This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 10.25 15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9
344.17161 18.09346 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 0 -0 0 10.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,10.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 10.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 11.87 16:14:52.44 -21:52:22.6
353.17929 20.57722 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 1 -0 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:14:52.44 -21:52:22.6: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:14:52.44 -21:52:22.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 12.48 16:07:07.43 -25:18:05.8
349.23218 19.50109 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.674 Rachele 0 0 0 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:07.43 -25:18:05.8: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:07.43 -25:18:05.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 13.33 16:30:12.03 -23:57:26.1
354.00882 16.55490 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.481 Emita 0 1 1 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:12.03 -23:57:26.1: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:12.03 -23:57:26.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 13.46 16:20:26.82 -29:11:53.0
348.45137 14.66504 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.123 Brunhild -0 -1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:26.82 -29:11:53.0: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:26.82 -29:11:53.0: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 13.40 15:54:34.80 -25:07:08.6
347.20170 21.61513 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis -1 1 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:54:34.80 -25:07:08.6: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:54:34.80 -25:07:08.6: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1554 2461209.6554 13.55 15:53:46.57 -26:59:08.9
345.69639 20.37321 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.254 Augusta 1 -0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:53:46.57 -26:59:08.9: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:53:46.57 -26:59:08.9: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6554,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1554 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461209.65559126 18.06.2026 03:43:53.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4802
Objects passed selection criteria: 4798
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4439.5
Average stars matched: 4081.5 (91.936 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111108 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 22:46:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
First image: 2461147.78803603 17.04.2026 06:54:36.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Last image: 2461209.65559126 18.06.2026 03:43:53.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 178
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50766
Objects passed selection criteria: 50671
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47571.8
Average stars matched: 43153 (90.7114 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 22:49:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.65518312
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DAIKxDfXji
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FKXqatrRBw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DZAbKVsXof
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cfxlj3lgcg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.386900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.386900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3887 to 253.5849 deg, Dec -31.5354 to -20.0792 deg
Loaded 8611 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4075 out of 4161 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4161 out of 5279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3727 to 253.6268 deg, Dec -31.4687 to -20.1177 deg
Loaded 8547 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4618 out of 4781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4781 out of 6303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DAIKxDfXji (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5279
Got 5279 stars (including 4876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=289 n_q2=245 n_q3=272 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.321
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FKXqatrRBw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=573, passed=6303
Got 6303 stars (including 5717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=299 n_q2=250 n_q3=255 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.410
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DZAbKVsXof (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, passed=6801
Got 6801 stars (including 6317 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6801 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6618 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.042 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.826 n_q1=248 n_q2=296 n_q3=247 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.653
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cfxlj3lgcg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=453, passed=6696
Got 6696 stars (including 6237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.042 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.741 n_q1=247 n_q2=295 n_q3=244 n_q4=173 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.751
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.321
ref2=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.410
new1=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits sigma_overall=0.630 worst_q_ratio=1.653
new2=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits sigma_overall=0.595 worst_q_ratio=1.751
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.3655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:15:17.36 -26:08:32.0: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:16:02.96 -28:02:47.1: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:32:58.82 -26:45:19.7: 11.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:16:32.77 -28:04:27.4: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:16:02.96 -28:02:47.1: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:15:17.36 -26:08:32.0: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:16:32.77 -28:04:27.4: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:02.96 -28:02:47.1: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1968 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:32:58.82 -26:45:19.7: 11.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:17.36 -26:08:32.0: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1400 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:32.77 -28:04:27.4: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2233 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:58.82 -26:45:19.7: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1309 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20802_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 20802_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20811_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20811_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.49 -27:03:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20836_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.92 -23:28:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20857_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20857_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20859_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20859_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20863_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20863_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20865_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20865_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:35.45 -26:29:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20870_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20870_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:32.44 -26:26:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20872_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20872_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20216_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20216_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:23.82 -23:46:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20317_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20317_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:39.21 -22:56:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:55:57.98 -29:38:18.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0112 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:19:12.067 -26:00:18.90
Second-epoch image center 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:19:11.773 -25:59:38.89
Second-epoch second image center 16:19:11.388 -25:59:33.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00212 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xiimJ0CJ7g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gbQqr7I6yB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qakspwA8Ss
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N2kmzeoom5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits and wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.178000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.178000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3307 to 253.5861 deg, Dec -31.5421 to -20.0424 deg
Loaded 8684 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6494 out of 7000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7000 out of 57338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 69536 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.3645 to 253.6286 deg, Dec -31.4708 to -20.1109 deg
Loaded 8557 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6303 out of 6992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6992 out of 69536 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
14.4 mag. Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xiimJ0CJ7g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2322, passed=57332
Got 57332 stars (including 54899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=300 n_q2=253 n_q3=262 n_q4=150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gbQqr7I6yB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3494, passed=69528
Got 69528 stars (including 65904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=308 n_q2=266 n_q3=248 n_q4=144 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qakspwA8Ss (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3389, passed=64876
Got 64876 stars (including 61413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.079 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.551 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.867 n_q1=259 n_q2=293 n_q3=243 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.693
