199-02707
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.553 Ic 9.790 Ic
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-02707,2461211.6224,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-02707 20260620.1224 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.19 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0
69.18118 6.19124 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" HAT 199-01822
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.718 g Y 1.134 g 2458250.58950 156.878215800000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-01822,2461211.6224,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-01822 20260620.1224 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.71 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7
73.99968 6.81470 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 199-01671
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.754 g Y 0.387 g 2458290.80050 63.341403700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-01671,2461211.6224,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-01671 20260620.1224 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 11.34 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3
68.97422 7.82017 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HAT 199-00742
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.746 Ic 8.879 Ic M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HAT 199-00742,2461211.6224,11.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HAT 199-00742 20260620.1224 11.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.16 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8
71.67330 6.99611 galactic Cyg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSVS J1942204+372820
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.096 R1 Y 0.461 R1 401.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1942204+372820,2461211.6224,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1942204+372820 20260620.1224 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 12.72 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9
74.48020 11.63551 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J192737+4204.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.762 V Y 0.710 V 2458427.35610 83.100000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J192737+4204.7,2461211.6224,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J192737+4204.7 20260620.1224 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.1224 2461211.6224 10.44 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5
68.91029 9.48175 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J192457.98+361257.4
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.930 V 12.390 V 2457494.10000 76.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J192457.98+361257.4,2461211.6224,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J192457.98+361257.4 20260620.1224 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
First image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Last image: 2461211.62266802 20.06.2026 02:56:28.517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40127
Objects passed selection criteria: 39835
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26024.5
Average stars matched: 25250.5 (97.0259 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:00:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
First image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Last image: 2461211.62266802 20.06.2026 02:56:28.517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 42 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 271212
Objects passed selection criteria: 270231
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 179756
Average stars matched: 172638 (96.0403 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2085480 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jun 19 22:11:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.62213677
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95
Second-epoch second image center 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00984 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U9UYVp2B9M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vo4gxzmugF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ispbD9uY48
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FczkFPM0I9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec +32.4089 to +43.4261 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec 32.4089 to 43.4261 deg
Loaded 30422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2455 out of 2763 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2763 out of 42857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.3 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
4.1 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
15.1 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.U9UYVp2B9M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5150, passed=43100
Got 43100 stars (including 37909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.98"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 637 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 795 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 794 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.91"
Excluding outliers - 794 stars left (next iteration limit 700)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=794 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.711 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.134 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=5.075 n_q1=170 n_q2=287 n_q3=125 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.622
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vo4gxzmugF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5184, passed=42857
Got 42857 stars (including 37636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 610 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.17"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 685 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 632 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.95"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.54"
Excluding outliers - 629 stars left (next iteration limit 661)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits N_match=629 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.829 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.783 sigma_q2_arcsec=4.749 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.955 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.900 n_q1=156 n_q2=342 n_q3=49 n_q4=82 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ispbD9uY48 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, passed=9232
Got 9232 stars (including 8724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9010 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.753 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=223 n_q2=266 n_q3=201 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FczkFPM0I9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=9534
Got 9534 stars (including 9025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.789 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.609 n_q1=234 n_q2=258 n_q3=201 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.388
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits sigma_overall=8.711 worst_q_ratio=0.622
ref2=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits sigma_overall=5.829 worst_q_ratio=2.394
new1=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits sigma_overall=0.596 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.388
reference average sigma_overall=7.27 worst_q_ratio=1.508
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301_astrometric_residuals.png (794 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302_astrometric_residuals.png (629 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008_astrometric_residuals.png (929 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.60 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:13.92 +32:29:20.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:12:13.92 +32:29:20.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:13.92 +32:29:20.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52825_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:39.47 +32:43:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52891_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:29.77 +34:04:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 52961_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:32.36 +33:23:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 53031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:29.68 +40:54:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 53032_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 41902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:34.70 +42:30:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18460_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 18460_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:59.03 +36:43:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 08025_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:15.09 +34:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 00258_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:33.64 +32:54:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18901_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 18901_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:55.91 +36:50:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0491 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0588 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:37:58.022 +37:59:20.95
Second-epoch second image center 19:37:55.476 +37:59:02.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00984 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QpokJ7REZH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cNmF9JsQKs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gQVM3I6dOc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KFqwX6b6su
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 298024 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.3851 to +43.2809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.3851 to 43.2809 deg
Loaded 29808 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1327 out of 2538 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2538 out of 298024 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.647200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.647200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 298024 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.3851 to +43.2809 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8268 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.3851 to 43.2809 deg
Loaded 29808 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1327 out of 2538 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2538 out of 298024 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 297199 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.1823 to 305.7702 deg, Dec +32.3871 to +43.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.1823 to 305.7702 deg, Dec 32.3871 to 43.4289 deg
