This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 10.31 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6
353.68607 22.21005 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 -0 1 10.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7418,10.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2418 10.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 11.96 16:15:30.48 -21:53:54.2
353.26524 20.45152 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis -0 -0 0 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:30.48 -21:53:54.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:30.48 -21:53:54.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7418,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2418 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 13.36 16:07:39.64 -15:27:00.6
357.13060 26.14734 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara -1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:39.64 -15:27:00.6: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:39.64 -15:27:00.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7418,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2418 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 14.13 16:16:32.19 -16:17:59.1
357.96963 23.97951 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia -1 0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:32.19 -16:17:59.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:32.19 -16:17:59.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7418,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2418 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 14.41 15:59:07.83 -17:17:10.3
354.07931 26.41662 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.291 Alice -1 -1 2 14.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:59:07.83 -17:17:10.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:59:07.83 -17:17:10.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7418,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2418 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2418 2461208.7418 12.88 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3
357.16276 23.16168 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" CSS_J161706.9-172337
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.870 CV Y 0.840 CV 214.355850000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS_J161706.9-172337,2461208.7418,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS_J161706.9-172337 20260617.2418 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461208.74204221 17.06.2026 05:48:22.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7962
Objects passed selection criteria: 7938
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6366.75
Average stars matched: 5710.25 (89.6886 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113024 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 04:09:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461208.74204221 17.06.2026 05:48:22.447 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 58 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 58717
Objects passed selection criteria: 58582
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51102
Average stars matched: 43635.2 (85.3885 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 04:12:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Lib-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lib-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lib-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 828146 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 828146 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.png' -> 'transient_report/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits_preview.png'
Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
renamed 'Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.png' -> 'transient_report/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits_preview.png'
Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1172.1890
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 559.5515
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1529.2974
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 614.1377
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1527.8590
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 614.4202
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.30465
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.74152905
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0214 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01602 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hYeIwNWKZL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yeva9HTOla
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rKhIgXpmqG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BHn4UqlihX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4659 out of 4800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4800 out of 7612 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.4 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.4 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hYeIwNWKZL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 7123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=269 n_q2=242 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yeva9HTOla (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7612
Got 7612 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=271 n_q2=241 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rKhIgXpmqG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=522, passed=8200
Got 8200 stars (including 7676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.645 n_q1=221 n_q2=274 n_q3=209 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BHn4UqlihX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8195
Got 8195 stars (including 7628 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=219 n_q2=277 n_q3=202 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.349
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.300
ref2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.228
new1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.381
new2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.349
reference average sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.264
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.7: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:54.83 -16:28:32.7: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:56.86 -17:22:36.2: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:16.0: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:02.75 -16:48:08.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:59.22 -18:44:04.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:56.86 -17:22:36.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.7: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:56.86 -17:22:36.2: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7279 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.17 -17:00:12.7: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7658 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:02.75 -16:48:08.3: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:16.0: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:24.53 -18:38:24.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:16.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6959 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:02.75 -16:48:08.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7289 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:54.83 -16:28:32.7: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:59.22 -18:44:04.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:59.22 -18:44:04.0: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7647 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:54.83 -16:28:32.7: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6717 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.91 -18:26:45.3: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:03.08 -17:27:21.2: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:24.53 -18:38:24.8: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:24.53 -18:38:24.8: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7916 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.91 -18:26:45.3: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:03.08 -17:27:21.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:03.08 -17:27:21.2: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8029 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.91 -18:26:45.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7901 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:48.70 -17:25:14.5: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:41.38 -14:51:28.7: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:24.00 -18:16:38.3: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:14.90 -17:34:32.9: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:52.06 -19:15:38.0: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:59:42.21 -18:49:07.8: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:48.70 -17:25:14.5: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:48.70 -17:25:14.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7993 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:24.00 -18:16:38.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:41.38 -14:51:28.7: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:24.00 -18:16:38.3: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8138 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:41.38 -14:51:28.7: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8194 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:52.06 -19:15:38.0: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:14.90 -17:34:32.9: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:52.06 -19:15:38.0: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8185 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:14.90 -17:34:32.9: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8279 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:49.87 -18:22:56.6: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:59:42.21 -18:49:07.8: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:42.21 -18:49:07.8: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8343 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:21.48 -18:32:37.3: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:05.27 -16:11:03.1: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:49.87 -18:22:56.6: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:49.87 -18:22:56.6: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8773 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:05.27 -16:11:03.1: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:14.00 -18:33:39.