This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3360 2461206.8360 8.86 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2
357.46225 -14.36286 galactic CrA Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" U CrA
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.900 pg 14.300 pg 2433175.00000 147.500000000000 M2Ibe
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2: 9.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.88 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U CrA,2461206.8360,8.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U CrA 20260615.3360 8.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3360 2461206.8360 12.69 19:01:17.41 -31:34:12.5
5.10787 -15.74244 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.785 Zwetana -1 1 1 12.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:01:17.41 -31:34:12.5: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:01:17.41 -31:34:12.5: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461206.8360,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260615.3360 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3360 2461206.8360 11.82 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0
358.31310 -13.69134 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" V0742 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.600 V < 15.500 V 2454668.00000 317.000000000000 M1e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0: 12.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0: 13.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0742 Sgr,2461206.8360,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0742 Sgr 20260615.3360 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3360 2461206.8360 11.48 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7
2.78388 -9.66223 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0933 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 pg 16.500 pg 2436748.00000 281.400000000000 M8/9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7: 13.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7: 13.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0933 Sgr,2461206.8360,11.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0933 Sgr 20260615.3360 11.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3360 2461206.8360 11.79 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7
359.73841 -13.71936 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2382 Sgr
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 V 12.900 V 2452878.00000 61.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7: 12.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2382 Sgr,2461206.8360,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2382 Sgr 20260615.3360 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461206.83627028 15.06.2026 08:04:03.752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10044
Objects passed selection criteria: 10032
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7776.75
Average stars matched: 6922.25 (89.0121 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 15 03:05:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461206.83627028 15.06.2026 08:04:03.752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 97
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 50 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111637
Objects passed selection criteria: 111466
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92319.2
Average stars matched: 76428 (82.7866 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1887448 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 15 03:08:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461206.83573309
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01434 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tMO3bmifIr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VfVp8IYjfP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ndn5TsGY41
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hMeLgFuM7N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.538200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.538200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=6.9)
Read 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7344 to 291.6637 deg, Dec -39.2761 to -28.4557 deg
Loaded 18882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9258 out of 9621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9621 out of 12244 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.7 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tMO3bmifIr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, passed=9805
Got 9805 stars (including 9075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.121 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.945 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.056 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.497 n_q1=269 n_q2=146 n_q3=285 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VfVp8IYjfP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, passed=12244
Got 12244 stars (including 11301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.657 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.764 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=249 n_q2=202 n_q3=262 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ndn5TsGY41 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, passed=8789
Got 8789 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8789 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.801 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.235 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.066 n_q1=188 n_q2=269 n_q3=181 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.541
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hMeLgFuM7N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=554, passed=8843
Got 8843 stars (including 8283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.874 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.232 n_q1=182 n_q2=255 n_q3=192 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.695
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits sigma_overall=1.121 worst_q_ratio=1.336
ref2=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits sigma_overall=0.657 worst_q_ratio=1.163
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.801 worst_q_ratio=1.541
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.874 worst_q_ratio=1.695
reference average sigma_overall=0.889 worst_q_ratio=1.2495
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.06 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.75 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.75 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:23.67 -37:35:24.3: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:36:40.86 -29:50:52.7: 10.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:41:31.99 -36:05:44.1: 11.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:57:42.54 -34:31:25.7: 11.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2: 9.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:36:40.86 -29:50:52.7: 10.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:57:42.54 -34:31:25.7: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:41:31.99 -36:05:44.1: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:40:23.67 -37:35:24.3: 11.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:23.67 -37:35:24.3: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0565 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:36:40.86 -29:50:52.7: ref_mag=10.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4871 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:42.54 -34:31:25.7: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0725 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:31.99 -36:05:44.1: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0840 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2: 9.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.88 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2: ref_mag=9.88 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.8636 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22003_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 22003_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:28.92 -36:22:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22494_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 22494_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22505_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 22505_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.48 -35:17:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22997_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 22997_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23014_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 23014_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23032_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 23032_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 01088_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:41:07.05 -37:50:10.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.0'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0129 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:56.198 -33:59:55.59
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:59.074 -33:59:18.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01434 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.smfHtp7mJr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9sfHY80N9u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qnqoj9MXSr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JF5ZW9FUVi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.220000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.220000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 152296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.6842 to 291.7049 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.6842 to 291.7049 deg, Dec -39.2762 to -28.4509 deg
Loaded 18985 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13296 out of 16025 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16025 out of 152296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.smfHtp7mJr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8993, passed=99876
Got 99876 stars (including 90761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.02"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.077 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.918 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.177 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.424 n_q1=270 n_q2=134 n_q3=311 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9sfHY80N9u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=13704, passed=152277
