Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461206.6645,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260615.1645 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Boo-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 233340 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 233340 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits_preview.png'
Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits

renamed 'Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits_preview.png'
Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 489.6180
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 516.3518
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1168.0653
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 497.0499
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1203.3869
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 493.0102
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.38567
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.008
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-14T22:56:22.3960074' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-15T03:56:22.3960074' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61206.164148102 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-15T03:56:32.2983600' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61206.1642627083 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 226.664427965416 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000282258377 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.3405555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 162.400555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06850165410294 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.22 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 289.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/d_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits :)
Spent 0.604855 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/d_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-14T22:56:58.9914278' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-15T03:56:58.9914278' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61206.164571655 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-15T03:57:08.8938411' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61206.1646862617 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 226.664427952 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 14.0000282137674 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 69.3777777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 162.800555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.06824080123552 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Boo-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29486 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.22 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 289.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/d_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits :)
Spent 0.561242 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/d_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits

fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461206.66426384
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0595 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0547 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nyr2pYJjPc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xe51fK2n1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.29kQ4nort1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2j0FilQ4tc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.834100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.834100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6792 to +19.2477 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6792 to 19.2477 deg
Loaded 4308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3555 out of 3660 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3660 out of 6628 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.2 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
2.5 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
2.5 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
15.2 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nyr2pYJjPc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=7234
Got 7234 stars (including 6692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=243 n_q2=205 n_q3=263 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xe51fK2n1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=6628
Got 6628 stars (including 6229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=234 n_q2=227 n_q3=235 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.29kQ4nort1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, passed=5848
Got 5848 stars (including 5482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=263 n_q2=248 n_q3=206 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2j0FilQ4tc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=5562
Got 5562 stars (including 5212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5437 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=255 n_q2=254 n_q3=204 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.372 worst_q_ratio=1.084
ref2=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new1=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.059
reference average sigma_overall=0.3975 worst_q_ratio=1.172
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01157_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 01157_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 10.35 | 14:54:19.96 +17:41:43.3 | 2929 5340 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
**** FOUND 14:54:19.96 +17:41:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0595 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0547 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:18.698 +13:58:48.09
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:19.753 +13:58:56.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DLGQyb96CO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3kuh2q6kAx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.49ylvODypi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JYaQ4psXne
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.706700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.706700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 37570 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6742 to +19.2568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6742 to 19.2568 deg
Loaded 4313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3706 out of 37570 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.1 pix Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
2.4 pix fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
15.3 mag. Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DLGQyb96CO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=1964, passed=44396
Got 44396 stars (including 42351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44396 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=245 n_q2=205 n_q3=260 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3kuh2q6kAx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1496, passed=37551
Got 37551 stars (including 36005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=233 n_q2=226 n_q3=236 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.49ylvODypi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1684, passed=34445
Got 34445 stars (including 32706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34445 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=259 n_q2=254 n_q3=204 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JYaQ4psXne (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1510, passed=32725
