This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.4361* 01 04 35.61 +41 17 56.6 11.9 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RX And,2461208.9361,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RX And 20260617.4361 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4361 2461208.9361 8.73 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1
132.99735 -22.58525 galactic And Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Y And
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.200 V 15.100 V 2449489.00000 220.500000000000 M3e-M4.5e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1: 9.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.4361* 01 39 36.78 +39 20 35.1 8.7 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Y And,2461208.9361,8.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Y And 20260617.4361 8.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.4361* 01 04 35.59 +41 17 57.3 11.9 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RX And,2461208.9361,11.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RX And 20260617.4361 11.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69734175 23.12.2025 04:44:00.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
First image: 2461032.69734175 23.12.2025 04:44:00.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Last image: 2461208.93634069 17.06.2026 10:28:09.836 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15675
Objects passed selection criteria: 15642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13451.8
Average stars matched: 13154 (97.7865 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 05:30:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.69734175 23.12.2025 04:44:00.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
First image: 2461032.69734175 23.12.2025 04:44:00.327 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Last image: 2461208.93634069 17.06.2026 10:28:09.836 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 59
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 92781
Objects passed selection criteria: 92583
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76225.5
Average stars matched: 73867.2 (96.9062 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1870176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 05:33:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.93581711
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits'
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C72Kds5agw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HAx6zqIO1T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cVF436iAH1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dqRfR7L8sn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec +32.1623 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec 32.1623 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12094 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8624 out of 9264 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9264 out of 16528 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.931050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.931050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec +32.1623 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9063 to 27.2264 deg, Dec 32.1623 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12094 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8624 out of 9264 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9264 out of 16528 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.9060 to 27.2094 deg, Dec +32.1622 to +43.3177 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.9060 to 27.2094 deg, Dec 32.1622 to 43.3177 deg
Loaded 12085 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8682 out of 9331 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9331 out of 16565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.0 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
3.2 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
3.2 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
2.0 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
15.4 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.5 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
14.5 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C72Kds5agw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=22, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1369, passed=16506
Got 16506 stars (including 15118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=231 n_q2=283 n_q3=181 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HAx6zqIO1T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1334, passed=16565
Got 16565 stars (including 15211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16565 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=225 n_q2=282 n_q3=186 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cVF436iAH1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=559, passed=10716
Got 10716 stars (including 10142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=227 n_q2=224 n_q3=250 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dqRfR7L8sn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=555, passed=10402
Got 10402 stars (including 9837 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10402 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10270 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=227 n_q2=223 n_q3=251 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.300
ref2=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.318 worst_q_ratio=1.231
new1=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new2=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.059
reference average sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1: 9.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1: 9.66 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.67 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1: ref_mag=9.67 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.7329 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21058_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 21058_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:42:30.90 +41:10:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21063_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 21063_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:30.99 +35:34:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21143_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 21143_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15052_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 15052_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:23.36 +34:22:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06180_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 06180_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12652_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 12652_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:44.86 +35:30:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0604 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:05:28.265 +37:59:54.28
Second-epoch image center 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0546 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:05:18.210 +38:02:56.43
Second-epoch second image center 01:05:16.716 +38:02:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01234 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits &> /tmp/tmp.btHNcjKebG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kKFzVCxt59
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mfzA6Lm2I8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dg7CfLOwUf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits and wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec +32.1466 to +43.3228 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec 32.1466 to 43.3228 deg
Loaded 12160 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7564 out of 9417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9417 out of 99677 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.813800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.813800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99677 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec +32.1466 to +43.3228 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8657 to 27.2719 deg, Dec 32.1466 to 43.3228 deg
Loaded 12160 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7564 out of 9417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9417 out of 99677 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 100358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.8619 to 27.2367 deg, Dec +32.1468 to +43.3220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.8619 to 27.2367 deg, Dec 32.1468 to 43.3220 deg
Loaded 12146 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7601 out of 9500 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9500 out of 100358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
1.9 pix And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
3.1 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
3.0 pix fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
1.9 pix wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
15.5 mag. And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
14.6 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
14.5 mag. fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.btHNcjKebG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=8225, passed=99656
Got 99656 stars (including 91263 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=225 n_q2=256 n_q3=212 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kKFzVCxt59 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8395, passed=100343
Got 100343 stars (including 91781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=221 n_q2=256 n_q3=212 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mfzA6Lm2I8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2655, passed=53491
Got 53491 stars (including 50771 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53491 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=230 n_q2=220 n_q3=245 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dg7CfLOwUf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2770, passed=53423
Got 53423 stars (including 50586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52621 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=226 n_q2=219 n_q3=242 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits -region wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-27-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0272.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_And-05-Q1b1x1_052847_TTUQ1b1x1_2980655_aqasSf9R/wcs_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:02:38.64 +41:17:31.2: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:02:38.64 +41:17:31.2: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:02:38.64 +41:17:31.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4828 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:39:35.25 +38:12:10.3: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:38:14.89 +40:56:19.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:35:11.75 +42:23:41.4: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:39:35.25 +38:12:10.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:07:05.87 +38:40:02.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:39:35.25 +38:12:10.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1666 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:38:14.89 +40:56:19.4: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:38:14.89 +40:56:19.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2062 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:35:11.75 +42:23:41.4: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:35:11.75 +42:23:41.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2756 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:26:08.78 +40:20:19.0: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:38:25.22 +37:50:47.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:44:32.32 +33:16:30.1: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:07:05.87 +38:40:02.2: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:05.87 +38:40:02.