This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1567 2461208.6567 13.14 10:53:42.21 +01:27:32.6
250.23942 51.85709 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe 0 0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:53:42.21 +01:27:32.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:53:42.21 +01:27:32.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1567* 10 53 42.21 +01 27 32.6 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6567,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1567 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1567 2461208.6567 13.40 11:25:24.97 -00:24:03.8
262.51405 55.57000 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:25:24.97 -00:24:03.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:25:24.97 -00:24:03.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1567* 11 25 24.97 +00 24 03.8 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6567,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1567 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1567 2461208.6567 14.61 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4
259.46031 50.38967 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1567* 11 07 09.84 -03 28 06.4 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6567,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1567 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1567 2461208.6567 14.64 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0
270.78399 51.88091 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1567* 11 34 16.75 -06 06 32.0 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6567,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1567 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461208.65698624 17.06.2026 03:45:53.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 19
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4256
Objects passed selection criteria: 4254
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3987.5
Average stars matched: 3932.25 (98.6144 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110840 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:56:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
First image: 2461146.71357755 16.04.2026 05:07:23.100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Last image: 2461208.65698624 17.06.2026 03:45:53.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24999
Objects passed selection criteria: 24946
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27258
Average stars matched: 23161.5 (84.9714 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:58:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-08-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-08-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-08-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119551 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 119551 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
renamed 'Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 625.4784
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.1793
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1314.9550
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 473.9635
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1314.9931
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 473.2991
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.10232
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.3500003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.65648484
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0796 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01082 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yuxuqNiqAE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LI6aRIPrde
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jjXq5LRScQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DfuZahcYzY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2717 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2909 to 175.0325 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2717 deg
Loaded 3803 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3190 out of 3294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3294 out of 5632 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.0 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.8 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yuxuqNiqAE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=218 n_q2=241 n_q3=230 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LI6aRIPrde (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=375, passed=5632
Got 5632 stars (including 5252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5632 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=219 n_q2=234 n_q3=238 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jjXq5LRScQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, passed=4562
Got 4562 stars (including 4204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=205 n_q2=243 n_q3=247 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DfuZahcYzY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=4570
Got 4570 stars (including 4223 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4570 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4490 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=206 n_q2=239 n_q3=249 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.295
new1=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.199
new2=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.306
reference average sigma_overall=0.4545 worst_q_ratio=1.2915
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:03:18.07 -03:16:10.2: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:10:55.11 -02:10:30.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:39.66 -01:23:26.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:57.06 -03:26:13.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:13:03.04 -01:54:09.7: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:13:07.21 -00:05:33.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:15:25.67 +01:44:29.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:06.35 -01:47:00.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:24.48 -00:27:19.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:07:17.24 -01:33:56.5: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:03:18.07 -03:16:10.2: 12.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:18.07 -03:16:10.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1264 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:05:39.66 -01:23:26.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:15:25.67 +01:44:29.4: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:13:07.21 -00:05:33.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:10:55.11 -02:10:30.1: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:13:03.04 -01:54:09.7: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:08:57.06 -03:26:13.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:39.66 -01:23:26.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0117 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:08:24.48 -00:27:19.6: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:15:25.67 +01:44:29.4: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2087 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:07.21 -00:05:33.1: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0548 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:55.11 -02:10:30.1: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1100 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:13:03.04 -01:54:09.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0971 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:08:06.35 -01:47:00.4: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:57.06 -03:26:13.4: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0259 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:24.48 -00:27:19.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8629 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:06.35 -01:47:00.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1241 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:07:17.24 -01:33:56.5: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:17.24 -01:33:56.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0849 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:11.36 -03:30:24.3: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:02:48.62 -01:55:10.6: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:00:32.19 -02:10:46.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:03:16.04 -03:09:20.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:02:31.52 -00:45:50.9: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:10:37.88 +01:46:56.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:04:25.26 -02:04:24.5: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:12:43.86 -00:17:52.9: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:06:11.36 -03:30:24.3: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:02:48.62 -01:55:10.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:00:32.19 -02:10:46.8: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:03:16.04 -03:09:20.2: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:11.36 -03:30:24.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1670 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:10:37.88 +01:46:56.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:02:31.52 -00:45:50.9: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:48.62 -01:55:10.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1208 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:04:25.26 -02:04:24.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:12:43.86 -00:17:52.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:32.19 -02:10:46.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2141 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:16.04 -03:09:20.2: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1667 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:37.88 +01:46:56.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2383 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:31.52 -00:45:50.9: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1718 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:25.26 -02:04:24.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1556 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:43.86 -00:17:52.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1833 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20134_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20134_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20149_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20149_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20152_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20152_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20153_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20153_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20154_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20154_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20155_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20155_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20156_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20156_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20158_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20158_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20159_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20159_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20161_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20161_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20162_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20162_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20163_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20163_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20164_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20164_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20165_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20165_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20166_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20166_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20167_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20167_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20169_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20169_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20171_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20171_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:02.77 -05:01:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20176_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 20176_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0791 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:33.967 -01:59:30.21
Second-epoch image center 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0796 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:52.724 -01:58:45.14
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:53.082 -01:59:23.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01082 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dXiMCdHl9w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.behsA10HAs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aJCAK60w6W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A5Byp0wW4D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.656500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.656500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 31205 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to +3.2727 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2881 to 175.0375 deg, Dec -7.2681 to 3.2727 deg
Loaded 3807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3109 out of 3359 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3359 out of 31205 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.3 pix Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
15.0 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.0 mag. Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dXiMCdHl9w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1524, passed=33863
Got 33863 stars (including 32293 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.580 n_q1=214 n_q2=238 n_q3=229 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.behsA10HAs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1336, passed=31195
Got 31195 stars (including 29815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31195 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.561 n_q1=223 n_q2=228 n_q3=236 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aJCAK60w6W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1422, passed=34521
