This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2319 2461208.7319 14.59 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0
20.87544 74.32546 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7319,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2319 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2319 2461208.7319 14.85 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0
17.34293 74.69006 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 11.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7319,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2319 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2319 2461208.7319 14.78 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0
23.47097 69.93022 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 12.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7319,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2319 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461178.75093155 18.05.2026 06:01:10.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
First image: 2461178.75093155 18.05.2026 06:01:10.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Last image: 2461208.73298284 17.06.2026 05:35:19.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4375
Objects passed selection criteria: 4375
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4197.25
Average stars matched: 4050.5 (96.5037 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110764 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:40:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461178.75093155 18.05.2026 06:01:10.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
First image: 2461178.75093155 18.05.2026 06:01:10.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Last image: 2461208.73298284 17.06.2026 05:35:19.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23944
Objects passed selection criteria: 23917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28148.8
Average stars matched: 22275.2 (79.1341 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:42:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Boo-07-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-07-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-07-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 79013 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 79013 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits_preview.png'
Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
renamed 'Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits_preview.png'
Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 378.2989
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 443.6794
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 952.3162
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 497.6748
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 954.5081
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 495.0298
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.51736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.73081539
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits'
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits'
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits'
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65
Second-epoch image center 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65
Second-epoch image center 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97
Second-epoch second image center 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01846 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9lsvCQoT9h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cYrkdIYp5B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FZyoLvxy34
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4EpUWkwnVA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5345 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9607 to 216.4105 deg, Dec +16.6263 to +27.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9607 to 216.4105 deg, Dec 16.6263 to 27.2517 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3187 out of 3265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3265 out of 5345 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.586200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.586200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5345 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9607 to 216.4105 deg, Dec +16.6263 to +27.2517 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9607 to 216.4105 deg, Dec 16.6263 to 27.2517 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3187 out of 3265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3265 out of 5345 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9602 to 216.4522 deg, Dec +16.6264 to +27.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9602 to 216.4522 deg, Dec 16.6264 to 27.2613 deg
Loaded 4036 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3204 out of 3284 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3284 out of 5423 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
2.2 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
2.3 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
2.2 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
15.2 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9lsvCQoT9h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=276, passed=5345
Got 5345 stars (including 5065 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.499 n_q1=252 n_q2=229 n_q3=262 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cYrkdIYp5B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=5423
Got 5423 stars (including 5148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=250 n_q2=231 n_q3=266 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FZyoLvxy34 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5118
Got 5118 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5118 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=220 n_q2=241 n_q3=258 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4EpUWkwnVA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, passed=5303
Got 5303 stars (including 4925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.7 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5214 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.7 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=229 n_q2=239 n_q3=261 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.222
ref2=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.224
new1=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new2=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=0.3965 worst_q_ratio=1.223
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:55:08.93 +21:51:30.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:54:47.67 +20:30:09.1: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:36:44.19 +23:01:42.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:55:46.90 +20:51:06.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:58:42.47 +22:53:23.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:55:08.93 +21:51:30.5: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:54:47.67 +20:30:09.1: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:08.93 +21:51:30.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2056 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:54:47.67 +20:30:09.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3061 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:36:44.19 +23:01:42.0: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:55:46.90 +20:51:06.3: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:58:42.47 +22:53:23.3: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:36:44.19 +23:01:42.0: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3689 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:46.90 +20:51:06.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3196 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:58:42.47 +22:53:23.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2691 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20233_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20233_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20234_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20234_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20235_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20236_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20236_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 20237_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65
Second-epoch image center 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0045 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:50:46.775 +22:00:13.65
Second-epoch image center 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:50:47.250 +21:59:58.97
Second-epoch second image center 13:50:44.617 +22:00:54.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01846 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wyQdspvRXc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4FpZ8aXG4Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f3Hfr1MhOl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CVEK5EB6k0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits and wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9607 to 216.4516 deg, Dec +16.6148 to +27.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9607 to 216.4516 deg, Dec 16.6148 to 27.2587 deg
Loaded 4039 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3311 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3311 out of 27809 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.471200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.471200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27809 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9607 to 216.4516 deg, Dec +16.6148 to +27.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9607 to 216.4516 deg, Dec 16.6148 to 27.2587 deg
Loaded 4039 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3311 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3311 out of 27809 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 27632 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 198.9587 to 216.4522 deg, Dec +16.6196 to +27.2737 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 198.9587 to 216.4522 deg, Dec 16.6196 to 27.2737 deg
Loaded 4042 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3313 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3313 out of 27632 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
2.1 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
2.4 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
2.4 pix Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
15.4 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
15.5 mag. Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wyQdspvRXc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1056, passed=27808
Got 27808 stars (including 26708 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=251 n_q2=227 n_q3=262 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.255
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4FpZ8aXG4Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1056, passed=27624
Got 27624 stars (including 26533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.451 n_q1=253 n_q2=228 n_q3=260 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f3Hfr1MhOl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1556, passed=40864
Got 40864 stars (including 39218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40864 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=218 n_q2=237 n_q3=236 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CVEK5EB6k0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1763, passed=40189
Got 40189 stars (including 38324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40189 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=250 n_q2=209 n_q3=262 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-32-12_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0182.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_003708_TTUQ2b1x1_2675146_rIo2efT4/wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:35:40.54 +20:52:19.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:46:47.83 +19:00:00.7: 14.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:32:02.17 +22:06:39.2: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:05:54.50 +23:58:35.7: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:00:54.44 +17:47:28.4: 15.36 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:16:09.81 +19:53:57.5: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:46:51.28 +18:02:05.1: 14.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:04:59.70 +24:42:19.9: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:35:40.54 +20:52:19.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:35:40.54 +20:52:19.5: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6534 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:32:02.17 +22:06:39.2: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:32:02.17 +22:06:39.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9184 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:16:09.81 +19:53:57.5: 15.21 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:46:47.83 +19:00:00.7: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:00:54.44 +17:47:28.4: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:47.83 +19:00:00.7: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5723 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:09.81 +19:53:57.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8753 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:54.44 +17:47:28.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9863 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:46:51.28 +18:02:05.1: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:51.28 +18:02:05.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8321 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:05:54.50 +23:58:35.7: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:54.50 +23:58:35.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5338 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:04:59.70 +24:42:19.9: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:59.70 +24:42:19.9: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8457 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:07:11.00 +19:23:02.5: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:06:45.16 +17:50:30.7: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:58:05.89 +22:52:48.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 13:55:10.67 +22:07:35.0: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:07:11.00 +19:23:02.5: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:11.00 +19:23:02.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6692 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:03:06.92 +17:52:06.3: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:02:22.69 +22:00:07.4: 16.00 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:06:45.16 +17:50:30.7: 15.16 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:45.16 +17:50:30.7: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7684 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:08:22.73 +23:21:41.3: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:02:22.69 +22:00:07.4: 15.61 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.74 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:02:22.69 +22:00:07.4: ref_mag=15.74 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.9310 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1578.fits at 14:11:14.74 +24:36:16.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:03:06.92 +17:52:06.3: 15.04 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:06.92 +17:52:06.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9227 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:17:13.53 +22:12:56.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:08:22.73 +23:21:41.3: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:22.73 +23:21:41.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9340 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-01-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1579.fits at 14:11:14.74 +24:36:16.5: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:14.74 +24:36:16.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9063 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35462.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 28s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31641_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31641_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31662_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31662_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31675_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31675_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31683_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31683_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31694_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31694_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31707_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31707_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31730_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31730_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31731_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 31731_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32756_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 32756_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33008_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 33008_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33357_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 33357_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33833_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 33833_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34008_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 34008_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34801_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 34801_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34986_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 34986_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34994_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 34994_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35462_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 35462_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35535_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 35535_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:25.57 +23:12:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35540_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 35540_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35550_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 35550_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36145_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 36145_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36444_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 36444_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36548_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 36548_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37227_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 37227_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37429_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 37429_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37564_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 37564_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38068_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38068_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38451_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38451_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38530_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38530_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38544_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38544_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38601_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
Preparing report for the candidate 38601_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38657_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38657_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38880_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 38880_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39203_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 39203_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40562_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183
The candidate 40562_Boo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-35-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0183 did not pass the final checks