This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1543 2461208.6543 12.31 19:07:24.32 -01:21:50.5
33.53792 -4.17443 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.57 Mnemosyne 0 -0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:07:24.32 -01:21:50.5: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:07:24.32 -01:21:50.5: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6543,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1543 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1543 2461208.6543 13.27 18:46:17.61 -04:09:26.1
28.64604 -0.75249 galactic Sct Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX23" Gaia DR3 4258215295209788160
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.750 G 18.420 G
The object was found in astcheck.663 Gerlinde 1 1 1 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:46:17.61 -04:09:26.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:46:17.61 -04:09:26.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4258215295209788160,2461208.6543,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4258215295209788160 20260617.1543 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1543 2461208.6543 13.62 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6
31.77282 6.55777 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1543* 18 25 58.57 +01 57 33.6 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6543,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1543 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1543 2461208.6543 13.88 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3
25.24559 3.29350 galactic Sct Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6543,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1543 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1543 2461208.6543 14.06 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7
26.21724 3.36609 galactic Sct Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.635+/-0.228 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6543,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1543 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.86503943 15.05.2026 08:45:29.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
First image: 2461175.86503943 15.05.2026 08:45:29.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Last image: 2461208.65461241 17.06.2026 03:42:28.512 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.97
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9233
Objects passed selection criteria: 9218
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7971
Average stars matched: 7796.5 (97.8108 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:56:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.86503943 15.05.2026 08:45:29.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
First image: 2461175.86503943 15.05.2026 08:45:29.407 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Last image: 2461208.65461241 17.06.2026 03:42:28.512 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 187
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99801
Objects passed selection criteria: 99623
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90553.2
Average stars matched: 84924 (93.7835 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1891876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:59:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Aql-03-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aql-03-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Aql-03-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119551 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119551 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits_preview.png'
Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
renamed 'Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits_preview.png'
Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 902.5440
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 589.6009
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1959.4832
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 610.6683
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1955.9853
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 610.7679
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.17107
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.5 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.6000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.65407137
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08
Second-epoch image center 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08
Second-epoch image center 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01312 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ICzaUwc0xT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m78lEI3wHA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8rTLgZR8NG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AxlxKsqgK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 275.0070 to 290.7498 deg, Dec -7.2514 to +3.2826 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 275.0070 to 290.7498 deg, Dec -7.2514 to 3.2826 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7025 out of 7466 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7466 out of 14325 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.722900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.722900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.97
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14325 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 275.0070 to 290.7498 deg, Dec -7.2514 to +3.2826 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 275.0070 to 290.7498 deg, Dec -7.2514 to 3.2826 deg
Loaded 9410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7025 out of 7466 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7466 out of 14325 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 14138 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.9988 to 290.7529 deg, Dec -7.2648 to +3.2822 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.9988 to 290.7529 deg, Dec -7.2648 to 3.2822 deg
Loaded 9437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6996 out of 7464 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7464 out of 14138 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.4 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.3 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.2 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.7 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.2 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
14.2 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ICzaUwc0xT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1242, passed=14325
Got 14325 stars (including 13071 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.746 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.625 n_q1=189 n_q2=276 n_q3=192 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m78lEI3wHA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1241, passed=14138
Got 14138 stars (including 12882 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14138 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.768 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=186 n_q2=278 n_q3=189 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8rTLgZR8NG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=656, passed=7934
Got 7934 stars (including 7273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=212 n_q2=241 n_q3=203 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7AxlxKsqgK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=678, passed=7877
Got 7877 stars (including 7195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=215 n_q2=238 n_q3=201 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits sigma_overall=0.609 worst_q_ratio=1.225
ref2=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits sigma_overall=0.615 worst_q_ratio=1.249
new1=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits sigma_overall=0.529 worst_q_ratio=1.062
new2=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.526 worst_q_ratio=1.118
reference average sigma_overall=0.612 worst_q_ratio=1.237
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 20667_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:04.36 -03:51:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20669_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 20669_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:53.07 -06:07:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20678_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 20678_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:10.61 -00:15:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08
Second-epoch image center 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 938.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:26.697 -01:59:01.08
Second-epoch image center 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0059 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:25.131 -01:58:49.30
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:28.082 -01:59:05.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01312 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wX4jRNGoQU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oIFIHbVGWl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WYLRz4tQGN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ekvUyfMWyc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits and wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 148413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 275.0028 to 290.7497 deg, Dec -7.2529 to +3.2886 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 275.0028 to 290.7497 deg, Dec -7.2529 to 3.2886 deg
Loaded 9416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6295 out of 8220 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8220 out of 148413 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.524400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.524400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.88
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 148413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 275.0028 to 290.7497 deg, Dec -7.2529 to +3.2886 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 275.0028 to 290.7497 deg, Dec -7.2529 to 3.2886 deg
Loaded 9416 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6295 out of 8220 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8220 out of 148413 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 150207 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.9984 to 290.7583 deg, Dec -7.2661 to +3.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.9984 to 290.7583 deg, Dec -7.2661 to 3.2823 deg
Loaded 9443 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6275 out of 8241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8241 out of 150207 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.2 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.2 pix Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