Got 34521 stars (including 33024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34521 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=217 n_q2=220 n_q3=254 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A5Byp0wW4D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1358, passed=34230
Got 34230 stars (including 32801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=215 n_q2=222 n_q3=256 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-10_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_225109_TTUQ2b1x1_4175031_rlYLAOun/wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:03:08.11 -03:02:22.0: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:52:48.79 -03:18:44.5: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:33.66 +01:20:21.9: 14.72 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:01.09 -00:29:04.9: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:23:30.63 +01:21:36.9: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:35:13.32 -03:51:35.3: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:03:38.28 +00:15:54.7: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:56:38.13 -00:42:50.1: 14.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:21:48.14 +00:52:20.7: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:03:08.11 -03:02:22.0: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:52:48.79 -03:18:44.5: 14.50 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:08.11 -03:02:22.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8105 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:52:48.79 -03:18:44.5: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3673 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:35:13.32 -03:51:35.3: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:08:33.66 +01:20:21.9: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:23:30.63 +01:21:36.9: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:30.63 +01:21:36.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5058 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:33.66 +01:20:21.9: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5591 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:13.32 -03:51:35.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7421 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:18:01.24 -04:21:52.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:05:01.09 -00:29:04.9: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:01.09 -00:29:04.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8768 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:56:38.13 -00:42:50.1: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:03:38.28 +00:15:54.7: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:21:48.14 +00:52:20.7: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:38.28 +00:15:54.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8827 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:38.13 -00:42:50.1: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5402 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:48.14 +00:52:20.7: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3607 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:18:01.24 -04:21:52.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:01.24 -04:21:52.6: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4803 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:19:58.16 -01:29:04.7: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:04:52.88 -04:30:56.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:53:42.21 +01:27:32.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:04:52.88 -04:30:56.8: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:04:52.88 -04:30:56.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4696 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:25:24.97 -00:24:03.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:19:58.16 -01:29:04.7: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:58.16 -01:29:04.7: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1412 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 10:53:42.21 +01:27:32.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:25:24.97 -00:24:03.8: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:17:08.32 -02:02:26.5: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:17:08.32 -02:02:26.5: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:08.32 -02:02:26.5: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4503 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.9: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:07:09.84 -03:28:06.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:31:21.69 -02:09:55.1: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:32:12.10 -01:17:22.6: 15.00 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:34:16.75 -06:06:32.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.9: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:21:19.53 -01:12:38.5: 15.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:10.47 -02:18:45.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6408 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:22:00.34 -00:23:34.6: 15.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:31:21.69 -02:09:55.1: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:32:12.10 -01:17:22.6: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:21.69 -02:09:55.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6763 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:12.10 -01:17:22.6: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5914 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:21:19.53 -01:12:38.5: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:19.53 -01:12:38.5: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6688 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:22:00.34 -00:23:34.6: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:00.34 -00:23:34.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6715 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:18:21.24 +00:29:38.2: 15.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:30:26.68 +00:35:08.8: 14.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:19:11.50 -01:42:55.2: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:18:21.24 +00:29:38.2: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:21.24 +00:29:38.2: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7260 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:27:28.00 +00:44:49.0: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:08:25.75 -05:59:02.1: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:30:26.68 +00:35:08.8: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:19:11.50 -01:42:55.2: 15.56 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:26.68 +00:35:08.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6865 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:11.50 -01:42:55.2: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7460 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:08:25.75 -05:59:02.1: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:08:25.75 -05:59:02.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7653 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:27:28.00 +00:44:49.0: 15.50 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:28.00 +00:44:49.0: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7472 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:30:11.79 -05:15:01.2: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:30:11.79 -05:15:01.2: 15.10 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:11.79 -05:15:01.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6702 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:23:51.42 -04:03:30.1: 15.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:34:58.26 -02:11:38.2: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:23:51.42 -04:03:30.1: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:51.42 -04:03:30.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8905 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-15-03_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 11:34:58.26 -02:11:38.2: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:58.26 -02:11:38.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8275 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56370.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51539_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51539_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51543_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51543_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51551_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51551_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51556_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51556_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51558_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51558_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51560_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51560_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51562_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51562_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51574_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51574_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51575_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51575_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51577_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51577_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51581_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51581_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51582_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51582_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51585_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51585_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51587_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 51587_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:52.26 -05:07:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52455_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 52455_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 52655_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.40 -02:53:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 52692_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:08.41 -00:54:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 52836_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 52884_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 53387_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54096_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 54096_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54125_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 54125_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54581_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 54581_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54977_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 54977_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55700_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 55700_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55919_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 55919_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55926_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 55926_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56035_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56035_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56335_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 56335_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56370_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 56370_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56450_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56450_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56453_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56453_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56486_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56486_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56803_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56803_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56844_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56844_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56965_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 56965_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57009_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57009_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57019_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57019_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57082_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57082_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57194_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57194_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57413_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57413_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57493_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57493_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57508_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57508_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57512_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57512_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57516_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57516_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57527_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57527_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57620_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57620_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57735_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57735_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57835_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57835_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57939_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 57939_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58284_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 58284_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14217_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 14217_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30494_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 30494_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08261_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 08261_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23045_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065
The candidate 23045_Leo-08-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_22-45-53_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0065 did not pass the final checks
