This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2402 2461208.7402 11.52 19:10:22.50 -27:00:49.6
10.26986 -15.81610 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -0 -1 1 11.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:22.50 -27:00:49.6: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:22.50 -27:00:49.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7402,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2402 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2402 2461208.7402 11.75 19:28:36.43 -25:59:26.7
12.87677 -19.20795 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis 0 -0 0 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:28:36.43 -25:59:26.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:28:36.43 -25:59:26.7: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7402,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2402 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2402 2461208.7402 12.63 19:22:50.62 -25:04:59.9
13.25244 -17.66307 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne 0 0 0 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:22:50.62 -25:04:59.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:22:50.62 -25:04:59.9: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7402,12.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2402 12.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2402 2461208.7402 12.50 19:05:40.09 -27:07:44.2
9.73539 -14.89659 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa 0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:05:40.09 -27:07:44.2: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:40.09 -27:07:44.2: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7402,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2402 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2402 2461208.7402 12.15 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9
12.56516 -16.33504 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V1259 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.600 pg < 15.600 pg 2425816.00000 273.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1259 Sgr,2461208.7402,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1259 Sgr 20260617.2402 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461208.74051473 17.06.2026 05:46:10.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8158
Objects passed selection criteria: 8156
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8035.5
Average stars matched: 7049.25 (87.7263 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 01:00:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461208.74051473 17.06.2026 05:46:10.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 162
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 67 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 96822
Objects passed selection criteria: 96721
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 95814.8
Average stars matched: 80728.5 (84.2548 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1885272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 01:04:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Sgr-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Sgr-05-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 75152 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 75152 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.png' -> 'transient_report/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits_preview.png'
Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
renamed 'Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.png' -> 'transient_report/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits_preview.png'
Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2543.3678
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 688.0670
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3118.1764
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 889.9995
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 3103.2266
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 885.8916
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.226
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4599990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.73997983
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01621 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z1LLnZRG4H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ldPhwbyYLn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aWp86fXABN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sWAfxfgu3H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z1LLnZRG4H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=248 n_q2=168 n_q3=254 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ldPhwbyYLn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=249 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aWp86fXABN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, passed=8277
Got 8277 stars (including 7581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=248 n_q2=210 n_q3=210 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sWAfxfgu3H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8397
Got 8397 stars (including 7712 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=249 n_q2=202 n_q3=213 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.654 worst_q_ratio=1.119
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.577 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.567 worst_q_ratio=1.232
new2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.536 worst_q_ratio=1.258
reference average sigma_overall=0.6155 worst_q_ratio=1.195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:21:23.78 -22:20:03.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:21:23.78 -22:20:03.2: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:23.78 -22:20:03.2: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2328 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23814_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23814_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:11.19 -28:46:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23818_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23818_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23821_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23821_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.71 -26:20:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23824_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23824_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.48 -22:34:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23830_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23830_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:33.01 -29:04:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23831_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23831_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22031_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.38 -28:51:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:11:58.360 -25:59:49.28
Second-epoch second image center 19:11:55.099 -25:59:10.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01621 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c9dM4cXdne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1QyxzyUVr0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uYgZvzrAau
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aid9zncdjR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.c9dM4cXdne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 80016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=267 n_q2=176 n_q3=221 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1QyxzyUVr0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uYgZvzrAau (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=7123, passed=103389
Got 103389 stars (including 96084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103389 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101020 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.720 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.524 n_q1=265 n_q2=215 n_q3=185 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aid9zncdjR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=7105, passed=103213
Got 103213 stars (including 95942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 103213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=258 n_q2=214 n_q3=185 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-45-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005510_TTUQ2b1x1_1430396_jGx5C2am/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:57.52 -28:13:23.1: 12.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:32.37 -24:22:35.4: 13.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:31.74 -24:29:39.0: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:40:54.27 -28:39:45.1: 12.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:22.39 -29:10:20.1: 13.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:21.52 -28:23:15.0: 13.15 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:39.86 -24:04:36.7: 13.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:54.43 -28:24:38.6: 13.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:31.74 -24:29:39.0: 13.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:32.37 -24:22:35.4: 12.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:31.74 -24:29:39.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4273 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:32.37 -24:22:35.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1673 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:57.52 -28:13:23.1: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:22.39 -29:10:20.1: 13.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:57.52 -28:13:23.1: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1222 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:14:03.63 -26:40:13.3: 13.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:22.39 -29:10:20.1: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4598 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:05:42.07 -28:11:35.1: 13.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:40:54.27 -28:39:45.1: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:54.27 -28:39:45.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3771 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:21.52 -28:23:15.0: 13.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:39.86 -24:04:36.7: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:21.52 -28:23:15.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2670 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:54.43 -28:24:38.6: 13.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:39.86 -24:04:36.