This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2219 2461205.7219 10.59 18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7
22.30936 7.00180 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 -0 1 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2219* 18 06 55.13 -06 09 24.7 10.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7219,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2219 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2219 2461205.7219 11.41 18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7
21.35362 5.68756 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 -0 0 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2219* 18 09 45.43 -07 37 02.7 11.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7219,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2219 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2219 2461205.7219 13.45 17:48:15.59 -13:57:26.2
13.19106 7.18709 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.527 Euryanthe 0 0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:48:15.59 -13:57:26.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:48:15.59 -13:57:26.2: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2219* 17 48 15.59 -13 57 26.2 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.7219,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.2219 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461205.72220271 14.06.2026 05:19:48.314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6143
Objects passed selection criteria: 6132
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5223.5
Average stars matched: 5100.75 (97.65 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:35:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
First image: 2461176.83459459 16.05.2026 08:01:38.973 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Last image: 2461205.72220271 14.06.2026 05:19:48.314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 66407
Objects passed selection criteria: 66315
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59393
Average stars matched: 56924.2 (95.8434 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 172928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:38:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.72166369
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01175 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nYp2IStTlG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uguItFByWN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.homkH0Su7M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDYTpp7xD0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.707650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.707650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9712 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2568 to -4.6948 deg
Loaded 6275 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5154 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5154 out of 10482 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9847 to 278.0962 deg, Dec -15.2534 to -4.6915 deg
Loaded 6271 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4878 out of 5146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5146 out of 10473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nYp2IStTlG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=794, passed=10482
Got 10482 stars (including 9676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.824 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.542 n_q1=231 n_q2=415 n_q3=133 n_q4=136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uguItFByWN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=789, passed=10473
Got 10473 stars (including 9672 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.680 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.898 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.664 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=234 n_q2=412 n_q3=132 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.320
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.homkH0Su7M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, passed=4982
Got 4982 stars (including 4686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4982 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=287 n_q2=274 n_q3=191 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wDYTpp7xD0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=345, passed=5642
Got 5642 stars (including 5289 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 918 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.769 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=276 n_q2=283 n_q3=176 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.694 worst_q_ratio=1.187
ref2=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits sigma_overall=0.680 worst_q_ratio=1.320
new1=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.552 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new2=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.614 worst_q_ratio=1.253
reference average sigma_overall=0.687 worst_q_ratio=1.2535
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210_astrometric_residuals.png (919 matched stars from wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (922 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (918 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20479.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 20471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.43 -05:55:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20472_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 20472_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20479_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 20479_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20483_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 20483_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:40.44 -12:05:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09369_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 09369_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:13.17 -06:42:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:06:55.13 -06:09:24.7
18:09:45.43 -07:37:02.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.128 -09:59:33.92
Second-epoch image center 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:59:58.205 -10:00:05.22
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:57.517 -09:59:24.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01175 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M4GOLLa54S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I6InCW4Nqc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tTHXHwZR3o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DaZxxQNbio
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits and wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.509900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.509900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.93
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98551 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9293 to 278.0974 deg, Dec -15.2608 to -4.6871 deg
Loaded 6295 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4581 out of 5549 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5549 out of 98551 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.9349 to 278.1088 deg, Dec -15.2533 to -4.6750 deg
Loaded 6299 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4565 out of 5541 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5541 out of 98094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.M4GOLLa54S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8119, passed=98540
Got 98540 stars (including 90269 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.808 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=246 n_q2=390 n_q3=140 n_q4=152 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I6InCW4Nqc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8187, passed=98079
Got 98079 stars (including 89711 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.564 n_q1=238 n_q2=390 n_q3=141 n_q4=159 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits -region wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tTHXHwZR3o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2598, passed=54385
Got 54385 stars (including 51695 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.754 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=286 n_q2=271 n_q3=192 n_q4=181 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.409
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DaZxxQNbio (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3132, passed=62391
