This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2478 2461208.7478 12.83 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3
3.79881 46.51415 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 1 0 1 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3: 15.85 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.85 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2478* 15 19 19.75 +01 52 18.3 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7478,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2478 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2478 2461208.7478 14.55 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4
1.02408 48.64665 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2478* 15 07 58.71 +01 48 15.4 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7478,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2478 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2478 2461208.7478 14.85 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1
0.22132 38.59739 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.7" and 10.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7478,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2478 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461208.74806612 17.06.2026 05:57:02.913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6330
Objects passed selection criteria: 6327
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6025
Average stars matched: 5850 (97.0954 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112424 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 01:43:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
First image: 2461172.79409781 12.05.2026 07:03:20.051 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Last image: 2461208.74806612 17.06.2026 05:57:02.913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 123
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38215
Objects passed selection criteria: 38161
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40814.2
Average stars matched: 35612.8 (87.2557 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144532 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 01:45:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Ser-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Ser-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Ser-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 163789 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 163789 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits_preview.png'
Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
renamed 'Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.png' -> 'transient_report/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits_preview.png'
Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 634.1552
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 478.8377
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1124.8201
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 507.8041
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1124.5352
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 507.3251
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.77373
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2299995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.4200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.74755047
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sRi4vFG4rV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lUcfdwH3Ra
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g4Mp0FO9Nj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hgHCsrWJr1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5808 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2613 deg
Loaded 4367 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3741 out of 3883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3883 out of 7872 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to +3.2636 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5849 to 239.3174 deg, Dec -7.2524 to 3.2636 deg
Loaded 4371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3740 out of 3886 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3886 out of 7902 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.4 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.4 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sRi4vFG4rV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7872
Got 7872 stars (including 7376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.686 n_q1=256 n_q2=255 n_q3=227 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.480
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lUcfdwH3Ra (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=7902
Got 7902 stars (including 7404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.660 n_q1=254 n_q2=258 n_q3=223 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.519
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g4Mp0FO9Nj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=507, passed=7187
Got 7187 stars (including 6674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7025 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=246 n_q2=259 n_q3=221 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.498
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hgHCsrWJr1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, passed=7178
Got 7178 stars (including 6712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7178 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=250 n_q2=253 n_q3=222 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.763
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.463 worst_q_ratio=1.480
ref2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.519
new1=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.498
new2=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.763
reference average sigma_overall=0.4485 worst_q_ratio=1.4995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:36:04.20 -00:06:56.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:23:06.70 -04:15:01.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:28:45.92 -01:34:51.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:36:04.20 -00:06:56.0: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:04.20 -00:06:56.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2726 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:23:06.70 -04:15:01.3: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:28:45.92 -01:34:51.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:06.70 -04:15:01.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2728 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:45.92 -01:34:51.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2653 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 20356_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 20357_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20359_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 20359_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:42.825 -01:59:55.09
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:43.015 -01:59:48.51
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.513 -01:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hx6ZFK1Lsy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cRwMgph85f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FwbrrQqsrU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Pl4QAzVx3p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.657400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.657400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44768 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to +3.2655 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5637 to 239.3007 deg, Dec -7.2623 to 3.2655 deg
Loaded 4374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3590 out of 3908 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3908 out of 44768 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 44929 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to +3.2684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5762 to 239.3172 deg, Dec -7.2589 to 3.2684 deg
Loaded 4375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3591 out of 3912 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3912 out of 44929 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
2.4 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.4 pix Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Hx6ZFK1Lsy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2413, passed=44762
Got 44762 stars (including 42284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44762 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44446 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=265 n_q2=244 n_q3=236 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.570
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cRwMgph85f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2430, passed=44919
Got 44919 stars (including 42424 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.685 n_q1=267 n_q2=248 n_q3=232 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.689
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FwbrrQqsrU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2840, passed=52111
Got 52111 stars (including 49171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=277 n_q2=235 n_q3=238 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.423
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Pl4QAzVx3p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=2772, passed=51536
Got 51536 stars (including 48655 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51536 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.538 n_q1=276 n_q2=240 n_q3=232 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.532