Loaded 30508 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1750 out of 2943 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2943 out of 297199 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 146 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.1 pix Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
15.3 mag. Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QpokJ7REZH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=71, blended=63637, passed=297953
Got 297953 stars (including 234025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 297953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 667 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 617 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.00"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 614 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.18"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 231720 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.18"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 274541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.92"
Excluding outliers - 820 stars left (next iteration limit 675)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=820 sigma_overall_arcsec=10.757 sigma_q1_arcsec=6.114 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.762 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.099 n_q1=187 n_q2=302 n_q3=135 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.585
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cNmF9JsQKs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=99, blended=63249, passed=297100
Got 297100 stars (including 233550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 297100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 653 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.06"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 668 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 626 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 180135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.22"
Excluding outliers - 624 stars left (next iteration limit 647)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits N_match=624 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.910 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.180 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.607 n_q1=171 n_q2=323 n_q3=55 n_q4=75 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gQVM3I6dOc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4144, passed=63062
Got 63062 stars (including 58864 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63062 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.728 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.832 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.678 n_q1=216 n_q2=241 n_q3=228 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KFqwX6b6su (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4418, passed=64575
Got 64575 stars (including 60110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64575 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.838 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.675 n_q1=222 n_q2=238 n_q3=221 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-55-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0008.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_215826_TTUQ1b1x1_3083244_6hdcWOlg/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:10:08.15 +36:02:22.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:27.61 +36:18:50.4: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:45:37.84 +37:41:47.0: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:08:06.77 +35:47:55.5: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:30.81 +34:30:13.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:48.72 +35:20:35.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:12:30.81 +34:30:13.8: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:27.61 +36:18:50.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:30.81 +34:30:13.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9900 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:27.61 +36:18:50.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5612 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:08:06.77 +35:47:55.5: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:52:48.72 +35:20:35.1: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:57:20.96 +32:41:36.5: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:06.77 +35:47:55.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9945 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:48.72 +35:20:35.1: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0431 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:10:08.15 +36:02:22.6: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.3023 delta=2.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:08.15 +36:02:22.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1167 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:16.52 +34:27:18.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:04:06.50 +33:24:04.3: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:45:37.84 +37:41:47.0: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:37.84 +37:41:47.0: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2841 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:57:20.96 +32:41:36.5: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:46:16.52 +34:27:18.0: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:16.52 +34:27:18.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1217 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:04:06.50 +33:24:04.3: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:49:08.68 +34:05:54.4: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:30.74 +37:07:54.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:07:21.28 +37:41:46.6: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.2502 delta=2.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:10:30.74 +37:07:54.8: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:49:08.68 +34:05:54.4: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:30.74 +37:07:54.8: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0130 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:08.68 +34:05:54.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8091 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:48:09.55 +37:44:59.2: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:07:21.28 +37:41:46.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:21.28 +37:41:46.6: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2652 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:48:09.55 +37:44:59.2: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:09.55 +37:44:59.2: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6269 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:10:24.64 +32:31:41.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:13.93 +32:29:19.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:10:24.64 +32:31:41.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:24.64 +32:31:41.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:12:13.93 +32:29:19.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:13.93 +32:29:19.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:51.05 +36:10:57.7: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:04:26.17 +37:51:26.2: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:04:26.17 +37:51:26.2: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:51.05 +36:10:57.7: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:26.17 +37:51:26.2: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1563 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:51.05 +36:10:57.7: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9093 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:06:19.78 +39:06:50.1: 15.12 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:04:46.48 +38:45:08.7: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:06:19.78 +39:06:50.1: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:06:19.78 +39:06:50.1: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=12.0650 delta=3.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:04:46.48 +38:45:08.7: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:46.48 +38:45:08.7: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4581 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:11:13.62 +38:13:33.7: 15.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:20:31.48 +39:54:32.5: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:06.30 +35:10:54.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:20:31.48 +39:54:32.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:31.48 +39:54:32.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4604 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:43:00.22 +40:44:03.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:11:13.62 +38:13:33.7: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:17:11.60 +39:00:15.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:13.62 +38:13:33.7: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0851 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:17:11.60 +39:00:15.3: 14.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:11.60 +39:00:15.3: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4855 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:43:00.22 +40:44:03.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:00.22 +40:44:03.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4005 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:06.30 +35:10:54.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:06.30 +35:10:54.8: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2940 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:08:25.65 +39:11:13.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 20:12:02.67 +33:18:25.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:08:25.65 +39:11:13.6: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:25.65 +39:11:13.6: ref_mag=11.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6159 delta=-0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:55:38.33 +32:41:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:51:30.41 +32:43:03.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 20:12:02.67 +33:18:25.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:02.67 +33:18:25.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9705 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:55:38.33 +32:41:17.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:38.33 +32:41:17.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:00.67 +39:39:45.6: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:51:30.41 +32:43:03.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:30.41 +32:43:03.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:38.12 +39:58:43.0: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:33:00.67 +39:39:45.6: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:00.67 +39:39:45.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6794 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:42:38.12 +39:58:43.0: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:38.12 +39:58:43.