This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2377 2461208.7377 14.61 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3
18.40492 64.01639 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.8" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7377,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2377 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2377 2461208.7377 14.81 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7
6.78580 65.97983 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7377,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2377 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last image: 2461208.73802009 17.06.2026 05:42:34.936 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4923
Objects passed selection criteria: 4921
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4700.5
Average stars matched: 4551 (96.8195 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 02:49:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last image: 2461208.73802009 17.06.2026 05:42:34.936 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27105
Objects passed selection criteria: 27061
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30958.8
Average stars matched: 25371.8 (81.9534 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 02:51:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Boo-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 660868 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 660868 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits_preview.png'
Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
renamed 'Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits_preview.png'
Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 513.4187
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.1084
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 981.3974
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 521.7167
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 981.8187
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 521.6639
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.9115
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.73745741
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0011 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01727 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ugdIrL8VDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MrGfxBBV6j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PvEbE5uLn1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i8qbWSfQbo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2632 deg
Loaded 3960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3337 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3337 out of 6128 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.2 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.2 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.2 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ugdIrL8VDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=6086
Got 6086 stars (including 5750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=233 n_q2=251 n_q3=248 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MrGfxBBV6j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=6128
Got 6128 stars (including 5817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=240 n_q2=243 n_q3=248 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PvEbE5uLn1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, passed=5763
Got 5763 stars (including 5389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=247 n_q2=244 n_q3=244 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i8qbWSfQbo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5702
Got 5702 stars (including 5335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5702 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=246 n_q2=245 n_q3=238 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.216
new2=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.234
reference average sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.1825
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:19:13.47 +14:54:56.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:21:05.78 +14:28:02.8: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:15:47.76 +12:11:44.1: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:17:20.14 +14:07:16.7: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:15:47.76 +12:11:44.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:21:05.78 +14:28:02.8: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:19:13.47 +14:54:56.8: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:47.76 +12:11:44.1: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3884 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:05.78 +14:28:02.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2939 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:17:20.14 +14:07:16.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:13.47 +14:54:56.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3558 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:20.14 +14:07:16.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3746 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 20288_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20289_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 20289_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20290_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 20290_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20291_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 20291_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0011 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:13:19.923 +13:59:59.72
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:17.309 +14:00:48.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01727 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cg8fXqiBf8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XuxE3bAHLO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HtE8MDciIp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pSwhdNbPp0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 31729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2673 deg
Loaded 3962 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3128 out of 3348 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3348 out of 31729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.2 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
2.4 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.3 pix Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Cg8fXqiBf8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1413, passed=32192
Got 32192 stars (including 30735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32192 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=237 n_q2=239 n_q3=252 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XuxE3bAHLO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1394, passed=31725
Got 31725 stars (including 30282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.554 n_q1=243 n_q2=230 n_q3=262 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HtE8MDciIp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1852, passed=42349
Got 42349 stars (including 40400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=249 n_q2=224 n_q3=266 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pSwhdNbPp0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1852, passed=42405
Got 42405 stars (including 40462 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42405 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=253 n_q2=220 n_q3=263 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-41-46_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_011705_TTUQ2b1x1_584505_4Dh2CC89/wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:58.22 +15:49:42.5: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:40:30.11 +14:18:48.5: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:21:20.40 +10:28:06.6: 15.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:32:46.91 +13:30:54.1: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:21.94 +18:05:36.1: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:10:22.83 +13:54:09.7: 14.90 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:32:29.81 +14:35:46.5: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:31:44.33 +10:20:52.7: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:18:02.92 +14:07:50.0: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:06:55.15 +11:47:23.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:58.22 +15:49:42.5: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:40:30.11 +14:18:48.5: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:58.22 +15:49:42.5: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2973 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:30.11 +14:18:48.5: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2465 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:21:20.40 +10:28:06.6: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:32:46.91 +13:30:54.1: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:10:22.83 +13:54:09.7: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:21.94 +18:05:36.1: 14.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:32:29.81 +14:35:46.5: 14.81 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:46.91 +13:30:54.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5470 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:20.40 +10:28:06.6: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9669 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:18:02.92 +14:07:50.0: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:31:44.33 +10:20:52.7: 14.74 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:21.94 +18:05:36.1: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8541 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:22.83 +13:54:09.7: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6691 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:29.81 +14:35:46.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6746 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:02.92 +14:07:50.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2042 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:44.33 +10:20:52.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7590 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:06:55.15 +11:47:23.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:55.15 +11:47:23.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4637 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:23:40.34 +11:37:54.6: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:00:04.36 +14:20:56.3: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:26:20.58 +11:08:15.