Got 32725 stars (including 31156 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=254 n_q2=257 n_q3=204 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:40:11.69 +14:12:24.4: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:42:19.97 +11:41:33.5: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:38:47.17 +15:02:46.2: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:30:04.48 +10:29:17.5: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:10:59.74 +10:05:18.6: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:42:19.97 +11:41:33.5: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:40:11.69 +14:12:24.4: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:30:04.48 +10:29:17.5: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:19.97 +11:41:33.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0672 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:11.69 +14:12:24.4: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9823 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:38:47.17 +15:02:46.2: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:04.48 +10:29:17.5: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4079 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:10:59.74 +10:05:18.6: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:38:47.17 +15:02:46.2: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7689 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:59.74 +10:05:18.6: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3621 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:15:02.48 +10:19:19.8: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:04:15.80 +17:03:48.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:04:15.80 +17:03:48.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:15:02.48 +10:19:19.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:02.48 +10:19:19.8: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3418 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:21:04.52 +10:04:31.2: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:50:01.63 +11:29:58.2: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:26:11.75 +14:16:28.1: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:16:00.41 +15:43:50.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:28:03.99 +09:45:26.5: 14.28 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:21:04.52 +10:04:31.2: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:04.52 +10:04:31.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1170 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:50:01.63 +11:29:58.2: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:16:55.12 +09:03:10.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:01.63 +11:29:58.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0362 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:30:32.12 +09:33:08.8: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:26:11.75 +14:16:28.1: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:11.75 +14:16:28.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1536 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:28:03.99 +09:45:26.5: 14.25 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:16:00.41 +15:43:50.2: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:03.99 +09:45:26.5: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3205 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:00.41 +15:43:50.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2690 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:16:55.12 +09:03:10.5: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:55.12 +09:03:10.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4243 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:30:32.12 +09:33:08.8: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:15:07.38 +14:07:11.5: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:30:32.12 +09:33:08.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5352 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:44:58.35 +11:46:59.4: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:15:07.38 +14:07:11.5: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:28:58.74 +10:50:05.5: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:07.38 +14:07:11.5: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5575 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 15:17:44.16 +12:12:16.7: 15.56 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:44:58.35 +11:46:59.4: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:58.35 +11:46:59.4: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8460 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits at 14:36:09.79 +15:51:47.7: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:28:58.74 +10:50:05.5: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:58.74 +10:50:05.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8568 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 15:17:44.16 +12:12:16.7: 15.77 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:44.16 +12:12:16.7: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9623 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits at 14:36:09.79 +15:51:47.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:09.79 +15:51:47.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4405 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52011_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.50 | 15:30:04.56 +10:29:16.4 | 8450 1340 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.35 | 15:30:04.40 +10:29:18.6 | 8447 1338 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52014_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52014_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.07 | 14:42:19.93 +11:41:33.2 | 1323 1639 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.07 | 14:42:20.01 +11:41:33.9 | 1321 1638 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52019_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 13.00 | 14:40:11.65 +14:12:24.5 | 0953 3152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.96 | 14:40:11.74 +14:12:24.3 | 0951 3150 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52020_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52020_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 12.39 | 15:10:59.74 +10:05:18.7 | 5627 0896 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.34 | 15:10:59.74 +10:05:18.4 | 5624 0894 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52027_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52027_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 10.55 | 15:34:14.03 +09:41:30.2 | 9118 0903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52029_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52029_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 10.90 | 15:10:32.22 +17:51:42.4 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52033_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52033_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 11.33 | 15:31:11.75 +11:06:27.3 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52034_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52034_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 11.46 | 15:12:03.33 +11:25:11.2 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52036_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52036_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 11.56 | 15:02:17.60 +10:50:09.4 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52037_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52037_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 11.77 | 14:38:47.19 +15:02:46.3 | 0728 3655 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 11.77 | 14:38:47.16 +15:02:46.1 | 0725 3653 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52039_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 11.81 | 15:03:52.48 +18:29:00.1 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52044_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.08 | 15:10:00.81 +09:02:13.0 | 5520 0248 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52045_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52045_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.08 | 15:08:36.85 +16:49:18.1 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52047_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.27 | 15:28:39.31 +14:36:10.6 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52049_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.34 | 14:44:07.07 +15:55:56.2 | 1492 4215 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52050_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52050_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.51 | 14:58:11.25 +18:43:26.3 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52057_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.54 | 15:28:26.16 +10:44:49.5 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52060_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52060_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.52 | 15:36:24.39 +15:25:46.9 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52065_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52065_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.89 | 15:06:46.00 +11:09:48.7 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52071_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52071_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 12.93 | 15:17:28.68 +10:30:11.3 | 6568 1209 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
