This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1722 2461208.6722 14.56 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5
149.19818 29.31536 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6722,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1722 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1722 2461208.6722 14.47 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0
150.12311 28.55582 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6722,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1722 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1722 2461208.6722 14.55 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9
149.55804 26.65101 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6722,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1722 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1722 2461208.6722 14.94 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1
144.96042 31.22526 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.1" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6722,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1722 14.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461208.67244661 17.06.2026 04:08:09.387 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9036
Objects passed selection criteria: 9023
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7825
Average stars matched: 7664.25 (97.9457 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115440 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:33:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461208.67244661 17.06.2026 04:08:09.387 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 171
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 60136
Objects passed selection criteria: 59986
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55971
Average stars matched: 50454 (90.1431 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:35:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-07-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-07-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-07-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 104218 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 104218 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits_preview.png'
Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
renamed 'Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits_preview.png'
Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 509.3841
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 572.9770
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1186.8372
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 484.6023
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1186.9595
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 485.0727
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.32995
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.3899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.3999996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.67194957
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72
Second-epoch second image center 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00884 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dJkaOM2HGj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QCZugra0cq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ukVtRKyMku
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.04UTbNhLEy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4715 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4715 deg
Loaded 12879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7120 out of 7567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7567 out of 13381 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.876000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.876000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4715 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4715 deg
Loaded 12879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7120 out of 7567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7567 out of 13381 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 12282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.7688 to 136.4976 deg, Dec +62.8990 to +75.4817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.7688 to 136.4976 deg, Dec 62.8990 to 75.4817 deg
Loaded 12850 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7069 out of 7496 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7496 out of 12282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
2.3 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.3 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
14.8 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
14.8 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dJkaOM2HGj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=962, passed=13381
Got 13381 stars (including 12404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=189 n_q2=291 n_q3=210 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QCZugra0cq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=918, passed=12282
Got 12282 stars (including 11351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=196 n_q2=298 n_q3=197 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ukVtRKyMku (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, passed=8213
Got 8213 stars (including 7672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=224 n_q2=297 n_q3=202 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.04UTbNhLEy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, passed=8233
Got 8233 stars (including 7684 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=227 n_q2=294 n_q3=204 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.223
ref2=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new1=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.179
new2=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.192
reference average sigma_overall=0.357 worst_q_ratio=1.2425
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:24:22.36 +67:53:08.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:12:53.73 +68:14:34.1: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:24:22.36 +67:53:08.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:12:53.73 +68:14:34.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:22.36 +67:53:08.1: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1535 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:53.73 +68:14:34.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2174 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 20444_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.42 +73:10:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 20482_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.60 +70:41:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20551_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 20551_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20569_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 20569_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01243_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 01243_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.60 +73:24:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03322_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 03322_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01931_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 01931_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:13.20 +73:54:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0199 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:12:03.459 +69:59:47.72
Second-epoch second image center 07:11:59.254 +69:59:24.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00884 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mVARHuPMIA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iGTsDrYTjx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.27lM07OsZt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FIhW5nzWYk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 82728 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8276 to +75.4772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8276 to 75.4772 deg
Loaded 12987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6447 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 82728 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 82728 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8276 to +75.4772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8276 to 75.4772 deg
Loaded 12987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6447 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 82728 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 79165 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6379 to 136.4976 deg, Dec +62.8277 to +75.4855 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6379 to 136.4976 deg, Dec 62.8277 to 75.4855 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6464 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 79165 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 104 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
2.3 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.3 pix Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
15.0 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
15.0 mag. Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mVARHuPMIA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5466, passed=82717
Got 82717 stars (including 77109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=199 n_q2=291 n_q3=220 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iGTsDrYTjx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=5057, passed=79135
Got 79135 stars (including 73918 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=200 n_q2=287 n_q3=210 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.27lM07OsZt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3245, passed=61567
Got 61567 stars (including 58212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61567 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=243 n_q2=283 n_q3=212 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FIhW5nzWYk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3732, passed=61325
Got 61325 stars (including 57475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=248 n_q2=273 n_q3=214 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-07-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_232313_TTUQ2b1x1_3098881_gksK0e9R/wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:23:43.62 +68:26:46.9: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:59:16.89 +65:35:54.0: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:25:25.64 +70:03:06.5: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:14:51.34 +69:02:39.5: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:52:55.34 +71:03:55.9: 14.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:24:53.81 +67:20:08.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:36:37.34 +71:19:03.3: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:12:04.80 +74:10:14.8: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:19:16.11 +71:33:37.9: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:25:25.64 +70:03:06.5: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:24:53.81 +67:20:08.8: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:59:16.89 +65:35:54.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:23:43.62 +68:26:46.9: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:52:55.34 +71:03:55.9: 14.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:12:04.80 +74:10:14.8: 14.70 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:14:51.34 +69:02:39.5: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:36:37.34 +71:19:03.3: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:25.64 +70:03:06.5: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3889 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:53.81 +67:20:08.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2116 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:59:16.89 +65:35:54.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1099 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:43.62 +68:26:46.9: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5211 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:55.34 +71:03:55.9: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5239 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:04.80 +74:10:14.8: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6804 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:51.34 +69:02:39.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6094 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:37.34 +71:19:03.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6322 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:19:16.11 +71:33:37.9: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:16.11 +71:33:37.9: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3756 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:33:25.11 +67:03:32.4: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:43:40.75 +71:31:23.3: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:21:21.25 +71:43:50.7: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:30:54.27 +69:38:42.0: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:07:25.37 +69:18:19.4: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:56:52.14 +70:45:00.1: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:58:44.95 +68:48:40.6: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:59:15.25 +65:49:57.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:33:25.11 +67:03:32.4: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:25.11 +67:03:32.4: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1954 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:33:26.02 +67:00:40.1: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:06:00.57 +66:18:13.8: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:43:40.75 +71:31:23.3: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:40.75 +71:31:23.3: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2034 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:58:44.95 +68:48:40.6: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:59:15.25 +65:49:57.0: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:56:52.14 +70:45:00.1: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:21:21.25 +71:43:50.7: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:30:54.27 +69:38:42.0: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:07:25.37 +69:18:19.4: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:44.95 +68:48:40.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1030 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:15.25 +65:49:57.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1359 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:52.14 +70:45:00.1: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6262 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:21.25 +71:43:50.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7004 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:30:54.27 +69:38:42.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9909 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.37 +69:18:19.4: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4109 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:33:26.02 +67:00:40.1: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:26.02 +67:00:40.1: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2375 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:06:00.57 +66:18:13.8: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:06:00.57 +66:18:13.8: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8651 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:50:59.16 +70:17:41.6: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:24:04.22 +71:10:09.9: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:06:40.64 +67:10:18.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:03:20.50 +66:47:22.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 06:24:16.62 +72:14:27.0: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:50:59.16 +70:17:41.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:59.16 +70:17:41.6: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9120 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:24:04.22 +71:10:09.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:04.22 +71:10:09.9: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8855 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:03:20.50 +66:47:22.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:20.50 +66:47:22.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5932 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:06:40.64 +67:10:18.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:40.64 +67:10:18.4: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0335 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 06:24:16.62 +72:14:27.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:16.62 +72:14:27.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7766 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:00:37.04 +67:49:23.1: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:01:19.14 +68:23:39.8: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:22:47.88 +73:17:09.5: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:00:37.04 +67:49:23.1: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:01:19.14 +68:23:39.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:37:02.91 +66:40:59.5: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:22:47.88 +73:17:09.5: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:37.04 +67:49:23.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0432 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:19.14 +68:23:39.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9583 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:22:47.88 +73:17:09.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3393 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:37:02.91 +66:40:59.5: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:37:50.53 +66:48:05.5: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:26:05.32 +73:47:35.7: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:02.91 +66:40:59.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4101 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:26:05.32 +73:47:35.7: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:30:33.16 +65:57:55.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:05.32 +73:47:35.7: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7598 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 07:11:21.04 +66:17:32.9: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-06-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 08:00:38.81 +70:22:14.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102061.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104196.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96311_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96311_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96338_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96338_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96346_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96346_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96354_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96354_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96355_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96355_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96357_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96357_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96359_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96359_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96368_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96368_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96375_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96375_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96378_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96378_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96386_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96386_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96390_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96390_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96391_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96391_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96393_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96393_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96395_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96395_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96407_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96407_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96409_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96409_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96413_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96413_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:51.91 +68:39:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96431_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96431_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96433_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96433_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96434_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96434_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96440_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96440_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96441_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96441_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96444_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96444_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96445_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96445_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96446_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96446_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96447_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96447_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.87 +67:24:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96448_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96448_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96449_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96449_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96453_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96453_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96949_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 96949_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.47 +73:10:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97402_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 97402_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.66 +70:50:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97876_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 97876_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.95 +74:09:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97899_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 97899_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:19.52 +71:49:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97994_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 97994_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:04.53 +68:11:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98205_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98205_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:22.50 +71:06:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98510_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98510_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.27 +70:31:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98769_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98769_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:59.65 +67:35:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98780_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98780_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:39.75 +66:02:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98794_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98794_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:26.65 +73:06:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98983_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98983_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:50.58 +70:44:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98991_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 98991_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:54.75 +68:54:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99034_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99034_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:15.19 +71:09:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99047_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99047_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:45.03 +72:07:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99097_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99097_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:11.46 +65:43:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99172_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99172_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:30.72 +70:50:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99340_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99340_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.18 +69:57:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99455_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99455_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:09.51 +67:10:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99470_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99470_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.82 +68:11:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99573_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99573_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:37.73 +70:47:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99679_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99679_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:57.53 +65:57:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99702_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99702_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:37.64 +67:30:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99741_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99741_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:54.69 +71:28:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99744_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99744_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:18.16 +68:11:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99764_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99764_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:07.77 +66:28:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99822_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99822_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:15.93 +66:15:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99828_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99828_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:42.24 +70:56:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99834_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99834_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99872_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99872_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99894_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 99894_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:51.22 +66:03:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100376_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100376_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100411_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100411_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:00.11 +69:24:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100504_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 100504_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101026_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101026_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:57.69 +67:27:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101110_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101110_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:02.28 +73:53:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101253_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101253_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:48.09 +71:32:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101261_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101261_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101388_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101388_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101440_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 101440_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102061_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 102061_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102306_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 102306_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102468_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 102468_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102513_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 102513_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:59.68 +72:36:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103132_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 103132_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103586_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 103586_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103938_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 103938_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103995_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 103995_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104192_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104192_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104196_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 104196_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104242_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104242_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104394_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104394_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104525_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104525_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104547_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104547_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104734_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 104734_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104988_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 104988_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105345_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 105345_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105537_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
Preparing report for the candidate 105537_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105980_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 105980_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40472_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 40472_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41684_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 41684_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43731_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 43731_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34351_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 34351_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.63 +70:41:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40595_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 40595_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10540_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 10540_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:13.20 +73:54:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47671_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 47671_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77253_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 77253_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76487_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 76487_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78265_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 78265_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22372_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 22372_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47986_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 47986_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07962_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 07962_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18932_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 18932_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11839_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 11839_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23292_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091
The candidate 23292_Cam-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-08-09_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0091 did not pass the final checks
