This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2813 2461208.7813 11.82 20:02:41.48 -30:11:30.0
11.26055 -27.68701 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 1 -0 1 11.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:02:41.48 -30:11:30.0: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:02:41.48 -30:11:30.0: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7813,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2813 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2813 2461208.7813 12.40 20:27:31.26 -22:40:00.8
21.41766 -30.66560 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" SSS 110515:202731-224002
Type: UGSU
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V 19.100 CV 0.070000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:27:31.26 -22:40:00.8: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:27:31.26 -22:40:00.8: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2813* 20 27 31.26 -22 40 00.8 12.4 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SSS 110515:202731-224002,2461208.7813,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SSS 110515:202731-224002 20260617.2813 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2813 2461208.7813 13.69 19:54:30.33 -30:12:26.5
10.65547 -26.00265 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1304 Arosa -1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:30.33 -30:12:26.5: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:30.33 -30:12:26.5: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7813,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2813 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2813 2461208.7813 13.92 20:23:49.38 -27:51:51.0
15.34056 -31.45042 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.949 Hel 1 0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:49.38 -27:51:51.0: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:49.38 -27:51:51.0: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7813,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2813 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2813 2461208.7813 14.00 20:22:25.30 -23:51:56.9
19.66467 -29.94551 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.66 Maja 1 -0 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:22:25.30 -23:51:56.9: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:22:25.30 -23:51:56.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2813* 20 22 25.30 -23 51 56.9 14.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7813,14.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2813 14.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461208.78164416 17.06.2026 06:45:24.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5369
Objects passed selection criteria: 5365
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5153.75
Average stars matched: 5113.25 (99.2142 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 03:05:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
First image: 2461172.91960030 12.05.2026 10:04:03.466 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Last image: 2461208.78164416 17.06.2026 06:45:24.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48687
Objects passed selection criteria: 48610
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46786.5
Average stars matched: 45631.2 (97.5308 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 03:08:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.78097425
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0318 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l6jy4KvkMU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zeqIO4jKpT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D5Fd3xq7b9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IuYPZ1jS0M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.595150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.595150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3532 to 311.4449 deg, Dec -31.2591 to -20.5808 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5874 out of 6007 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6007 out of 7487 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3531 to 311.4448 deg, Dec -31.2697 to -20.5709 deg
Loaded 9431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5463 out of 5572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5572 out of 6777 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.2 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.l6jy4KvkMU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=7487
Got 7487 stars (including 7021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=239 n_q2=214 n_q3=259 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zeqIO4jKpT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=434, passed=6777
Got 6777 stars (including 6336 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6777 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=241 n_q2=208 n_q3=265 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D5Fd3xq7b9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5914
Got 5914 stars (including 5546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5914 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=233 n_q2=208 n_q3=263 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IuYPZ1jS0M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=5979
Got 5979 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5979 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=229 n_q2=209 n_q3=263 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.313
ref2=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.248
new1=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits sigma_overall=0.550 worst_q_ratio=1.121
new2=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.560 worst_q_ratio=1.100
reference average sigma_overall=0.5205 worst_q_ratio=1.2805
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:51.81 -27:41:13.9: 11.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:19:34.23 -22:00:46.3: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:09.34 -22:25:05.1: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:36.53 -22:26:42.4: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:09.34 -22:25:05.1: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:01:36.53 -22:26:42.4: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:19:34.23 -22:00:46.3: 11.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:51.81 -27:41:13.9: 11.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:09.34 -22:25:05.1: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4086 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:36.53 -22:26:42.4: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4544 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:34.23 -22:00:46.3: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4602 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:51.81 -27:41:13.9: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5212 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20121_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 20121_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20137_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 20137_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20139_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 20139_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20140_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 20140_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 01380_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:56.58 -29:11:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:09:38.992 -25:59:45.66
Second-epoch image center 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0318 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:09:38.112 -26:00:56.50
Second-epoch second image center 20:09:35.027 -26:01:26.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LfqEdiDcXz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QXwGF42Qdj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ERWBENt0gJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ENK684g9O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits and wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.416350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.416350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3219 to 311.5256 deg, Dec -31.2659 to -20.5417 deg
Loaded 9495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7512 out of 8123 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8123 out of 59775 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 55853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 293.3400 to 311.4447 deg, Dec -31.2749 to -20.5514 deg
Loaded 9461 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7592 out of 8135 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8135 out of 55853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
14.4 mag. Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LfqEdiDcXz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2722, passed=59771
Got 59771 stars (including 56973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.690 n_q1=249 n_q2=207 n_q3=248 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QXwGF42Qdj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2424, passed=55845
Got 55845 stars (including 53348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=248 n_q2=208 n_q3=249 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits -region wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ERWBENt0gJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1972, passed=50333
Got 50333 stars (including 48289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=246 n_q2=207 n_q3=244 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0ENK684g9O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2016, passed=50843