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-56-18_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_012903_TTUQ2b1x1_2737047_Mkn3pJsG/wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:30:18.01 -04:51:20.1: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:53.12 -02:17:40.1: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:45:44.25 +01:00:09.4: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:57.05 -02:00:02.7: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:43:03.08 -00:33:09.2: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:43:42.83 +01:09:55.8: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:15:49.36 -03:08:53.6: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:26.59 -01:08:39.6: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:43.93 -02:24:03.9: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:44:01.62 +00:58:02.4: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:30:18.01 -04:51:20.1: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:18.01 -04:51:20.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3603 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:53.12 -02:17:40.1: 14.87 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:53.12 -02:17:40.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5293 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:43:03.08 -00:33:09.2: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:03.08 -00:33:09.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5671 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:43.93 -02:24:03.9: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:57.05 -02:00:02.7: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:43.93 -02:24:03.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4981 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:43:42.83 +01:09:55.8: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:57.05 -02:00:02.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5919 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:26.59 -01:08:39.6: 15.30 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:15:49.36 -03:08:53.6: 14.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:45:44.25 +01:00:09.4: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:44:01.62 +00:58:02.4: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:26.59 -01:08:39.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6839 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:44.25 +01:00:09.4: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2882 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:49.36 -03:08:53.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7572 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:01.62 +00:58:02.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6051 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:42.83 +01:09:55.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5075 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:32:30.78 -05:26:58.6: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:31:59.03 -03:56:32.0: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:22:09.20 +00:40:31.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:28:44.82 -05:34:17.7: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:22:05.02 -00:23:21.0: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3: 15.85 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:32:30.78 -05:26:58.6: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:30.78 -05:26:58.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1668 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:31:59.03 -03:56:32.0: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:22:09.20 +00:40:31.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:09.20 +00:40:31.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7872 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:59.03 -03:56:32.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0075 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:28:44.82 -05:34:17.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:44.82 -05:34:17.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8614 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:22:05.02 -00:23:21.0: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:05.02 -00:23:21.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2836 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.85 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:19:19.75 +01:52:18.3: ref_mag=15.85 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=12.8285 delta=3.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:45:21.00 -05:29:04.2: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:18:52.38 +02:03:55.3: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:13:41.52 -00:57:12.4: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:07:58.71 +01:48:15.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:24:01.51 -00:50:02.0: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:45:21.00 -05:29:04.2: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:18:52.38 +02:03:55.3: 14.54 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:21.00 -05:29:04.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3179 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:52.38 +02:03:55.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5227 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:13:41.52 -00:57:12.4: 14.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:41.52 -00:57:12.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6373 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:26:20.84 -05:16:19.6: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:34:43.22 -05:07:48.7: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:24:01.51 -00:50:02.0: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:01.51 -00:50:02.0: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5832 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:28:47.52 -03:51:37.4: 15.37 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:43:07.22 -03:17:16.1: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:32:42.01 +01:30:18.0: 14.96 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:34:43.22 -05:07:48.7: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:26:20.84 -05:16:19.6: 15.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:37:06.30 -00:59:48.2: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:26:34.92 -01:01:31.4: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:43.22 -05:07:48.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6896 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:20.84 -05:16:19.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6620 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:28:47.52 -03:51:37.4: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:47.52 -03:51:37.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7482 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:43:07.22 -03:17:16.1: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:07.22 -03:17:16.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6287 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:26:34.92 -01:01:31.4: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:34.92 -01:01:31.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7358 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:37:06.30 -00:59:48.2: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:32:42.01 +01:30:18.0: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:06.30 -00:59:48.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6435 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:11.76 +01:06:04.6: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:42.01 +01:30:18.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6919 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:44:02.19 +01:23:17.1: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:11.76 +01:06:04.6: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:11.76 +01:06:04.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6029 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:26:51.08 -03:58:48.3: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:37:27.28 -00:50:45.9: 14.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:44:02.19 +01:23:17.1: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:39:25.91 +01:42:31.0: 15.44 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:38:13.37 -03:12:43.9: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:02.19 +01:23:17.1: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6745 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:35:11.84 +00:34:49.5: 15.49 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:37:27.28 -00:50:45.9: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:27.28 -00:50:45.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7071 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:26:51.08 -03:58:48.3: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:51.08 -03:58:48.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7751 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:38:13.37 -03:12:43.9: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:13.37 -03:12:43.9: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7892 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:35:11.84 +00:34:49.5: 15.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:41:13.77 -02:20:20.6: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:11.84 +00:34:49.5: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7771 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:39:25.91 +01:42:31.0: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:25.91 +01:42:31.0: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8228 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:41:13.77 -02:20:20.6: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:13.77 -02:20:20.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7147 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:32:38.14 -05:59:09.7: 15.32 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:36:45.00 -05:14:43.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:38:51.50 +02:02:46.1: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:32:38.14 -05:59:09.7: 15.52 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:38.14 -05:59:09.7: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8965 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:52:30.71 -02:18:23.3: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:38:21.54 -00:13:39.2: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:39:56.99 -01:10:52.4: 15.29 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:38:51.50 +02:02:46.1: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:51.50 +02:02:46.1: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8618 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:42:09.43 -03:44:40.2: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:38:21.54 -00:13:39.2: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:21.54 -00:13:39.