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:05.27 -16:11:03.1: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8756 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:55:21.48 -18:32:37.3: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:39.30 -17:00:16.3: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:27.63 -16:51:02.5: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:21.48 -18:32:37.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8250 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:37.40 -15:52:49.7: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:46.51 -18:15:56.3: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:37.86 -16:31:05.0: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:27.63 -16:51:02.5: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:39.30 -17:00:16.3: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:39.30 -17:00:16.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8667 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:37.40 -15:52:49.7: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:27.63 -16:51:02.5: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8944 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:37.40 -15:52:49.7: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8665 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:14.00 -18:33:39.3: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:14.00 -18:33:39.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8912 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:46.51 -18:15:56.3: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:46.51 -18:15:56.3: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8954 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:46.42 -17:08:11.9: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:37.86 -16:31:05.0: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:37.86 -16:31:05.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8555 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:04.45 -19:10:36.6: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:19.08 -17:16:29.6: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:46.42 -17:08:11.9: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:46.42 -17:08:11.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8950 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:04.45 -19:10:36.6: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:04.45 -19:10:36.6: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8790 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:59:07.04 -18:52:34.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:47.55 -19:01:26.3: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:02.79 -16:49:00.5: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:19.08 -17:16:29.6: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:19.08 -17:16:29.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9088 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:14.94 -19:26:27.6: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:45.33 -16:43:48.9: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:33.08 -17:00:58.8: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:47.55 -19:01:26.3: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:47.55 -19:01:26.3: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8557 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:59:07.04 -18:52:34.3: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:07.04 -18:52:34.3: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8737 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:02.79 -16:49:00.5: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:02.79 -16:49:00.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9220 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:09:14.94 -19:26:27.6: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:14.94 -19:26:27.6: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8848 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:45.33 -16:43:48.9: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:45.33 -16:43:48.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8961 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:33.08 -17:00:58.8: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:33.08 -17:00:58.8: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8587 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:44.40 -13:58:27.5: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:47.43 -17:02:12.1: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:03.82 -18:40:09.5: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:44.40 -13:58:27.5: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:44.40 -13:58:27.5: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8858 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:55:48.30 -16:22:00.8: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:47.43 -17:02:12.1: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:47.43 -17:02:12.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8981 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:19.48 -18:02:52.9: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:35.5: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:46.47 -17:08:50.3: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:03.82 -18:40:09.5: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:03.82 -18:40:09.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9108 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:55:48.30 -16:22:00.8: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:48.30 -16:22:00.8: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9347 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:19.48 -18:02:52.9: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:35.5: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:19.48 -18:02:52.9: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9110 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:27.01 -15:29:35.5: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8898 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:46.47 -17:08:50.3: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:46.47 -17:08:50.3: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9035 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20499.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20499_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 20499_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20622_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20622_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.93 -21:31:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20745_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20745_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.93 -16:36:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20855_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.62 -20:06:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20919_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20919_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20924_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20924_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20936_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20936_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20940_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20940_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20973_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20973_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20982_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20982_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20984_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20984_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20994_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20994_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20998_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 20998_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21006_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21006_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21011_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21011_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21015_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21015_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21023_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21023_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21030_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21030_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21034_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21043_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21043_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21054_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21054_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21057_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21057_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21058_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21058_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21059_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21059_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21060_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21060_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21066_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21066_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21067_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21067_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21069_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21069_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21070_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21070_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21076_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21076_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21086_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21086_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21087_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21087_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21088_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21088_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21089_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21089_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21090_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21090_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21093_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21093_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21095_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21095_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21100_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21100_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21101_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21101_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21102_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21102_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21103_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21103_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21104_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21104_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21105_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21105_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21107_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 21107_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03712_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 03712_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.79 -18:18:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0214 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.382 -17:59:47.51