**** FOUND 15:17:28.67 +10:30:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52072_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 52072_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52074_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52074_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.38 | 14:58:57.03 +19:05:51.8 | 3548 6222 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
**** FOUND 14:58:57.08 +19:05:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52079_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52079_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 13.31 | 15:15:02.49 +10:19:20.6 | 6217 1077 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.38 | 15:15:02.48 +10:19:19.1 | 6214 1075 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52082_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.39 | 14:55:08.08 +16:25:38.2 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52083_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.44 | 14:44:10.70 +18:00:12.8 | 1452 5473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52086_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.38 | 14:40:41.80 +12:20:48.0 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52090_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.44 | 14:36:26.78 +09:16:05.0 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52091_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52091_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.48 | 14:44:01.41 +19:18:47.1 | 1398 6272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52097_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52097_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.83 | 15:37:20.77 +14:03:15.4 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52128_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52128_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.46 | 15:05:33.97 +19:03:17.5 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52188_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52188_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.80 | 15:35:24.74 +08:28:53.7 | 9367 0177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52252_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.25 | 14:58:21.55 +10:42:17.9 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52271_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52271_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.15 | 15:08:52.29 +10:48:47.0 | 5281 1312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52273_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.01 | 14:50:01.61 +11:29:58.0 | 2474 1573 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.07 | 14:50:01.64 +11:29:58.5 | 2472 1572 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52341_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52341_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.17 | 15:06:22.18 +13:16:20.5 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52361_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.07 | 15:21:04.49 +10:04:31.4 | 7125 0989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.19 | 15:21:04.56 +10:04:30.9 | 7123 0988 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52383_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52383_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.07 | 15:06:23.42 +10:41:12.0 | 4919 1213 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52497_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52497_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.14 | 15:26:11.79 +14:16:27.9 | 7680 3580 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.17 | 15:26:11.72 +14:16:28.2 | 7677 3579 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52545_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52545_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.21 | 14:37:11.07 +15:21:47.1 | 0482 3839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52601_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.25 | 15:16:00.35 +15:43:50.9 | 6128 4341 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.29 | 15:16:00.46 +15:43:49.4 | 6125 4339 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52630_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.32 | 15:28:04.04 +09:45:26.8 | 8187 0873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.32 | 15:28:03.94 +09:45:26.1 | 8184 0871 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52688_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.21 | 14:38:46.81 +18:43:21.1 | 0650 5893 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52702_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52702_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.50 | 15:16:55.05 +09:03:10.0 | 6552 0326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.36 | 15:16:55.19 +09:03:10.9 | 6550 0325 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52707_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.03 | 14:35:48.50 +16:53:17.1 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52718_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.53 | 15:30:32.11 +09:33:08.3 | 8569 0776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.54 | 15:30:32.12 +09:33:09.2 | 8567 0775 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52725_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.58 | 15:00:17.67 +17:27:03.3 | 3795 5233 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52727_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.60 | 15:35:22.58 +11:59:06.7 | 9160 2311 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52729_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52729_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.56 | 15:15:07.26 +14:07:10.4 | 6067 3363 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.55 | 15:15:07.50 +14:07:12.7 | 6065 3362 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52745_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.64 | 14:36:21.93 +16:25:02.3 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52773_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.84 | 14:44:58.28 +11:47:00.1 | 1716 1711 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.86 | 14:44:58.43 +11:46:58.7 | 1713 1709 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52789_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52789_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.86 | 15:34:18.47 +13:27:43.6 | 8918 3191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52790_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52790_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.49 | 14:53:40.17 +18:03:09.7 | 2823 5552 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52792_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.63 | 15:36:11.64 +18:12:56.4 | 8934 6101 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52800_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.57 | 14:43:35.44 +14:08:58.1 | 1455 3133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52804_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.84 | 15:28:58.74 +10:50:03.4 | 8267 1537 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.88 | 15:28:58.74 +10:50:07.6 | 8265 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52828_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.79 | 15:31:19.61 +17:53:59.9 | 8243 5837 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52843_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52843_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.95 | 14:47:23.94 +16:33:48.8 | 1956 4614 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52871_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 52871_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 14.94 | 15:17:44.07 +12:12:16.7 | 6533 2239 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 14.98 | 15:17:44.24 +12:12:16.8 | 6531 2238 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50034_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 50034_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 15.16426 | 2461206.66426 | 13.38 | 14:36:09.76 +15:51:47.5 | 0324 4141 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.58 | 14:36:09.82 +15:51:48.0 | 0321 4140 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50912_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 50912_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 13.68 | 15:14:43.16 +11:53:48.6 | 6100 2021 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
**** FOUND 15:14:43.15 +11:53:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 15.16469 | 2461206.66469 | 10.40 | 14:54:19.96 +17:41:43.3 | 2929 5340 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_001040_TTUQ1b1x1_3540192_dgC8ejg8/fd_Boo-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-56-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits |
**** FOUND 14:54:19.95 +17:41:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:04:15.80 +17:03:48.6
########### Completed Boo-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:04:15.80 +17:03:48.6