Got 152277 stars (including 138365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 152277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.671 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.823 n_q1=249 n_q2=216 n_q3=243 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qnqoj9MXSr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=7454, passed=92071
Got 92071 stars (including 84515 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92071 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.770 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.059 n_q1=206 n_q2=248 n_q3=226 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.592
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JF5ZW9FUVi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=7364, passed=91975
Got 91975 stars (including 84496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 91975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 90847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.259 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.070 n_q1=217 n_q2=235 n_q3=224 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.626
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-03-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_030437_TTUQ2b1x1_1278276_Ennw8BJH/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:38:17.88 -29:44:08.9: 13.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:33:15.19 -35:23:19.0: 12.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:30:02.07 -30:34:03.2: 13.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:46:28.16 -33:01:33.1: 12.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:07:18.74 -34:54:31.4: 12.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:01:54.16 -31:06:58.7: 12.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:47:55.27 -37:30:20.8: 12.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:45:45.12 -34:10:22.5: 12.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:54:05.19 -31:12:29.9: 13.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:28:58.25 -31:11:03.9: 12.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:33:15.19 -35:23:19.0: 12.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:38:17.88 -29:44:08.9: 13.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:15.19 -35:23:19.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2613 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:01:54.16 -31:06:58.7: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:38:17.88 -29:44:08.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.1652 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:54:05.19 -31:12:29.9: 13.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:07:18.74 -34:54:31.4: 12.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:54.16 -31:06:58.7: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0612 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:47:55.27 -37:30:20.8: 12.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:30:02.07 -30:34:03.2: 14.48 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:28:58.25 -31:11:03.9: 13.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:46:28.16 -33:01:33.1: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:45:45.12 -34:10:22.5: 12.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:05.19 -31:12:29.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.2299 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:07:18.74 -34:54:31.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1235 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:55.27 -37:30:20.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3141 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:30:02.07 -30:34:03.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.7891 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:28.16 -33:01:33.1: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9686 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:45.12 -34:10:22.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9642 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:28:58.25 -31:11:03.9: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0177 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:33:46.37 -37:13:10.5: 12.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:16.86 -29:43:28.2: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:25:01.88 -37:54:22.6: 11.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:26.33 -31:21:15.9: 11.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:49:27.44 -31:21:14.0: 12.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:43:39.86 -30:21:33.0: 10.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:26:49.32 -36:52:50.8: 12.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:51:21.41 -30:07:48.8: 11.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:33:46.37 -37:13:10.5: 12.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:46.37 -37:13:10.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6742 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:40:16.86 -29:43:28.2: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:26.33 -31:21:15.9: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:49:27.44 -31:21:14.0: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:43:39.86 -30:21:33.0: 10.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:16.86 -29:43:28.2: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2906 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:26:49.32 -36:52:50.8: 12.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:26.33 -31:21:15.9: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9960 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:27.44 -31:21:14.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7438 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:39.86 -30:21:33.0: ref_mag=10.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6977 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:25:01.88 -37:54:22.6: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:49.32 -36:52:50.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7040 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:59:36.87 -36:36:16.1: 12.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:25:01.88 -37:54:22.6: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2963 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:51:21.41 -30:07:48.8: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:51:21.41 -30:07:48.8: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5258 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:59:36.87 -36:36:16.1: 12.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:36.87 -36:36:16.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.3916 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:04:43.08 -35:44:21.9: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:48:45.63 -30:05:21.9: 12.46 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:41:41.18 -30:29:59.8: 12.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:09:43.68 -37:54:42.1: 13.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:09:48.24 -38:06:20.4: 13.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:50:51.46 -34:18:04.1: 12.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:45:24.17 -35:51:53.1: 12.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:46:08.42 -33:52:58.3: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:29:02.92 -34:02:28.5: 14.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:48:45.63 -30:05:21.9: 12.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:41:41.18 -30:29:59.8: 12.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:04:43.08 -35:44:21.9: 14.25 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:45.63 -30:05:21.9: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3971 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:41.18 -30:29:59.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.3823 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:04:43.08 -35:44:21.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=12.9299 delta=1.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:09:43.68 -37:54:42.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:43.68 -37:54:42.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.1209 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:09:48.24 -38:06:20.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:48.24 -38:06:20.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.3406 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:45.36 -29:54:05.4: 12.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:50:51.46 -34:18:04.1: 12.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:51.46 -34:18:04.1: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9176 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:45:24.17 -35:51:53.1: 12.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:46:08.42 -33:52:58.3: 14.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:24.17 -35:51:53.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9977 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:29:02.92 -34:02:28.5: 14.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:40:45.36 -29:54:05.4: 13.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:45.36 -29:54:05.4: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0447 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:27:08.85 -35:02:33.4: 13.76 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:05.46 -30:39:16.2: 13.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:31:27.35 -31:00:05.2: 13.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:34:23.20 -30:19:22.3: 13.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:27:08.85 -35:02:33.4: 14.33 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:08.85 -35:02:33.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.2638 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:37:05.46 -30:39:16.2: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:05.46 -30:39:16.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.1456 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:31:27.35 -31:00:05.2: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:27.35 -31:00:05.2: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.0230 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:34:23.20 -30:19:22.3: 14.