Got 62391 stars (including 59167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=279 n_q2=286 n_q3=181 n_q4=187 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-01_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_002836_TTUQ2b1x1_969238_KNSKsg7t/wcs_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:02:53.99 -12:30:13.5: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:00:37.71 -06:14:02.1: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:46:44.23 -13:38:36.1: 12.77 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:37:52.67 -13:40:37.0: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:38:16.81 -13:21:45.7: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:20.55 -14:05:04.2: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:54:45.92 -06:42:27.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:00:37.71 -06:14:02.1: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:46:44.23 -13:38:36.1: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:46:44.23 -13:38:36.1: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9725 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:37.71 -06:14:02.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3602 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:37:52.67 -13:40:37.0: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:38:16.81 -13:21:45.7: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:02:53.99 -12:30:13.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:52.67 -13:40:37.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2443 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:38:16.81 -13:21:45.7: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8391 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:53.99 -12:30:13.5: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3081 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:11.42 -13:47:11.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:54:45.92 -06:42:27.2: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:45.92 -06:42:27.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1178 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:20.55 -14:05:04.2: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:20.55 -14:05:04.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4080 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:11.42 -13:47:11.4: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:11.42 -13:47:11.4: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6505 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:43.42 -12:57:17.4: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:46.68 -13:46:30.0: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:37:18.19 -13:47:32.5: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:43.42 -12:57:17.4: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:43.42 -12:57:17.4: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9904 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:46.68 -13:46:30.0: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:46.68 -13:46:30.0: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2359 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:41.01 -06:50:48.3: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:37:18.19 -13:47:32.5: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:37:18.19 -13:47:32.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3222 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:41.01 -06:50:48.3: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:41.01 -06:50:48.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6179 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:48:15.59 -13:57:26.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:51:43.76 -06:29:38.2: 14.17 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:44:45.06 -12:14:03.0: 14.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:43:22.56 -12:31:18.7: 13.69 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:04:59.20 -11:30:14.3: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:32:04.02 -13:18:53.1: 14.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:51:43.76 -06:29:38.2: 14.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:48:15.59 -13:57:26.2: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:51:43.76 -06:29:38.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0907 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:36:08.35 -13:47:01.2: 14.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:44:45.06 -12:14:03.0: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:04:59.20 -11:30:14.3: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:45.06 -12:14:03.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8462 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:59.20 -11:30:14.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3906 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:43:22.56 -12:31:18.7: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:43:22.56 -12:31:18.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7835 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:32:04.02 -13:18:53.1: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:54.05 -09:07:53.0: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:32:04.02 -13:18:53.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9507 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:50:52.98 -12:21:47.5: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:36:08.35 -13:47:01.2: 14.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:36:08.35 -13:47:01.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8900 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:54.05 -09:07:53.0: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:54.05 -09:07:53.0: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2844 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:50:52.98 -12:21:47.5: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:52.98 -12:21:47.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7867 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:49.85 -10:22:29.7: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:35:37.75 -13:40:31.6: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:31.95 -08:00:14.5: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:49.85 -10:22:29.7: 14.16 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:49.85 -10:22:29.7: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1822 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:35:37.75 -13:40:31.6: 14.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:37.75 -13:40:31.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0912 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:34:16.80 -10:32:37.6: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:31.95 -08:00:14.5: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:31.95 -08:00:14.5: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2208 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:33:50.25 -09:09:58.7: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:34:16.80 -10:32:37.6: 13.94 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:16.80 -10:32:37.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1407 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:33:50.25 -09:09:58.7: 14.20 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:33:50.25 -09:09:58.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4190 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:56:20.67 -09:30:27.1: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:35:40.10 -09:13:39.7: 14.33 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:18.45 -12:23:35.5: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:56:20.67 -09:30:27.1: 15.31 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:20.67 -09:30:27.1: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3381 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:47:35.49 -10:22:21.2: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:59:11.64 -06:08:32.6: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:11.22 -08:49:47.0: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:20.59 -10:36:25.2: 14.40 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:54:58.27 -07:27:20.8: 15.35 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:18.45 -12:23:35.5: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:18.45 -12:23:35.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2993 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:35:40.10 -09:13:39.7: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:35:40.10 -09:13:39.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4759 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:47:35.49 -10:22:21.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:59:11.64 -06:08:32.6: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:47:35.49 -10:22:21.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3279 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:11.64 -06:08:32.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4616 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:11.22 -08:49:47.0: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:20.59 -10:36:25.2: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:20.59 -10:36:25.2: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4999 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:11.22 -08:49:47.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3848 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:54:58.27 -07:27:20.8: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:58.27 -07:27:20.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5844 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:53:26.89 -08:43:03.2: 14.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:00:01.73 -08:18:32.6: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:54:33.35 -10:50:40.5: 15.11 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:04:04.42 -07:55:48.7: 15.14 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:00:01.73 -08:18:32.6: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:01.73 -08:18:32.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4316 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:53:26.89 -08:43:03.2: 15.00 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:26.89 -08:43:03.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5334 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:01:08.02 -09:20:00.0: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:54:33.35 -10:50:40.5: 15.39 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:33.35 -10:50:40.5: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5002 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:04:04.42 -07:55:48.7: 15.18 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:04.42 -07:55:48.7: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5143 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:01:08.02 -09:20:00.0: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:08.02 -09:20:00.0: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5379 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 18:03:47.46 -09:54:23.1: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-01-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0209.fits at 17:41:15.58 -13:32:14.4: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 18:03:47.46 -09:54:23.1: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:47.46 -09:54:23.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6427 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_03-02-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0210.fits at 17:41:15.58 -13:32:14.4: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:15.58 -13:32:14.4: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2416 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out67471.