This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1646 2461209.6646 14.61 10:24:17.97 +18:21:52.3
219.57550 55.09944 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.567 Eleutheria 0 -0 0 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:17.97 +18:21:52.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:17.97 +18:21:52.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1647* 10 24 17.97 +18 21 52.3 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6646,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1646 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1646 2461209.6646 14.52 09:52:44.57 +26:17:00.0
203.62036 50.29760 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.596 Scheila 0 1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:52:44.57 +26:17:00.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:52:44.57 +26:17:00.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1647* 09 52 44.57 +26 17 00.0 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6646,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1646 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
First image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Last image: 2461209.66489014 18.06.2026 03:57:16.508 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6264
Objects passed selection criteria: 6253
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5375.25
Average stars matched: 5239 (97.4652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112172 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:06:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
First image: 2461139.72915330 09.04.2026 05:29:48.845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Last image: 2461209.66489014 18.06.2026 03:57:16.508 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 51
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32314
Objects passed selection criteria: 32234
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29650.2
Average stars matched: 28452.8 (95.9612 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:09:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.66440585
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0652 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0527 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01250 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cyuDUnd4fT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bOiu1ll7Dm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ZW6fy6Mws
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sbJPF0ZbnF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec +16.5183 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec 16.5183 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3596 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 6417 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cyuDUnd4fT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6437
Got 6437 stars (including 6029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=203 n_q2=247 n_q3=183 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bOiu1ll7Dm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=6417
Got 6417 stars (including 6016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=202 n_q2=249 n_q3=184 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7ZW6fy6Mws (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, passed=4388
Got 4388 stars (including 4096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4388 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 899 stars left (next iteration limit 988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=215 n_q2=230 n_q3=213 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sbJPF0ZbnF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=280, passed=4401
Got 4401 stars (including 4115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4401 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=207 n_q2=222 n_q3=217 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.213
ref2=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.273
new1=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.097
new2=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.087
reference average sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (904 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (899 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071_astrometric_residuals.png (898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:03.85 +20:51:43.1: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:03.85 +20:51:43.1: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.94 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:03.85 +20:51:43.1: ref_mag=10.94 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3703 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20413_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 20413_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04407_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 04407_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:25.74 +19:51:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:00:01.92 +21:15:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0652 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0527 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:27.939 +22:02:27.84
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:25.296 +22:02:01.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01250 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gRL23Yf686
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AWya8yuNg9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uUPuT3QkhL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JUdc9erIKl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.649450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.649450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec +16.4866 to +27.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec 16.4866 to 27.2736 deg
Loaded 4585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3776 out of 33297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gRL23Yf686 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1503, passed=32992
Got 32992 stars (including 31441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 899 stars left (next iteration limit 988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=198 n_q2=245 n_q3=183 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AWya8yuNg9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1479, passed=33280
Got 33280 stars (including 31754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=198 n_q2=251 n_q3=181 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uUPuT3QkhL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1242, passed=27016
Got 27016 stars (including 25718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 895 stars left (next iteration limit 984)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits N_match=895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=207 n_q2=230 n_q3=219 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JUdc9erIKl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=788, passed=26377
Got 26377 stars (including 25536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 896 stars left (next iteration limit 985)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=200 n_q2=227 n_q3=219 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-56-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0070.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_230235_TTUQ1b1x1_3385119_DJGcqjdg/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:26:11.57 +20:15:32.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:46.36 +23:01:15.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:37.39 +21:03:23.3: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:36.12 +22:56:21.5: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:37:03.63 +23:53:16.3: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:40:13.80 +25:05:59.6: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:26:11.57 +20:15:32.2: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:11.57 +20:15:32.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3404 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:46.36 +23:01:15.7: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:46.36 +23:01:15.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5677 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:40:29.50 +24:16:29.5: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:19:01.97 +18:08:30.1: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:17.97 +18:21:52.3: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:37.39 +21:03:23.3: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:37.39 +21:03:23.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1412 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:36.12 +22:56:21.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:37:03.63 +23:53:16.3: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:36.12 +22:56:21.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3390 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:37:03.63 +23:53:16.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0965 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:40:13.80 +25:05:59.6: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:13.80 +25:05:59.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3436 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:40:29.50 +24:16:29.5: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:17.97 +18:21:52.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:29.50 +24:16:29.5: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3530 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:19:01.97 +18:08:30.1: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:01.97 +18:08:30.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6189 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:52:44.57 +26:17:00.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:41:12.67 +24:10:56.8: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:52:44.57 +26:17:00.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:19:56.24 +24:37:23.3: 15.50 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:40:19.64 +24:50:34.9: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:02:46.84 +26:43:06.4: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:32:05.66 +18:43:45.6: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:14.27 +18:04:59.1: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:41:12.67 +24:10:56.8: 15.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:12.67 +24:10:56.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7073 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:19:56.24 +24:37:23.3: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:56.24 +24:37:23.3: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8766 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:40:19.64 +24:50:34.9: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:19.64 +24:50:34.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4542 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:32:05.66 +18:43:45.6: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:02:46.84 +26:43:06.4: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:05.66 +18:43:45.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7089 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:46.84 +26:43:06.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7947 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:14.27 +18:04:59.1: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:14.27 +18:04:59.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6124 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54000.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52566_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:04.12 +25:10:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:58.13 +25:05:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52575_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:03.77 +25:53:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52578_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52578_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:56.42 +24:05:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52581_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:05.91 +26:28:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52582_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52582_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:44.39 +18:22:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52583_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52583_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:38.50 +25:23:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52768_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:48.88 +24:27:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52954_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:55.58 +24:21:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 52970_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:26:52.50 +19:22:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53049_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:54.00 +22:05:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53071_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53135_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:44.24 +20:10:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53146_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53162_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:55.84 +20:47:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53267_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:32.33 +19:24:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53274_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:33:29.00 +17:34:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53287_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53287_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:30.75 +21:18:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53532_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53532_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:36:22.40 +26:14:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53611_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53611_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:58.98 +17:07:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53678_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53678_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53707_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53707_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:31:03.88 +22:13:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53765_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53765_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53768_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53843_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53843_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:03.15 +24:56:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53881_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53881_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53885_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:53.48 +21:19:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53946_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:01.26 +26:40:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53967_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 53972_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53978_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53978_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53987_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:34:26.58 +22:35:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53993_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 53993_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:21.02 +23:56:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
Preparing report for the candidate 54000_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54022_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54022_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:51.79 +25:44:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54039_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54039_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54056_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54056_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:31:34.62 +24:53:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54059_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54059_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:56.22 +23:19:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54071_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54071_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:38.28 +21:08:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54082_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:35.69 +22:21:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54093_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54093_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54105_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54105_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54115_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54115_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54127_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54127_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 54140_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31518_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 31518_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:43:25.74 +19:51:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00784_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 00784_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:20.29 +26:41:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071
The candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_22-57-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071 did not pass the final checks