Got 50843 stars (including 48747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.643 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=244 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-44-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0249.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_015907_TTUQ2b1x1_1982337_34zRkY73/wcs_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:45.69 -29:54:54.2: 13.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:09:22.64 -24:09:57.8: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:16:41.68 -24:53:21.4: 13.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:04:02.02 -30:16:19.2: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:01.11 -28:11:59.7: 13.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:49:47.39 -26:45:25.5: 13.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:17:30.56 -27:31:00.9: 13.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:22:24.48 -21:46:11.4: 13.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:57.46 -29:13:57.0: 12.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:45.99 -25:51:35.0: 13.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:45.69 -29:54:54.2: 13.31 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:45.69 -29:54:54.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2980 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:09:22.64 -24:09:57.8: 12.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:49:47.39 -26:45:25.5: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:57.46 -29:13:57.0: 12.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:01.11 -28:11:59.7: 13.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:22:24.48 -21:46:11.4: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:22.64 -24:09:57.8: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0099 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:17:30.56 -27:31:00.9: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:16:41.68 -24:53:21.4: 13.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:45.99 -25:51:35.0: 13.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:47.39 -26:45:25.5: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3558 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:04:02.02 -30:16:19.2: 13.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:01.11 -28:11:59.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4601 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:57.46 -29:13:57.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1212 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:24.48 -21:46:11.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4959 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:30.56 -27:31:00.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9749 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:45.99 -25:51:35.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3352 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:41.68 -24:53:21.4: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3665 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:02.02 -30:16:19.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6361 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:16:19.66 -24:51:23.4: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:02:41.48 -30:11:30.0: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:37.44 -26:07:41.7: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:09.94 -29:11:49.5: 11.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:15:02.57 -28:28:09.1: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:27:31.26 -22:40:00.8: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:24.34 -23:19:04.8: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:52.69 -27:54:14.5: 13.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:11.03 -25:17:50.0: 13.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:16:19.66 -24:51:23.4: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:15:02.57 -28:28:09.1: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:37.44 -26:07:41.7: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:27:31.26 -22:40:00.8: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:02:41.48 -30:11:30.0: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:19.66 -24:51:23.4: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1647 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:09.94 -29:11:49.5: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:37.44 -26:07:41.7: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9420 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:02.57 -28:28:09.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5473 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:09.94 -29:11:49.5: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9624 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:52.69 -27:54:14.5: 13.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:52.69 -27:54:14.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6013 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:24.34 -23:19:04.8: 13.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:24.34 -23:19:04.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3001 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:11.03 -25:17:50.0: 13.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:11.03 -25:17:50.0: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3297 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:07:23.60 -22:48:44.1: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:22:00.18 -27:24:54.9: 14.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:30.33 -30:12:26.5: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:09.36 -29:41:43.2: 14.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:49.38 -27:51:51.0: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:07:23.60 -22:48:44.1: 14.15 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:23.60 -22:48:44.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6706 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:28:17.01 -22:32:50.5: 14.22 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:50:57.14 -22:48:39.2: 14.97 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:11:18.36 -28:25:08.8: 14.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:22:00.18 -27:24:54.9: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:30.33 -30:12:26.5: 14.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:00.18 -27:24:54.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8540 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:49.38 -27:51:51.0: 14.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:09.36 -29:41:43.2: 14.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:09.36 -29:41:43.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7488 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:28:17.01 -22:32:50.5: 14.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:50:57.14 -22:48:39.2: 14.64 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:28:17.01 -22:32:50.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8836 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:50:57.14 -22:48:39.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.8601 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:11:18.36 -28:25:08.8: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:18.36 -28:25:08.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7108 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:59:47.04 -21:48:22.1: 13.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:04:06.48 -28:14:37.8: 14.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:24.78 -30:00:21.8: 14.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:59:47.04 -21:48:22.1: 13.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:47.04 -21:48:22.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8393 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:17.07 -27:05:08.6: 14.25 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:37.80 -29:43:34.4: 13.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:04:06.48 -28:14:37.8: 14.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:06.48 -28:14:37.8: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9289 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:24.78 -30:00:21.8: 14.50 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:24.78 -30:00:21.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.8547 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:17.07 -27:05:08.6: 14.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:17.07 -27:05:08.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8250 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:37.80 -29:43:34.4: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:37.80 -29:43:34.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7885 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:23:16.24 -28:51:28.0: 13.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:40:27.53 -27:29:50.4: 13.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:07.12 -27:59:48.7: 14.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:23:16.24 -28:51:28.0: 14.08 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:16.24 -28:51:28.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9825 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:45:15.14 -22:26:12.8: 14.52 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:43:29.17 -28:44:58.6: 13.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:00:40.82 -28:14:32.8: 14.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:40:27.53 -27:29:50.4: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:27.53 -27:29:50.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8250 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:07.12 -27:59:48.7: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:07.12 -27:59:48.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8823 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:45:15.14 -22:26:12.8: 14.64 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:15.14 -22:26:12.8: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9369 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:43:29.17 -28:44:58.6: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:29.17 -28:44:58.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8667 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:00:40.82 -28:14:32.8: 14.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:40.82 -28:14:32.8: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8740 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:52:23.97 -29:53:11.3: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:22:25.30 -23:51:56.9: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:25:39.22 -24:05:40.5: 14.33 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:52:23.97 -29:53:11.3: 13.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:23.97 -29:53:11.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8531 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:51:32.47 -27:35:17.6: 14.45 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:44:47.93 -25:17:03.2: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:22:25.30 -23:51:56.9: 15.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:25:39.22 -24:05:40.5: 14.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:39.22 -24:05:40.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9827 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:51:32.47 -27:35:17.6: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:08:19.81 -23:09:22.0: 14.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:32.47 -27:35:17.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9462 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:44:47.93 -25:17:03.2: 14.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:47.93 -25:17:03.2: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7801 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:55:10.77 -24:55:00.2: 14.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:08:19.81 -23:09:22.0: 14.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:19.81 -23:09:22.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9956 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:42:22.07 -23:37:52.6: 14.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:55:10.77 -24:55:00.2: 13.87 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:10.77 -24:55:00.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9300 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:49.68 -21:59:51.6: 13.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:58:19.15 -29:55:56.6: 14.