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7817 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3312 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8365 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.9409 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=12.8060 delta=2.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8490 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7419 delta=1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5: 14.49 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1836 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:45:17.09 +38:16:28.9: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.0906 delta=1.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2230 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:45:17.09 +38:16:28.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:17.09 +38:16:28.9: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9401 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:48:17.87 +34:08:31.8: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:48:17.87 +34:08:31.8: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:17.87 +34:08:31.8: ref_mag=11.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9301 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4: 15.48 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.48 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4: ref_mag=15.48 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=12.5693 delta=2.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5011 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8695 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5273 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4332 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0683 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6608 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:13:38.31 +37:42:20.1: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2130 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:13:38.31 +37:42:20.1: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:38.31 +37:42:20.1: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4735 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1806 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7008 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3358 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:36.23 +37:50:01.4: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1326 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:52:36.23 +37:50:01.4: 14.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:36.23 +37:50:01.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4607 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:45:37.99 +37:46:16.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.7160 delta=2.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:45:37.99 +37:46:16.5: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:37.99 +37:46:16.5: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3453 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:15:52.56 +39:18:54.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4316 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:15:52.56 +39:18:54.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:52.56 +39:18:54.3: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7816 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out334443.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out334446.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out335477.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105636.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117040.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119009.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122334.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142867.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out158700.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177984.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out203285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out225875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out235443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out256330.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out260193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out275117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out334437.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out334454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46806.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99821.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 30s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 16s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334393_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334402_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334402_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334425_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334425_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334427_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334430_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334433_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:21.23 +32:56:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334434_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334434_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334435_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334437_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 334437_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334438_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334438_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:42.40 +42:35:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334439_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334439_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:06.50 +33:24:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.324 2043975142326862080 286.02693859025 +33.40238935583 12.1055 11.4030 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.324#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334446_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:20.96 +32:41:36.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334453_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 334454_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334456_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:29.59 +41:05:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334458_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334458_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334459_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334459_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:56:57.28 +34:09:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334462_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334487_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:53.77 +33:14:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334496_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:50.68 +32:33:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334529_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:39.46 +32:43:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334572_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334572_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:02.15 +32:47:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334682_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:32.20 +33:23:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334707_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334711_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334711_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:20.90 +39:08:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334727_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334727_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:56.76 +32:37:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334738_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334796_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:06.49 +41:41:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:34.52 +32:34:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334836_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:48.57 +32:41:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334902_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:38.17 +32:39:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334940_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:52.21 +32:47:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 334970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 334970_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:29.82 +32:52:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335047_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335047_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:32.80 +40:42:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335051_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:46.82 +42:26:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335055_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:37.04 +32:37:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335093_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:48.40 +35:47:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335145_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335145_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:48.30 +37:51:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335154_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:08.70 +36:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335161_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335161_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:01.25 +32:58:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335192_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335192_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:48.27 +41:20:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335214_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335214_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335260_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335268_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:05.57 +32:39:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335270_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335270_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:18.43 +32:59:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335292_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335292_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:05.58 +32:57:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335306_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:38.37 +37:49:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335314_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:27:59.45 +42:14:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335326_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:25.69 +36:52:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335346_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335346_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335391_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335391_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:10.38 +42:43:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335417_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335417_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:49.01 +41:52:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335449_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:57.89 +35:00:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:46:33.08 +33:44:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335472_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335472_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:09.25 +38:25:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335477_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335477_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:19.78 +39:06:50.