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7969 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:39:56.99 -01:10:52.4: 15.83 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:56.99 -01:10:52.4: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8710 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:52:30.71 -02:18:23.3: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:30.71 -02:18:23.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7075 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:51:03.07 -03:04:35.4: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:42:09.43 -03:44:40.2: 15.38 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:09.43 -03:44:40.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8533 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:45.95 -05:19:44.3: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:51:03.07 -03:04:35.4: 15.22 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:03.07 -03:04:35.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6945 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:46:13.35 -05:58:03.1: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:45.95 -05:19:44.3: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:45.95 -05:19:44.3: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7076 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:52:11.70 -04:35:12.3: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:45:58.73 -00:06:14.5: 15.12 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:48:21.24 -00:48:13.5: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:46:13.35 -05:58:03.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:13.35 -05:58:03.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7528 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-03-20_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits at 15:52:00.29 -01:28:57.6: 15.08 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:52:11.70 -04:35:12.3: 15.18 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:11.70 -04:35:12.3: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7384 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:45:58.73 -00:06:14.5: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:48:21.24 -00:48:13.5: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:58.73 -00:06:14.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8837 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:21.24 -00:48:13.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8949 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-04-06_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0254.fits at 15:52:00.29 -01:28:57.6: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:00.29 -01:28:57.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5101 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53828.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53193_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53200_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53201_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53201_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53206_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53209_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53219_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53219_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53221_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53222_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53230_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53235_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53249_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53254_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53267_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53270_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:37.26 -01:38:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53275_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:32.65 -04:41:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53276_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53276_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53277_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53277_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:00.96 +01:24:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53280_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 53280_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53828_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
Preparing report for the candidate 53828_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54559_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 54559_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54859_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 54859_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:03.04 -04:54:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54963_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 54963_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55417_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 55417_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55505_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
Preparing report for the candidate 55505_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55829_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 55829_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55924_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 55924_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55988_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 55988_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56033_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56033_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56051_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56051_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56106_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56106_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56109_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56109_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56123_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56123_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56365_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56365_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56567_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56567_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56749_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 56749_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57025_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57025_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57107_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57107_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57114_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57114_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57135_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57135_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57203_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57203_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57233_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57233_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57271_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57271_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57324_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57324_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57432_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57432_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57444_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57444_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57449_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57449_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57475_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57475_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57705_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57705_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57768_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57768_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57798_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57798_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57822_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57822_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57854_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57854_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57922_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
Preparing report for the candidate 57922_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57965_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 57965_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58035_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58035_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58184_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58184_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58216_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58216_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58231_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58231_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58254_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58254_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58329_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58329_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58350_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58350_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58387_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58387_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58542_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58542_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58755_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58755_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58848_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58848_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58850_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58850_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58862_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 58862_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59176_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207
The candidate 59176_Ser-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-57-02_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0207 did not pass the final checks