###################################################################################
15:04:15.80 +17:03:48.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461206.66426384 -observatory V36
07:19:30.21 +23:18:15.1 Mercury (0.5mag)
08:17:24.35 +21:46:37.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:09:55.68 +17:13:11.4 Mars (1.3mag)
07:54:19.75 +21:16:15.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:14.65 +02:58:42.4 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:01:50.73 +20:30:08.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:30.33 +00:18:46.4 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:56.08 -23:07:14.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
05:31:41.36 +27:12:09.4 Moon (99.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 15 00:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461206.66426384:
07:54:18.33 +21:16:22.2 Io (6.2mag)
07:54:17.54 +21:16:24.7 Europa (6.3mag)
07:54:04.72 +21:17:01.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:53:54.17 +21:17:37.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:54:12.14 +20:53:18.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:54:19.51 +21:16:16.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:54:00.00 +21:05:46.6 Elara (17.6mag)
07:56:51.32 +21:24:09.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:00:35.90 +21:18:31.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:51:26.68 +02:58:40.2 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:19.56 +02:58:35.6 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:51:39.12 +03:01:15.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:51:30.03 +02:58:31.5 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:51:48.26 +02:59:38.3 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 15 00:13 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461206.66426384:
17:28:25.21 -35:35:55.2 JWST
18:55:48.21 +19:46:04.9 Chandra
08:23:27.07 -45:40:00.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 15 00:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461206.66426384 -observatory V36
18:38:25.36 -33:08:25.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:00:22.64 -68:00:35.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:51:38.23 +32:03:41.3 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:11:57.01 +15:39:28.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:20:27.40 -43:50:04.8 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:10:49.41 +31:50:22.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:42:33.55 +27:00:18.7 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:52.85 +30:49:46.1 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:54:23.22 +04:14:35.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:23:37.72 +21:41:35.4 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:17:00.92 -11:02:00.3 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:11:27.01 +66:55:40.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:29:02.52 -07:23:30.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:36.80 +81:22:37.4 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:20:21.74 +64:33:28.8 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:57:42.26 +28:25:09.1 13.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:31:58.53 +14:05:16.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:07:55.63 +33:10:18.4 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:25:00.41 -15:22:10.5 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:12:22.57 +33:17:27.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:34.62 +52:19:53.1 17.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:52:49.38 -11:11:56.6 14.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:30:08.35 +23:13:32.3 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:47.55 +04:38:12.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
18:00:08.49 +76:31:23.7 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:12:20.45 +43:53:19.1 16.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:13:08.90 -01:26:13.8 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:36:13.12 -09:13:36.3 8.4mag 10P/Tempel
11:03:49.89 -01:05:20.4 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:22:28.37 +26:33:38.9 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:14:50.65 +21:44:57.5 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:32:39.91 -05:57:09.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:06:05.41 +34:00:53.2 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:26:04.66 +18:03:28.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:35:32.69 +06:18:38.3 15.7mag 88P/Howell
05:17:03.18 +30:43:25.5 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
03:03:00.85 +28:40:52.1 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:07:16.30 +32:43:59.4 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:02:24.11 +11:39:57.8 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:10:32.45 +19:41:26.1 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:47:23.66 +19:21:55.8 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:27:13.57 +17:45:01.6 15.5mag 141P/Machholz
06:30:19.37 +17:53:34.4 15.5mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:28:27.69 +16:56:53.2 12.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:02:29.16 -23:46:18.7 16.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:04:45.55 +26:29:30.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:08.41 +03:54:28.6 16.5mag 169P/NEAT
00:36:59.08 +03:47:19.7 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:05.29 -08:12:21.2 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:50:20.89 +35:09:31.7 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:50:44.53 +00:32:42.1 16.2mag 260P/McNaught
04:23:27.05 +33:41:17.8 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:31:42.46 -01:36:36.3 17.8mag 320P/McNaught
15:12:19.84 +07:48:46.8 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:12:47.41 +20:33:21.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:11:20.03 +41:11:31.7 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 15 00:13 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 15 00:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 15 00:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:49:19.289 -10:17:13.45 AT 2026ome 2026-06-06.42 19.9
15:05:48.011 -29:45:37.21 AT 2026omd 2026-06-06.50 20.04
20:30:10.926 -29:56:07.53 AT 2026omc 2026-06-07.64 18.81
19:50:57.124 -53:24:23.12 AT 2026omb 2026-06-06.67 20.17
23:28:37.442 -43:16:54.75 AT 2026oma 2026-06-06.73 19.64
11:48:30.394 -39:49:36.11 AT 2026olz 2026-06-06.77 19.237
13:56:31.281 +70:50:34.89 AT 2026oly 2026-06-06.35 19.395
12:22:49.169 -21:19:33.91 AT 2026olx 2026-06-07.30 18.696
22:49:46.803 -26:24:12.60 SN 2026olw 2026-06-07.58 18.251
10:47:10.687 -70:44:55.20 AT 2026olv 2026-06-06.81 18.37
11:06:55.086 +37:19:50.72 AT 2026olu 2026-06-01.30 18.692
14:54:40.331 -10:41:24.18 SN 2026olt 2026-06-04.43 18.588
10:58:43.462 +36:47:26.62 AT 2026ols 2026-06-04.90 18.501
08:45:48.069 -64:46:34.13 AT 2026olr 2026-06-06.71 18.616
10:02:19.987 -84:42:35.43 AT 2026olq 2026-06-06.80 18.714
22:35:38.444 -55:59:06.00 SN 2026olp 2026-05-30.09 18.424
21:02:06.402 +85:28:22.07 AT 2026olo 2026-06-07.10 18.987
18:52:00.191 +72:19:28.04 AT 2026oln 2026-06-07.07 18.528
23:35:46.181 -42:09:54.16 AT 2026olm 2026-06-07.13 18.697
12:34:21.767 -10:29:46.08 AT 2026oll 2026-06-05.82 19.393
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 15 00:12 tns_transients_list.txt