This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 12.05 14:18:21.71 -12:55:11.6
333.46465 44.73721 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona -0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:21.71 -12:55:11.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:21.71 -12:55:11.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2191* 14 18 21.71 -12 55 11.6 12.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 12.80 14:03:24.61 -10:04:35.7
330.49357 48.90532 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome -0 0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:03:24.61 -10:04:35.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:03:24.61 -10:04:35.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2191* 14 03 24.61 -10 04 35.7 12.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 13.01 14:50:49.05 -12:09:16.9
343.21353 41.19629 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard -0 1 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:50:49.05 -12:09:16.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:50:49.05 -12:09:16.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 13.07 14:25:08.62 -11:38:42.6
336.38139 45.05442 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.144 Vibilia -0 0 0 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:25:08.62 -11:38:42.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:25:08.62 -11:38:42.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 13.12 14:38:28.63 -05:58:27.5
344.91870 47.97870 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio -0 1 1 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:38:28.63 -05:58:27.5: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:38:28.63 -05:58:27.5: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2191* 14 38 28.63 -05 58 27.5 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 14.21 14:41:11.84 -14:07:15.0
339.17750 40.90053 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina -0 0 0 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:41:11.84 -14:07:15.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:41:11.84 -14:07:15.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 14.28 14:28:30.44 -08:28:39.4
339.78412 47.32911 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.758 Mancunia 0 1 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:28:30.44 -08:28:39.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:28:30.44 -08:28:39.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2191* 14 28 30.44 -08 28 39.4 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 14.59 14:29:00.78 -12:11:28.5
337.13900 44.10423 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1137 Raissa -0 -0 0 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:29:00.78 -12:11:28.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:29:00.78 -12:11:28.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2191 2461209.7191 14.64 14:34:45.60 -11:34:02.1
339.25797 43.89699 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.429 Lotis 0 1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:34:45.60 -11:34:02.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:34:45.60 -11:34:02.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7191,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2191 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461209.71930469 18.06.2026 05:15:37.925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7387
Objects passed selection criteria: 7383
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7045.25
Average stars matched: 6627.5 (94.0705 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 00:52:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461209.71930469 18.06.2026 05:15:37.925 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 142
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45040
Objects passed selection criteria: 44933
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43632
Average stars matched: 42123.5 (96.5427 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 00:54:45 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.71883836
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.683 -10:00:34.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.683 -10:00:34.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.416 -10:00:03.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:13.416 -10:00:03.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:14.683 -10:00:34.62
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:13.416 -10:00:03.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01002 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M2GsOOGj1Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8c2IDLzFpg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UKX8Y7B7Mi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7vRZ2TONBX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.748900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.748900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4942 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3664 out of 3804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3804 out of 6495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
2.8 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
2.8 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M2GsOOGj1Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=6505
Got 6505 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=221 n_q2=224 n_q3=275 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8c2IDLzFpg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=6495
Got 6495 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=221 n_q2=222 n_q3=275 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UKX8Y7B7Mi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, passed=7711
Got 7711 stars (including 7282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=213 n_q2=221 n_q3=279 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7vRZ2TONBX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, passed=7673
Got 7673 stars (including 7254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7673 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7577 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=216 n_q2=225 n_q3=277 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.045
ref2=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new1=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.085
new2=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.179
reference average sigma_overall=0.3495 worst_q_ratio=1.0795
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-14-57_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0158.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_004231_TTUQ1b1x1_1338785_V3I7uOTR/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:21.71 -12:55:11.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.1: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:38:07.45 -09:51:28.5: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:31:50.53 -09:20:59.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:16.6: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:39:13.92 -09:11:37.7: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.9: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:38:07.45 -09:51:28.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:21.71 -12:55:11.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:39:13.92 -09:11:37.7: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:31:50.53 -09:20:59.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:16.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.1: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:07.45 -09:51:28.5: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0591 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:13.92 -09:11:37.7: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0668 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:50.53 -09:20:59.3: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9955 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:39.83 -05:44:01.9: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0326 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:30.60 -10:29:16.6: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8933 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:32.89 -07:26:34.1: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0436 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20389.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20380_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20381_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:18.02 -08:57:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20382_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20384_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20385_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20385_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20386_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:59.87 -10:56:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20387_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20387_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20388_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 20388_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53664_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53666_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53666_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53668_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53668_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53670_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53670_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53673_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53674_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53676_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:28:14.54 -12:51:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53678_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53688_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:18:21.72 -12:55:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53699_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53699_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:21.98 -14:10:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53700_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53704_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53706_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53707_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53708_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53708_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:11.30 -05:44:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53710_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53714_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:48.68 -11:49:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53718_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53718_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:11.06 -11:48:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53724_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:11:17.71 -07:44:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53725_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:08:58.45 -06:09:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:15.39 -13:05:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53739_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:45.81 -14:58:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53744_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53744_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53745_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53745_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53746_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:54.83 -04:57:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53752_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53758_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53759_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53761_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53761_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53769_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53769_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53771_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53771_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53772_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53772_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53775_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53777_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53777_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53779_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53779_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53782_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53789_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53789_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53791_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53791_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53794_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53794_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53795_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53795_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53797_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53797_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53800_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53800_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:44:43.13 -15:02:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53801_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53801_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53802_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53802_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53804_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53804_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53806_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:36:21.94 -14:02:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53809_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53809_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53813_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53815_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:11:00.98 -14:01:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53817_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53820_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53820_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:37.29 -13:51:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53821_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53821_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53823_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53826_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53826_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53827_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53829_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:14.77 -14:24:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53830_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53830_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53832_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53835_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53836_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53836_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53837_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53839_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53839_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53840_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53849_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53850_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53850_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53851_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53851_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53854_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53854_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53857_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53857_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53860_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53861_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53861_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53863_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53863_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53875_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53875_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53881_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53882_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53882_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53888_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53888_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53889_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53889_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53892_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53893_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53897_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53897_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53901_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53903_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 53903_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53906_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53910_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53910_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53911_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53919_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53923_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53923_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53925_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53925_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53926_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53928_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53931_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53932_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53932_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53938_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53938_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53940_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53943_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53944_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53944_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53945_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53945_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53956_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53956_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53960_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53962_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53963_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53968_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53968_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53972_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53980_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53980_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53984_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53984_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53985_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53985_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53988_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53988_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53990_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53990_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53991_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53991_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53992_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 53995_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54002_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54002_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54005_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54005_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54007_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54007_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54021_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54021_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54027_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54027_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54029_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54029_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54036_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54036_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54054_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54054_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54061_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54061_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54062_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54067_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54075_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54075_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54081_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54089_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54101_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 54101_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159
The candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-15-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0159 did not pass the final checks