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:34:23.20 -30:19:22.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.1110 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:29:36.48 -34:16:51.3: 12.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 19:01:17.41 -31:34:12.5: 14.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:29:36.48 -34:16:51.3: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:29:36.48 -34:16:51.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3931 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0: 12.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 19:01:17.41 -31:34:12.5: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7: 13.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0: 13.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:39:41.13 -36:48:39.0: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.8194 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7: 12.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7: 13.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:30:57.36 -31:08:34.7: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.4631 delta=1.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-45-26_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1260.fits at 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:42:34.75 -35:33:17.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.7964 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out163832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out165500.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out167042.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out157293.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21623.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158719_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158719_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158723_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158723_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158749_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158749_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158757_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158757_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158761_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158761_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158771_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158771_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158774_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158774_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158777_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158777_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158779_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158779_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158780_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158780_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158784_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158784_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158791_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158791_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158793_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158793_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158796_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158796_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158797_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158797_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158798_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158798_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158799_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158799_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:30.36 -34:11:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158805_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158805_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158806_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 158806_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160114_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 160114_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:58.77 -30:28:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160724_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 160724_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161962_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 161962_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:54.97 -29:55:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162003_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 162003_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162358_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 162358_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:20.94 -36:46:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162372_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 162372_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:49.80 -34:49:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162723_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 162723_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:22.35 -34:09:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163218_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 163218_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163504_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 163504_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:27.79 -31:03:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163525_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 163525_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163801_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 163801_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:04.49 -35:46:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163832_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 163832_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:43.08 -35:44:21.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.759 6731368171324636928 286.17975785625 -35.73939156307 12.6918 11.0649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.759#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164149_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 164149_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:14.15 -29:55:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164593_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 164593_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164811_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 164811_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164948_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 164948_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165163_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 165163_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:25.56 -31:17:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165500_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 165500_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:08.42 -33:52:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.241 6735567279266003968 281.53499135847 -33.88252486925 13.2540 11.2118 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.241#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165573_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 165573_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167042_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 167042_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:02.92 -34:02:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.131 6734954228496155264 277.26195362551 -34.04099003800 12.8328 11.5243 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.131#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167947_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 167947_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168608_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 168608_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168767_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 168767_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:35.91 -30:43:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168931_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 168931_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 168957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169074_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 169074_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.57 -29:55:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:52.87 -31:33:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110820_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 110820_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117077_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 117077_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:08.37 -29:58:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157293_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 157293_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12121_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 12121_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120610_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 120610_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:11.81 -29:40:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 113957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.31 -33:50:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143054_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 143054_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:50.29 -32:16:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 06292_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:07.04 -37:50:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118726_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 118726_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:37.17 -31:24:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61885_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 61885_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:26.51 -35:17:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21623_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 21623_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141297_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 141297_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-04-03_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