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N2kmzeoom5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3351, passed=64209
Got 64209 stars (including 60773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64209 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62321 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.733 n_q1=255 n_q2=291 n_q3=243 n_q4=175 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.648
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_224423_TTUQ2b1x1_3944161_liqabsrc/wcs_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:26:09.36 -29:47:03.1: 13.33 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:52.91 -29:18:13.2: 13.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:56:05.19 -29:32:40.0: 13.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:35:53.70 -25:15:44.1: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:33:50.86 -26:31:51.7: 13.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:01:35.62 -25:51:23.8: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:26:09.36 -29:47:03.1: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:09.36 -29:47:03.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5586 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:52.91 -29:18:13.2: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:52.91 -29:18:13.2: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5386 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:33:50.86 -26:31:51.7: 13.64 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:56:05.19 -29:32:40.0: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:05.19 -29:32:40.0: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2256 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:50.86 -26:31:51.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7514 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:01:35.62 -25:51:23.8: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:59.36 -29:21:43.1: 13.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:35.62 -25:51:23.8: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6785 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:33:44.58 -27:07:05.6: 13.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:35:53.70 -25:15:44.1: 13.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:53.70 -25:15:44.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7449 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:52.61 -28:03:26.7: 13.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:59.36 -29:21:43.1: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.36 -29:21:43.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4348 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:52.61 -28:03:26.7: 13.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:33:44.58 -27:07:05.6: 13.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:52.61 -28:03:26.7: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2639 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:44.58 -27:07:05.6: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6531 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:56.29 -27:01:28.1: 13.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:18:03.55 -23:36:20.7: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:09.03 -25:26:59.1: 13.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:56.29 -27:01:28.1: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:56.29 -27:01:28.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2751 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:18:03.55 -23:36:20.7: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:03.55 -23:36:20.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4820 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:09.03 -25:26:59.1: 13.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:09.03 -25:26:59.1: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4751 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:57:14.23 -27:47:59.7: 11.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:14:52.44 -21:52:22.6: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:57:14.23 -27:47:59.7: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:14.23 -27:47:59.7: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5298 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:28.46 -26:32:59.0: 12.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:07.43 -25:18:05.8: 14.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:14:52.44 -21:52:22.6: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:28.46 -26:32:59.0: 12.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:28.46 -26:32:59.0: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.5334 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:07.43 -25:18:05.8: 15.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:23:26.99 -26:32:39.6: 13.05 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:12.03 -23:57:26.1: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:23:26.99 -26:32:39.6: 13.14 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:26.99 -26:32:39.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=12.8114 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:58:42.38 -28:33:01.8: 13.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:12.03 -23:57:26.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:20:26.82 -29:11:53.0: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:36:07.34 -22:29:55.6: 13.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:58:42.38 -28:33:01.8: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:42.38 -28:33:01.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.2911 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:06:54.29 -24:10:02.8: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:36:07.34 -22:29:55.6: 13.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:07.34 -22:29:55.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7120 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:20:26.82 -29:11:53.0: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:04:28.69 -25:17:32.4: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:06:54.29 -24:10:02.8: 13.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:54:34.80 -25:07:08.6: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.29 -24:10:02.8: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3486 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:28:41.07 -29:56:41.3: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:04:28.69 -25:17:32.4: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:28.69 -25:17:32.4: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3677 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:54:34.80 -25:07:08.6: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:28:41.07 -29:56:41.3: 14.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:41.07 -29:56:41.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6800 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:47.54 -27:25:45.7: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:24:15.96 -29:59:28.8: 14.61 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:32:42.37 -22:49:25.0: 14.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:47.54 -27:25:45.7: 13.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:47.54 -27:25:45.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4659 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:24:15.96 -29:59:28.8: 14.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:15.96 -29:59:28.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6658 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:32:42.37 -22:49:25.0: 14.53 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:42.37 -22:49:25.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8950 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:53:46.57 -26:59:08.9: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:48.00 -26:06:50.8: 13.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:53:46.57 -26:59:08.9: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:48.00 -26:06:50.8: 14.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:48.00 -26:06:50.8: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6155 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:30:11.88 -27:45:44.8: 14.31 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:01:49.58 -28:47:20.5: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:03:47.98 -26:25:18.5: 13.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:30:11.88 -27:45:44.8: 14.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:11.88 -27:45:44.8: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8273 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:01:49.58 -28:47:20.5: 13.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:49.58 -28:47:20.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6096 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:03:47.98 -26:25:18.5: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:47.98 -26:25:18.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5781 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:13:37.69 -22:54:45.6: 13.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:13:37.69 -22:54:45.6: 14.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:37.69 -22:54:45.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7526 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:18:04.21 -22:41:57.0: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:28.97 -24:10:42.7: 13.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:18:04.21 -22:41:57.0: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:04.21 -22:41:57.0: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7913 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:14.63 -25:04:15.8: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:28.97 -24:10:42.7: 13.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:28.97 -24:10:42.7: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4904 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:14.63 -25:04:15.8: 15.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:24:23.96 -25:43:22.0: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:24:41.83 -29:46:34.3: 13.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:24:23.96 -25:43:22.0: 13.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:23.96 -25:43:22.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6589 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:24:41.83 -29:46:34.3: 14.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:41.83 -29:46:34.3: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8561 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.0: 14.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.0: 14.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:49.74 -23:28:32.0: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8802 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:22:07.02 -29:14:31.7: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:50:59.38 -23:06:35.2: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:58:04.66 -28:28:44.8: 13.