This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 11.84 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0
236.00723 57.50739 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope -0 0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 50 20.90 +11 22 28.0 11.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 12.02 10:19:03.78 +10:38:12.2
230.19422 50.58377 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.41 Daphne 0 0 0 12.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:19:03.78 +10:38:12.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:19:03.78 +10:38:12.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 19 03.78 +10 38 12.2 12.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 12.76 11:02:36.54 +17:09:17.3
228.89741 62.97388 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.416 Vaticana -0 -0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:02:36.54 +17:09:17.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:02:36.54 +17:09:17.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 11 02 36.54 +17 09 17.3 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 13.25 10:30:35.67 +12:41:02.8
229.56466 54.04995 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.103 Hera -0 0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:30:35.67 +12:41:02.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:30:35.67 +12:41:02.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 30 35.67 +12 41 02.8 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 14.20 10:41:25.04 +11:19:06.2
233.94470 55.63515 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor -0 -0 0 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:41:25.04 +11:19:06.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:41:25.04 +11:19:06.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 41 25.04 +11 19 06.2 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 14.50 10:54:30.61 +17:10:48.2
227.04210 61.24460 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.508 Princetonia -0 0 0 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:54:30.61 +17:10:48.2: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:54:30.61 +17:10:48.2: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 54 30.61 +17 10 48.2 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1665 2461209.6665 14.19 10:13:21.09 +12:17:04.8
226.87044 50.15877 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.47 Aglaja -1 -1 2 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:13:21.09 +12:17:04.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:13:21.09 +12:17:04.8: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1665* 10 13 21.09 +12 17 04.8 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6665,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1665 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461209.66678696 18.06.2026 04:00:00.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5643
Objects passed selection criteria: 5639
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5162.75
Average stars matched: 5057.25 (97.9565 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 01:20:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461209.66678696 18.06.2026 04:00:00.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29639
Objects passed selection criteria: 29552
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28244
Average stars matched: 27031 (95.7053 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 01:22:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.66629134
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:11.615 +14:01:49.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:40:11.615 +14:01:49.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:10.760 +14:02:19.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:40:10.760 +14:02:19.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0556 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:11.615 +14:01:49.12
Second-epoch second image center 10:40:10.760 +14:02:19.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00919 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BAKgIByhYT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YkZC5RlZAA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pnUnGpPYS7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NhuuFPipDA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2606 deg
Loaded 4238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3433 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.729100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.729100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.61
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2606 deg
Loaded 4238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3433 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7044 to 168.1822 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2438 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7044 to 168.1822 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2438 deg
Loaded 4241 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3438 out of 3510 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3510 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BAKgIByhYT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 869 stars left (next iteration limit 955)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=198 n_q2=228 n_q3=236 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.329
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YkZC5RlZAA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.571 n_q1=197 n_q2=222 n_q3=239 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pnUnGpPYS7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=9, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=4689
Got 4689 stars (including 4399 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4689 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 877 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits N_match=877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=222 n_q2=207 n_q3=249 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NhuuFPipDA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=4636
Got 4636 stars (including 4339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 877 stars left (next iteration limit 964)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits N_match=877 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=216 n_q2=207 n_q3=250 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.033
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.444 worst_q_ratio=1.329
ref2=Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.307
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.033
reference average sigma_overall=0.4405 worst_q_ratio=1.318
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (869 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (865 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074_astrometric_residuals.png (877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075_astrometric_residuals.png (877 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-59-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0074.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_230630_TTUQ1b1x1_3960230_kelFXmek/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.5: 10.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:19:03.78 +10:38:12.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.5: 10.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.96 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:19:03.78 +10:38:12.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:12.05 +11:41:08.5: ref_mag=10.96 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1407 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20337.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20233_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 20233_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:18.04 +16:30:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 20293_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32160_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32160_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:00.96 +15:08:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32165_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32165_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32166_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32166_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:43.69 +16:31:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:32.40 +16:10:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32172_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32172_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:44.29 +18:22:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32173_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:06.86 +12:30:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32174_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32174_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32240_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32240_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32281_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32281_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:20.90 +11:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32299_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32299_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:03.77 +10:38:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32307_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32307_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:36.28 +15:44:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32322_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32322_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32402_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32402_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32405_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 32405_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32525_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 32525_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32555_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32640_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32641_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32800_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32800_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32818_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32818_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32830_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32830_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32835_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32835_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32842_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32842_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:14.92 +15:10:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32846_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32856_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32856_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32873_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32873_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32878_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32878_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32883_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32883_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32893_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32893_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32895_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32913_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32913_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32932_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32932_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32938_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32946_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32946_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32957_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32957_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32960_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 32960_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32969_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32969_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32975_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32975_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32978_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32978_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32983_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32983_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:51.19 +18:48:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32985_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32985_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32988_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32988_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32995_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 32995_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33007_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33007_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33010_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33010_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33026_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33026_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33031_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33031_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 33038_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33039_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33039_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
Preparing report for the candidate 33044_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33052_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33052_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:59.80 +18:41:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33059_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33059_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33060_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33075_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33075_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33085_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33085_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33087_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33087_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33092_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33092_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33094_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33094_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33098_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33106_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33106_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33115_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33115_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33116_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33116_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33117_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33117_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33135_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33135_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33136_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33136_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:51.41 +19:02:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33139_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33151_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33168_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33170_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33170_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33196_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33196_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33204_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33204_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33209_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33209_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33211_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33211_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33212_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33212_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33215_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33215_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:24.03 +18:05:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33221_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33221_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33239_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33239_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33244_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33244_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33245_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33245_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33258_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33267_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33267_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33268_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33268_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33272_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33272_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33273_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33273_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33275_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33275_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:42.76 +16:35:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33276_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33276_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33277_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33277_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33286_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33286_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:51.18 +14:12:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33301_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33301_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33304_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33304_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33309_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33309_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33324_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33324_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33344_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33344_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33349_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33349_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33357_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33357_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33360_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33360_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33377_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33377_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33382_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33382_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33418_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 33418_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075
The candidate 00890_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-00-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0075 did not pass the final checks