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:04.474 -17:59:10.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01602 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8M42zrXSJS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A8A0dMSsbw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wk7OdCvPyu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kEvNkq8V4m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 58808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Loaded 5929 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4737 out of 5215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5215 out of 58808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.4 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8M42zrXSJS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2882, passed=59407
Got 59407 stars (including 56426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59407 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=285 n_q2=237 n_q3=224 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A8A0dMSsbw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2840, passed=58797
Got 58797 stars (including 55880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=287 n_q2=240 n_q3=218 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Wk7OdCvPyu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3510, passed=63158
Got 63158 stars (including 59551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=245 n_q2=259 n_q3=214 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.394
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kEvNkq8V4m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3671, passed=63688
Got 63688 stars (including 59917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63688 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.626 n_q1=239 n_q2=268 n_q3=210 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.340
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-47-38_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0196.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_005110_TTUQ2b1x1_416428_HsfjqGys/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:52.62 -18:00:01.4: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:51.34 -20:46:55.2: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:42.37 -21:45:20.9: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:29.86 -21:48:18.8: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:10.89 -17:45:44.7: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:04.44 -21:36:53.9: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:19.04 -16:20:41.1: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:25.91 -20:43:21.4: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:53.03 -18:06:31.2: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:38.15 -14:24:32.9: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:52.62 -18:00:01.4: 14.18 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:52.62 -18:00:01.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2547 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:29.86 -21:48:18.8: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:29.86 -21:48:18.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0897 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:42.37 -21:45:20.9: 14.14 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:51.34 -20:46:55.2: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:42.37 -21:45:20.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2397 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:51.34 -20:46:55.2: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3166 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:10.89 -17:45:44.7: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:10.89 -17:45:44.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3303 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:25.91 -20:43:21.4: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:19.04 -16:20:41.1: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:25.91 -20:43:21.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3787 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:19.04 -16:20:41.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4663 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:04.44 -21:36:53.9: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:53.03 -18:06:31.2: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:04.44 -21:36:53.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4203 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:53.03 -18:06:31.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5087 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:38.15 -14:24:32.9: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:38.15 -14:24:32.9: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3349 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:27.08 -20:21:40.9: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:46.19 -21:14:48.7: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:44.75 -20:16:51.8: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:24.70 -18:29:48.0: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:09:28.17 -17:04:43.4: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:48.25 -15:43:19.4: 13.40 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:58.16 -17:06:28.6: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:14.60 -17:24:16.8: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:42.73 -17:30:20.5: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.83 -15:00:29.8: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:27.08 -20:21:40.9: 14.15 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:27.08 -20:21:40.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1609 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:09:46.19 -21:14:48.7: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:46.19 -21:14:48.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1361 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:44.75 -20:16:51.8: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:44.75 -20:16:51.8: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9365 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:24.70 -18:29:48.0: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:09:28.17 -17:04:43.4: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:48.25 -15:43:19.4: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:24.70 -18:29:48.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7796 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:28.17 -17:04:43.4: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9546 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:48.25 -15:43:19.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5233 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:42.73 -17:30:20.5: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:42.73 -17:30:20.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3319 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:58.16 -17:06:28.6: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:58.16 -17:06:28.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3179 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:14.60 -17:24:16.8: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:14.60 -17:24:16.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7606 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.83 -15:00:29.8: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.83 -15:00:29.8: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2305 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:17.55 -14:54:17.7: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:30.48 -21:53:54.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:20.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:39.64 -15:27:00.6: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:00.71 -19:28:16.3: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:56.09 -18:59:47.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.54 -19:06:36.7: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:17.55 -14:54:17.7: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:17.55 -14:54:17.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7777 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:18.17 -22:08:55.5: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:32.72 -15:19:01.1: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:30.48 -21:53:54.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:20.0: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:46.80 -14:29:20.0: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1106 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:39.64 -15:27:00.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:16:32.19 -16:17:59.1: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:42:00.71 -19:28:16.3: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:00.71 -19:28:16.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7049 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:56.09 -18:59:47.5: 15.22 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.28