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:22:07.02 -29:14:31.7: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:50:59.38 -23:06:35.2: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:59.38 -23:06:35.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7069 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:58:04.66 -28:28:44.8: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:04.66 -28:28:44.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6509 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:14.60 -28:42:43.1: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:14.60 -28:42:43.1: 13.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:14.60 -28:42:43.1: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7048 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:07:17.32 -26:33:36.1: 13.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:49:08.32 -27:07:56.6: 14.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:51:41.64 -25:39:21.3: 13.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:07:17.32 -26:33:36.1: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:17.32 -26:33:36.1: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5832 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:49:08.32 -27:07:56.6: 13.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:08.32 -27:07:56.6: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6840 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:51:41.64 -25:39:21.3: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:41.64 -25:39:21.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6008 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:02:51.87 -27:53:56.2: 14.32 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:01:38.38 -26:24:41.8: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:01:06.30 -28:42:34.0: 14.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:02:51.87 -27:53:56.2: 14.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:51.87 -27:53:56.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7481 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:01:06.30 -28:42:34.0: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:06.30 -28:42:34.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7944 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:06:48.15 -29:50:24.3: 13.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:01:38.38 -26:24:41.8: 13.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:38.38 -26:24:41.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7592 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:05:05.51 -24:03:28.3: 13.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:56.31 -26:17:48.2: 14.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:02:30.33 -29:37:33.6: 13.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:06:48.15 -29:50:24.3: 13.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:48.15 -29:50:24.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7825 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:59:37.13 -27:11:58.3: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:05:05.51 -24:03:28.3: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:56.31 -26:17:48.2: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:05.51 -24:03:28.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8558 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:56.31 -26:17:48.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8913 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:02:30.33 -29:37:33.6: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:30.33 -29:37:33.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7732 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:01.75 -25:58:35.1: 14.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:22.32 -27:43:14.4: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:59:37.13 -27:11:58.3: 13.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:37.13 -27:11:58.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6909 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:53:54.01 -27:14:53.3: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:22.32 -27:43:14.4: 14.01 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:01.75 -25:58:35.1: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:22.32 -27:43:14.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6792 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:01.75 -25:58:35.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8161 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:53:54.01 -27:14:53.3: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:54.01 -27:14:53.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8088 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:52:01.49 -23:30:45.3: 13.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 16:00:32.49 -27:52:44.1: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:50:00.31 -27:42:14.0: 14.00 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:55:58.10 -27:00:52.9: 14.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:53:08.42 -23:05:53.5: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:56:19.07 -26:00:08.2: 13.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:52:01.49 -23:30:45.3: 13.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_01-54-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0173.fits at 15:53:25.03 -25:47:25.1: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:01.49 -23:30:45.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6199 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 16:00:32.49 -27:52:44.1: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:32.49 -27:52:44.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8851 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:50:00.31 -27:42:14.0: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:00.31 -27:42:14.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7100 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:55:58.10 -27:00:52.9: 14.22 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:58.10 -27:00:52.9: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8588 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:53:08.42 -23:05:53.5: 14.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:08.42 -23:05:53.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8619 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:56:19.07 -26:00:08.2: 13.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:19.07 -26:00:08.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8315 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-36-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0255.fits at 15:53:25.03 -25:47:25.1: 14.47 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:25.03 -25:47:25.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7900 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78886.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78011.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78679.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77800_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77800_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77802_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77802_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:25.45 -23:59:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77806_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77806_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77810_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:06.10 -27:13:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77811_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77811_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77812_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77812_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77814_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77814_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77816_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77816_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77817_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77817_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.29 -21:42:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77818_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77818_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77820_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77820_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77824_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77824_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77826_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77826_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77827_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77827_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:25.10 -25:09:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77829_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77829_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77835_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77835_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77839_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77839_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:39.49 -25:41:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77844_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77844_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77845_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77845_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77847_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77847_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:44.68 -25:51:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77880_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77880_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:57.99 -29:38:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77895_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77895_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77903_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 77903_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78004_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78004_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78011_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78011_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78054_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78081_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78081_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.90 -27:54:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78110_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78110_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78134_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78134_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78141_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78141_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.76 -25:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78151_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78151_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78163_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78163_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78194_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78194_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78208_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78208_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:47.43 -26:44:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78223_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78223_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78236_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78236_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78253_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78253_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:49.86 -25:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78268_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78268_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78279_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78279_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78292_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78292_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:28.74 -27:58:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78350_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78350_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:19.46 -23:17:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78398_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78398_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:18.46 -25:52:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78416_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78416_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78432_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78432_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78447_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78447_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:43.17 -26:02:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78547_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78547_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78560_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78560_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:22.29 -26:57:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78571_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78571_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78581_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78581_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78596_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78596_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:36.74 -30:13:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78622_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78622_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78624_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78624_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78634_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78634_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:48.20 -29:44:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78656_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78656_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78679_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78679_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78703_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78703_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78712_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78712_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78713_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78713_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:47.76 -26:22:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78721_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78721_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78732_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78732_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78741_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78741_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78747_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78747_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:16.25 -25:45:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78762_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 78762_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78772_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78772_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78779_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78779_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:18.61 -26:33:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78781_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78781_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78783_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78783_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78795_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78795_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78813_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78813_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78823_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78823_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78827_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78827_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78840_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78840_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78842_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78842_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:14.63 -25:04:15.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.575 6048860248373535744 244.31110007393 -25.07115040421 12.2932 10.4850 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.575#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78843_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78843_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78866_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78866_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78879_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78879_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78886_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78886_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:07.02 -29:14:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.862 6038156159083782144 245.52984576909 -29.24307737197 13.9541 12.7199 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.862#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78888_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78888_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78903_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78903_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78939_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78939_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78950_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78950_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78960_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78960_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78964_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78964_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:40.80 -29:53:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78968_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78968_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78971_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78971_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78974_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78974_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78989_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78989_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78995_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78995_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 78999_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79022_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79022_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79031_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79031_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79046_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79046_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79062_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79062_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79066_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79066_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79071_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79071_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79076_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79076_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79085_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79085_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79109_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79120_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79120_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79122_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79122_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79130_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79130_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79136_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79136_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79166_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79166_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79181_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79192_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79192_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79224_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79224_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79397_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 79397_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 52502_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.94 -23:28:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 25529_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:41.52 -27:03:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07633_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 07633_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67834_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 67834_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.29 -29:15:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67544_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 67544_fd_Sco-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_22-43-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
