This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1978 2461208.6978 14.73 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5
159.72363 47.21039 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1978* 09 50 56.15 +54 57 46.5 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6978,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1978 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1978 2461208.6978 14.80 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2
165.69906 50.92870 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1978* 10 04 32.80 +49 58 45.2 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6978,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1978 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1978 2461208.6978 14.68 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8
166.17548 48.98349 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1978* 09 52 25.80 +50 18 38.8 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6978,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1978 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
First image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Last image: 2461208.69805047 17.06.2026 04:45:01.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7050
Objects passed selection criteria: 7024
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5336.5
Average stars matched: 5017.75 (94.027 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112680 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:54:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
First image: 2461058.81449691 18.01.2026 07:32:42.533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Last image: 2461208.69805047 17.06.2026 04:45:01.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 77
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38161
Objects passed selection criteria: 38040
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33646
Average stars matched: 27370.2 (81.3477 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 139924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:56:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 96117 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 96117 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
renamed 'UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 455.8761
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 544.8872
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1109.8590
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 490.4749
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1110.2933
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 490.3102
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.43456
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.2099990844727 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.69754800
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0426 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00918 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zPSzweAITN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FO6TlROH1H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K9JtwBkUxZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oyl8Z4FwZe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.894600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.894600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5565 to +59.4234 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5565 to 59.4234 deg
Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8222 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.4 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.4 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
15.0 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
14.9 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zPSzweAITN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=8251
Got 8251 stars (including 7709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=265 n_q2=239 n_q3=229 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FO6TlROH1H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=547, passed=8222
Got 8222 stars (including 7663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=262 n_q2=240 n_q3=229 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K9JtwBkUxZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, passed=5469
Got 5469 stars (including 5041 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=231 n_q2=257 n_q3=208 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oyl8Z4FwZe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, passed=5469
Got 5469 stars (including 5034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5401 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 981 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 981 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 981 stars left (next iteration limit 1079)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits N_match=981 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=229 n_q2=249 n_q3=213 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.166
ref2=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.126
new1=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new2=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.146
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127_astrometric_residuals.png (981 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16
Second-epoch image center 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0426 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:20.013 +54:00:45.63
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:18.189 +54:00:16.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00918 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8AO4E0LYqH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c4nXfLJlWQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zU9PPwecCS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dXvyXRTp87
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg
Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg
Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 42530 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec +47.5271 to +59.4461 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec 47.5271 to 59.4461 deg
Loaded 6384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3952 out of 4417 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4417 out of 42530 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.0 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.4 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
2.4 pix UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8AO4E0LYqH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2009, passed=42350
Got 42350 stars (including 40291 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42350 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=263 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c4nXfLJlWQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2054, passed=42517
Got 42517 stars (including 40398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=257 n_q2=240 n_q3=230 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zU9PPwecCS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1656, passed=40711
Got 40711 stars (including 38961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40711 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=229 n_q2=246 n_q3=206 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dXvyXRTp87 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1742, passed=40355
Got 40355 stars (including 38517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40355 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=232 n_q2=242 n_q3=205 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.110
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-44-18_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_235107_TTUQ2b1x1_410623_rf4k1NLA/wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:11:48.61 +52:30:00.0: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:22:30.85 +55:31:17.1: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:24:20.29 +57:21:37.1: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:20:41.64 +57:31:36.2: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:09:55.32 +51:56:21.0: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:34:31.41 +51:56:29.8: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:28:18.99 +51:02:36.3: 14.50 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:28:29.50 +55:06:27.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:11:48.61 +52:30:00.0: 14.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:48.61 +52:30:00.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8835 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:16.6: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:22:30.85 +55:31:17.1: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:24:20.29 +57:21:37.1: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:20:41.64 +57:31:36.2: 14.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:22:30.85 +55:31:17.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3147 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:24:20.29 +57:21:37.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.7565 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:41.64 +57:31:36.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4093 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:09:55.32 +51:56:21.0: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:55.32 +51:56:21.0: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7584 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:34:31.41 +51:56:29.8: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:28:29.50 +55:06:27.0: 14.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:31.41 +51:56:29.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3803 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:28:18.99 +51:02:36.3: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:03:48.18 +54:35:06.7: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:28:29.50 +55:06:27.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2745 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:28:18.99 +51:02:36.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8158 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:16.6: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:16.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5683 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:03:48.18 +54:35:06.7: 13.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:48.18 +54:35:06.7: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1427 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:53:37.11 +51:58:22.0: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:53:37.11 +51:58:22.0: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:37.11 +51:58:22.0: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6977 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:06:44.18 +55:40:14.9: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:50:56.15 +54:57:46.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:06:44.18 +55:40:14.9: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:44.18 +55:40:14.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5912 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:52:25.80 +50:18:38.8: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:04:32.80 +49:58:45.2: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62342.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52424_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52428_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52430_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52430_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52453_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52453_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52455_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52456_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52458_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52458_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52461_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52462_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52463_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52463_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:58.98 +53:18:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52464_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52464_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52467_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52467_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54233_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 54233_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:07.17 +50:00:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 54419_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:03.73 +52:19:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54421_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 54421_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:30.98 +55:52:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55499_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 55499_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:36:47.50 +56:59:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56039_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56039_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56152_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56152_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:24.69 +57:25:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56192_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56192_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:02.30 +55:26:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56234_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56234_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:15.03 +57:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56573_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56573_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:37.43 +53:20:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56847_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56847_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56891_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 56891_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:10.78 +55:05:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57010_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 57010_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:56.96 +52:01:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57042_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 57042_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:55.41 +52:15:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57471_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 57471_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:50:01.80 +51:23:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58285_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 58285_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59693_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 59693_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60118_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 60118_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60649_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 60649_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60867_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 60867_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61150_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 61150_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62318_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 62318_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62342_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
Preparing report for the candidate 62342_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62518_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 62518_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62566_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 62566_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62895_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 62895_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63345_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 63345_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63925_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 63925_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52296_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52269_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 52269_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17876_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 17876_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50918_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127
The candidate 50918_UMa-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-45-01_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0127 did not pass the final checks