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.54 -19:06:36.7: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:07:56.09 -18:59:47.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.28 new_mean_mag=13.8157 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.54 -19:06:36.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7930 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:18.17 -22:08:55.5: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:18.17 -22:08:55.5: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7749 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:32.72 -15:19:01.1: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:32.72 -15:19:01.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9739 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:16:32.19 -16:17:59.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:46.33 -22:15:04.3: 14.14 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:04.8: 14.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:39.62 -19:00:12.6: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:46.33 -22:15:04.3: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.33 -22:15:04.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0723 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:27.50 -21:53:08.8: 14.73 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:04.8: 14.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:02.52 -14:42:04.8: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2099 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:56.80 -20:05:49.0: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:39.62 -19:00:12.6: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:39.62 -19:00:12.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0485 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:56.50 -15:22:51.1: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:27.50 -21:53:08.8: 15.21 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:27.50 -21:53:08.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.2005 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:42.76 -15:43:51.4: 15.20 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:56.80 -20:05:49.0: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:56.80 -20:05:49.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2484 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:56.50 -15:22:51.1: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:56.50 -15:22:51.1: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3444 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:26.18 -22:09:10.0: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:24.54 -14:28:39.0: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:42.76 -15:43:51.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:42.76 -15:43:51.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3188 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:03.92 -15:11:13.0: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:26.18 -22:09:10.0: 14.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:32.18 -14:41:59.5: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:26.18 -22:09:10.0: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1292 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:24.54 -14:28:39.0: 14.98 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:46:25.10 -19:32:42.1: 15.31 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.54 -14:28:39.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3560 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:03.92 -15:11:13.0: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:03.92 -15:11:13.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4440 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:44.39 -20:36:04.9: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:32.18 -14:41:59.5: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:32.18 -14:41:59.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4754 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:08.90 -14:43:15.1: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:46:25.10 -19:32:42.1: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:46:25.10 -19:32:42.1: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=14.3868 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:44.39 -20:36:04.9: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.39 -20:36:04.9: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2633 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:34.03 -14:31:31.7: 15.34 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:01.86 -13:55:05.4: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:08.90 -14:43:15.1: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:08.90 -14:43:15.1: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4448 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:34.03 -14:31:31.7: 15.58 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:51:34.03 -14:31:31.7: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.4376 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:24.36 -19:56:38.1: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:01.86 -13:55:05.4: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:01.86 -13:55:05.4: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3596 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:44.71 -16:44:39.8: 15.09 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:24.36 -19:56:38.1: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:24.36 -19:56:38.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2997 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:44.71 -16:44:39.8: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:44.71 -16:44:39.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4677 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:32.84 -15:11:57.2: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:04.33 -15:42:25.9: 15.08 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:03.11 -22:08:18.9: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:32.84 -15:11:57.2: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:32.84 -15:11:57.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3792 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:03.11 -22:08:18.9: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.11 -22:08:18.9: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2802 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:04.33 -15:42:25.9: 15.53 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:04.33 -15:42:25.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.5057 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:47.58 -14:53:51.4: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:05.14 -14:36:49.8: 14.97 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:24.51 -14:23:41.0: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:47.58 -14:53:51.4: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:47.58 -14:53:51.4: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5420 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:05.14 -14:36:49.8: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:24.51 -14:23:41.0: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:05.14 -14:36:49.8: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4966 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:24.51 -14:23:41.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5612 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:05.38 -17:31:41.1: 14.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:59:07.83 -17:17:10.3: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:59.68 -15:13:14.9: 14.98 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:05.38 -17:31:41.1: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:05.38 -17:31:41.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4912 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:59:07.83 -17:17:10.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:43:59.68 -15:13:14.9: 14.74 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:59.68 -15:13:14.9: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5230 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:53.01 -20:24:08.5: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:47.32 -21:57:34.0: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:36.27 -16:14:18.2: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:10.38 -21:53:27.0: 15.10 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:53.01 -20:24:08.5: 14.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:36.27 -16:14:18.2: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:47.32 -21:57:34.0: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:53.01 -20:24:08.5: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3346 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:36.27 -16:14:18.2: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4775 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:47.32 -21:57:34.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4012 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:44.4: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:10.38 -21:53:27.0: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:10.38 -21:53:27.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4739 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:44.4: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:58.94 -21:23:44.4: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5049 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:46.67 -18:42:01.9: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:50.48 -21:54:06.3: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:46.67 -18:42:01.9: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:46.67 -18:42:01.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3756 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:55.24 -20:56:57.8: 14.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:50.48 -21:54:06.3: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:50.48 -21:54:06.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4863 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:55.24 -20:56:57.8: 15.00 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:55.24 -20:56:57.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5064 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3: 13.86 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:17:06.81 -17:23:37.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8890 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79335.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82285.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82377.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34137.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80065.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82896.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73629_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73629_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73638_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73638_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73641_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73641_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73642_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73642_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73647_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73647_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73649_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73649_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73650_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73650_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73651_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73651_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73655_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73655_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:38.13 -20:30:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73658_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73658_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73660_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73660_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73664_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73664_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73674_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73674_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73678_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73678_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73681_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73681_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73686_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73686_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73687_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73687_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73693_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73693_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73696_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73696_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73697_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73697_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73700_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73700_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73701_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73701_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.60 -21:58:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73705_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73705_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73847_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 73847_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:05.19 -20:25:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74812_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 74812_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75663_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 75663_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:59.00 -18:30:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76489_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 76489_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77089_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 77089_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78630_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 78630_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.98 -14:50:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79000_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 79000_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79288_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 79288_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79335_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 79335_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.09 -18:59:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.071 6248773963633172352 241.98403991536 -18.99701024084 12.3884 10.8769 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.071#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79637_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 79637_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79866_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 79866_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80065_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 80065_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80291_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 80291_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80430_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 80430_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80540_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 80540_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80721_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 80721_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:36.18 -14:44:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80957_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 80957_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81142_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81142_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81498_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81498_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81539_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81539_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81649_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81649_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81704_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81704_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81711_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 81711_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82100_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82100_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82106_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82106_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82283_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82283_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82285_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82285_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:25.10 -19:32:42.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.218 6247978677427038976 236.60482236630 -19.54477533171 14.8295 14.3805 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.218#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82307_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82307_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82364_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82364_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82377_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82377_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:34.03 -14:31:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.934 6263612358386140160 237.89234666744 -14.52547098708 14.7217 14.2575 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.934#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82526_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82526_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82535_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82535_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:16.31 -17:19:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82585_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82585_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82605_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82605_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82665_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82665_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82689_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82689_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82728_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82728_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82782_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82782_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82814_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82814_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82824_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82824_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82868_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82868_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82873_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82873_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82896_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 82896_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82971_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 82971_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83099_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83099_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:11.48 -21:46:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83260_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83260_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83295_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83295_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83542_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83542_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83556_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83556_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83685_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83685_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83737_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83737_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83807_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83807_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83822_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 83822_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28147_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 28147_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.78 -18:18:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46468_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 46468_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.92 -16:36:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17884_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 17884_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.62 -20:06:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09608_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 09608_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.93 -21:31:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34137_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
Preparing report for the candidate 34137_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07980_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197
The candidate 07980_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-48-22_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0197 did not pass the final checks
