This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 11.12 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.4
276.54779 60.16955 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia 0 -1 1 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 00 21.25 +00 03 32.4 11.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 13.27 12:22:05.60 -01:13:01.9
287.76830 60.78770 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto 0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:22:05.60 -01:13:01.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:22:05.60 -01:13:01.9: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 22 05.60 -01 13 01.9 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 13.35 12:03:16.22 +00:20:35.8
277.59496 60.82331 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 -0 0 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:03:16.22 +00:20:35.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:03:16.22 +00:20:35.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 03 16.22 +00 20 35.8 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 13.76 12:23:28.66 -03:41:48.8
289.51337 58.44452 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja 1 0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:28.66 -03:41:48.8: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:28.66 -03:41:48.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 23 28.66 -03 41 48.8 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 14.02 12:28:33.45 -06:46:24.4
292.82982 55.64888 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.509 Iolanda -0 -1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:28:33.45 -06:46:24.4: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:28:33.45 -06:46:24.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 28 33.45 -06 46 24.4 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 14.23 11:48:12.49 -00:50:54.0
271.85137 58.15581 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea -0 -0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:48:12.49 -00:50:54.0: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:48:12.49 -00:50:54.0: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 11 48 12.49 +00 50 54.0 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 14.79 12:01:32.10 -02:57:35.2
279.19379 57.59375 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.109 Felicitas -1 0 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:01:32.10 -02:57:35.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:01:32.10 -02:57:35.2: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 12 01 32.10 -02 57 35.2 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1865 2461209.6865 14.54 11:58:42.47 +00:19:54.0
275.47090 60.36124 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda 0 1 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:58:42.47 +00:19:54.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:58:42.47 +00:19:54.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1865* 11 58 42.47 +00 19 54.0 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6865,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1865 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461209.68667080 18.06.2026 04:28:38.357 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5530
Objects passed selection criteria: 5528
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5083.25
Average stars matched: 4990.75 (98.1803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111568 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:47:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461209.68667080 18.06.2026 04:28:38.357 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 159
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 30918
Objects passed selection criteria: 30830
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29465.8
Average stars matched: 28397.5 (96.3746 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:50:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.68624499
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:11.352 -01:56:44.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:11.352 -01:56:44.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0744 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:09.722 -01:56:44.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:09.722 -01:56:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:11.352 -01:56:44.88
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:09.722 -01:56:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00679 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bUsT7upTDj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8wM1dMlBEw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3hcmZlV29q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kw4hSB98gg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3118 out of 3206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3206 out of 5500 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bUsT7upTDj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5769
Got 5769 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=240 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8wM1dMlBEw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5500
Got 5500 stars (including 5152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=242 n_q2=228 n_q3=245 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3hcmZlV29q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, passed=4619
Got 4619 stars (including 4296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=256 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kw4hSB98gg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=4617
Got 4617 stars (including 4270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=256 n_q2=217 n_q3=261 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.115
ref2=Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new1=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.086
new2=fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.094
reference average sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0104.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_234230_TTUQ1b1x1_3803233_Jwlr05fl/wcs_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:03:25.55 -03:09:20.0: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.6: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.6: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:03:25.55 -03:09:20.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:37.87 -00:34:48.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2203 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:25.55 -03:09:20.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2083 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:15.92 -00:03:52.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7056 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20219.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20153_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 20153_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 20219_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 20259_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.16 -05:38:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 20317_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20319_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 20319_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:42.49 +01:31:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 20321_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51732_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51732_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:56.78 +01:45:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51734_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51739_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51739_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:10.45 -00:48:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:30.18 +02:10:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51742_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51742_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:30.29 +00:00:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51743_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51743_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:49.64 -05:51:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51744_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51744_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51745_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51745_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:08.02 -03:30:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51746_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.88 +02:04:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51749_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51749_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51750_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51816_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51816_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:00:21.25 -00:03:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 51864_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:45.15 -05:38:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52112_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52112_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52123_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52132_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52139_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:43.66 -05:22:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52244_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52244_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52269_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:08.10 +00:06:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52281_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52296_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:42.96 +02:07:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52310_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:50.16 -04:54:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52327_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:22.70 -05:40:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52346_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:25.80 -04:32:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52360_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52360_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52387_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52398_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52432_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52432_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52471_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52471_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:58.10 -05:02:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52473_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52474_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52474_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52491_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52499_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52499_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52501_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52501_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52508_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:18:06.77 -03:50:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52514_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52515_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52517_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52521_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52521_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52523_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52523_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52529_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52529_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52537_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52543_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52543_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52554_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52554_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52561_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52561_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52576_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52577_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52583_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52584_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52585_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52585_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:12.00 -05:15:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52587_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52587_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:11.38 -00:54:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52588_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52589_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52591_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52591_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52603_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52604_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52605_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52617_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52624_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52624_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:01.06 -05:57:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52628_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52631_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52638_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52643_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52646_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52646_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52647_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52648_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52666_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52681_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52683_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52687_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52688_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52692_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52693_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52694_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52696_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52698_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52698_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:16.10 -05:13:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52709_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52713_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52713_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52714_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52714_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:19.76 -04:51:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52720_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52729_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52731_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52733_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52735_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52737_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52741_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:49.08 -06:04:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52748_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52748_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52753_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52760_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52767_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52768_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52781_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52781_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52784_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52801_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52818_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52822_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52828_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52830_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52833_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52840_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:12.49 +02:12:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52844_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52862_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52862_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52864_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52867_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52870_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52871_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
Preparing report for the candidate 52871_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52872_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52872_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:07.74 +00:56:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52876_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52887_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:30:39.83 -01:40:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52889_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52899_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52913_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52913_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:53.22 -05:08:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52914_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52922_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52923_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52924_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52930_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52934_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52941_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52948_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52952_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52961_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52964_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52973_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52974_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 52974_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 53018_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50034_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 50034_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21142_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 21142_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:39.65 -06:23:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105
The candidate 25747_fd_Vir-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-28-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0105 did not pass the final checks