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3211 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:38:25.22 +37:50:47.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:26:08.78 +40:20:19.0: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:38:25.22 +37:50:47.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3627 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:26:08.78 +40:20:19.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3863 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:44:32.32 +33:16:30.1: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:06:41.19 +35:34:52.9: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:44:32.32 +33:16:30.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4166 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:23:17.00 +40:37:20.2: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:06:41.19 +35:34:52.9: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:06:41.19 +35:34:52.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4922 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:23:17.00 +40:37:20.2: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:23:17.00 +40:37:20.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5124 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:43:37.08 +33:50:45.2: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:42:29.50 +40:57:47.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:53:50.39 +35:06:43.3: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:48:06.75 +38:07:45.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:28:16.66 +43:07:05.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:43:37.08 +33:50:45.2: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:42:29.50 +40:57:47.9: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:42:29.50 +40:57:47.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6158 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:37.08 +33:50:45.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6347 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:53:50.39 +35:06:43.3: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:48:06.75 +38:07:45.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:50.39 +35:06:43.3: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6650 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:48:06.75 +38:07:45.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7995 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:28:16.66 +43:07:05.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:16.66 +43:07:05.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:08:39.61 +34:33:12.7: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 00:46:10.25 +38:17:03.1: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:08:39.61 +34:33:12.7: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:39.61 +34:33:12.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6926 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 00:46:10.25 +38:17:03.1: 14.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:40:01.02 +33:36:19.9: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:46:10.25 +38:17:03.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2596 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0192.fits at 01:41:49.97 +35:21:11.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:40:01.02 +33:36:19.9: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:40:01.02 +33:36:19.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9889 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_And-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-44-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 01:41:49.97 +35:21:11.1: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:49.97 +35:21:11.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0630 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117847_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 117847_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:35:52.78 +40:08:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117848_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 117848_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118012_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118012_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:13.78 +37:06:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118105_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118105_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:29.94 +39:05:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118176_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118176_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:27:05.01 +38:47:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118192_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118192_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:05.13 +39:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118196_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118196_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:13:17.12 +41:12:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118200_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118200_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:15:36.37 +40:44:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118202_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118202_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:04.01 +41:47:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118210_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118210_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:02:21.40 +35:42:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118230_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118230_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118233_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118233_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:55.29 +38:43:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118237_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118237_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:31.84 +43:00:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118240_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118240_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118253_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118253_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118260_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118260_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:27:04.88 +34:39:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118263_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118263_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:00:42.43 +33:46:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118281_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118281_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:01.24 +39:14:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118285_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118285_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:38.13 +38:11:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118291_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118291_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118298_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118298_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:57:15.20 +34:51:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118329_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118329_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118330_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118330_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118332_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118332_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:25:07.43 +42:28:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118346_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118346_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118349_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118349_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:41:16.01 +36:14:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118350_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118350_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:45:48.55 +40:16:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118359_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118359_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118374_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118374_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118380_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118380_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:05:21.74 +39:16:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118393_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118393_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:05:25.85 +39:13:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118395_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118395_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:23:56.56 +39:54:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118407_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118407_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118415_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118415_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118421_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118421_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:08.87 +41:08:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118426_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118426_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:04.67 +39:03:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118430_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118430_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118452_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118452_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118493_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118493_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:34.31 +40:53:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118526_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118526_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118536_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118536_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:48.50 +41:27:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118545_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118545_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118614_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118614_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:09.24 +39:10:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118655_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118655_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:20.25 +35:33:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118715_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 118715_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89141_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 89141_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:17:44.84 +35:30:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73050_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 73050_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 74381_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:51:23.36 +34:22:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36558_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 36558_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:39:36.78 +39:20:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22436_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
Preparing report for the candidate 22436_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109890_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 109890_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58021_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273
The candidate 58021_fd_And-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_05-28-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0273 did not pass the final checks