14.9 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.3 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
14.4 mag. Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wX4jRNGoQU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=18535, passed=148397
Got 148397 stars (including 129670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 148397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=189 n_q2=271 n_q3=203 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oIFIHbVGWl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=19074, passed=150190
Got 150190 stars (including 130922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147559 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.625 n_q1=190 n_q2=273 n_q3=194 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WYLRz4tQGN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=7491, passed=95461
Got 95461 stars (including 87822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 92097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=205 n_q2=256 n_q3=194 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ekvUyfMWyc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=7821, passed=96881
Got 96881 stars (including 88905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96881 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.521 n_q1=211 n_q2=246 n_q3=190 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-41-41_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_225306_TTUQ2b1x1_337373_0rE5MSrY/wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:25:54.08 -06:04:27.4: 14.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:51:26.72 +01:03:09.2: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:58:34.49 -01:20:38.1: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:53:55.63 -00:16:34.7: 14.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:08:11.61 -00:02:32.4: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:57:55.01 -05:15:00.7: 14.04 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:57:19.77 -01:19:41.9: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:30:33.19 -00:46:08.4: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:34:39.42 +01:50:02.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:25:54.08 -06:04:27.4: 14.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:25:54.08 -06:04:27.4: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0090 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:08:11.61 -00:02:32.4: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:57:55.01 -05:15:00.7: 13.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:51:26.72 +01:03:09.2: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:53:55.63 -00:16:34.7: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:11.61 -00:02:32.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9485 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:58:34.49 -01:20:38.1: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:57:19.77 -01:19:41.9: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:30:33.19 -00:46:08.4: 13.93 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:55.01 -05:15:00.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0511 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:26.72 +01:03:09.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7383 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:55.63 -00:16:34.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0412 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:34.49 -01:20:38.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8274 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:19.77 -01:19:41.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2411 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:33.19 -00:46:08.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0456 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:34:39.42 +01:50:02.0: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:39.42 +01:50:02.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7236 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:04:13.23 -01:47:46.3: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:04:13.23 -01:47:46.3: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:31:27.20 -00:26:21.5: 13.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:13.23 -01:47:46.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7978 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:06:17.42 -05:16:30.3: 13.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:06:26.76 -02:51:26.5: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:04:19.62 +00:09:04.2: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:04:17.63 -00:01:02.1: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:53:35.04 -04:29:26.1: 13.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:31:27.20 -00:26:21.5: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:54:59.62 -05:46:40.5: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:27.20 -00:26:21.5: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7091 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:06:17.42 -05:16:30.3: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:17.42 -05:16:30.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8740 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:45:18.75 -04:46:01.5: 13.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:56:21.74 -04:22:40.0: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:06:26.76 -02:51:26.5: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:04:19.62 +00:09:04.2: 13.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:26.76 -02:51:26.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7877 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:04:17.63 -00:01:02.1: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:19.62 +00:09:04.2: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5549 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:17.63 -00:01:02.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7400 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:53:35.04 -04:29:26.1: 13.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:35.04 -04:29:26.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5299 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:54:59.62 -05:46:40.5: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:06:52.86 -05:08:41.8: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:59.62 -05:46:40.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5150 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:56:21.74 -04:22:40.0: 13.05 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:45:18.75 -04:46:01.5: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:21.74 -04:22:40.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3612 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:18.75 -04:46:01.5: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3922 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:06:52.86 -05:08:41.8: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:52.86 -05:08:41.8: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3398 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:53:14.15 +02:15:33.2: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:58:23.78 -06:05:54.2: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:47:36.11 -05:14:43.5: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:51:46.69 -05:43:36.7: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:53:14.15 +02:15:33.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:59:29.00 -05:53:17.2: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:58:23.78 -06:05:54.2: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:03:39.12 +00:07:26.9: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:14.15 +02:15:33.2: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3040 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:23.78 -06:05:54.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3685 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:47:45.18 -06:05:24.2: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:47:36.11 -05:14:43.5: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:36.11 -05:14:43.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2498 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:51:46.69 -05:43:36.7: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:41:20.85 -02:38:03.7: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:46.69 -05:43:36.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2158 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:59:29.00 -05:53:17.2: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:29.00 -05:53:17.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2296 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:03:39.12 +00:07:26.9: 13.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:39.12 +00:07:26.9: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3229 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:47:45.18 -06:05:24.2: 13.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:45.18 -06:05:24.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1243 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:41:20.85 -02:38:03.7: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:20.85 -02:38:03.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9976 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:04:18.09 +00:07:18.5: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:03:29.96 -01:12:17.5: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:57:19.08 -00:47:31.1: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:51:25.23 -01:25:10.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:38:23.01 -05:38:22.8: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:04:18.09 +00:07:18.5: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:18.09 +00:07:18.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1156 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:01:47.89 -05:36:18.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:03:29.96 -01:12:17.5: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:57:19.08 -00:47:31.1: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:29.96 -01:12:17.5: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0315 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:19.08 -00:47:31.1: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0602 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:51:25.23 -01:25:10.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:25.23 -01:25:10.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8690 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:07:24.32 -01:21:50.5: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:07:26.16 -01:09:20.9: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:38:23.01 -05:38:22.8: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:23.01 -05:38:22.8: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6669 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:01:47.89 -05:36:18.0: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:47.89 -05:36:18.0: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6280 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:07:24.32 -01:21:50.5: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:07:26.16 -01:09:20.9: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:26.16 -01:09:20.9: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1350 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:08:57.84 +01:20:22.2: 13.