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1821 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:54.43 -28:24:38.6: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2925 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:14:03.63 -26:40:13.3: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:42.07 -28:11:35.1: 13.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:42.07 -28:11:35.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4718 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:14:03.63 -26:40:13.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4560 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:48.09 -23:32:52.0: 12.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:08:29.23 -26:18:41.7: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:12.83 -29:00:56.1: 13.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:37.57 -29:23:01.6: 13.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:42.79 -25:00:14.8: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:31.82 -29:53:01.3: 13.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:53.60 -24:32:58.1: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:12.83 -29:00:56.1: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:48.09 -23:32:52.0: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:29.23 -26:18:41.7: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:37.57 -29:23:01.6: 13.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:48.09 -23:32:52.0: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8772 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:12.83 -29:00:56.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4997 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:29.23 -26:18:41.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4748 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:37.57 -29:23:01.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2383 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:27.71 -27:44:48.7: 12.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:42.79 -25:00:14.8: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:42.79 -25:00:14.8: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0897 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:57.39 -24:58:26.4: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:53.60 -24:32:58.1: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:53.60 -24:32:58.1: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2905 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:31.82 -29:53:01.3: 13.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:31.82 -29:53:01.3: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0238 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:27.71 -27:44:48.7: 12.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:27.71 -27:44:48.7: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8776 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:57.39 -24:58:26.4: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:57.39 -24:58:26.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4329 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:15:19.87 -22:57:22.9: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:47.85 -25:06:44.2: 12.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:59.41 -22:33:08.2: 12.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:42.07 -27:18:07.0: 12.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:23.08 -25:09:58.7: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:04:22.30 -28:50:58.0: 12.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:14.77 -28:36:28.2: 12.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:12.44 -26:44:24.3: 12.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:15:19.87 -22:57:22.9: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:19.87 -22:57:22.9: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1328 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:47.85 -25:06:44.2: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:47.85 -25:06:44.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9415 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:59.41 -22:33:08.2: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:23.08 -25:09:58.7: 12.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:42.07 -27:18:07.0: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:59.41 -22:33:08.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8156 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.08 -25:09:58.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1662 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:42.07 -27:18:07.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8128 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:04.17 -27:05:52.4: 12.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:18.64 -29:07:22.8: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:14.77 -28:36:28.2: 12.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:14.77 -28:36:28.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8684 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:04:22.30 -28:50:58.0: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:22.30 -28:50:58.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9672 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:12.44 -26:44:24.3: 12.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:12.44 -26:44:24.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9917 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:04.17 -27:05:52.4: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:04.17 -27:05:52.4: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7926 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:18.64 -29:07:22.8: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:18.64 -29:07:22.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1079 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:07:11.29 -29:40:37.8: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:26:51.38 -24:39:00.0: 12.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:02.68 -22:02:29.3: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:33.59 -30:06:12.6: 12.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:25.59 -29:00:19.0: 12.57 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:35.77 -26:54:02.1: 12.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:28:23.15 -22:19:33.2: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:43.04 -28:29:24.0: 12.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:07:11.29 -29:40:37.8: 12.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:11.29 -29:40:37.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8364 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:26:51.38 -24:39:00.0: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:02.68 -22:02:29.3: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:51.38 -24:39:00.0: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9890 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:02.68 -22:02:29.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4952 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:33.59 -30:06:12.6: 12.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:33.59 -30:06:12.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8074 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:25.59 -29:00:19.0: 12.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:49.1: 12.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:25.59 -29:00:19.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6402 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:13:15.29 -22:15:56.2: 12.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:35.77 -26:54:02.1: 12.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:28:23.15 -22:19:33.2: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:35.77 -26:54:02.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4119 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:23.15 -22:19:33.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6931 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:43.04 -28:29:24.0: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:43.04 -28:29:24.0: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2805 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:49.1: 12.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.03 -22:04:49.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4367 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:13:15.29 -22:15:56.2: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:13:15.29 -22:15:56.2: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4868 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:30.93 -27:10:10.1: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:33.79 -23:44:31.7: 11.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:07.00 -24:24:39.9: 11.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:28:36.43 -25:59:26.7: 14.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:22.50 -27:00:49.6: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:20.45 -27:25:41.3: 12.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:33.79 -23:44:31.7: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:33.79 -23:44:31.7: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0795 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:28:36.43 -25:59:26.7: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:07.00 -24:24:39.9: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:30.93 -27:10:10.1: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:07.00 -24:24:39.9: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5643 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:22:50.62 -25:04:59.9: 14.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:30.93 -27:10:10.1: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2770 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:22.50 -27:00:49.6: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:20.45 -27:25:41.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:05:40.09 -27:07:44.2: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:54.54 -26:23:02.8: 12.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:20.45 -27:25:41.3: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2341 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:22:50.62 -25:04:59.9: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:05:40.09 -27:07:44.2: 15.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:54.54 -26:23:02.8: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:54.54 -26:23:02.8: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4639 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:49.03 -27:20:57.4: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:10.99 -26:11:27.5: 13.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:49.03 -27:20:57.4: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:31.14 -25:00:04.4: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:20:16.28 -28:17:41.4: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:10.99 -26:11:27.5: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:10.99 -26:11:27.