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.964 2061931369814681216 301.58255721050 +39.11529130933 12.1368 11.3509 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.964#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335479_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335480_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:06.47 +37:47:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335511_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:41.80 +37:00:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335521_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335521_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:13:03.73 +33:01:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335527_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335527_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:40.58 +32:58:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335544_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:19:24.85 +40:54:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335559_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:34.86 +33:59:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335585_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335585_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335603_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335617_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:34.88 +33:01:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335645_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335645_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:05.84 +42:41:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335656_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335661_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:45.36 +40:22:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335680_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335680_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335685_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335691_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335691_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:17.14 +41:57:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335709_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335709_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:31.27 +39:44:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335728_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:53.95 +32:31:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335734_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:25.54 +40:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335745_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:05.33 +39:03:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335757_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335757_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:57.32 +36:56:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335770_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335770_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335786_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335788_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:34.53 +40:37:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335794_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335844_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335863_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335863_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:09.00 +42:43:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335866_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:39.17 +35:17:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335883_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:28.10 +39:01:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335892_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335892_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 335994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 335994_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 336031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 336031_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:16.36 +34:24:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 99821_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133968_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 133968_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117040_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 117040_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 260193_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 296675_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 296675_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:21.94 +41:02:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 270176_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:46.83 +41:57:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122334_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 122334_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 133465_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:37.61 +37:01:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 235443_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 216816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 216816_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:24.95 +39:40:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 237263_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:53.88 +40:30:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49566_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 49566_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 182170_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:02:29.58 +38:35:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257704_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 257704_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:34.71 +42:30:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 120555_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 192327_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:57.77 +38:54:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119009_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 119009_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41792_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 41792_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:28.55 +34:08:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168858_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 168858_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 40313_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 256330_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 196091_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 294550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 294550_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:03.38 +41:08:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 177984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 232984_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:28.77 +40:30:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 125079_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:55.91 +36:50:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47431_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 47431_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:36:15.10 +34:23:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 225875_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 158700_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107582_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 107582_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 78787_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:49:03.30 +35:27:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 46806_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169960_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 169960_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:16:18.63 +37:55:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159593_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 159593_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:04:00.09 +37:49:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114807_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 114807_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 155147_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192683_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 192683_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:28.83 +39:03:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 06869_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:37.18 +32:59:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 61900_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 203285_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 80833_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155905_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 155905_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 16464_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:12.21 +33:12:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 142867_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 311308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 311308_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:34.61 +33:23:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277046_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 277046_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:44.42 +42:00:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 275117_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 152659_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22769_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 22769_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:15.52 +33:33:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 120592_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:59.01 +36:43:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 09855_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:33.64 +32:54:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 227331_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:25.83 +40:15:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105636_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
Preparing report for the candidate 105636_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37801_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 37801_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:29.75 +34:04:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 203651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 203651_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144917_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009
The candidate 144917_fd_Cyg-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_21-56-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0009 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:14.92 +37:14:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 49s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5
########### Completed Cyg-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5
###################################################################################
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0 -- not a known variable star
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3 -- a known variable star
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5 -- a known variable star
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5 -- a known variable star
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5 -- a known variable star
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9 -- a known variable star
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9 -- a known variable star
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4 -- a known variable star
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6 -- a known variable star
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3 -- a known variable star
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4 -- a known variable star
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3 -- a known variable star
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6 -- a known variable star
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0 -- a known variable star
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0 -- a known variable star
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5 -- a known variable star
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8 -- a known variable star
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0 -- a known variable star
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9 -- a known variable star
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9 -- a known variable star
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0 -- a known variable star
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7 -- a known variable star
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0 -- a known variable star
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5 -- not a known variable star
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2 -- not a known variable star
Found 3 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
25 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
19:12:04.87 +33:35:39.0
19:22:02.16 +38:31:35.3
19:24:21.99 +34:26:55.5
19:24:57.98 +36:12:55.5
19:25:49.76 +39:08:27.5
19:26:13.37 +36:46:52.9
19:27:37.64 +42:04:34.9
19:27:44.80 +34:21:21.4
19:31:51.38 +42:45:02.6
19:32:23.72 +35:30:31.3
19:34:18.40 +42:55:11.4
19:35:53.61 +36:36:55.3
19:36:03.86 +40:14:00.6
19:36:42.09 +36:22:31.0
19:39:53.35 +34:54:53.0
19:41:07.47 +36:43:09.5
19:42:20.42 +37:28:13.8
19:42:42.30 +37:54:13.0
19:44:09.70 +36:35:54.9
19:44:32.51 +37:10:00.9
19:46:02.65 +36:46:32.0
19:48:55.87 +39:23:39.7
19:52:48.03 +40:32:01.0
19:54:24.59 +36:04:16.5
20:06:28.17 +39:48:59.2
19:04:06.50 +33:24:04.3
19:57:20.96 +32:41:36.5
20:06:19.78 +39:06:50.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.62213677 -observatory V36
07:37:00.69 +21:45:37.2 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:41:15.31 +20:21:30.4 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:26.90 +18:12:17.5 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:36.99 +21:04:42.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:25.54 +03:04:49.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:58.84 +20:33:20.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.41 +00:19:47.8 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:35.57 -23:09:16.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:30:16.62 +08:13:06.3 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 19 22:00 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.62213677:
07:58:31.66 +21:04:59.9 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:47.03 +21:04:09.1 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:48.51 +21:04:01.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:58:57.61 +21:03:41.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:12.12 +20:42:36.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:36.52 +21:04:45.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:52.21 +20:53:09.0 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:22.41 +21:09:52.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:38.93 +21:07:25.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:21.05 +03:05:18.8 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:30.86 +03:04:48.2 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:40.07 +03:07:13.3 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:30.19 +03:05:16.5 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:52.86 +03:05:01.6 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 19 22:00 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.62213677:
17:29:39.50 -35:30:39.6 JWST
18:21:30.47 +29:45:51.7 Chandra
18:25:52.52 -27:54:36.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 19 22:00 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.62213677 -observatory V36
18:34:29.91 -33:27:14.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:20.04 -67:59:42.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:28.56 +32:07:52.9 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:10:01.00 +15:49:17.8 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:10:43.80 -36:29:06.5 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:11.25 +31:59:21.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:33.96 +27:00:44.2 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:42.90 +30:38:15.5 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:14.69 +04:26:08.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:19.38 +21:42:12.9 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:32.31 -11:04:12.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:26.95 +67:10:11.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:43.58 -07:54:49.3 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:33.51 +80:11:37.4 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:27:46.39 +64:45:13.9 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:04:56.00 +28:47:18.9 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:25.02 +14:25:35.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:38.82 +34:33:28.2 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:29:56.85 -14:59:41.8 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:16:54.56 +32:26:59.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.60 +52:01:14.1 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:45.94 -11:27:36.2 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:43.88 +23:06:55.7 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:11.43 +04:33:33.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:56.04 +77:20:50.6 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:03.29 +44:11:47.2 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:56.38 +00:00:12.2 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:00.02 -09:55:15.4 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:22.15 -01:12:09.2 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:03.37 +27:11:18.5 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:23.92 +20:16:35.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:24.43 -05:42:07.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:12.74 +34:17:06.6 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:08.55 +18:35:33.1 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:36.05 +07:16:45.6 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:32:53.34 +30:53:36.3 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:17:42.79 +29:20:44.0 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:16.65 +32:26:57.0 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:13.16 +09:34:14.7 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:42.87 +19:58:12.8 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:10.20 +19:30:59.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:46:31.77 +16:58:47.5 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:05.48 +17:52:37.4 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:51:53.01 +17:16:40.4 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:44.32 -23:09:46.3 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:21:38.41 +28:14:56.2 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:41.76 +05:38:14.2 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:03.09 +04:40:06.6 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:52.03 -08:06:13.8 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:24.16 +34:52:10.9 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:03:57.63 +02:45:02.2 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:28.82 +34:28:00.5 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:54:24.33 +03:06:21.0 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:34.73 +07:33:02.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:16:55.95 +20:24:19.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:23.36 +40:49:18.4 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 19 22:00 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 19 22:00 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 19 22:00 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84 AT 2026oxy 2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85 SN 2026oxx 2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57 SN 2026oxw 2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56 AT 2026oxv 2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79 AT 2026oxu 2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94 AT 2026oxt 2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24 AT 2026oxs 2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54 AT 2026oxr 2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60 AT 2026oxq 2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45 AT 2026oxp 2026-06-10.01 20.192
19:48:49.856 +70:58:44.48 SN 2026oxo 2026-06-10.06 19.319
12:22:13.437 +27:24:59.57 AT 2026oxn 2026-06-10.94 19.381
23:01:57.544 -22:53:59.27 AT 2026oxm 2026-06-10.56 18.766
23:50:06.038 -14:01:39.26 AT 2026oxl 2026-06-10.58 18.422
13:13:55.656 -30:49:07.21 AT 2026oxk 2026-06-11.21 19.115
19:13:25.854 +49:32:53.84 AT 2026oxj 2026-06-10.06 19.005
23:31:30.736 +31:22:08.82 AT 2026oxi 2026-06-11.17 18.865
21:36:15.644 -21:19:14.62 AT 2026oxh 2026-06-10.53 18.749
22:37:33.079 +29:47:40.75 AT 2026oxg 2026-06-11.14 19.184
20:53:38.599 -35:13:40.58 SN 2026oxf 2026-06-10.52 18.812
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 19 22:00 tns_transients_list.txt