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:07:47.46 +01:12:39.0: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:00:28.55 -05:22:15.9: 13.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:46:16.28 -06:08:03.3: 13.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:45:36.92 -05:35:44.7: 13.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:46:17.61 -04:09:26.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:08:57.84 +01:20:22.2: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:07:47.46 +01:12:39.0: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:57.84 +01:20:22.2: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2676 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:47.46 +01:12:39.0: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3754 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:00:28.55 -05:22:15.9: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:28.55 -05:22:15.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2886 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:09:13.23 -06:03:59.7: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:46:16.28 -06:08:03.3: 13.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:01:42.36 -00:08:46.5: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:16.28 -06:08:03.3: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2081 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:45:36.92 -05:35:44.7: 13.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:46:17.61 -04:09:26.1: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:36.92 -05:35:44.7: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1609 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:37:51.66 -04:48:14.9: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:09:13.23 -06:03:59.7: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:01:42.36 -00:08:46.5: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:13.23 -06:03:59.7: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4562 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:42.36 -00:08:46.5: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4465 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:37:51.66 -04:48:14.9: 13.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:51.66 -04:48:14.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1855 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:56:49.47 -05:05:25.0: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:44:05.58 -06:11:18.1: 13.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:41:33.72 -05:24:42.6: 13.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:58:10.12 +01:36:55.5: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:57:04.19 -03:14:44.2: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:56:49.47 -05:05:25.0: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:49.47 -05:05:25.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5063 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:03:43.74 -02:33:49.8: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:44:05.58 -06:11:18.1: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:05.58 -06:11:18.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.2880 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:59:56.52 -05:26:17.3: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:41:33.72 -05:24:42.6: 13.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:33.72 -05:24:42.6: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3645 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:57:04.19 -03:14:44.2: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:58:10.12 +01:36:55.5: 13.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:04.19 -03:14:44.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5558 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:10.12 +01:36:55.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6781 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:03:43.74 -02:33:49.8: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:03:43.74 -02:33:49.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7245 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:59:56.52 -05:26:17.3: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:55:41.69 -01:19:20.2: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:56.52 -05:26:17.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9374 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:04:15.19 -00:56:57.6: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:05:21.59 -05:13:18.0: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:55:41.69 -01:19:20.2: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:54:06.51 -04:29:36.0: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:41.69 -01:19:20.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9675 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 19:00:52.53 -03:25:39.3: 14.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:42:36.73 -04:08:47.4: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:04:15.19 -00:56:57.6: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:04:15.19 -00:56:57.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8349 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:05:21.59 -05:13:18.0: 13.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:05:21.59 -05:13:18.0: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8637 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:54:06.51 -04:29:36.0: 13.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:06.51 -04:29:36.0: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9108 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 19:00:52.53 -03:25:39.3: 13.90 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:52.53 -03:25:39.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9693 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:42:36.73 -04:08:47.4: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:36.73 -04:08:47.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8746 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:25:58.57 +01:57:33.6: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-45-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0122.fits at 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:25:35.99 -05:18:56.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-59-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits at 18:27:08.76 -04:25:20.7: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172024.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out172797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out174151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out174871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out174923.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171257_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171257_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171259_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171259_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171266_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171266_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171268_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171268_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171295_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171295_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171310_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171310_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171320_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171320_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171328_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171328_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:39.17 +00:33:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171332_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171332_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171339_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171339_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171350_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171350_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171351_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171351_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:07.23 -05:30:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171353_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171353_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171362_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171362_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171365_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171365_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:46.23 -06:10:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171382_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171382_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171389_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171389_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:58.01 -03:33:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171391_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171391_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171403_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171403_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171407_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171407_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:14.55 -06:11:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171413_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171413_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171418_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171418_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171437_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171437_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171453_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171453_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171456_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171456_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171460_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171460_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171469_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171469_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171471_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171471_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:50.53 -00:38:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171473_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171473_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171475_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171475_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:09.73 -05:50:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171478_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171478_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:39.47 -00:45:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171484_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171484_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171487_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171487_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171491_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171491_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171494_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171494_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171495_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171495_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:54.90 -05:00:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171501_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171501_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:47.79 -00:52:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171504_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171504_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171508_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171508_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171512_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171512_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:02.05 -05:47:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171514_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171514_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:09.48 -06:03:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171523_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171523_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171527_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171527_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171535_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171535_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171536_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171536_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:28.64 +01:41:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171541_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171541_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171546_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171546_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171548_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171548_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:05.54 -00:54:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171549_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171549_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171855_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171855_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171928_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 171928_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:33.46 -05:43:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172024_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 172024_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172389_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172389_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:58.42 -03:40:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172455_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172455_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172460_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172460_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:07.10 -04:53:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172568_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172568_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:46.56 -05:49:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172576_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172576_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:10.89 -04:45:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172651_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172651_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172660_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172660_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172690_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172690_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:35.46 -05:55:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172716_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172716_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172726_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172726_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:35.96 -05:18:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172760_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172760_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172762_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172762_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:58.98 -03:05:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172785_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172785_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172797_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 172797_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172832_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172832_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:35.86 -04:57:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172840_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172840_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172953_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172953_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172955_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172955_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172971_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 172971_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:17.76 -06:06:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173010_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173010_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:45.10 -05:39:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173017_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173017_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:00.12 -06:05:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173021_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173021_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:23.14 -00:40:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173024_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173024_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:39.28 -00:14:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173025_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173025_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173044_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173044_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:11.18 -05:45:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173045_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173045_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173083_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173083_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:08.53 -00:14:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173105_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173105_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173124_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173124_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:10.28 -04:45:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173161_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173161_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173488_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173488_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173513_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173513_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173629_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173629_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173738_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173738_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:39.47 +01:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173756_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173756_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173903_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173903_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173904_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173904_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173909_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173909_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173926_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 173926_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174006_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174006_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174009_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174009_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174151_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 174151_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174220_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174220_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174347_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174347_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174390_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174390_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174514_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174514_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174595_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 174595_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174871_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 174871_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174923_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 174923_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 175490_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175627_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 175627_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28594_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 28594_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:48.73 -05:47:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25180_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 25180_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:48.59 -05:57:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22172_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 22172_Aql-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-42-28_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