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9863 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:31.14 -25:00:04.4: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:20:16.28 -28:17:41.4: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:31.14 -25:00:04.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8237 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:52:24.06 -29:57:26.7: 13.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:19.17 -28:11:03.4: 13.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:52:24.06 -29:57:26.7: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:24.06 -29:57:26.7: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2229 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:57:15.47 -23:48:24.1: 13.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:41.18 -29:26:58.6: 13.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:13.99 -29:19:28.5: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:19.17 -28:11:03.4: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:15.47 -23:48:24.1: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:15.47 -23:48:24.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1620 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:19.17 -28:11:03.4: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1567 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:57.61 -24:25:53.7: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:41.18 -29:26:58.6: 13.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:41.18 -29:26:58.6: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3879 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:13.99 -29:19:28.5: 13.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:13.99 -29:19:28.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3285 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:57.61 -24:25:53.7: 13.63 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:57.61 -24:25:53.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.3421 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:51.07 -30:06:06.8: 13.03 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:05.86 -25:29:59.9: 13.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:42.05 -27:51:20.3: 13.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:05.86 -25:29:59.9: 13.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:55:34.89 -23:20:07.2: 14.50 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:05.86 -25:29:59.9: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:51.07 -30:06:06.8: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:51.07 -30:06:06.8: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1093 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:42.05 -27:51:20.3: 13.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:42.05 -27:51:20.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0966 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:55:34.89 -23:20:07.2: 14.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:55:34.89 -23:20:07.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4382 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:54:35.46 -25:28:18.1: 13.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:54:35.46 -25:28:18.1: 13.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:35.46 -25:28:18.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4021 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:43.24 -26:07:07.8: 13.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:59.57 -25:32:30.5: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:23.49 -24:37:05.4: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:20.23 -30:02:29.0: 13.73 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:59.57 -25:32:30.5: 13.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:59.57 -25:32:30.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4088 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:23.49 -24:37:05.4: 13.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:23.49 -24:37:05.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5271 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:43.24 -26:07:07.8: 13.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:43.24 -26:07:07.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3635 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:20.23 -30:02:29.0: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:20.23 -30:02:29.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5182 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:57:08.55 -24:31:05.9: 14.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:09.75 -30:02:09.8: 13.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:08.55 -24:31:05.9: 13.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:08.55 -24:31:05.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5634 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:28.65 -25:25:17.6: 12.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:09.75 -30:02:09.8: 13.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:09.75 -30:02:09.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6049 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:44:15.60 -23:36:47.4: 13.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:45:15.99 -26:49:41.2: 13.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:21.93 -26:02:05.5: 14.15 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:28.65 -25:25:17.6: 13.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:28.65 -25:25:17.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3255 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:44:15.60 -23:36:47.4: 13.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:45:15.99 -26:49:41.2: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:15.60 -23:36:47.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.3153 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:15.99 -26:49:41.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4683 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:21.93 -26:02:05.5: 13.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:21.93 -26:02:05.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5868 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9: 14.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:16:18.67 -25:10:52.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.1525 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out149292.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out149384.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out150007.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148685.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45893.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148299_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148299_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148307_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148307_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148325_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148325_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148335_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148335_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148341_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148341_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148342_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148342_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148346_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148346_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148352_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148352_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148353_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148353_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148359_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148359_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:34.72 -26:32:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148361_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148361_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148362_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148362_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148366_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148366_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148367_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148367_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148379_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148379_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148384_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148384_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148388_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148388_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148396_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148396_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:13.21 -23:27:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148397_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148397_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148402_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148402_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148405_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148405_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148406_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148406_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148410_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148410_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:53.12 -22:25:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148411_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148411_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148416_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148416_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148419_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148419_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148422_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148422_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148423_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148423_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148424_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148424_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148425_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148425_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148431_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148431_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148438_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148438_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148439_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148439_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148444_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148444_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148447_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148447_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148453_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148453_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148455_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148455_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148457_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148457_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148465_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148465_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148466_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148466_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148467_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148467_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148468_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148468_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148469_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148469_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148471_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148471_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148472_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148472_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148474_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148474_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148684_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 148684_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148685_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 148685_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148839_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148839_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.95 -25:53:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148922_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148922_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.34 -28:37:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148938_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148938_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148998_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 148998_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.21 -25:11:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149003_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 149003_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149027_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149027_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149059_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 149059_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149160_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149160_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.50 -23:55:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149163_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149163_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.26 -26:25:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149179_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149179_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:26.97 -28:39:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149208_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149208_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.67 -25:29:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149292_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149292_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:49.03 -27:20:57.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.406 4072014929507036288 283.45418324285 -27.34933622956 13.0713 10.9614 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.406#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149340_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149340_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149372_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149372_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149384_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149384_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.28 -28:17:41.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.820 6759609784617432832 290.06792342529 -28.29504679958 12.9506 10.8346 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.820#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149388_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149388_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:31.85 -29:54:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149405_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149405_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.93 -28:06:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149449_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149449_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:38.19 -23:54:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149450_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149450_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.94 -28:00:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149563_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149563_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:49.91 -26:58:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149573_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149573_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:18.81 -23:32:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149620_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149620_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149655_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149655_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149666_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149666_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149702_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149702_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149762_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149762_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149802_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149802_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149806_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149806_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149921_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149921_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149985_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 149985_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150007_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150007_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:34.89 -23:20:07.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.189 4075522264203388928 283.89545553457 -23.33565513124 12.0858 10.7616 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150039_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150039_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:19.58 -23:22:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150064_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150064_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150079_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150079_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150086_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150086_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150096_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150096_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150100_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150100_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150120_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150120_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150209_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150209_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150213_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150213_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150265_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150265_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150328_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150328_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150387_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150387_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150487_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150487_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150518_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 150518_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 101215_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.13 -27:14:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 102551_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.61 -24:58:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 98198_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.78 -23:56:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129488_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 129488_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:31.96 -23:55:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 105121_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.23 -28:07:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98386_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 98386_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:54.54 -27:44:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 15695_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.20 -28:51:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 45893_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 110046_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.71 -28:03:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 104936_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.58 -27:50:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 98054_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.71 -26:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 98039_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.47 -22:34:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119392_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 119392_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.40 -22:07:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 112797_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.96 -22:59:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 08935_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.56 -29:49:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 106879_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.34 -25:01:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127334_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 127334_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-46-10_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