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:42:22.07 -23:37:52.6: 14.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:22.07 -23:37:52.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9280 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:49.68 -21:59:51.6: 14.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:49.68 -21:59:51.6: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0333 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:58:19.15 -29:55:56.6: 14.47 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:56.32 -27:13:27.2: 14.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:19.15 -29:55:56.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.0516 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:53:52.08 -30:02:01.8: 14.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:56.32 -27:13:27.2: 14.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:56.32 -27:13:27.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8374 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 20:01:54.76 -22:54:23.1: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:53:52.08 -30:02:01.8: 13.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:52.08 -30:02:01.8: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0769 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:46:31.72 -24:30:40.0: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 20:01:54.76 -22:54:23.1: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:54.76 -22:54:23.1: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8678 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:54:04.20 -23:46:07.3: 14.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:46:31.72 -24:30:40.0: 14.80 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-04-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0446.fits at 19:41:30.80 -27:28:55.3: 14.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:31.72 -24:30:40.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.9937 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:54:04.20 -23:46:07.3: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:04.20 -23:46:07.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0950 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_05-02-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0447.fits at 19:41:30.80 -27:28:55.3: 14.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:30.80 -27:28:55.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.0259 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72925.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72789.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72893.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72727_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72727_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72738_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72738_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72748_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72748_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72749_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72749_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72751_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72751_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72752_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72752_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72754_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72754_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72756_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72756_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72759_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72759_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72760_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72760_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72761_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72761_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72766_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72766_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72768_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72768_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72769_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72769_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72789_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
Preparing report for the candidate 72789_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72798_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72798_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:09.03 -28:46:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72801_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
Preparing report for the candidate 72801_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72812_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72812_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:03:01.21 -22:19:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72814_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72814_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:39.29 -24:13:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72835_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72835_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:17.09 -27:05:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72846_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72846_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72847_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72847_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72858_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72858_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:59:58.10 -22:58:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72860_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72860_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72863_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72863_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:55.45 -22:18:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72882_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72882_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72891_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
Preparing report for the candidate 72891_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72893_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
Preparing report for the candidate 72893_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72894_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72894_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72897_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72897_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72915_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72915_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72925_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72925_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:57.14 -22:48:39.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.524 6863983812101178240 297.73740978070 -22.81056344732 13.4118 12.2692 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.524#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72933_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72933_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72936_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72936_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72940_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72940_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72947_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72947_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72952_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72952_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72961_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72961_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72963_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72963_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72966_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72966_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72967_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72967_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72971_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72971_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72976_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72976_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72977_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72977_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72997_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 72997_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72999_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
Preparing report for the candidate 72999_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73001_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73001_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73008_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73008_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73010_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73010_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73011_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73011_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73020_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73020_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73021_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73021_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73022_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73022_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73028_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73028_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73030_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73030_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73034_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73034_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73059_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73059_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73060_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73060_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73066_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73066_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:48:13.38 -23:49:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73097_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73097_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73112_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73112_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73125_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 73125_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 11495_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:29:04.22 -28:31:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250
The candidate 08080_fd_Cap-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_01-45-24_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0250 did not pass the final checks