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116766.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116573_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116573_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116586_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116586_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116592_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116592_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:03.76 -12:36:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116593_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116593_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116594_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116594_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:42.27 -08:13:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116597_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116597_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116599_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116599_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116603_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116603_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:51.74 -13:57:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116609_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116609_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116612_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116612_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116614_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116623_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116623_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:30.43 -05:55:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116624_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116624_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:55.12 -06:09:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116631_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116631_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:45.42 -07:37:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116643_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116643_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116656_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:24.14 -07:22:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116658_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116658_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.50 -13:44:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116708_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116708_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116717_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116717_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116719_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116719_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:36.89 -13:46:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116723_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116723_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116728_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116728_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:44.59 -11:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116733_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116733_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:50.82 -06:07:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116735_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116735_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.83 -14:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116740_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116740_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:32.60 -12:41:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116743_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:48.86 -06:09:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116753_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116753_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.94 -13:12:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 116766_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116794_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116794_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116796_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116796_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116801_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116801_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116804_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116804_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:00.52 -14:10:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116811_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116811_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116814_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116814_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116816_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116816_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116834_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116834_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116835_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116835_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:32.64 -14:12:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116836_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116836_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116839_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116839_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116843_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116843_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:52.81 -08:42:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116844_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116844_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:07.49 -12:35:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116847_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116847_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116855_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:34.94 -10:30:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116863_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116863_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116865_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116865_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:56.79 -06:32:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116866_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116866_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116870_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116870_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116891_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116891_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:51.39 -07:02:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116900_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116900_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:20.03 -12:22:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116913_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116913_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.71 -10:38:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116914_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116914_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116928_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116928_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116934_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116934_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:42.69 -06:25:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116940_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116940_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116970_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116970_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116976_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116976_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116988_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116988_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116998_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 116998_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117021_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117021_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117025_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117025_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:58.05 -07:27:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117033_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117033_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117053_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117053_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117078_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117078_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:37.77 -11:25:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117107_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117107_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117133_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117133_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117137_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 117137_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 84098_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:49.52 -06:33:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26758_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 26758_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 67471_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:47.46 -09:54:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.318 4158242063014545664 270.94782624616 -09.90646327351 12.8756 11.5464 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.318#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 65523_fd_Oph-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_00-19-48_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks