This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 11.75 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2
235.55181 57.34790 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.11 Parthenope 0 0 0 12.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 49 15.35 +11 29 32.2 11.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6653,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1653 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 12.85 11:01:32.84 +17:20:55.0
228.27002 62.83195 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.416 Vaticana 0 0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:32.84 +17:20:55.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:32.84 +17:20:55.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 11 01 32.84 +17 20 55.0 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6653,12.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1653 12.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 13.18 10:29:31.41 +12:47:11.3
229.19758 53.87095 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.103 Hera -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:31.41 +12:47:11.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:31.41 +12:47:11.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 29 31.41 +12 47 11.3 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6653,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1653 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 14.11 10:40:20.88 +11:28:21.2
233.46828 55.49419 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor 0 -1 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:40:20.88 +11:28:21.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:40:20.88 +11:28:21.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 40 20.88 +11 28 21.2 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6653,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1653 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 14.09 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1
238.47854 57.79562 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 54 21.26 +10 26 41.1 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6653,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1653 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 14.29 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8
237.13863 58.78496 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 56 02.32 +11 35 11.8 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6653,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1653 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1653 2461208.6653 14.27 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4
237.42408 58.34254 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1653* 10 54 53.21 +11 12 53.4 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6653,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1653 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461208.66561922 17.06.2026 03:58:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4155
Objects passed selection criteria: 4147
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3829.75
Average stars matched: 3768.25 (98.3942 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110752 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:14:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
First image: 2461171.68283635 11.05.2026 04:23:07.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Last image: 2461208.66561922 17.06.2026 03:58:19.501 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22986
Objects passed selection criteria: 22938
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25901.8
Average stars matched: 21292.2 (82.2039 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131588 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:16:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 111461 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 111461 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1214.7516
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 447.5695
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1214.3028
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 446.9526
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.24082
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.66493160
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0414 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0357 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNGUbeOnqL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8UaaorizFA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vwy05sPOQf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j03E2s5tOO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2606 deg
Loaded 4238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3433 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5744 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7234 to 168.1820 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2606 deg
Loaded 4238 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3433 out of 3512 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3512 out of 5744 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7044 to 168.1822 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2438 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7044 to 168.1822 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2438 deg
Loaded 4241 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3438 out of 3510 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3510 out of 5709 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
14.8 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
14.8 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FNGUbeOnqL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, passed=5744
Got 5744 stars (including 5420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5652 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 869 stars left (next iteration limit 955)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.589 n_q1=199 n_q2=228 n_q3=236 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8UaaorizFA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, passed=5709
Got 5709 stars (including 5396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 866 stars left (next iteration limit 952)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=198 n_q2=222 n_q3=239 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vwy05sPOQf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=296, passed=4347
Got 4347 stars (including 4049 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 868 stars left (next iteration limit 954)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=217 n_q2=232 n_q3=215 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j03E2s5tOO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, passed=4353
Got 4353 stars (including 4040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 868 stars left (next iteration limit 954)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits N_match=868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=219 n_q2=231 n_q3=212 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.328
ref2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.142
new2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.166
reference average sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.3155
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (869 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (866 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (868 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (868 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:40:37.88 +15:33:29.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:37:02.83 +15:11:39.2: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:33:11.06 +15:18:20.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:36:02.03 +14:53:31.1: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:37:52.09 +13:28:37.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:40:37.88 +15:33:29.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:33:11.06 +15:18:20.0: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:37:52.09 +13:28:37.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:37:02.83 +15:11:39.2: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:36:02.03 +14:53:31.1: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:37.88 +15:33:29.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1835 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:52.09 +13:28:37.1: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1487 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:11.06 +15:18:20.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2380 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:02.83 +15:11:39.2: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1874 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:02.03 +14:53:31.1: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2065 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20201.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 20201_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20206_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 20206_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20207_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 20207_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20210_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 20210_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 20213_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20217_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 20217_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0414 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.126 +14:00:12.98
Second-epoch image center 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0357 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:39:50.160 +13:59:38.78
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:52.706 +13:59:03.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EldkU1kmr0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NYFLGEpUYh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U6900vuLlt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oq4MZQUcTo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7133 to 168.2349 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7133 to 168.2349 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2695 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 29548 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7133 to 168.2349 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2695 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7133 to 168.2349 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2695 deg
Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3395 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 29548 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7044 to 168.1930 deg, Dec +8.6409 to +19.2613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7044 to 168.1930 deg, Dec 8.6409 to 19.2613 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3391 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 29453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 50 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EldkU1kmr0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1176, passed=29533
Got 29533 stars (including 28316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29533 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29070 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=207 n_q2=228 n_q3=235 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.316
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NYFLGEpUYh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1170, passed=29442
Got 29442 stars (including 28242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29442 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.553 n_q1=202 n_q2=227 n_q3=239 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U6900vuLlt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1665, passed=34475
Got 34475 stars (including 32734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 844 stars left (next iteration limit 928)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits N_match=844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=221 n_q2=214 n_q3=218 n_q4=191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oq4MZQUcTo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1449, passed=34380
Got 34380 stars (including 32857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 843 stars left (next iteration limit 927)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits N_match=843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=226 n_q2=214 n_q3=213 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-57-20_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0078.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_230910_TTUQ2b1x1_1387748_qXZCZjqF/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:43:20.26 +14:02:59.9: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:07:29.39 +17:37:20.9: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:46:00.58 +15:25:25.3: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:03.56 +16:04:01.9: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:25:03.03 +15:14:31.2: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:34:02.43 +12:10:13.4: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:05:06.37 +18:13:25.8: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:33:57.13 +12:55:45.1: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:50:01.45 +11:41:36.0: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:28.39 +10:49:36.5: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:43:20.26 +14:02:59.9: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:07:29.39 +17:37:20.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:46:00.58 +15:25:25.3: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:03.56 +16:04:01.9: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:20.26 +14:02:59.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5354 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:29.39 +17:37:20.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7048 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:00.58 +15:25:25.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6837 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:03.56 +16:04:01.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7638 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:25:03.03 +15:14:31.2: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:34:02.43 +12:10:13.4: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:25:03.03 +15:14:31.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5571 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:34:02.43 +12:10:13.4: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4416 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:28.39 +10:49:36.5: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:50:01.45 +11:41:36.0: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:33:57.13 +12:55:45.1: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:28.39 +10:49:36.5: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1046 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:50:01.45 +11:41:36.0: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0509 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:57.13 +12:55:45.1: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1905 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:05:06.37 +18:13:25.8: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:06.37 +18:13:25.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6507 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:51:35.12 +17:34:16.0: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:33:53.42 +12:55:25.6: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:26.13 +15:30:14.8: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:35.16 +13:25:47.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:32.84 +17:20:55.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:31.41 +12:47:11.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:51:35.12 +17:34:16.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:33:53.42 +12:55:25.6: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:35.12 +17:34:16.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7516 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:53.42 +12:55:25.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8437 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:26.13 +15:30:14.8: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:35.16 +13:25:47.8: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:45:26.13 +15:30:14.8: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9290 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:35.16 +13:25:47.8: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7601 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:32.84 +17:20:55.0: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:40:20.88 +11:28:21.2: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:31.41 +12:47:11.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:40:20.88 +11:28:21.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:54:21.26 +10:26:41.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:36:53.99 +16:29:11.8: 15.49 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:56:02.32 +11:35:11.8: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:42:41.68 +17:45:57.6: 15.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:42:41.68 +17:45:57.6: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:41.68 +17:45:57.6: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6697 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:36:53.99 +16:29:11.8: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:53.99 +16:29:11.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6818 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:54:53.21 +11:12:53.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:57:48.82 +18:02:16.2: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:35.35 +13:03:58.0: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:57:48.82 +18:02:16.2: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:48.82 +18:02:16.2: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6522 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:35.35 +13:03:58.0: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:35.35 +13:03:58.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6256 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:58:15.68 +10:16:46.1: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:56:25.06 +14:33:44.7: 15.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:52:50.62 +12:36:40.4: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:58:15.68 +10:16:46.1: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:58:15.68 +10:16:46.1: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7473 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:56:25.06 +14:33:44.7: 15.26 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:25.06 +14:33:44.7: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7595 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 11:01:44.42 +14:28:38.2: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:52:50.62 +12:36:40.4: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:52:50.62 +12:36:40.4: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7864 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 11:01:44.42 +14:28:38.2: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:01:44.42 +14:28:38.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7615 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32661.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35643.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36648.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31758_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31758_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31763_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31763_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31765_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31765_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31767_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31767_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31783_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31783_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31791_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31791_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31799_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31799_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31804_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31804_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31805_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31805_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31807_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31807_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31808_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31808_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31809_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31809_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31810_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31810_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31818_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 31818_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32083_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 32083_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:15.35 +11:29:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32661_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 32661_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32728_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 32728_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32997_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 32997_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33502_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 33502_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:08.07 +14:13:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33614_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 33614_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34132_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34132_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34352_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 34352_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34517_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34517_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34546_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34546_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34781_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 34781_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35393_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35393_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35643_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 35643_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35823_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 35823_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35853_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35853_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35875_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35875_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35965_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 35965_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36065_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36065_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36120_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36120_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36241_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36241_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36242_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36242_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36351_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36351_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36589_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36589_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36648_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 36648_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36762_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 36762_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37127_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37127_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37229_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37229_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37326_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37326_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37666_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37666_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37722_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37722_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37911_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 37911_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38177_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 38177_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38403_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 38403_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38478_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 38478_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38815_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 38815_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39028_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079
The candidate 39028_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-58-19_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0079 did not pass the final checks