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:23:40.34 +11:37:54.6: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:40.34 +11:37:54.6: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6532 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:26:20.58 +11:08:15.2: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:00:04.36 +14:20:56.3: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:20.58 +11:08:15.2: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0077 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:04.36 +14:20:56.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0387 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:22.79 +14:01:02.6: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:37:29.44 +18:11:06.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:12:48.00 +13:23:47.9: 15.77 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:11:58.77 +16:40:41.3: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:23:37.81 +17:23:35.3: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:22.79 +14:01:02.6: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:22.79 +14:01:02.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7000 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:37:13.71 +17:26:23.5: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:26:44.24 +16:04:58.1: 15.93 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:33:37.18 +09:53:53.7: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:12:48.00 +13:23:47.9: 15.94 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.84 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:12:48.00 +13:23:47.9: ref_mag=15.84 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9464 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:23:37.81 +17:23:35.3: 15.83 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:11:58.77 +16:40:41.3: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:20:23.51 +17:22:54.5: 15.25 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:23:37.81 +17:23:35.3: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9126 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:58.77 +16:40:41.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9386 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:37:13.71 +17:26:23.5: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:13.71 +17:26:23.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6214 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:26:44.24 +16:04:58.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:33:37.18 +09:53:53.7: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:20:17.98 +14:53:00.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.93 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 14:26:44.24 +16:04:58.1: ref_mag=15.93 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.9058 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:37.18 +09:53:53.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8341 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:20:23.51 +17:22:54.5: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:20:23.51 +17:22:54.5: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9921 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:19:43.55 +10:46:35.0: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:28:52.18 +10:18:54.5: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:33:56.50 +14:39:26.1: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:19:43.55 +10:46:35.0: 15.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:19:43.55 +10:46:35.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8764 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:07.29 +14:51:43.5: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:58.40 +15:04:38.7: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:28:52.18 +10:18:54.5: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:33:56.50 +14:39:26.1: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:28:52.18 +10:18:54.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9406 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:56.50 +14:39:26.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8831 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:58.40 +15:04:38.7: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:07.29 +14:51:43.5: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:58.40 +15:04:38.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9471 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:07.29 +14:51:43.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out57818.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55349.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57919.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51944_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51944_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51945_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51945_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51958_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51958_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51960_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51960_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51977_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51977_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51987_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51987_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51990_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51990_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51994_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51994_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51999_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 51999_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52002_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 52002_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52003_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 52003_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52005_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 52005_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:37.31 +18:01:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52218_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 52218_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53312_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53312_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:20:06.66 +15:19:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53372_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53372_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:05.65 +13:16:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53564_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53564_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53649_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:23:14.68 +10:34:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53815_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53931_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 53931_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54153_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 54153_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54310_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 54310_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54413_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 54413_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55349_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 55349_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55495_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 55495_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55549_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 55549_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55595_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 55595_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56022_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56022_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56244_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56244_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56269_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56269_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56462_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56462_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56490_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56490_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56663_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56663_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56732_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56732_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56796_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56796_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56867_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56867_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56917_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56917_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56924_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 56924_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57133_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 57133_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57352_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 57352_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57470_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 57470_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57818_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 57818_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:26:44.24 +16:04:58.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57919_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 57919_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58152_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58152_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58182_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58182_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58347_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58347_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58415_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58415_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58789_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58789_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58821_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58821_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58856_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 58856_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59002_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 59002_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59189_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 59189_Boo-09-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-42-34_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks